to change this to eth0 but all attempts at route del . . . result
in an invalid modification. I assume that Bind created the 169.254.0.0
entry. Ultimately, I want all traffic going out on eth0.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
reading this correctly, network sends are over device eth1. I
need to change this to eth0 but all attempts at route del . . . result
in an invalid modification. I assume that Bind created the 169.254.0.0
entry. Ultimately, I want all traffic going out on eth0.
If I read you correctly, all traffic
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 16:58, Edward Croft wrote:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1. Make sure there is no GATEWAY
line. If there is comment it out or delete it, otherwise that route will
continue to come back.
To delete that route manually, try
route del default dev eth1
Thanks
router 0.0.0.0 UG eth0
If I'm reading this correctly, network sends are over device eth1.
I need to change this to eth0 but all attempts at route del . . .
result in an invalid modification. I assume that Bind created the
169.254.0.0 entry. Ultimately, I want all
Hi
I am new to this list as i just install redhat 9 and have an ?
about an route in the kernel routing table after i install and config
my lan it seems that somehow redhat or something has add an NET route
of 169.254.0.0 has anyone seen this happen before or know why it might have happen
also
was
implemented.
- Paul
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 14:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am new to this list as i just install redhat 9 and have an ?
about an route in the kernel routing table after i install and config
my lan it seems that somehow redhat or something has add an NET route
ok thanks for the reply
so this is then normal thing within redhat 9 to see this
also will add those lines
and yes i hope someone will explian an bit more on why this
was added
thanks again
Bob
The best thing to hit the internet
I did a new install from Red Hat 7 to 8.0 some time ago without xwindows. I
have moved the box to a different subnet and I need to change the IP address
and default route. 8 does not have linuxconf which I was use to. What
files do I edit to make the changes and is there a replacement
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 10:39, YoloIts wrote:
I did a new install from Red Hat 7 to 8.0 some time ago without xwindows. I
have moved the box to a different subnet and I need to change the IP address
and default route. 8 does not have linuxconf which I was use to. What
files do I edit to make
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 00:39, YoloIts wrote:
I did a new install from Red Hat 7 to 8.0 some time ago without xwindows. I
have moved the box to a different subnet and I need to change the IP address
and default route. 8 does not have linuxconf which I was use to. What
files do I edit to make
I have been trying to setup some type of load balancing by directing all www
trafic to a second net link via a second isp from which I have only one ip
address asigned and the rest of the traffic via the main link at isp1. I
needed that so I can do SNAT to a couple of routable ip's I received from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've got two networkcards in my rh8 box and need to route / bridge
across them.
eth0 (192.168.1.1) connected to network1 on 192.168.1.*
eth1 (192.168.0.1) connected to network2 on 192.168.0.*
how can I get network1 to see network2 and vicea
MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've got two networkcards in my rh8 box and need to route / bridge
across them.
eth0 (192.168.1.1) connected to network1 on 192.168.1.*
eth1 (192.168.0.1) connected to network2 on 192.168.0.*
how can I get network1 to see network2 and vicea versa. I've
192.168.x.x 0.0.0.0 UG0
00 eth0
when using the GUI tools (redhat-config-network).
The other problem I have is when using the GUI tools
to alias IP's on a eth device. Even though it works,
the routing tables lists entries like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# route
Kernel IP
Hey guys,
Does anyone have a script / recommend a script that will do route changes
when an interface disappears? i.e for a box which has a satellite
interface and a modem backchannel, if the satellite plays up for any
reason I'd like it to switch the routing to be solely via the modem
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, J. M. Brenner wrote:
So, I've got a routing table that more or less works for
me. Now where am I expected to put the route add commands
so that the routing table will still be there after I
reboot?
My impression is that I need to create this file, and put
them
I want to setup a modem failover (that dials the Internet) when the primary route fails on my RH 7.3 box. I'll be using an external modem, which will be off normally. The users will be instructed to cut the modem on when they lose their connection to the Internet. After they've been using
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 07:43:19AM -0800, Stephen Corey wrote:
1. How can I dial the Internet automatically when the Internet goes down?
This shouldn't be that hard to do.
I've seen quite a few scripts that check if your xDSL connection is
up and try to start it if it isn't.
Setup a cron job
I want to setup my RH 7.3 box so if my main route to the Internet goes down, the system will dial the Internet with a modem and use that as the primary route. How would I do that? I've heard someone say they've done that with using OSPF, but I don't have all the details. I basically need
.
Jon
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Stephen Corey wrote:
I want to setup my RH 7.3 box so if my main route to the Internet goes down, the
system will dial the Internet with a modem and use that as the primary route. How
would I do that? I've heard someone say they've done that with using OSPF, but I
I just installed 7.3 on one of my machines at home. The box sits behind a
firewall (Smoothwall) which is connected to my cable modem. The machine
gets its IP (from the Smoothwall) using DHCP. When i go to register my
system using rhn_register, I get a No route to host error. I am able to
ping
Message -
From: Doza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:39 AM
Subject: rhn_register - No route to host
I just installed 7.3 on one of my machines at home. The box sits behind a
firewall (Smoothwall) which is connected to my cable modem. The machine
gets
Hi Will,
I tried your advice, I took this output,
root@bulent root]# up2date -u
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/sbin/up2date, line 20, in ?
from up2date_client import rpcServer
File /usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rpcServer.py, line 10, in ?
import up2dateAuth
File
From: bulent acikgoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Will,
I tried your advice
What advice? The output below looks like you may have actually cleared everthing from
your /etc/sysconfig/rhn/up2date or something like that? I was just suggesting that
Doza look into this as one possible cause of problems.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07 Feb 2003 14:56:31 +0200, bulent acikgoz wrote:
can you send me sample file /etc/sysconfig/rhn/up2date?
thank you.
Huh? Why that?
Run up2date-config or up2date --configure.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7
Hi all
I am running RH8. Now I have to change something in route table, but I found
that after system reboot the route table will be changed back again. So my
question is how to save the new route table into kernel?
Thanks in advance
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL
On 11/1/02 3:59 AM, gregory mott (and others) tapped the keys:
on my redhat box, the gateway is specified in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:
[snip]
I know this is a bit old now, but thanks to everyone who has responded. I
haven't been able to reboot this 'in production' box yet,
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 17:53, Edward Marczak wrote:
On 11/1/02 3:59 AM, gregory mott (and others) tapped the keys:
on my redhat box, the gateway is specified in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:
[snip]
You can also specify the GATEWAY in the /etc/sysconfig/network file.
The line
. This is a 7.3 boxdid they change something on me? I'm trying to
avoid just putting a line in rc.local. I'd like to do this the 'RedHat
way'. Thanks.
Check that the gatewaydev in
/etc/sysconfig/network is the gateway device if there. Are there any other network
devices about with a route
I have a machine that I've moved. I edited
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 to reflect the new ip address.
I'm also sticking the new gateway in /etc/sysconfig/network. However, upon
a reboot, I don't have any default gateway under netstat -rn.
H. This is a 7.3 boxdid they
. This is a 7.3 boxdid they change something on me? I'm trying to
avoid just putting a line in rc.local. I'd like to do this the 'RedHat
way'. Thanks.
Check that the gatewaydev in
/etc/sysconfig/network is the gateway device if there. Are there any other network devices about with a route set
Yep. Your original routing table looks ok to me but then I have never
done the aliasing thing so I don't know what the eth1:0 should look
like.
I would probably try it with eth0 and eth1 first and then bring up
eth1:0 after I got it working but I am a break a problem into chunks
kind of
Not sure about the Network unreachable but I do not think you need a gw
on the router since the route is already attached to the network. THe
gateway is to tell a machine , since you don;t know anything about this
network, here is where to send these packets.
right, but i still need
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 08:38, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
Not sure about the Network unreachable but I do not think you need a gw
on the router since the route is already attached to the network. THe
gateway is to tell a machine , since you don;t know anything about this
network, here
Hmm. Are saying that if you try to ping the eth1 interface from a
machine attached to the network on eth0 it does not work? If so what is
does the routing table on the ping orignating machine look like? It
needs to be told that the router is the gateway to that network.
to refresh, the
try the following command and see if it works
ping -I 10.1.1.2 10.1.5.1
rahul.
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
Hmm. Are saying that if you try to ping the eth1 interface from a
machine attached to the network on eth0 it does not work? If so what is
does the routing table
iface
10.1.1.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 eth0
10.1.5.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 eth1
10.1.6.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 eth1
0.0.0.0 10.1.1.10.0.0.0 eth0
Now, whenever I try to add a route statement the way i _think_ it should
be added, I
, whenever I try to add a route statement the way i _think_ it should
be added, I get Network Unreachable. When I add them reverse from what I
think, route doesn't complain, but stuff still doesn't work. For example
route add -net 10.1.5.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 gw 10.1.5.1 dev eth0
(associating
, September 18, 2002 3:08 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: persistent route
What the command to add a persistent route in linux. I use 'route add
-host
x.x.x.x gw x.x.x.x' but this route is gone after reboot.
Thanks,
-Devon
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
in order to make your routes permanent, you can add your route command to
the following file
/etc/rc.local
this file is called at boot time and hence any command present in this
file will be executed.
rahul.
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Rechenberg, Andrew wrote:
Add your routes to /etc
What the command to add a persistent route in linux. I use 'route add -host
x.x.x.x gw x.x.x.x' but this route is gone after reboot.
Thanks,
-Devon
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:07:37PM -0400, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote:
What the command to add a persistent route in linux. I use 'route add -host
x.x.x.x gw x.x.x.x' but this route is gone after reboot.
Put those commands in /etc/sysconfig/static-routes
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
Hi all,
I've recently re-installed my box which I use as a
router/firewall/dhcp/etc... I was running RH 7.2 - but after a horrid hard
disc failure I've installed 7.3. My problem is this:
I dialup via ppp0 and set that as my default route in my dial script. Three
times in the last two days, my
I am getting a permission denied statement
Anthony E. Greene wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-Aug-2002/01:31 -0400, Lou Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried to delete them but they still show up after a reboot.
Look at /etc/sysconfig/network. There may be
Here are my results (sorry for the permission denied e-mail previously, i found my
error):
-
/etc/sysconfig/network
NETWORKING=yes
HOSTNAME='Apollo'
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-Aug-2002/02:36 -0400, Lou Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are my results (sorry for the permission denied e-mail previously, i
found my error):
I don't see anything wrong. This has to be a routing problem. I just don;t
know what it is.
that I am getting an IP address from the DHCP
and it is valid on my network.
'route -n', however, is showing that I have too many routes in my table
and seems to be confusing the packets and sending everything to the
default gateway. I do not even know where these routes came from. I
never
and it is valid on my network.
'route -n', however, is showing that I have too many routes in my table
and seems to be confusing the packets and sending everything to the
default gateway. I do not even know where these routes came from. I
never entered anything in manually. I only activated
the DHCP
and it is valid on my network.
'route -n', however, is showing that I have too many routes in my table
and seems to be confusing the packets and sending everything to the
default gateway. I do not even know where these routes came from. I
never entered anything in manually. I only activated
Workstation. I have some extra lines in my routing table that I am
having difficulties removing.
[snip]
My 'ifconfig' is showing that I am getting an IP address from the DHCP
and it is valid on my network.
'route -n', however, is showing that I have too many routes in my table
and seems
table that I am
having difficulties removing.
[snip]
My 'ifconfig' is showing that I am getting an IP address from the DHCP
and it is valid on my network.
'route -n', however, is showing that I have too many routes in my table
and seems to be confusing the packets and sending everything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-Aug-2002/01:31 -0400, Lou Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried to delete them but they still show up after a reboot.
Look at /etc/sysconfig/network. There may be something unintended there.
Also look at
Hi all,
When I run pppd, it's connecting to the ISP ok, but
traffic doesn't go anywhere and in
/var/log/messages, I'm getting "not replacing existing default route to eth0". I
can see why outgoing traffic isn't going anywhere cause its trying to go out via
eth0, but why is this?
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Kevin - KD Micro Software wrote:
When I run pppd, it's connecting to the ISP ok, but traffic doesn't go
anywhere and in /var/log/messages, I'm getting not replacing existing
default route to eth0. I can see why outgoing traffic isn't going
anywhere cause its trying to go
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:46:09 +0800, Kevin wrote:
When I run pppd, it's connecting to the ISP ok, but traffic doesn't go anywhere and
in /var/log/messages, I'm getting not replacing existing default route to eth0. I
can see why outgoing traffic isn't going anywhere cause its trying to go out
Thanks for the quick response
Ed.
I knew it had something to do with the routing, and I had had trouble with
the static-routes file before but it didn'tappear to be it this time.I
dunno why I didn't think of this before, but a simple route del
default and then route add default ppp0 sorted
ah, same thinking :)
didn't see your message before I replied then.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: pppd not replacing existing default route to eth0
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:46:09
Hi.
Which is the difference between route and ip route ?
Un Cordial Saludo / Best regards
Ximo Llácer
Dpto Sistemas (GrupoInterpack )
G 0034 61767050 • 0034 61767158
0mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 7/8/02 3:39 AM, Ximo Llacer [EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed the keys
forming the message:
Hi.
Which is the difference between route and ip route ?
'ip route' is using the new, iproute2 software. 'route' is actually using
that same code, but is presented for legacy reasons.
Consider 'arp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edward Marczak wrote:
Consider 'arp', 'route', 'ifconfig', etc legacy commands. 'ip' is the new
way of interacting with networking.
And it foists upon the user a new way of interacting with man pages:
you don't. The man page does nothing
Hi,
My problem is the next:
Ive got a box with 2 ifaces :
eth0 eth1 and my route table is:
0.0.0.0 192.168.200.17 0.0.0.0 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
19.174.16.51 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth1
192.168.2.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello -
It's not clear to me why you have or need two fixed routes. You only
need one default route. My three-head gateway sees the internet on one
side, and two private nets on the other. Its route table looks like
this (probably linewrapped
Please show the courtesy to send your mail without the HTML,
Thanks,
--
Ray Curtis
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ccux.com
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could someone tell me where the script is that should set the default
route.
I am trying to get ppp up and running and it is not setting the default
route by itself and I need to know how to change that (I can do it by
hand, but that is a pain).
Thanks,
Blake
me where the script is that should set the default
route.
I am trying to get ppp up and running and it is not setting the default
route by itself and I need to know how to change that (I can do it by
hand, but that is a pain).
Thanks,
Blake
in that file called GATEWAYDEV=...you
might set that to ppp0 and see if it helps.
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Blake C. Thornton wrote:
Could someone tell me where the script is that should set the default
route.
I am trying to get ppp up and running and it is not setting the default
route
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-May-2002/07:53 -0600, Blake C. Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone tell me where the script is that should set the default
route.
I am trying to get ppp up and running and it is not setting the default
route by itself and I need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-May-2002/07:53 -0600, Blake C. Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone tell me where the script is that should set the default
route.
I am trying to get ppp up and running and it is not setting the default
route by itself
How do I set up an internet route to my subnet.
eth0 card connects to internet and eth1 to the subnet
hub. I have enabled ip forwarding like this.
echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward.
The win95 maschine says it cant find dhcp server.
=
Investigating the Norwegain 4.th Secret Service
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:50:54 +0200 (CEST)
Kjetil Tjensvold [EMAIL PROTECTED] quietly intimated:
How do I set up an internet route to my subnet.
eth0 card connects to internet and eth1 to the subnet
hub. I have enabled ip forwarding like this.
echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward.
The win95
Do I have to use any route commands?
-- ABrady [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: On Thu, 25 Apr
2002 08:50:54 +0200 (CEST)
Kjetil Tjensvold [EMAIL PROTECTED] quietly
intimated:
How do I set up an internet route to my subnet.
eth0 card connects to internet and eth1 to the
subnet
hub. I have
Did you setup DHCP on your linux machine?
-Original Message-
From: Kjetil Tjensvold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:51 AM
To: redhat list redhat list
Subject: How do I set up a internet route to my subnet
How do I set up an internet route to my subnet.
eth0
a internet route to my
subnet
How do I set up an internet route to my subnet.
eth0 card connects to internet and eth1 to the
subnet
hub. I have enabled ip forwarding like this.
echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward.
The win95 maschine says it cant find dhcp server
, 2002 2:51 AM
To: redhat list redhat list
Subject: How do I set up a internet route to my
subnet
How do I set up an internet route to my subnet.
eth0 card connects to internet and eth1 to the
subnet
hub. I have enabled ip forwarding like this.
echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4
linux machine?
-Original Message-
From: Kjetil Tjensvold
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:51 AM
To: redhat list redhat list
Subject: How do I set up a internet route to my
subnet
How do I set up an internet route to my subnet
It's been a long time since I've used route... I just ran it got this,
could someone please explain to me what it means?
TIA,
Tom
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask
Flags Metric RefUse Iface
210.47.246.10
I can't figure out where the default route gets set up in 7.2. For
whatever reason I didn't get prompted to setup networking during the
install, so I set it up manually. From the looks of it, ifup uses the
GATEWAY and GATEWAYDEV env variables set in /etc/sysconfig/network to do
this automatically
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Redhat List
Subject: simple default route question, RH7.2
I can't figure out where the default route gets set up in 7.2. For
whatever reason I didn't get prompted to setup networking during the
install, so I set it up manually
below for my fix.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Galpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Redhat List
Subject: simple default route question, RH7.2
I can't figure out where the default route gets set up in 7.2. For
whatever reason I didn't
: RE: simple default route question, RH7.2 [SOLVED]
Hi Paul, thanks for replying
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 11:32, Paul Hamm wrote:
The location is in /etc/sysconfig/networking/profiles/default/NIC there
is
another one in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/NIC there is a new very
complicated gui called
Hi Paul
First, I think you missed the fact that the problem is solved.
Second, I know how to tunnel X through ssh. This pc has no X libs, apps
or anything. An X gui is in no way appropriate for this task. Then I did
say I would *rather* edit the files anyway :)
charles
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at
added though is not one I would permanently add
to my system.
Paul Anderson
Kumar wrote:
Hello Everyone,
When every i try to do telnet/ftp to 192.168.1.1, this
is what i get cannot reach the network / not route.
Then i have done this,
#route add -host 192.168.1.1 lo
This appears to fix
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Tim wrote:
I'm helping to set up a rather odd network environment, and I'm
running into some difficulties in the route command.
This is what I want to accomplish:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
domain
Hello Everyone,
When every i try to do telnet/ftp to 192.168.1.1, this
is what i get cannot reach the network / not route.
Then i have done this,
#route add -host 192.168.1.1 lo
This appears to fix it.
CAUSE OF PROBLEM:
1) I was trying to play with the HOSTNAME,
used , netcfg, netconfig
I'm helping to set up a rather odd network environment, and I'm
running into some difficulties in the route command.
This is what I want to accomplish:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
domain * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
I'm helping to set up a rather odd network environment, and I'm
running into some difficulties in the route command.
This is what I want to accomplish:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
domain * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Tim wrote:
I'm helping to set up a rather odd network environment, and I'm
running into some difficulties in the route command.
This is what I want to accomplish:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
domain
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
For a perminate solution, you will need to edit
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1. You can do this by hand, you
use your faverate GUI. Basicly what you need is something like this:
DEVICE=eth1
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=10.3.1.2
I have installed Openmail and now it will now send mail. It gives a no
route to host error. WhenI do a traceroute it does not seem to work
either. My web browser, telnet, ssh ftp etc all work fine.
Any ideas?
~TIA
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Vineeta wrote:
yes,interrupt has to be different for 2 ethernet cards.
Vineeta
I thought PCI NICs could share an interupt. I know ISA cards usualy can
not share interupts. Also the parrelle port code has problems with two
ports sharing an interupt. I have a PCI
Did you try changing the interrupts?I, myself was not too sure about
this,but i read some docs on the net which say that you can have some probs
if u try sharing the same irq.
Try changing it out and see..
lemme know...
Cheers,
Vineeta
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001,
My take on IRQ sharing is: unless you have seperate channels (as with IDE,
etc), everything bound to the interrupt will be interrupted at the same
time... which will cause problems in many cases.. I had 2 things on the
same IRQ one time on accident.. one of them was my sound card.. the sound
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
If you want to disable services, you have to edit /etc/inetd.conf, not
/etc/services. /etc/services lists what services are on what port, but
Ungh, that was a typo. Of course I meant /etc/inetd.conf.
But I think I have found my problem. The person who last
Then,irq sharing didn't give you any problems?Guess,with the PCI cards,it
doesn't...
Cheers,anyways
Vineeta
Peter Peltonen wrote:
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
If you want to disable services, you have to edit /etc/inetd.conf, not
/etc/services. /etc/services lists what services are
Vineeta wrote:
yes,interrupt has to be different for 2 ethernet cards.
Vineeta
Umm, so the Interrupt that ifconfig reports is the IRQ of the card, yes?
I should proably change it then. How do I do it? They are 3com's 3C905B-TX
cards. Should just change the PCI slot of the card or should I
Statux wrote:
Only one thing can be interrupted at a time.. I hate IRQ sharing.. the x86
is so restrictive.. you have like IRQ's 3 and 4 for serial ports, 5 is
open but usually used for audio, 7 is open but usually used for parallel
port, 9 I was once told was linked with 2 and is the funky
Firstly,is it still not working?
You posted a mail saying [SOLVED].What's going on...?
If not,then,
It can be done through /etc/conf.modules.
check out:
http://www.linux.org/docs/ldp/howto/Ethernet-HOWTO-3.html
For Example:
alias eth0 3c501
options eth0 -o 3c501-0 io=0x280 irq=5
Vineeta
Peter
Kindly tell me how to unsubscribe
- Original Message -
From: Vineeta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: no route to host?
Firstly,is it still not working?
You posted a mail saying [SOLVED].What's going
vineeta
his problem is solved for the movement kindly leave him to his work.
Vineeta wrote:
Firstly,is it still not working?
You posted a mail saying [SOLVED].What's going on...?
If not,then,
It can be done through /etc/conf.modules.
check out:
Vineeta wrote:
Firstly,is it still not working?
You posted a mail saying [SOLVED].What's going on...?
It is working. I'm just wondering about the IRQs -- they haven't given me any
trouble yet, but I'm anticipating here :)
For Example:
alias eth0 3c501
options eth0 -o 3c501-0 io=0x280
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
