Hello all!!
I have trying samba and i can access and see the samba server from
windows, but i receive the following message when i try to connect from
linux:
added interface ip=192.168.0.54 ...
Password:
Domain=[]OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.7a]
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
Al
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:23:40 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to enable two users from our windows domain to access particular
> share from my samba server. I am new to linux ... please help me out.
>
> I'd setup public share and configured samba long time before. It works fin
Title: Samba Question: Want to enable specific users from windows domain to access samba share.
Hi All,
I want to enable two users from our windows domain to access particular share from my samba server. I am new to linux ... please help me out.
I'd setup public share and configured
I was hoping someone could give me some input on tripwire? I
have redhat servers that do IDS, DNS, and webserver. What would you do as far
as tripwire goes? Should I run it on all of them? Just the dns and webserver?
Any thoughts would be helpful. Thanks in advance.
I was also having pr
ov 2002 11:57:28 -0500
Subject: Re: samba question
> On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 06:15, linux power wrote:
> > Open the ports 137-139 on your lan card.
> >
>
> Ah... not sure what you meant by "open the ports 137-139" on my lan card
> but your comment did point me in the
On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 06:15, linux power wrote:
> Open the ports 137-139 on your lan card.
>
Ah... not sure what you meant by "open the ports 137-139" on my lan card
but your comment did point me in the right direction. I forgot that RH
8.0 configures a firewall. I needed to change the INPUT ru
linux power wrote:
Open the ports 137-139 on your lan card.
--- Russell Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: >
I'm having trouble getting SAMBA 2.2.5 (RH 8.0)
speaking with my XP and
98 boxes. Actually, I can do a smbclient from the
linux box and connect
to a share on the MS boxes... just
Open the ports 137-139 on your lan card.
--- Russell Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: >
> I'm having trouble getting SAMBA 2.2.5 (RH 8.0)
> speaking with my XP and
> 98 boxes. Actually, I can do a smbclient from the
> linux box and connect
> to a share on the MS boxes... just can't browse
I'm having trouble getting SAMBA 2.2.5 (RH 8.0) speaking with my XP and
98 boxes. Actually, I can do a smbclient from the linux box and connect
to a share on the MS boxes... just can't browse shares on the linux
box. I've tried all the obvious things with encrypted passwords and
things like that
Hello All,
True, that I could use Samba via PAM but the actual idea is I want to move
most
of the RID and other similar information into LDAP, using PAM will just allow me
to authenticate against an LDAP server the passwords, but the other information
will remain in a flat files. I wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27-Jul-2002/23:40 -0600, Aly Dharshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I prefer to use the rpms usually shipped by RedHat and try not to compile
>to many pkgs unless required. I wanted to find out if the samba package
>shipped with RedHat Linux 7.3 has l
I can't answer the first part, but as to the second, you don't necessarily
have to download the sources and build them, manually.
Instead,you can download the source rpms (.src.rpm)...you then "rpm -i
xxx.src.rpm", and then, after modifying the spec file (if the spec file
has an option for lda
Hello All,
I prefer to use the rpms usually shipped by RedHat and try not to compile to
many
pkgs unless required. I wanted to find out if the samba package shipped with
RedHat Linux 7.3 has ldap support compiled in. If not would that mean that I
would have to compile the samba packag
Hi all,
I am having problems with samba I got it working after I upgraded
from 6.2 then it quit working? I tried
smbclient -L star -N
amd get this message
added interface ip=192.168.1.3 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
session setup failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Question
if i{m not wrong, in Windows you must use backslashes instead of slashes..
Daniel BI
> On the Windows client, open my computer, select Tools->Map network drive
and
> type:
> //sambaservername/sharename
> where 'samb
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:12:05PM -0600, Jay Paulson wrote:
> I've gone through the suggestions.. i've even gone to B&N and got a couple of books
>on samba... but the redhat machine isn't even showing up on our local network..
>although i can bring it up in IE by pluging in 192.168.0.137 and i
i found out that we aren't running a workgroup here but a domain. so
i gotthe network admin to add my samba server to the PDC so now it is
showing upin network neighborhood. however, when i run the smbpass to
try and jointhe domain i get the error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED we are using
a NT4
Hope this helps!
> smbinyon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Paulson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Samba Question
>
>
> Can anyone either tell me or point me to a good place to figure ou
Hi,
Does your workgroup match whatever it shows under
network neighborhood properties?
Have you removed the IPX/SPX and NetBEUI protocols
from your windows pc?
Linda
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com
nuary 10, 2002 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: Samba Question
> nmbd is running and it is broadcasting on 192.168.0.255 i run the
nmblookup
> and get the following:
>
> querying on 192.168.0.255
> name_query failed to find name
>
> in my smb.conf file i have the following.
>
network here is not running a Workgroup it is running a Domain. so
i have the wins support option just commented out.
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Winegarden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: Samba Q
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Jay Paulson wrote:
> I've gone through the suggestions.. i've even gone to B&N and got a couple of books
>on samba... but the redhat machine isn't even showing up on our local network..
>although i can bring it up in IE by pluging in 192.168.0.137 and i can ssh into it
>et
]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:12
PM
Subject: Re: Samba Question
I've gone through the suggestions.. i've even
gone to B&N and got a couple of books on samba... but the redhat machine
isn't even showing up on our local network.. although i can bring it up
This might sound stupid, but are you using Iptables/Ipchains at all? Did
you make sure to leave the Windows networking ports open? I know you
might not be firewalling at all, but often in troubleshooting people
miss these sort of things.
Jared
On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 13:12, Jay Paulson wrote:
> I'
I've gone through the suggestions.. i've even gone
to B&N and got a couple of books on samba... but the redhat machine isn't
even showing up on our local network.. although i can bring it up in IE by
pluging in 192.168.0.137 and i can ssh into it etc.. but i just can't see it on
the local ne
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.2-Manual/custom-guide/samba.html
shows you how to setup the Red Hat Linux side.
Sincerely,
Tammy
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:26:50AM -0600, Jay Paulson wrote:
> Can anyone either tell me or point me to a good place to figure out how to map a
>driv
erm ya
I interpeted it backwards.
- Original Message -
From: "Binyon Steve Contr Det 4 AFC2TIG/ASRCC"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: Samba Question
> On the Windows client, open my computer,
9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Samba Question
Can anyone either tell me or point me to a good place to figure out how to
map a drive from windows explorer to a redhat box using samba 2.2.2? I've
already tried samba.org and that&
Paulson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:26
AM
Subject: Samba Question
Can anyone either tell me or point me to a good
place to figure out how to map a drive from windows explorer to a redhat box
using samba 2.2.2? I've already tried samba.org and t
Can anyone either tell me or point me to a good
place to figure out how to map a drive from windows explorer to a redhat box
using samba 2.2.2? I've already tried samba.org and that's really not too
helpful.
thanks...
On my RedHat 6.1 system, there is an smbmount command.
Should be able to:
smbmount //windowsmachine/sharename /mnt/mountpoint
But I had some trouble with that. It worked when:
smbmount //windowsmachine/sharename /mnt/mountpoint -I windowsIpAdress -U
windowsUsername
Then it asked for a password
Samba rpm from redhat is pre-cooked and ready to serve.. Best when server
HOT.. No compiling just season to taste..
- Original Message -
From: Matt Housh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: simple samba questio
Hello
Have you tried Sharity? I am running it on my server and the gui
interfacer is pretty nice.
Regards
Eduardo
> > This time, i am in need of the command, the exact command, if possible,
> > to mount a share on a win98 machine from my linux rh6.2 machine.
>
> You need to compile samba
-Original Message-
From: John Losey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, August 31, 2000 11:30 AM
Subject: RE: simple samba question
>If I understand correctly...You are trying to mount a share from the Win98
>bo
> This time, i am in need of the command, the exact command, if possible,
> to mount a share on a win98 machine from my linux rh6.2 machine.
You need to compile samba with smbmount support (./configure
--with-smbmount), as it is NOT compiled in by default. If you're using
RPMS, I'm not sure if th
ool for what you're doing.
Good luck,
John
-Original Message-
From: davros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 9:58 PM
To: redhat
Subject: simple samba question
hi all,
first off, thanx to those who answered my first question to the list
regarding permissi
hi all,
first off, thanx to those who answered my first question to the list
regarding permissions and Apache - the responses were much appreciated,
i was able to solve the problem.
This time, i am in need of the command, the exact command, if possible,
to mount a share on a win98 machine
On 02 Aug 2000 06:46 Steven Pierce wrote:
>
>Is Samba, the only way to get from an NT box to a Linux box? I worked in
an office that I was able
>to get to the SUN boxes, but did not use Samba. Does anyone know why??
>
>Steven
You're _sure_ the Sun box wasn't running Samba? It's transparent to W
On 1 Aug 00, at 21:46, Steven Pierce wrote:
> Is Samba, the only way to get from an NT box to a Linux box? I
> worked in an office that I was able to get to the SUN boxes, but did
> not use Samba. Does anyone know why??
Mmmm, could it be... NFS?!?!
That'd be my guess, anyway. You weren't
Is Samba, the only way to get from an NT box to a Linux box? I worked in an office
that I was able
to get to the SUN boxes, but did not use Samba. Does anyone know why??
Steven
BTW.. I am a newbie also...
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/1/2000 at 6:11 PM Chris Watt wrote:
>A
Chris Watt wrote:
>
> Samba always reports the amount of writable space (not necessarily the same
> as the amount of free space, since it takes disk quotas into account) on
> whatever filesystem the root directory of a particular share is on. This is
> because neither Windows nor SMB are set up t
At 13:18 01/08/00 -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
>trouble is that NT and Windows 98 don't include the space availible
>under the Software directory when veiwing in explorer. Even selecting
Samba always reports the amount of writable space (not necessarily the same
as the amount of free space, since i
I have /pub directory shared via samba that was beginning to fill up.
So I used created another partition and mounted it as /pub/Software
This brings the total space availible to a little over 10GB. The
trouble is that NT and Windows 98 don't include the space availible
under the Software dire
I did and it works!
Thank you!
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> At 02:02 PM 2/28/00 -0500, Steve wrote:
> >I have 2 subnets w/ a rh6.1 samba server/router in the middle ie:
> >
> >subnet 192.168.0.0 -eth1/router/sambaserver/eth2--subnet 192.168.1.0
> >
> >I can ping one
At 02:02 PM 2/28/00 -0500, Steve wrote:
>I have 2 subnets w/ a rh6.1 samba server/router in the middle ie:
>
>subnet 192.168.0.0 -eth1/router/sambaserver/eth2--subnet 192.168.1.0
>
>I can ping one subnet from the other etc. but can't get the winblows boxes on
>one subnet to see the other i
I have 2 subnets w/ a rh6.1 samba server/router in the middle ie:
subnet 192.168.0.0 -eth1/router/sambaserver/eth2--subnet 192.168.1.0
I can ping one subnet from the other etc. but can't get the winblows boxes on
one subnet to see the other in the net neighborhood. I set the interfaces t
On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, Robert A. Hayden wrote:
> I have a samba share I've set up that I restrict by IP address. It's
> starting to get a little unwieldy since there are several listings in it.
>
> I tried simply adding a new "hosts allow =" line in smb.conf but it only
> accepted addresses listed
- Original Message -
From: Robert A. Hayden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Redhat Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 1:55 PM
Subject: samba question: multiple hosts allow lines
> I have a samba share I've set up that I restrict by IP addres
I have a samba share I've set up that I restrict by IP address. It's
starting to get a little unwieldy since there are several listings in it.
I tried simply adding a new "hosts allow =" line in smb.conf but it only
accepted addresses listed in the last entry instead of the previous allow
lines
Here's my smb.conf file:
# This is the main Samba configuration file.
# You should read the# smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options
listed
# here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too
# many!) most of which are not shown in this example
#
# Any line wh
>
>
> [1999/11/26 21:19:55, 0]
> nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(180)
> process_name_refresh_request: unicast name registration request received
> for name LINUXSERV<00> from IP 198.0.1.2 on sub
On Sat, 27 Nov 1999 08:13:36 +0100 (CET), hai scritto:
>*** I started the Win box yesterday just to generate "fresh" logs. I did
>find an error message in the log.nmb which I didn't see before concerning
>the WINS server. Here follows the log.nmb:
You put a lot of global settings under a share de
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, David Powers wrote:
->If the windows box is not showing up on itself and you can ping and ftp
->to the linux box, then we know your network is working. I would suggest
->that you might have a conflict problem with nic in the windows box
->but it sounds more to me like
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> P.S. Sorry to the list for the upcoming Microsoft (tm) references.
>
> > *** What's your secret!?
>
> Well, I could send you all the Samba configurations, netlogon scripts etc.,
> but I have a distinct feeling it will do zip with your configuration.
P.S. Sorry to the list for the upcoming Microsoft (tm) references.
> *** What's your secret!?
Well, I could send you all the Samba configurations, netlogon scripts etc.,
but I have a distinct feeling it will do zip with your configuration. If
your own computer doesn't show in NN, then it seems i
Zoki wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Edward Dekkers wrote:
>
>
>
> ->Seems he's wrong. My 95/98 boxes log onto SAMBA as an NT server. Even run
> ->startup-scripts.
>
> *** What's your secret!?
>
> I calmed down a bit since Sunday but it did cost me a keyboard and the
> piece of the screen ho
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Edward Dekkers wrote:
->Seems he's wrong. My 95/98 boxes log onto SAMBA as an NT server. Even run
->startup-scripts.
*** What's your secret!?
I calmed down a bit since Sunday but it did cost me a keyboard and the
piece of the screen housing to blow off steam.
My setup a
> Hang on, I thought the idea of Samba was that a Linux box could look just
> like
> an NT one to the rest of the network. (At least, that's what the blurb
> always
> says.) But this implies that Samba can't masquerade as an NT domain. Is
this
> guy right, or is he just lazy with his config files?
What does your smb.conf file look like?
> --
> From: Paul M. Foster[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 12:11 AM
> To: RedHat List
> Subject: Samba Question
>
> Sambanese:
>
> Two computer network. One Win95, t
vember 23, 1999 3:23 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Samba Question - NT domains?
Hi all,
I was just reading an article:
http://news.tucows.com/ext2/99/11/articles/ext211221999.shtml
about upgrading an NT server to Linux. :)
Towards the end it said:
> The desktops
> Fo
To: RedHat List
Subject: Samba Question
Sambanese:
Two computer network. One Win95, the other Linux RH 6.1. Both can ping
each other by name.
With smbd -D and nmbd -D running, when I issue the command:
smbclient //rocky/nancyf
I get the errors:
session request to ROCKY failed
session reques
Hi all,
I was just reading an article:
http://news.tucows.com/ext2/99/11/articles/ext211221999.shtml
about upgrading an NT server to Linux. :)
Towards the end it said:
> The desktops
> For the desktops, very few has changed. The only thing that we need to
physically
> change on the desktops
Sambanese:
Two computer network. One Win95, the other Linux RH 6.1. Both can ping
each other by name.
With smbd -D and nmbd -D running, when I issue the command:
smbclient //rocky/nancyf
I get the errors:
session request to ROCKY failed
session request to *SMBSERVER failed
However, if I iss
: Saturday, June 13, 1998 8:01 AM
|To: redhat-list
|Subject: Samba question...
|
|
|I have samba working fine for serving up the file system and printers on
|the linux server fine, however I'd like to be able to use some of the
|hardware and spare hd space on the clients for things, they are se
Rick L. Mantooth wrote:
>
> James,
> You are wanting to mount the Win95/Win3.11 shares?
>
> If so, look at smbclient and smbmount (samba and smbfs rpms)
>
> smbclient -L machine_name will show you shares on the Wxx boxes.
> (If it cannot resolve (DNS) put the machines in your /etc/hosts)
>
> s
James,
You are wanting to mount the Win95/Win3.11 shares?
If so, look at smbclient and smbmount (samba and smbfs rpms)
smbclient -L machine_name will show you shares on the Wxx boxes.
(If it cannot resolve (DNS) put the machines in your /etc/hosts)
smbmount /machine_name/share /mnt/point -n -d
I have samba working fine for serving up the file system and printers on
the linux server fine, however I'd like to be able to use some of the
hardware and spare hd space on the clients for things, they are set up
as shares, however I can't figure out how to get linux to be able to
attach back to
67 matches
Mail list logo
