Trying to make this work:
/usr/lib/sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] < test
The file test contains the string "test:test".
It seems sendmail is trying to interpret the ":" for being something like "To:" or
"Subject:".
Is there anyway to escape the ":
twas resolv.conf!
Many thanks
Nat
--- Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 08:23, Nathalie Boulos wrote:
> > Hello everyone.
> >
> > I have RH7.1 running sendmail, MailScanner and
> Sophos
> > antivirus. It's been a while now, wh
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 08:23, Nathalie Boulos wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I have RH7.1 running sendmail, MailScanner and Sophos
> antivirus. It's been a while now, when I access the
> server via SSH, the password prompt takes time to
> appear.
> And also, when i send an
Hello everyone.
I have RH7.1 running sendmail, MailScanner and Sophos
antivirus. It's been a while now, when I access the
server via SSH, the password prompt takes time to
appear.
And also, when i send and receive email via ipop3d,
the "connecting" phase takes too much time,
Title: DSNs thru Sendmail after domino migration
Hi Folks
I have a problem with the delivery confirmation for SMTP messages. I have a Domino Server for internal Mail routing and this server connects to a local Linux server configured with sendmail for SMTP service. When I send a mail
At 11:06 10/16/2003, you wrote:
My system is Red Hat Linux 9.
At the moment it's just a test box while I get used to the OS. I have
been tasked with setting up a webserver with mail support. I have been
using LAMP for a while so I am quite happy with that, but SendMail is
still a mystery.
D
At 08:08 10/17/2003, you wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 08:08:54AM -0400, Edward Croft wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:16, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> > At 13:12 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Rodolfo needs to change the attrition like. Ed Croft is trying to steal
my beer!
Sorry, Eudora does not have a way
At 06:08 10/17/2003, you wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:16, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>
> Big man Ed speak truth. Buy beer for Ed, take Ed's advice.
>
Um, my name's Ed too, my advice, don't bet on Grey Lady in the fifth.
Now where's my beer?
Virtual beer. Cheers!
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED
At 13:02 10/16/2003, you wrote:
It seems only qmail has been mentioned as an alternative to sendmail...why
not exim?
Postfix has been mentioned as well. I have not discussed Exim simply
because I have no knowledge of it. In the same vein, Courier
(www.courier-mta.org) is another option, that
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 08:08:54AM -0400, Edward Croft wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:16, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> > At 13:12 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Rodolfo needs to change the attrition like. Ed Croft is trying to steal
my beer!
> > Big man Ed speak truth. Buy beer for Ed, take Ed's advice.
tion for $82 (buy.com) which
> >includes a year of RHN. More bang for the buck in my opinion. Both
> >sendmail and postfix are part of RHEL WS on which RHPW is based, so you
> >should be fine for those updates.
>
> Big man Ed speak truth. Buy beer for Ed, take Ed's adv
>
> > Wow, do you believe in statistics?
> > I think sendmail is on rank 6 at the moment, since it is used that often.
> > Look at apache, it is on 3!
> >
>
> Is it just me or are the statistics really dated Version 1.33 June 25,
> 2001??? I don't know
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 15:36, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
> >
> > But friends will let friends use the number 5 "Most Critical Internet
> > Security Threat" (http://www.sans.org/top20/top10.php)?
> >
> Wow, do you believe in statistics?
> I think sendmail is o
I must say I find this sadistic.
Get off your soapbox. I offered an alternative suggestion, and even
warned him of the qmail mailing list.
"friends don't force friends to patch and recompile just to prove they
have hair on their chest"
But friends will let friends use the number 5 "Most Cri
net
Security Threat" (http://www.sans.org/top20/top10.php)?
Wow, do you believe in statistics?
I think sendmail is on rank 6 at the moment, since it is used that often.
Look at apache, it is on 3!
I think other services have no rank, since these services are so rare, that
on the one hand it
T, what I would
> recommend to someone who is just starting out and can't even modify
> sendmail to accept remote SMTP connections.
>
> Alternatives are a great thing... I'm currently learning postfix myself,
> and I've run a qmail-based system for over a year. It&#x
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 12:39, Donald Tyler wrote:
> And now I see perfectly the fanaticism behind each MTA.
>
> Thank you for all your suggestions, try to play nice OK?
>
>
No kidding.
See what happens when you have to run a mail server? Are you sure you
want to get one going?
Bret
--
redha
opinion. Both
sendmail and postfix are part of RHEL WS on which RHPW is based, so you
should be fine for those updates.
Big man Ed speak truth. Buy beer for Ed, take Ed's advice.
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lem with giving Red Hat $60 now for RHN is that Red Hat
Linux 9 is only supported through the end of April. You might be better
off buying Red Hat Professional Workstation for $82 (buy.com) which
includes a year of RHN. More bang for the buck in my opinion. Both
sendmail and postfix are part of RHE
It seems only qmail has been mentioned as an alternative to
sendmail...why not exim?
Although (ahem) I have no personal experience with Exim, several
engineer-friends who worked at extremely large installations (hundreds
of dns servers, internal routers, etc.) all mentioned Exim as what I
At 11:18 10/16/2003, you wrote:
The general argument I've heard and happen to agree with is that if you
are already a sendmail expert or have access to one, continue with
sendmail. However, if you're just starting out, go with Postfix.
I've heard this argument many times but cannot
And now I see perfectly the fanaticism behind each MTA.
Thank you for all your suggestions, try to play nice OK?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
can't even
modify sendmail to accept remote SMTP connections.
Funny, qmail users are nasty, hostile, and difficult, yet you reply to
my suggestion to SOMEONE else the way you did. I'm happy that you're so
very good at it. FWIW, I'm an ex-Sendmail user of 4+ years who got
tired of
nd of the month. Fun fun.
The general argument I've heard and happen to agree with is that if you
are already a sendmail expert or have access to one, continue with
sendmail. However, if you're just starting out, go with Postfix. I've
worked with both but am currently in production wit
You could put linuxconf on and get sendmail
(including users) going within minutes. linuxconf includes a GUI, TUI, and
web interface.
If you decided to go the linuxconf route, you'll
want to install:
http://vimap.sourceforge.net/ first.
-eric wood
- Original Message -
qmail users I know are all just plain nasty, hostile, and
difficult to deal with. That's fine if it's your cup of tea and you have
the knowledge to handle it. However, it is NOT, repeat NOT, what I would
recommend to someone who is just starting out and can't even modify
sendmail t
My system is Red Hat Linux 9.
At the moment it's just a test box while I get used to the OS. I have
been tasked with setting up a webserver with mail support. I have been
using LAMP for a while so I am quite happy with that, but SendMail is
still a mystery.
We have a separate machine that w
Donald Tyler wrote:
Thanks for the tip,
Does it come with a GUI? Or can I get one from somewhere?
It doesn't come with one, but Webmin is good for it.
http://www.webmin.com/
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 09:58 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Friends don't let friends use Sendmail. There are other (read better)
alternatives to Sendmail, and I would suggest qmail.
http://www.qmail.org
I would argue that friends don't let friends get bullied and beaten on
the qmai
Thanks for the tip,
Does it come with a GUI? Or can I get one from somewhere?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of John Nichel
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SendMail GUI
Donald Tyler wrote:
>
At 09:58 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Friends don't let friends use Sendmail. There are other (read better)
alternatives to Sendmail, and I would suggest qmail.
http://www.qmail.org
I would argue that friends don't let friends get bullied and beaten on the
qmail list and that friends d
Donald Tyler wrote:
Hi,
I have been asked to get a mail server up and running quickly, and since
I know almost nothing of Sendmail I really need a GUI to do that.
Can anyone recommend something?
If not, can someone point me in the direction of a quick start guide? I
have a book that I am
The closest you'll get I think is webmin.
-Original Message-
From: Donald Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SendMail GUI
Hi,
I have been asked to get a mail server up and running quickly, and since I
know a
Webmin is your friend. http://www.webmin.com
-Original Message-
From: Donald Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SendMail GUI
Hi,
I have been asked to get a mail server up and running quickly, and since
I know
Hi,
I have been asked to get a mail server up and running
quickly, and since I know almost nothing of Sendmail I really need a GUI to do
that.
Can anyone recommend something?
If not, can someone point me in the direction of a quick
start guide? I have a book that I am reading
At 23:36 10/10/2003, you wrote:
I am running sendmail-8.12.8-9.80 on a redhat 8.0 box. My mail has been
running just fine for a long time but I have a very annoying problem. I
get 2 Drafts, Sent and Trash folders for each inbox I have for my users.
INBOX.Drafts, Drafts, INBOX.Sent, Sent
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 06:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am running sendmail-8.12.8-9.80 on a redhat 8.0 box. My mail has been
> running just fine for a long time but I have a very annoying problem. I
> get 2 Drafts, Sent and Trash folders for each inbox I ha
Hi Guys,
I am running sendmail-8.12.8-9.80 on a redhat 8.0 box. My mail has been
running just fine for a long time but I have a very annoying problem. I
get 2 Drafts, Sent and Trash folders for each inbox I have for my users.
INBOX.Drafts, Drafts, INBOX.Sent, Sent, INBOX.Trash and Trash. Is
Karthikeyan Sankaran wrote:
Hi,
I am Karthik from India. I have a problem which i am seeing in most sendmail/fetchmail servers. May be someone faced this problem(Mail looping problem )before. Problem is, say i have [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] as pop3 ids and [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my
Hi,
My sendmail server working fine accept one.
domain = mycomopany.com
nonlocaluser = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any local user sending mail to this perticuler user it gives message unknown
user. As user is not a local. xyz user use his account with some different
places.
I tried to use LUSER_RELAY
- Original Message -
From: "David Barkman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 7:08 PM
Subject: Sendmail or Postfix
> Hi, I'm building a small web server on RH 9 and are looking for some
> opinions on mail serve
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:08:17PM -0700, David Barkman wrote:
> Hi, I'm building a small web server on RH 9 and are looking for some
> opinions on mail servers. I'm sure Sendmail will have all the
> features I could ever dream of needing, but it's complexity is a bit
&g
Hi, I'm building a small web server on RH 9 and are looking for some
opinions on mail servers.
I'm sure Sendmail will have all the features I could ever dream of needing,
but it's complexity
is a bit frightening. I have the book RH Linux Internet Server and it walks
through set
-
Forcing the attempted delivery of mail with the command /usr/lib/sendmail -v -q
-C/etc/mail/sendmail.cf ..
Running /var/spool/mqueue/h8P9P17J024330 (sequence 1 of 1)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Connecting to mail.mycompany.com. via relay... ** actual
address ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
this is my log file forcefull delivery of the mail.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is non local user
Forcing the attempted delivery of mail with the command /usr/lib/sendmail -v -q
-C/etc/mail/sendmail.cf ..
Running /var/spool/mqueue/h8P9P17J024330 (sequence 1 of 1)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Connect
Hi Helgi,
--- Helgi Örn Helgason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On
2003-09-27, Michael Mansour wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using sendmail on RH8. What I'd like to do is
> > modify the standard delivery of mail from:
> >
> > /var/s
On 2003-09-27, Michael Mansour wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using sendmail on RH8. What I'd like to do is
> modify the standard delivery of mail from:
>
> /var/spool/mail/$USERNAME
>
> to the
>
> /home/mail
>
>
> directory. I want to do this as it wil
Hi,
I'm using sendmail on RH8. What I'd like to do is
modify the standard delivery of mail from:
/var/spool/mail/$USERNAME
to the
/home/mail
directory. I want to do this as it will help in quota
setup.
I've thought of the easiest approach by just moving
/var/spool/mail to
I am still trying to get Sendmail working with two milters...Vexira Vamilter
for Anti-virus and Spamassassin via spamd. I have Vexira filtering and
tagging each Email but Spamassassin's spamd does not appear to be doing
anything. checking the Email logs shows nothing that would suggest that
Hi,
I configured sendmail as domain = mycompany.com
and using
define(`LUSER_RELAY',`smtp:mail.mycompany.com')
It was working nicely, with web hosting on IMAIL server.
But few days back our webhosting was changed on WEMMAIL server and we could not send
the mai to one of my non local
Geoffrey Lane wrote:
# /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail start
Starting sendmail: 451 4.0.0 /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 91: fileclass: cannot
open '/etc/mail/local-host-names': World writable directory
451 4.0.0 /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 568: fileclass: cannot open
'/etc/mail/truste
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 09:35:16PM -0300, Geoffrey Lane wrote:
> This is what I get on my log:
>
> # /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail start
> Starting sendmail: 451 4.0.0 /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 91: fileclass: cannot
> open '/etc/mail/local-host-names': World writable d
Geoffrey Lane wrote:
> This is what I get on my log:
>
> # /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail start
> Starting sendmail: 451 4.0.0 /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 91:
> fileclass: cannot open '/etc/mail/local-host-names': World writable
> directory 451 4.0.0 /etc/mail/send
This is what I get on my log:
# /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail start
Starting sendmail: 451 4.0.0 /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 91: fileclass: cannot
open '/etc/mail/local-host-names': World writable directory
451 4.0.0 /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 568: fileclass: cannot open
'/etc/mai
At 18:16 9/11/2003 -0400, you wrote:
I support a large number of windows users, and for the most part the crowd
is either using outlook or eudora for their MUA. No problems with
that. I have succeeded in setting up secure pop and secure imap for the
both of these user groups.
Can you tell us h
lly states that you have to change the 'postfix' to a
real email account.
That should fix ya.
Ben
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Peter Skensved wrote:
>
> > I'm considering migrating from sendmail to postfix but I have run into
> > something which looks like a permission
In my opinion mutt command works better for sending
mail with attatchment using shell script then
sendmail. I tried to send attatchment using sendmail
didn't work for me!
mutt -s "test" -a /root/.bashrc [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
/root/greetings
--- Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PR
open
sendmail.cf under /etc/mail
find
the line that has :
DaemonPortOptions=Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA
and
add
DaemonPortOptions=Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1,Addr=1.2.3.4
Name=MTA
where 1.2.3.4 = ip of your eth0
restart sendmail
You can also put into the sendmail.mc file
but then
The default config file in RH9 instructs sendmail to listen only on the
loopback interface. To change this modify /etc/mail/sendmail.cf and
then restart sendmail. e.g. service sendmail restart.
Both methods below will modify sendmail.cf to listen on ALL interfaces.
Modifying it to listen to a
Hi
I've installed Sendmail 8.12.9 on Redhat Linux 9.
But since I'm quite new to the sendmail and knowing that most of you gurus use
sendmail, I am posting this question.
I did a search on the web for this but no link
pointed to what I'm looking for.
I'd appreciate if you
Hi,
I've installed Sendmail 8.12.9 on Redhat Linux 9.
But since I'm quite new to the sendmail and knowing that most of you gurus use
sendmail, I am posting this question. I did a search on the web for this but no
link pointed to what I'm looking for.
I'd appreciate if
I am trying to relay mail from external to an internal Exchange server through
sendmail for security and spam protection. Here is my setup:
internal <-< Sendmail <external
Exchange Spamassassin
Could it be configured by sendmail only having 1 nic?
Thanks,
Crai
Check to see what the permissions are on /var/spool/mail/postfix.
Though, really, you should probably have 'postfix' aliased to a real user.
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Peter Skensved wrote:
> I'm considering migrating from sendmail to postfix but I have run into
> somethi
I'm considering migrating from sendmail to postfix but I have run into
something which looks like a permission problem. I followed the directions
in the RedHat postfix HOWTO, stopped sendmail, started postfix and sent
mail to the machine. However, it bounces telling me that :
;
| > If its plain text then just
| >
| > cat filename | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >
| I new there was an animal in there but couldn't come up with cat.
Well you don't need it:
sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] < filename
Cat is a tad overused
to do it.
> > >
> >
> > If its plain text then just
> >
> > cat filename | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> I new there was an animal in there but couldn't come up with cat.
> Thanks.
Well that's one animal that should have been left sleepi
m a shell script but
> > > cannot remember how to do it.
> > >
> >
> > If its plain text then just
> >
> > cat filename | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> I new there was an animal in there but couldn't come up with cat.
> Thanks.
&
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 19:41, Rus Foster wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, David Hart wrote:
>
> > I seem to recall there's a way to send a file from a shell script but
> > cannot remember how to do it.
> >
>
> If its plain text then just
>
> cat filename |
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, David Hart wrote:
> I seem to recall there's a way to send a file from a shell script but
> cannot remember how to do it.
>
If its plain text then just
cat filename | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
else you want to look at uuencoding it then cat'ing
I seem to recall there's a way to send a file from a shell script but
cannot remember how to do it.
Help, please.
--
Hart's PGP Key: 0x7BFF655E - http://TQMcube.com/hart_pgp.txt
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:05, Ezra Nugroho wrote:
> Any idea when Redhat is going to come up with rpms for this?
>
> http://www.sendmail.org/8.12.10.html
This has already been filed in Bugzilla as Bug 104563.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104563
The associated RHSA is RHSA-
> Any idea when Redhat is going to come up with rpms for this?
>
> http://www.sendmail.org/8.12.10.html
They already have. It's called "postfix". :)
Ben
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Any idea when Redhat is going to come up with rpms for this?
http://www.sendmail.org/8.12.10.html
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
That's exactly what you need to do. Since there is no reverse lookup on your
local sendmail server, you need to send from a known SMTP as stated below.
Tell sendmail to forward all outgoing mail to smtp.charter.net. I use Charter
as well. This keeps folks like AOL from rejecting your
My DSL provider blocks outgoing SMTP, unless it is from their own SMTP
server. You may need to setup a smarthost from sendmail, to forward the
mail through your ISPs mail server.
Try to telnet to the remote SMTP server on port 25 to test if your ISP
is blocking the mail:
Example$ telnet mx1
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sendmail blocking
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed
Wilts
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sendmail blocking
>
>
> On
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:53:17AM -0700, Nick White wrote:
>> I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
>> mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
>> relay box. We do this using the mailertable file. So any mail fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sendmail - splitting outgoing mail to 2 recipients
I just re-read what I wrote.. lets try again :)
eg: person (a) sends an email to person (b)
that email goes (as usual) to person (b)
but also gets copied by sendmail to person (c)
there.. that sounds better :)
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 15 September 2003 11:29, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote this in an
attempt to be witty or informative:
> Well, sendmail is currently sent to localhost, but when I tried to
> send to messages via sendmail, they got bounced back to the loc
>
> > I'm running RH9 on a PII 300MHz w/MMX and 128MB RAM on a cable
> > modem (the comp is a combo server/workstation, for now) and need to
> > set up sendmail so that I can bypass my ISP's SMTP server when I
> > can't send an email through them (all attempt
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed
Wilts
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sendmail blocking
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:53:17AM -0700, Nick White
wrote:
> > I have a quick sendmail question. A server s
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all.
>
> I'm running RH9 on a PII 300MHz w/MMX and 128MB RAM on a cable modem
> (the comp is a combo server/workstation, for now) and need to set up
> sendmail so th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
I'm running RH9 on a PII 300MHz w/MMX and 128MB RAM on a cable modem
(the comp is a combo server/workstation, for now) and need to set up
sendmail so that I can bypass my ISP's SMTP server when I can't send an
email th
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:53:17AM -0700, Nick White wrote:
> I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
> mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
> relay box. We do this using the mailertable file. So any mail for
> [EMAIL PRO
Awesome, it worked. Thanks for all your help here on redhat-list. I
noticed that redhat ships sendmail with
FEATURE(`blacklist_recipients')dnl already turned on!
Thanks,
- nick
-Original Message-
From: MKlinke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:30
On Monday 15 September 2003 09:53, Nick White wrote:
> Hi redhat-list,
>
> I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
> mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
> relay box. We do this using the mailertable file. So any ma
message, or the taking of any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kelerion
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sendmail - splitting outgoing mail to 2 recipients
I
Hi redhat-list,
I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
relay box. We do this using the mailertable file. So any mail for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gets forwarded to the internal mail server.
An employee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Kelerion
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: sendmail - splitting outgoing mail to 2
recipients
>
>
> I just re-read wh
I just re-read what I wrote.. lets try again :)
eg: person (a) sends an email to person (b)
that email goes (as usual) to person (b)
but also gets copied by sendmail to person (c)
there.. that sounds better :)
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
person (b)
that email goes to person (a) but sendmail also sends a copy of that
email to person (b)
Hope that makes sense..
Regards
Kel.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> Hi,
>
> I have been searching for an answer on this one, and hope that someone on
> this list can help out. I support a large number of windows users, and
for
> the most part the crowd is either using outlook or eudora for their
> MUA. No problems with that. I have succeeded in setting up secu
Hi,
I have been searching for an answer on this one, and hope that someone on
this list can help out. I support a large number of windows users, and for
the most part the crowd is either using outlook or eudora for their
MUA. No problems with that. I have succeeded in setting up secure pop a
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:48:03AM -0400, Joe Polk wrote:
> These directions are pretty-much as I have done. I just used the rpm's and
> the script fell into place. I see that my problem appears to be that sendmail
> is not compiled with Milter support. Which sucks. I should be a
These directions are pretty-much as I have done. I just used the rpm's and
the script fell into place. I see that my problem appears to be that sendmail
is not compiled with Milter support. Which sucks. I should be able to compile
an rpm to do this, right? I'm on RH7.3, which evident
Joe Polk wrote:
> I'm trying to get spamass-milter to work. But I don't really want to
> recompile sendmail. I'd prefer to work with rpm's if possible. Then
> again, I have everything setup but no spam is being filtered.
>
1) Type: sendmail -bt -d0.
I'm trying to get spamass-milter to work. But I don't really want to
recompile sendmail. I'd prefer to work with rpm's if possible. Then again, I
have everything setup but no spam is being filtered.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: R P Herrold <
On Monday 08 September 2003 14:06, Joe Polk wrote:
> Does anyone know if in 7.3 if sendmail is compiled in the rpm with
> libmilter support? I'm trying to get spamass-milter working and I
> have it all setup (so I think) but nothing is filtering.
>
> <>
Mine wasn'
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Joe Polk wrote:
> Does anyone know if in 7.3 if sendmail is compiled in the rpm with libmilter
> support? I'm trying to get spamass-milter working and I have it all setup (so
> I think) but nothing is filtering.
As RHL 7.3 initially issued, milter support wa
Does anyone know if in 7.3 if sendmail is compiled in the rpm with libmilter
support? I'm trying to get spamass-milter working and I have it all setup (so
I think) but nothing is filtering.
<>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.
1 - 100 of 2569 matches
Mail list logo
