On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Dan Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 at 02:58AM -0500, David Joyner wrote:
I think it's excellent. I laughed at the intro to the Sage definition
too. Very good.
I was totally not expecting 4chan to appear in a Sage talk...
Also, what font
Hey Martin -- this looks great! In fact, I'm giving an Intro to Sage
talk at SD11 on Friday ... I'm tempted to just reuse your slides! :P
-cc
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Martin Albrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I'll give a talk on Sage this Thursday to the PhD student seminar
On Nov 3, 11:43 pm, Georg S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 4 Nov., 01:57, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:13 PM, mabshoff wrote:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
this has been reported, but I just noticed that there is
On Nov 4, 2:04 pm, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think SageTeX deserves to have a more prominent place on the webpage
It's on http://sagemath.org/tour-research.html (not new, there since
months) but it could be more visible -- although as always, making
more things visible makes
Hello, in my last post about sagetex and more exposure of sage pages,
i had the idea to create a random link (not really random, there is
nothing like that in apache ssi, but the seconds of the timestamp are
more than ok)
therefore, there are now 10 links that are very prominent on the
index.html
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Craig Citro wrote:
Hey Martin -- this looks great! In fact, I'm giving an Intro to Sage
talk at SD11 on Friday ... I'm tempted to just reuse your slides! :P
Go for it! I can upload my sources to sage.math. I would add some
history/background for SD11 though.
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Craig Citro wrote:
Go for it! I can upload my sources to sage.math. I would add some
history/background for SD11 though.
Oh, I was mostly kidding -- but actually, please upload the sources!
Your beamer slides are WAY prettier than the ones I create. Amusingly,
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to create a repository of talks about sage?
Ronan Paixão
It would be good to add to this:
http://sagemath.org/talks/
William
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 01:08 -0800, Craig Citro escreveu:
Hey Martin
Wow, the last talks in there are from 2007!
Here are mine, feel free to add them:
OKCon:
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb/talks/20080315%20-%20Sage%20-%20OKCon%20-%20London.pdf
Trophees du libre:
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb/talks/20071129%20-%20Sage%20-%20Soissons.pdf
Are there safeguards in place to prevent a student from changing the
contents of the book?
Also, if the notebook itself is not user-changeable, at least
temporarily, it would defeat the most of the purpose of making it the
book inside a notebook.
I'm not familiar enough with the notebook's
There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
how to get files there (who to send to). I noticed there have been quite
some talks around since I started watching this list.
Ronan
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 11:19 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:14
Hi,
I have made all known numerical noise issues with 3.2.a2 tickets - see
#4436-4439. If someone has some additional failures please add them to
the tickets. If you have a failure in another file please open a new
ticket against 3.2.
Cheers,
Michael
Martin Albrecht wrote:
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Craig Citro wrote:
Go for it! I can upload my sources to sage.math. I would add some
history/background for SD11 though.
Oh, I was mostly kidding -- but actually, please upload the sources!
Your beamer slides are WAY prettier than the ones
I think SageTeX deserves to have a more prominent place on the webpage
and wiki - maybe I'm missing it but I don't see any links to it.
When you (Dan) were first working on it, I tried to use it and failed
but I just tried again (on a mac) and almost everything works for me,
not using the
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there safeguards in place to prevent a student from changing the
contents of the book?
Yes.
Also, if the notebook itself is not user-changeable, at least
temporarily, it would defeat the most of the purpose of
Dan,
Thanks for the reply. Yes, I looked closely at SageTex a couple of
months ago. Its a great idea, but I think it maybe does the reverse
of what I want. I'd like to have Sage input/commands appear in a
worksheet, surrounded by text from the book. Then a student could
read the text, execute
Note: You have log in first at sagenb.org before that link will work.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:25 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there safeguards in place to prevent a student from changing the
contents
Right, I typed it incorrectly. But if I type R.t = RDF['t'] the
result is the same.
Bill.
On 4 Nov, 03:43, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Bill Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sage: R.x=RDF['t']
This first line is wrong. It should be
R.t = RDF[]
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Bill Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, I typed it incorrectly. But if I type R.t = RDF['t'] the
result is the same.
Bill.
Yes, that's true. I just jumped on that one problem, since it
initially prevented
me from executing the rest of the code. Then when I
On 4 Nov, 03:39, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Hart wrote:
sage: R.x=RDF['t']
sage: s=1.0e1*t^3+1.0e-100*t^2+1.01234e-100*t+1.0e1
sage: u=1.0e1*t^3-1.0e1*t^2+1.0e1*t-1.0e1
sage: s*u
100.0*t^6 - 100.0*t^5 + 100.0*t^4 - 100.0*t^2 + 100.0*t - 100.0
What happened to the
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 at 07:09AM -0800, Rob Beezer wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Yes, I looked closely at SageTex a couple of
months ago. Its a great idea, but I think it maybe does the reverse
of what I want. I'd like to have Sage input/commands appear in a
worksheet, surrounded by text from
No I concocted the example as a result of a conversation with someone
about a related computation comparing speed of algorithms in RDF['x'].
Interestingly Pari returns 0.e-36*t^3 for the middle term. This means
that if further computations are done involving that term, the answer
will always
Bill Hart wrote:
On 4 Nov, 03:39, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Hart wrote:
sage: R.x=RDF['t']
sage: s=1.0e1*t^3+1.0e-100*t^2+1.01234e-100*t+1.0e1
sage: u=1.0e1*t^3-1.0e1*t^2+1.0e1*t-1.0e1
sage: s*u
100.0*t^6 - 100.0*t^5 + 100.0*t^4 - 100.0*t^2 + 100.0*t - 100.0
What
On 5 Nov, 00:26, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Hart wrote:
On 4 Nov, 03:39, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Hart wrote:
sage: R.x=RDF['t']
sage: s=1.0e1*t^3+1.0e-100*t^2+1.01234e-100*t+1.0e1
sage: u=1.0e1*t^3-1.0e1*t^2+1.0e1*t-1.0e1
sage: s*u
100.0*t^6 -
Doh! Mma = mathematica. I need to learn how to read!!
Thanks for checking that.
Bill.
On 5 Nov, 00:45, Bill Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5 Nov, 00:26, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Hart wrote:
On 4 Nov, 03:39, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Hart wrote:
On the numpy list, there has been discussion on PEP225, which advocates
for more custom inline operators in python, particularly to address
matrix multiplication versus element-wise multiplication. Fernando
Perez has put together a summary and is sending this to python-dev in a
few days.
Bill Hart wrote:
Mma returns the term as 0. t^3
That's interesting. Which version of Magma?
I meant mathematica; version 6.0.1 on Linux.
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Harald,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I want to propose a process to increase the quality of the Sage
documentation. This is the by far most annoying thing about Sage
Hi,
I skimmed the crypto tutorial and liked it. I really wish we
had a bunch of domain-specific tutorials gathered together
and included in a single book or directory with Sage,
and on the website. I wrote one recently for algebraic
number fields. These tutorials would mostly -- like yours
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I skimmed the crypto tutorial and liked it. I really wish we
had a bunch of domain-specific tutorials gathered together
and included in a single book or directory with Sage,
and on the website.
Is that a challenge? :-)
On a serious note, I'm planning to do
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 18:56 -0600, Jason Grout escreveu:
On the numpy list, there has been discussion on PEP225, which advocates
for more custom inline operators in python, particularly to address
matrix multiplication versus element-wise multiplication. Fernando
Perez has put together a
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I skimmed the crypto tutorial and liked it. I really wish we
had a bunch of domain-specific tutorials gathered together
and included in a single book or directory with Sage,
and on the website.
Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 12:07 +1100, Minh Nguyen escreveu:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Harald,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I want to propose a process to increase the quality of the Sage
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 12:07 +1100, Minh Nguyen escreveu:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Harald,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ronan Paixão wrote:
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 18:56 -0600, Jason Grout escreveu:
On the numpy list, there has been discussion on PEP225, which advocates
for more custom inline operators in python, particularly to address
matrix multiplication versus element-wise multiplication. Fernando
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
how to get files there (who to send to). I noticed there have been quite
some talks
Agreed!
I am still hoping to replace the document const.tex by
cookbook.tex. I'm happy to assemble the chapters but
even happier if someone else does:-)
I'm not sure what the correct procedure is, so I put a
chapter up on trac http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3624
Maybe a wiki page is
Jason Grout wrote:
Ronan Paixão wrote:
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 18:56 -0600, Jason Grout escreveu:
On the numpy list, there has been discussion on PEP225, which advocates
for more custom inline operators in python, particularly to address
matrix multiplication versus element-wise
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
how to get files
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
how to get files there (who to
As I have been teaching abstract algebra this semester, I have been
keeping notes on how to use Sage for this, and distributing them to my
students. So they follow the outline of a typical undergraduate
course on group theory, trying to use only the ideas they have been
taught previously in the
Hi Rob,
Rob Beezer wrote:
As I have been teaching abstract algebra this semester, I have been
keeping notes on how to use Sage for this, and distributing them to my
students. So they follow the outline of a typical undergraduate
course on group theory, trying to use only the ideas they have
Martin Albrecht wrote:
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
how to get
Does anyone know if it is assumed that if the _pos dictionary in a graph
is not None, then it contains each vertex as a key? It seems like it is
assumed several places in the code (e.g., in the subgraph() function).
However, _pos isn't updated properly (e.g., in the delete_vertex
function,
Thanks, Minh, for the offer to take in my group theory notes. I'll be
back in touch once I have something to dump your way. ;-)
Rob
On Nov 4, 7:11 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A good way to do it is to dump your abstract algebra notes on a novice
like me :-) I'd be more than
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4) Generating public and private keys
Choosing p and q of such different sizes is really a bad idea and IMHO
shouldn't be encouraged. The hardness of factorisation depends on the size
(and form) of the smaller factor.
46 matches
Mail list logo
