As a number teorist who is more liklely to want Hermite and Smith
normal forms than an actual echelon form (i nthe usual linear algebra
over fields sense), I would be quite happy for echelon form of a
matrix over ZZ to promote to QQ, and have differently names functions
for Hermite and Smith
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
Dr David Kirkby wrote:
From what I have read of the GNU linker documentation on the linker
'ld'
http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.20/ld/Options.html#Options
there is no such flag as -m64. So I can't understand how it works.
(There is an opton
John Cremona wrote:
As a number teorist who is more liklely to want Hermite and Smith
normal forms than an actual echelon form (i nthe usual linear algebra
over fields sense), I would be quite happy for echelon form of a
matrix over ZZ to promote to QQ, and have differently names functions
for
Jaap Spies wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
Dr David Kirkby wrote:
From what I have read of the GNU linker documentation on the linker
'ld'
http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.20/ld/Options.html#Options
there is no such flag as -m64. So I can't understand how it works.
Hi Robert!
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 02:21:55PM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:54:57 -0800, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
And here are the eight longest -long doctests:
devel/sage-main/sage/rings/arith.py
506.284008026
Where was this run? I find
Hi!
Thanks Jason for working on that!
On ..., John Cremona:
As a number theorist who is more liklely to want Hermite and Smith
normal forms than an actual echelon form (i nthe usual linear algebra
over fields sense), I would be quite happy for echelon form of a
matrix over ZZ to
I will respond to myself since I solved this bug :
I updated my Fedora 12 as proposed by the system.
I guess that gcc and others were updated
Works fine now
On 14 jan, 14:33, Nicolas nicolas.fresseng...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear developers,
I tried to build sage by simply typingmakeon the
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:52:07PM +, David Kirkby wrote:
Would it be better to manually create Wiki accounts on demand, rather
than let anyone create their own? Create them only when someone when
you are confident the person is a serious Sage user.
It has proved useful to us in the past
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Hi!
Thanks Jason for working on that!
On ..., John Cremona:
As a number theorist who is more liklely to want Hermite and Smith
normal forms than an actual echelon form (i nthe usual linear algebra
over fields sense), I would be quite happy for echelon form of
Hi Dave,
AFAIK, the linker itself (let's call it ld) is too simplistic to
handle more complex scenarios, e.g. the presence of both (and
incompatible ...) 32bit and 64bit shared libraries of one and the same
functionality in the system.
OTOH, the gcc script (resp. the g++ script) knows these
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
Dr David Kirkby wrote:
From what I have read of the GNU linker documentation on the linker
'ld'
http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.20/ld/Options.html#Options
there is no such flag as -m64. So I can't
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
One one could ask a non-obvious question rather than what is the name
of the maths software using python. How about What is the 10th Word
in README.txt ? Then, to get the information, someone has to download
250 MB of source code. I suspect most spammers would not
Hi,
That's a pity to loose a write-up just like this...
Dmitrii
On Jan 20, 2:02 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dmitrii,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I have written up some instructions on how to patch an spkg. The
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
I hope there's not going to be a rule to call 'ld' directly to do
linking in SPKGs, that would be a nightmare...
Nobody was suggesting that. I was just puzzled how LDFLAGS could work. I assumed
the flags were passed directly to the linker, but it appears I am
Hi Dmitrii,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
In the meantime,
I'll rewrite the instructions.
The rewritten instructions on patching an spkg are now up on the
Development FAQ [1] as a response to the question How do I patch an
spkg?. I have also
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:43:00AM -0800, Jason Grout wrote:
I'd rather have it called `echelon_form`, so I vote for leaving
echelon_form as is. Jason's current change has the merit of pleasing
everyone. If there is a strong majority for further changing
`echelon_form`, then please make sure
2010/1/20 Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:43:00AM -0800, Jason Grout wrote:
I'd rather have it called `echelon_form`, so I vote for leaving
echelon_form as is. Jason's current change has the merit of pleasing
everyone. If there is a strong majority for
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:56:03PM +, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
One one could ask a non-obvious question rather than what is the name
of the maths software using python. How about What is the 10th Word
in README.txt ? Then, to get the information, someone has to download
250 MB of source
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:38 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/20 Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:43:00AM -0800, Jason Grout wrote:
I'd rather have it called `echelon_form`, so I vote for leaving
echelon_form as is. Jason's current
On 2010-Jan-20 15:27:50 +, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Nobody was suggesting that. I was just puzzled how LDFLAGS could
work. I assumed the flags were passed directly to the linker, but it
appears I am incorrect in assuming that.
LDFLAGS would normally be passed to the
On Jan 20, 2010, at 3:33 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:52:07PM +, David Kirkby wrote:
Would it be better to manually create Wiki accounts on demand, rather
than let anyone create their own? Create them only when someone when
you are confident the person is a
On 2010-Jan-17 04:53:11 +, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Could an argument not be made to the Debian people that the code is
gap singular etc, but patched versions of them. Call them Foo and Bar
if necessary! No seriously, I can understand them not wanting
'standard' things
The single bad account can be deleted. Our text captcha system seems to work
well enough--the above doesn't seems to happen very often. It would be nice
if it was on account creation rather than every edit.
+1. (I accidentally typed '+21' at first -- which is probably closer
to my real
Hi all,
even if in the recent times I've been much less involved with SAGE, I
just wanted to point out two pieces of software that I hope could
become useful in the next future for SAGE.
The first is Bespin, the Javascript code editor by Mozilla. It has
very recently been released under GPL.
Hi,
This will become sage-4.3.1.final and be the next release:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.3.1.alpha5.tar
or whatever is in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of
William Stein wrote:
I argue for keeping the current design when I'm *doing* math.
I argue for changing echelon_form to return something over the
fraction field when I'm teaching undergraduates.
Which is exactly why I think the best solution is to just have a .rref()
command, which is what
It somehow escaped my attention until recently that Fluid (a site specific
browser that I use a lot) was open sourced at under the Apache license
http://github.com/itod/fluidium. I have hacked together a quick demo of what
is possible using a site specific browser. Currently there are many
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
even if in the recent times I've been much less involved with SAGE, I
just wanted to point out two pieces of software that I hope could
become useful in the next future for SAGE.
The first is Bespin, the
Hi,
I've released sage-4.3.1.
Get the source here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/src/
Upgrade (in a day or so you can omit the http:// for faster upgrade):
sage -upgrade http://sagemath.org/packages/
The release managers were Mike Hansen and Robert Miller. There
metalink is also in place (torrent inside!!)
sudo apt-get install aria2
aria2c http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/src/meta/sage-4.3.1.tar.metalink
You can watch mirrors at their work here (top is most recent):
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/schilly/mm/mirror-log/mirror_manager.html
H
Now that dsage has been laid to rest, http://sagemath.org/tour-research.html
should be updated as it still advertises dsage to be one of the top 5
sage features for researchers! Perhaps it could be replaced by a few
words about @parallel, which is still parallel computing (albeit not
I had errors building sage-4.3.1.
The trouble came after this warning:
sage-spkg fortran-20100118 21
Warning: Attempted to overwrite SAGE_ROOT environment variable
fortran-20100118
Eventually I got:
Error installing Fortran: You must install gfortran or set
SAGE_FORTRAN (and possibly
Same issue here.
Linux IT 2.6.28-17-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 1 21:27:25 UTC 2009
x86_64 GNU/Linux
gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4)
Upgrading from 4.3.1.rc0.
Igor Tolkov
On Jan 20, 8:26 pm, bump b...@match.stanford.edu wrote:
I had errors building sage-4.3.1.
The trouble came
Should we put
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
at the top of all .py and .pyx(?) files in the Sage library?
I think this will allow us to use Unicode literal strings in Sage code,
doctests, documentation --- without raising coding errors.
Thoughts?
Some links:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/devel/nonASCII
Hi Robert,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
SNIP
The single bad account can be deleted.
Now there is another spammer account with the username Robert. The
spammer has put spam content on the FAQ [1] and the main wiki [2]
pages.
[1]
Hi Dan,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:26 PM, bump b...@match.stanford.edu wrote:
I had errors building sage-4.3.1.
Note this output from a configuration script (it's from the install
log you posted):
checking for g77... no
checking for xlf... no
checking for f77... no
checking for frt... no
36 matches
Mail list logo
