Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/19/12 12:34 PM, William Stein wrote: >> >> (which exposes that font bug in mathjax). > > > Just to be clear, since your comment could be read two ways, my > understanding is the bug is in Lion, not in mathjax. Thanks. I keep forgetting

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/19/12 12:34 PM, William Stein wrote: (which exposes that font bug in mathjax). Just to be clear, since your comment could be read two ways, my understanding is the bug is in Lion, not in mathjax. Thanks, Jason -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:09 AM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:37:00 AM UTC-8, William wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Regarding jsmath and mathjax...   It seems like we have the issues >> worked out for the Sage notebook.  Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, >> etc., for thei

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/19/12 11:37 AM, William Stein wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Regarding jsmath and mathjax...   It seems like we have the issues >> worked out for the Sage notebook.  Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, >> etc., for their persistence. > > > At what

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/19/12 11:37 AM, William Stein wrote: Hi, Regarding jsmath and mathjax... It seems like we have the issues worked out for the Sage notebook. Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, etc., for their persistence. At what point should we merge it? I hesitate to merge it into #11080, since we've

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:37:00 AM UTC-8, William wrote: > > Hi, > > Regarding jsmath and mathjax... It seems like we have the issues > worked out for the Sage notebook. Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, > etc., for their persistence. > > I was just browsing mathoverflow, e.g., [1], and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

Hi, Regarding jsmath and mathjax... It seems like we have the issues worked out for the Sage notebook. Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, etc., for their persistence. I was just browsing mathoverflow, e.g., [1], and noticed that suddenly their math typesetting is very, very painful to look at.

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/16/12 10:14 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Sunday, 15 January 2012 06:37:34 UTC+8, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: > Do I have to install special fonts? What am I doing wrong? If this > is really what MathJax looks like, I definitely don't want to s

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Sunday, 15 January 2012 06:37:34 UTC+8, Jason Grout wrote: > > On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: > > Do I have to install special fonts? What am I doing wrong? If this > > is really what MathJax looks like, I definitely don't want to switch > > to MathJax. > > > I pushed a fix to tes

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 01/17/2012 02:34 AM, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/16/12 12:28 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 12:11:12 AM UTC+8, jason wrote: Do you want to take my mathjax fork on github and experiment with that? https://github.com/jasongrout/sagenb/tree/mathjax Thanks, Jason I can l

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/15/12 2:22 AM, P Purkayastha wrote: On 01/15/2012 12:11 PM, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/14/12 5:24 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: Thanks a lot for the fix. This works here now on firefox. It also works on opera as long as I am using the worksheet. The _published_ worksheet on the other hand only hal

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/15/12 2:27 AM, P Purkayastha wrote: From MathJax documentation (I see it in the source code of v1.1a), it appears that you need to Ctrl-Click in order to get that menu. This Ctrl-Click is only for Macs, whereas it is right click for the other OSs. On a mac, ctrl-click is the same as a rig

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Sunday, January 15, 2012 2:36:08 PM UTC+8, William wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Jason Grout > wrote: > >> It's a little sad to me that the only way to get the menu is right > >> click. This is somewhat non-mac friendly (and downright hostile to > >> tablets and phones), as we

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 01/15/2012 12:11 PM, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/14/12 5:24 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: Thanks a lot for the fix. This works here now on firefox. It also works on opera as long as I am using the worksheet. The _published_ worksheet on the other hand only half-works in opera. See the attached screens

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Saturday, 14 January 2012 23:29:55 UTC+8, jason wrote: > > On 1/14/12 8:59 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > > On 1/14/12 8:51 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Saturday, 14 January 2012 22:37:17 UTC+8, jason wrote: > >> > >> On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> > looks good (chrome

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Jason Grout wrote: >> It's a little sad to me that the only way to get the menu is right >> click.  This is somewhat non-mac friendly (and downright hostile to >> tablets and phones), as we saw often with jmol at the JMM booth where >> we were constantly tripped u

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 5:24 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: Thanks a lot for the fix. This works here now on firefox. It also works on opera as long as I am using the worksheet. The _published_ worksheet on the other hand only half-works in opera. See the attached screenshot for the glitch. Can anyone else confirm

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: Do I have to install special fonts? What am I doing wrong? If this is really what MathJax looks like, I definitely don't want to switch to MathJax. I pushed a fix to test.sagenb.org. The default now should be to use TeX local fonts, then TeX web fo

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: Do I have to install special fonts? What am I doing wrong? If this is really what MathJax looks like, I definitely don't want to switch to MathJax. Over on sage-notebook, I forwarded a message from Davide which tells us what is happening. I quote be

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 2:37 PM, William Stein wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout wrote: Thanks for the feedback; please test the fixes. I really hate to write this, but it's important

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout >>  wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the feedback; please test the fixes. >> >> >> I really hate to write this, but it's important.    Evidently, I have >>

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout wrote: Thanks for the feedback; please test the fixes. I really hate to write this, but it's important.Evidently, I have never seriously looked at MathJax before just now, I guess, because my first rea

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 1:17 AM, P Purkayastha wrote: On Saturday, January 14, 2012 2:11:55 PM UTC+8, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/13/12 5:04 PM, William Stein wrote: > Are you planning to install mathjax on any *.sagenb.org ? I cleared off some space and

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 8:59 AM, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/14/12 8:51 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Saturday, 14 January 2012 22:37:17 UTC+8, jason wrote: On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > looks good (chrome on MacOSX). > What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page > relo

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 8:51 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Saturday, 14 January 2012 22:37:17 UTC+8, jason wrote: On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > looks good (chrome on MacOSX). > What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page > reloading? > Is

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Saturday, 14 January 2012 22:37:17 UTC+8, jason wrote: > > On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > looks good (chrome on MacOSX). > > What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page > > reloading? > > Is it a bug or a feature? > > Are you talking about Chrome askin

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 2:51 AM, Julien Puydt wrote: Le 14/01/2012 00:48, Jason Grout a écrit : I'd love to, if we have enough disk space for another sage install on that disk. Right now, we have around 4.4G free, so it would take up about a quarter to half of the space left for all of the sagenb.org servers

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 1:17 AM, P Purkayastha wrote: On Saturday, January 14, 2012 2:11:55 PM UTC+8, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/13/12 5:04 PM, William Stein wrote: > Are you planning to install mathjax on any *.sagenb.org ? I cleared off some space and

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: looks good (chrome on MacOSX). What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page reloading? Is it a bug or a feature? Are you talking about Chrome asking for permission to run a java applet? I think that's a Chrome thing, and not

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

I am not sure if this is Sage's bug. Similar things happen on mathoverflow.net... On the other hand it might just mean that the mathjax settings need to adjusted. Or could it be tinymce? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

looks good (chrome on MacOSX). What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page reloading? Is it a bug or a feature? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroup

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

Le 14/01/2012 00:48, Jason Grout a écrit : I'd love to, if we have enough disk space for another sage install on that disk. Right now, we have around 4.4G free, so it would take up about a quarter to half of the space left for all of the sagenb.org servers. That seems a little tight to me. A go

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Saturday, January 14, 2012 2:11:55 PM UTC+8, Jason Grout wrote: > > On 1/13/12 5:04 PM, William Stein wrote: > > Are you planning to install mathjax on any *.sagenb.org < > http://sagenb.org>? > > I cleared off some space and installed this as well as the jmol update > at #11503 on test.sagen

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 12:11 AM, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/13/12 5:04 PM, William Stein wrote: Are you planning to install mathjax on any *.sagenb.org ? I cleared off some space and installed this as well as the jmol update at #11503 on test.sagenb.org. So please, everyone, try mathjax a

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/13/12 5:04 PM, William Stein wrote: Are you planning to install mathjax on any *.sagenb.org ? I cleared off some space and installed this as well as the jmol update at #11503 on test.sagenb.org. So please, everyone, try mathjax and the new jmol out at test.sagenb.org

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/13/12 5:04 PM, William Stein wrote: On Jan 13, 2012 2:44 PM, mailto:jason-s...@creativetrax.com>> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I've put up a patch to Sage and a SageNB spkg for review which upgrades the notebook from jsMath to MathJax. If you are interested in reviewing this, please fol

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Jan 13, 2012 2:44 PM, wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I've put up a patch to Sage and a SageNB spkg for review which upgrades the notebook from jsMath to MathJax. If you are interested in reviewing this, please follow the directions in the description of http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9