[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-17 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 17, 7:47 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael, > > > Mhh, can you remove the extra redirection in spkg-install and try > > again. Hi Kate. > I still have a problem in clisp.  To remind you this is 3.0.alpha5 > compiled with gcc-4.3.0. How could I forget? ;) > gcc -g -O2 -W -W

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-17 Thread Kate
Michael, > Mhh, can you remove the extra redirection in spkg-install and try > again. I still have a problem in clisp. To remind you this is 3.0.alpha5 compiled with gcc-4.3.0. gcc -g -O2 -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wreturn- type -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-sign-compare -

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-17 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 17, 6:04 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael, Hi Kate, > Adding #include  to >     givaro-3.2.10.rc3.p0/src/src/kernel/gmp++/gmp++.h > worked. Ok, I will patch Givaro And LinBox then to do so. IIRC I already patched that in LinBox for gcc 4.3 once, but maybe I am mixing thin

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-17 Thread Kate
Michael, Adding #include to givaro-3.2.10.rc3.p0/src/src/kernel/gmp++/gmp++.h worked. I also have had to add #include to libfplll-2.1.6-20071129.p2/src/src/main.cpp. Now it has failed in clisp-2.41.p13 with [1] + Suspended (tty input) make >& zzz1.4 Kate On Apr 16, 5:19

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-16 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 16, 9:22 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael, > > When trying to build 3.0.alpha5 using gcc-4.3.0 on x86-Linux > (pentium4-fc6), I get the following error in givaro > > make[5]: Entering directory `/home/kate/sage/sage-3.0.alpha5-x86-Linux/ > spkg/build/givaro-3.2.10.rc3.p0/src/

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-16 Thread Kate
Michael, When trying to build 3.0.alpha5 using gcc-4.3.0 on x86-Linux (pentium4-fc6), I get the following error in givaro make[5]: Entering directory `/home/kate/sage/sage-3.0.alpha5-x86-Linux/ spkg/build/givaro-3.2.10.rc3.p0/src/src/kernel/gmp++' /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=comp

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-16 Thread John Cremona
All tests passed for me on Linux host-57-71 2.6.18.8-0.3-default #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35 UTC 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux with gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux) John 2008/4/16 Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Apr 15, 2008, at 04:18 , mabshoff wrote: >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-15 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Apr 15, 2008, at 04:18 , mabshoff wrote: > > Hello folks > > here we go with 3.0.alpha5. So, that happened to 3.0.alpha4? It was > never announced in public since it was a snapshot I initially > considered > potentially unstable, but that didn't happen. We have closed a total > of *221* ticket

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-15 Thread mhampton
All tests passed on my intel mac pro (running 10.4.11). -M. Hampton On Apr 15, 4:04 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My alpha5 build report: > > (1) arch linux failure when building lapack; this is a known issue involving > fortran. I'll try working around it... yep that gets pas

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-15 Thread William Stein
My alpha5 build report: (1) arch linux failure when building lapack; this is a known issue involving fortran. I'll try working around it... yep that gets past the lapack issue. (2) 32-bit ubuntu, debian, 64-bit debian; sage.math: 100% good (3) OS X 10.5 ppc: sage -t devel/sage/sage/mod

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-15 Thread Jaap Spies
Jaap Spies wrote: > mabshoff wrote: >> Hello folks >> >> here we go with 3.0.alpha5. So, that happened to 3.0.alpha4? It was >> never announced in public since it was a snapshot I initially >> considered >> potentially unstable, but that didn't happen. We have closed a total >> of *221* tickets so

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-15 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks > > here we go with 3.0.alpha5. So, that happened to 3.0.alpha4? It was > never announced in public since it was a snapshot I initially > considered > potentially unstable, but that didn't happen. We have closed a total > of *221* tickets so far. This alpha should bu

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-15 Thread David Joyner
Installed and passed sage -testall on an intel macbook running os 10.4. On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:18 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello folks > > here we go with 3.0.alpha5. So, that happened to 3.0.alpha4? It was > never announced in public since it was a snapshot I initially >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-15 Thread Kiran Kedlaya
All tests pass on 64-bit RHEL (Opteron), and no more segfaults at exit either. Kiran mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks > > here we go with 3.0.alpha5. So, that happened to 3.0.alpha4? It was > never announced in public since it was a snapshot I initially > considered > potentially unstable, but that