On Sep 21, 2008, at 02:23 , mabshoff wrote:
On Sep 20, 8:43 pm, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 20, 2008, at 13:31 , mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
I will try the -j1 version and report back next week :-}
Thanks.
Built OK on my 8-core Mac Pro. I ran tests with -j6, and had one
On Sep 18, 2:21 pm, Justin Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 16, 2008, at 10:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
after 251 closed tickets here we go. This is rc5/final and likely
identical to the 3.1.2 release. There was an rc4 that never got
publicly announced since it had
On Sep 21, 2008, at 17:36 , mabshoff wrote:
On Sep 18, 2:21 pm, Justin Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 16, 2008, at 10:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
Below is the output from the failure of lisp.py. Make sense to
anyone?
Ok, the above seems to fail due to memory vs. MEMORY in the
Hi, all,
On Sep 16, 2008, at 21:43 , mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
after 251 closed tickets here we go. This is rc5/final and likely
identical to the 3.1.2 release. There was an rc4 that never got
publicly announced since it had some Gremlins in it. As far as we know
there are no know
On Sep 20, 11:12 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Justin,
Although I was able to build 3.1.2 on a (32-bit) 10.5 system, I can't
build it on my 64-bit 10.5 system. I've tried 4 times. Three, it
blew up installing python (_md5 import failed);
This is a known issue that
On Sep 18, 10:51 pm, Georg S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Good morning,
here the final results of my PPC box:
--
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
sage -t
On Sep 20, 2008, at 13:31 , mabshoff wrote:
On Sep 20, 11:12 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Justin,
Although I was able to build 3.1.2 on a (32-bit) 10.5 system, I can't
build it on my 64-bit 10.5 system. I've tried 4 times. Three, it
blew up installing python
Good morning,
On 18 Sep., 02:46, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All tests passed on my intel mac (10.4).
-M. Hampton
On Sep 16, 11:43 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
after 251 closed tickets here we go. This is rc5/final and likely
identical to the 3.1.2
Good evening,
highlights from make test on my low-RAM (768 MB) low-speed (550 MHz)
PPC PowerBook box so far:
...
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py *** ***
Error: TIMED OUT! *** ***
**
File
On Sep 16, 2008, at 10:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
after 251 closed tickets here we go. This is rc5/final and likely
identical to the 3.1.2 release. There was an rc4 that never got
publicly announced since it had some Gremlins in it. As far as we know
there are no know build
Good morning,
here the final results of my PPC box:
--
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/desolvers.py
sage -t
On Wednesday 17 September 2008, Georg S. Weber wrote:
Good morning,
to get more information on trac ticket #3758 crypto -- sage -t -long
devel/sage/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py fails on many machines,
which hits e.g. my Intel Mac with 2.0 GB RAM for the time being:
Please could everyone who runs
On Sep 17, 2:26 am, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wednesday 17 September 2008, Georg S. Weber wrote:
Good morning,
to get more information on trac ticket #3758 crypto -- sage -t -long
devel/sage/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py fails on many machines,
which hits e.g. my Intel Mac
Hi,
It built fine on 3 machines:
- 32-bit dell laptop running ubuntu
- 64-bit 4-processor (AMD) running redhat of some sort
- 32-bit mac os x laptop
Testing was also successful on the first two machines, and ongoing on the third
(I'll report if anything goes amiss).
There's one weird thing:
On Sep 17, 4:11 am, Alex Ghitza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
It built fine on 3 machines:
- 32-bit dell laptop running ubuntu
- 64-bit 4-processor (AMD) running redhat of some sort
- 32-bit mac os x laptop
Testing was also successful on the first two machines, and ongoing on the
3.1.2 built and passed all tests on both machines, 32-bit ubuntu and
64-bit Suse linux.
I looked for something called 3.1.2.rc5 but only found 3.1.2. Optimism!?
John
2008/9/17 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sep 17, 4:11 am, Alex Ghitza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
It built fine
On Sep 17, 10:09 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3.1.2 built and passed all tests on both machines, 32-bit ubuntu and
64-bit Suse linux.
I looked for something called 3.1.2.rc5 but only found 3.1.2. Optimism!?
Not really, rc4 passed tests everywhere minus some known issues with
Michael,
#4028: Mike Hansen: doctest and improve sage/interfaces/axiom.py
[Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
was originally in 3.1.2.alpha4 but got removed somewhere along the
line. In trac is now says it's closed and Merged in Sage
3.1.2.alpha4 but I do not think that is actually true. Or did some
On Sep 17, 1:01 pm, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael,
Hi Bill,
#4028: Mike Hansen: doctest and improve sage/interfaces/axiom.py
[Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
was originally in 3.1.2.alpha4 but got removed somewhere along the
line. In trac is now says it's closed and Merged in
All tests passed on my intel mac (10.4).
-M. Hampton
On Sep 16, 11:43 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
after 251 closed tickets here we go. This is rc5/final and likely
identical to the 3.1.2 release. There was an rc4 that never got
publicly announced since it had some
Good morning,
to get more information on trac ticket #3758 crypto -- sage -t -long
devel/sage/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py fails on many machines,
which hits e.g. my Intel Mac with 2.0 GB RAM for the time being:
Please could everyone who runs the long tests note whether the
doctest for sr.py not only
21 matches
Mail list logo
