On Sep 22, 11:39 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2008, at 22:24 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> > Nope, none of those fixes is in alpha0, but I hope that at least some
> > of them will make it into alpha1, due out late tomorrow. I still don't
> > see how parallel make impact
On Sep 22, 2008, at 11:37 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> Hello,
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:34 PM, cesarnda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> If I do:
>>
>> sage: MS = MatrixSpace(IntegerModRing(9), 5,5)
>> sage: G = MS([[5, 0, 0, 0, 4],[4, 5, 0, 0, 0],[0, 4, 5, 0, 0],[0,
>> 0,4,
>> 5, 0], [0, 0, 0
On Sep 22, 11:32 pm, Adam Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ^^^ This is some sort of permission error. Are you running SELinux or
> > > something like that?
Hi Adam,
> Just to confirm. SELinux was added to the computer. I am now
> 'negotiating' with IT. :-)
good luck negotiating :). You c
On Sep 22, 2008, at 22:24 , mabshoff wrote:
> Nope, none of those fixes is in alpha0, but I hope that at least some
> of them will make it into alpha1, due out late tomorrow. I still don't
> see how parallel make impacts numpy, so if you could send me the
> portion of the blown up numpy build wi
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:34 PM, cesarnda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I do:
>
> sage: MS = MatrixSpace(IntegerModRing(9), 5,5)
> sage: G = MS([[5, 0, 0, 0, 4],[4, 5, 0, 0, 0],[0, 4, 5, 0, 0],[0, 0,4,
> 5, 0], [0, 0, 0, 4, 5]])
> sage: G.base_ring()
> Ring of integers modulo 9
>
> is
I start sage and I type notebook and firefox is open to the following
address:
http://localhost:8000/?startup_token=1af26f2b14cac678ab97c121c9cca7c5
which is not found, so I have to cut it just to http://localhost:8000,
is there a way to solve this problem?
--~--~-~--~~~-
If I do:
sage: MS = MatrixSpace(IntegerModRing(9), 5,5)
sage: G = MS([[5, 0, 0, 0, 4],[4, 5, 0, 0, 0],[0, 4, 5, 0, 0],[0, 0,4,
5, 0], [0, 0, 0, 4, 5]])
sage: G.base_ring()
Ring of integers modulo 9
is there a way to get the base ring as an integer?, i.e. I want to
know the base ring to work with
> > ^^^ This is some sort of permission error. Are you running SELinux or
> > something like that?
>
Just to confirm. SELinux was added to the computer. I am now
'negotiating' with IT. :-)
cheers,
Adam
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sa
Hi,
Thanks a lot, that solves it.
arnold
On Sep 22, 6:27 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Sep 22, 5:38 am, arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > L.S.
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> > When updating to Sage 3.1.2 I run into the following problem:
>
> > Am using a Mac G4 dual core, OS
On Sep 22, 10:16 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2008, at 21:33 , mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
Hi Justin,
> > I am playing with libpng-1.2.32 since that is the latest release and
> > also has a boatload of security updates since the lowly 1.2.22 that we
> > ship. Hopef
On Sep 22, 2008, at 21:33 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Sep 22, 8:41 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sep 21, 2008, at 23:35 , mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> I'll guess that it's a difference between versions (1.2.22 vs.
>> 1.2.24), but I can't find old source on the libpng site, an
On Sep 22, 8:41 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2008, at 23:35 , mabshoff wrote:
Hi Justin,
> > On Sep 21, 11:27 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is the same crap issue you hit when building 3.1.2.rc-something,
> > i.e. emacs is linked a
On Sep 21, 2008, at 23:35 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Sep 21, 11:27 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the same crap issue you hit when building 3.1.2.rc-something,
> i.e. emacs is linked against Apple's libnpng while launching it from
> hg causes it to pick up "out" linpng.
Oops. Forgot one thing...
On Sep 22, 2008, at 20:18 , Justin C. Walker wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2008, at 18:19 , Jason Grout wrote:
[snip]
>> What is the "meta" key in OS X? For me, pressing escape (my meta
>> key)
>> and then b takes me back a word. Does option-b take you back?
>
> "Get Info" on
On Sep 22, 2008, at 18:19 , Jason Grout wrote:
>
> David Philp wrote:
>>
>> On 23/09/2008, at 11:00 AM, Bob Wonderly wrote:
>>
>>> I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
>>> previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very
>>> tedious
>>> in that the on
William Stein wrote:
>
> What's the rule about whose is a dupe then? I posted on sage-support
> first, but you hit "new ticket" first.I'll let you have the ticket; please
> mark mine a dupe.
Hehe...I believe it's the "Code talks" rule. Robert has a patch up
already :).
Jason
--~--~--
David Philp wrote:
>
> On 23/09/2008, at 11:19 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> David Philp wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2008, at 11:00 AM, Bob Wonderly wrote:
>>>
I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very
On 23/09/2008, at 11:19 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> David Philp wrote:
>>
>> On 23/09/2008, at 11:00 AM, Bob Wonderly wrote:
>>
>>> I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
>>> previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very
>>> tedious
>>> in that the on
On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:17 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Jason Grout
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bob Wonderly w
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Jason Grout
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Bob Wonderly wrote:
Using Sage I solved a long list of equations and put the
solutions (s)
in a list; e.g.:
sag
David Philp wrote:
>
> On 23/09/2008, at 11:00 AM, Bob Wonderly wrote:
>
>> I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
>> previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very tedious
>> in that the only way I have figured out how to move the cursor
>> around in
On Sep 22, 6:17 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> >> This is a bug, so I've added it to trac:
>
> >>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4171
>
> > ... just after I added the ticket here:http://trac.sagemath.org/
> > sage_
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Jason Grout
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Bob Wonderly wrote:
Using Sage I solved a long list of equations and put
William Stein wrote:
> Regarding your "long" question in the other thread, you might
> try typing
>
> SR(s)
>
> to explicitly coerce s from a long to a "symbolic ring element".
>
That doesn't work, which might be a bug:
sage: SR(long(2))
-
On 23/09/2008, at 11:00 AM, Bob Wonderly wrote:
>
> I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
> previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very tedious
> in that the only way I have figured out how to move the cursor
> around in
> the text is one characte
On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Jason Grout
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Bob Wonderly wrote:
>>> Using Sage I solved a long list of equations and put the
>>> solutions (s)
>>> in a list; e.g.:
>>>
>>> sage: for j in range(52,54,1):
>>
Bob Wonderly wrote:
> I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
> previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very tedious
> in that the only way I have figured out how to move the cursor around in
> the text is one character at a time using the left and ri
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bob Wonderly wrote:
>> Using Sage I solved a long list of equations and put the solutions (s)
>> in a list; e.g.:
>>
>> sage: for j in range(52,54,1):
>> q = slst[j]
>> j=q[0]; k=(q[1]); s=(q[2])
>> (q,j,k,s
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Bob Wonderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
> previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very tedious
> in that the only way I have figured out how to move the cursor around in
> the t
Bob Wonderly wrote:
> Using Sage I solved a long list of equations and put the solutions (s)
> in a list; e.g.:
>
> sage: for j in range(52,54,1):
> q = slst[j]
> j=q[0]; k=(q[1]); s=(q[2])
> (q,j,k,s)
> .:
> ([52, 30, 2081203288L], 52, 30, 2081203288L)
> ([53, 53, 17903198518
I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very tedious
in that the only way I have figured out how to move the cursor around in
the text is one character at a time using the left and right arrow keys
and the back
Using Sage I solved a long list of equations and put the solutions (s)
in a list; e.g.:
sage: for j in range(52,54,1):
q = slst[j]
j=q[0]; k=(q[1]); s=(q[2])
(q,j,k,s)
:
([52, 30, 2081203288L], 52, 30, 2081203288L)
([53, 53, 17903198518682712L], 53, 53, 17903198518682712L)
No
On Sep 22, 4:23 pm, phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 10:26 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I'll try to reproduce the crash and see what I can do about it. You could
> > help
> > by running sage -gdb (if you have gdb installed) and send me the backtrace
> > of
On Sep 15, 10:26 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Monday 15 September 2008, phil wrote:
>
> > I've been pushing the limits of determinant calculation over
> > multivariate polynomial rings. I can calculate determinants of
> > matrices up to 9x9 of the form [[x_0_0, x_0_1],[
I had the content earlier this morning. But couldn't run sage on it. I
might accidentally click the "discard and quit" button. But if I'm not
mistaken, usually the old content will still be there.
I think (and hope) this is an isolated case.
On Sep 22, 12:02 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:01 PM, pong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William,
>
>Thanks for the reply. And I understand that could happen. Well, it
> looks like the content of one of my worksheets is gone. In my case,
> that's really no big deal. But I hope other people who have more
> substa
William,
Thanks for the reply. And I understand that could happen. Well, it
looks like the content of one of my worksheets is gone. In my case,
that's really no big deal. But I hope other people who have more
substantial worksheets in that server won't encounter the same
problem.
On Sep 22,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:36 AM, pong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is server 2 currently down? I have troubles in running sage there this
> morning.
Thanks for letting me know. The server directory is suddenly out of disk
space, so the server can't work. So I've deleted a bunch of files, s
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:05 AM, D. Monarres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I want to produce a worksheet tutorial for SAGE usage on our campus
> and was wondering how I could add static text around the notebook
> cells like is done in the live tutorial . Do I just edit as plain text
> and add fo
Is server 2 currently down? I have troubles in running sage there this
morning.
my username there is pong
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For mo
I want to produce a worksheet tutorial for SAGE usage on our campus
and was wondering how I could add static text around the notebook
cells like is done in the live tutorial . Do I just edit as plain text
and add formatting there?
D. Monarres
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--~--~-~--~~--
>
> It works for me:
>
> sage: wiki()
> **
> * *
> * Open your web browser tohttp://localhost:9000*
> * *
> ***
On Sep 22, 6:59 am, Adam Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Adam,
> I would guess this might be related to ticket #1870. If I try to run
> sage -wiki or wiki() I get an error.
>
> $ sage
> --
> | SAGE Version 3.1.2, Rele
On 9/22/08, Maike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm, I get "NameError: name 'auto' is not defined". I'm using version
> 3.1.1, should that support %auto?
Use #auto, not %auto
>
> Thanks! Maike
>
> On Sep 22, 12:06 pm, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Maike,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 22,
On Sep 22, 5:38 am, arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> L.S.
Hi,
> When updating to Sage 3.1.2 I run into the following problem:
>
> Am using a Mac G4 dual core, OSX 10.4.11.
> Used a previous version of Sage without apparent problems. Updating to
> 3.1.2 however was not without hickups: copyi
David Joyner wrote:
> sage: assume(x>0)
> sage: integral( cos(2 * pi * x * t), t , 0 , Infinity)
> ind
>
> What is "ind"?
I guess this is coming from Maxima, where ind = indeterminate.
Btw und = undefined if ever you run across that, and don't forget
inf = positive real infinity, minf = negati
Hi,
I would guess this might be related to ticket #1870. If I try to run
sage -wiki or wiki() I get an error.
$ sage
--
| SAGE Version 3.1.2, Release Date: 2008-09-16 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and li
L.S.,
When updating to Sage 3.1.2 I run into the following problem:
Am using a Mac G4 dual core, OSX 10.4.11.
Used a previous version of Sage without apparent problems. Updating to
3.1.2 however was not without hickups: copying Sage with the finder
resulted in error messages that duplicate names
Hmmm, I get "NameError: name 'auto' is not defined". I'm using version
3.1.1, should that support %auto?
Thanks! Maike
On Sep 22, 12:06 pm, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Maike,
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Maike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (2) Thanks that sounds good
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 7:03 AM, kkwweett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (where is my my last post ?)
All 1st posts must be moderated due to the large amount of spam sent to
the list.
>
> you can indirectly get :
>
>>./sage
> --
> | SAGE Version 3.1.1 ...
> | Type noteb
(where is my my last post ?)
you can indirectly get :
>./sage
--
| SAGE Version 3.1.1 ...
| Type notebook()
--
sage: var('a b t x')
(a, b, t, x)
sage: assume(b<0)
sage: expr(x)=integral(exp(-2*I*pi*(a+I*b)*t),t,0,x)
sage: factor(limit(expr
you can indirectly get
> ./sage
---
| SAGE Version 3.1.1 ...
| Type notebook() ...
--
sage: var('a b t x')
(a, b, t, x)
sage: assume(b<0)
sage: expr(x)=integral(exp(-2*I*pi*(a+I*b)*t),t,0,x)
sage: factor(limit(expr(x),x=infinity))
On Sep 22, 12:14 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sage: integral( cos(2 * pi * x * t), t , 0 , Infinity)
> ind
>
> What is "ind"?
my guess: indefinite (NaN in python-speak)
h
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support
It doesn't converge because in your first post you said
assume(f>0)
Its convergence is the same as
integral( cos(2 * pi * f * t), t , 0 , Infinity)
(think about area under a curve...). By the way, sage gives:
sage: t = var("t")
sage: x = var("x")
sage: assume(x>0)
sage: integral( cos(2 * pi
Hi Maike,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Maike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (2) Thanks that sounds good. I'm not sure how to use #auto though,
> where do I put this option?
You put %auto as the first line of the cell that you want to auto-evaluate.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~--
(2) Thanks that sounds good. I'm not sure how to use #auto though,
where do I put this option?
Cheers,
Maike
On Sep 5, 6:12 pm, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a wiki page for notebook suggestions, but I don't think its
> been used much lately:http://wiki.sagemath.
Hi all,
this is a reminder that Sage Days 10 (SD10) is fast approaching! It is still
possible to register until October 3. See http://wiki.sagemath.org/days10,
where you can see the scientific program, with the titles and abstracts of the
invited and contributed talks.
After SD6 in Bristo
On Sep 21, 10:34 pm, Nasser Abbasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me rewrite what I wrote in last post again, since it did not
> format well.
>
I think it is still not clear, so I wrote it in latex via SW, here it
is again as screen image and PDF file
http://12000.org/tmp/092108/eq.gif
http
58 matches
Mail list logo
