On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 at 22:11, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> I'm just running
>>
>> make -j ptestlong
>>
>
> yes. Although -j without a parameter is a bit risky...
>
Point taken Dima about using -j without a parameter. That could have been
tricky if doctesting had used thousands of threads.😂😂
TLDR
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 at 22:22, julian...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:33:04 PM UTC+2 David Kirkby wrote:
> (base) drkirkby@canary:~$ command -v R
> /home/drkirkby/miniforge3/bin/R
>
> something went wrong in your conda setup I believe.
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 at 21:31, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> we have 9.8 now :-)
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/releases
>
Okay, I'm trying again.
It seems an unusual build process.
* There's a configure.ac, but no configure script.
* I typed make, which then builds a configure script, and exits w
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 at 21:06, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 8:33 PM David Kirkby wrote:
>
>> /home/drkirkby/miniforge3/bin/R
>
>
> Oh, you build in Conda...
> This might be a bit of a problem - it's not too well-tested for sure.
> Did you see
.log
k...@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk:
sagemath_doc_html-none.log
100% 162KB 2.5MB/s
00:00
(base) drkirkby@canary:~/sage$
On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 20:17:38 UTC David Kirkby wrote:
> I got this rather weird error on Ubuntu 20.04. It says the followi
I got this rather weird error on Ubuntu 20.04. It says the following
packages failed to build, but does not say what they were! The hardware is
a Dell 7920 with 2 x 26 core CPUs and 384 GB RAM.
I put config.log here
https://www.kirkbymicrowave.co.uk/config.log
and a compressed version of inst
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 11:27:23 UTC dim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dave,
Hi Dima
We aren't maintaining Ubuntu/Debian packages, so this report should
not have gone here. :-)
Some years/releases Debian packaging of Sage is in good shape, some
years it's falling behind,
but we are trying
Some of you may remember me - I did a fair amount of work porting Sage to
Solaris SPARC.
I wanted to try sage, and could not be bothered to build from source, so
thought I'd just install a binary onto a Dell 7920 tower workstation (2 x
26-core 2.0 GHz CPUs with 384 GB RAM) running Ubuntu 20.04
On 21 February 2017 at 17:48, Simon King wrote:
>
> Is the problem on my side?
>
> Also I see that (unlike in the past) I could not do
> ssh simonk...@sage.math.washington.edu
> (on two different laptops). It tells me "Permission denied (publickey)".
>
drkirkby@hawk:~/openssh-7.4p1$ ./ssh kir
On 23 Jan 2015 21:24, "Jeroen Demeyer" wrote:
>
> On 2015-01-23 22:19, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
>>
>> But I think you should elaborate a bit more since the question was about
>> Cygwin.
>
> I think the original question was native o
On 16 Jan 2015 14:45, "William Stein" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:59 AM, 张秦川 wrote:
> > Python can be used on windows. And sage is written in python.
> > So why cannot Sage run as a native application on Windows.
>
> Because people haven't done the work to make it happen.
What you say i
ite.
http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/author.html?author=Nasser+M.+Abbasi
I wonder what made you start using Sage?
I hope you get your questions answered.
Dave (a Sage developer).
--
Dr. David Kirkby G8WRB
http://www.vnacalibration.co.uk/
Economical & accurate VNA calibration kits.
Coeff
I
On 3 May 2014 16:54, "Javier Marquez" wrote:
>
> solve(sin(x)==1/2,x) produces only one solution. Is here a way to have
sage produce all real solutions ? Thx
Is there not an infinite number of solutions? If so, it would be difficult
to get them all
Dave
--
You received this message because
up and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
> For more options, visit https://groups.g
On 4 March 2013 17:51, Dan Aldrich wrote:
> I've been using Sage for about 3 years now. One thing that hit me was when I
> got into the 3rd year Electrical Engineering classes, my Matlab usage was
> increasing because professors wanted all homework done in Matlab not Sage.
This is not surprising,
On 4 March 2013 16:55, Luis Finotti wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I will give a couple of informal talks on Sage. A question that will
> certainly be asked is how Sage compares with MATLAB, probably in regards of
> performance and functionality in modeling and other applied math
> applications.
I think
On 6 February 2013 08:17, Christophe BAL wrote:
> Hello,
> it could be very useful for undergraduate students to have a light version
> of sage so as to not have such a huge program to install.
Is it really that huge, given the size of disks now? If a copy was
held in your university, it should b
On 31 December 2012 17:09, William Stein wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:54 AM, David Kirkby
> wrote:
>>
>> On 28 December 2012 17:55, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> > On Dec 28, 2012, at 4:47 PM, David Kirkby
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> Math
On 28 December 2012 17:55, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2012, at 4:47 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> Mathematica were not tested regularly - I don't know if that has
>> changed.
>
> Of course, the Mathematica interface cannot be tested as often as everything
> el
On 29 December 2012 02:39, William Stein wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Kirkby
> wrote:
>>
>> On 28 December 2012 16:47, William Stein wrote:
>> > also make it an optional sage package).
>>
>> This is what I was thinking, bu
On 28 December 2012 16:47, William Stein wrote:
> also make it an optional sage package).
This is what I was thinking, but I personally thought it worth asking
WRI exactly where we stood if using their protocol.
At the end of the day, anything you do to circumvent using their
shared library, WRI
On 28 December 2012 16:41, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Friday, December 28, 2012 4:19:11 PM UTC, William wrote:
>>
>> I disagree. The only reason Sage doesn't have an interface to Mathematica
>> written using the MathLink protocol is that nobody has got around to
>> writting such an interface. I wou
On 28 December 2012 14:53, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
> Note to (potential) users of the sage interface to Mathematica : something
> seems to have changed in Mathematica version 9 interface with "the rest of
> the world".
>
> Setup(s) : Debian wheezy with self-compiled sage v 5.4.1 then v 5.5,
>
On 21 October 2012 13:04, LFS wrote:
> yes - i finally saw that and took the call to the GDDinit out of the loop
> and this may be working, but I don't know how to explain this to the
> kiddies.
> Probably should have just stuck with Excel where I understand the
> generators. Too complicated by fa
On 21 October 2012 12:03, LFS wrote:
> Hiya Dave,
> What would the line of code look like to reseed it with the epoch thing each
> time I call it?
> Thanks so much,
>
> Linda
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/misc/randstate.html
says
If set_random_seed() is called with no arguments, t
On 21 October 2012 12:03, LFS wrote:
> Hiya Dave,
> What would the line of code look like to reseed it with the epoch thing each
> time I call it?
> Thanks so much,
>
> Linda
The truth is I don't know off hand. I've spent a lot of time porting
Sage to Solaris, but have not used it much at all. I'
One simple way to get a qualitative feel for the quality of random
numbers is to take them two at a tim, staring with the first two being
x1, y1. So you gererate:
x1, y1
x2, y2
x3, y3 etc
then plot a graph of x,y for all parts xn, yn
The graph should look like a scatter graph, with no obvious pa
On 21 October 2012 11:42, LFS wrote:
> Hiya Dimitri, It might actually be working. Not sure, but when I increased
> the number of sets ns, it does looks better. Still alot of repeats, but the
> histogram looks better. Linda
If there is a number of repeats, something is defnitely wrong. It
should
On 21 October 2012 11:30, LFS wrote:
> Hiya Dmitrii
> Thanks so much for your quick reply, but I am still getting the same
> problem.
I don't know if this the best way in Sage, but it is common practice
to seed the random number generator from the number of seconds since
the Epoch (1/1/1970). So
On 28/09/2012 18:56, William Stein wrote:
In the next few months, I'll be launching the service described here,
which you'll have the opportunity to financially support:
http://wstein.org/grants/2012-rrf/rrf.pdf
-- William
I read that, and two things come to mind.
1) A minor one, but
On 3 September 2012 08:49, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Monday, September 3, 2012 4:49:05 AM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>>>
>>> It supports Windows as much as any Linux software that does not support
>>> windows -- install a virtual machine and run it inside. And it convices
>>> people that Sage is h
On 3 September 2012 04:49, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>> Honestly I don't think it's very constructive to tell users that they
>> should install a different operating system in order to use Sage, and
>> that is basically what this dual-booting suggestion amounts to
>
>
> I totally agree with that. And I
On 1 September 2012 13:23, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Honestly I don't think it's very constructive to tell users that they
> should install a different operating system in order to use Sage, and
> that is basically what this dual-booting suggestion amounts to -
> dual-booting is unlikely to be a very
On 31 August 2012 21:20, Guilherme Boaviagem Ribeiro
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have installed Sage (with the file sage-5.0-disk1.vmdk) on my Windows
> 64-bits (4 GB RAM, and processor of 2.4 GHz), and it is already running in
> my Virtual Box. But it's way too slow, even for the simplest command
On 26 August 2012 10:33, Volker Braun wrote:
> Sounds very much like a non-linear fit will be able to figure out the 8
> unknown parameters. You need a formula ("model") for impedance(frequency)
> depending on the parameters.
Maybe this is not as hard as I thought, and wrote half an hour ago.
Th
ptimize.html#sage.numerical.optimize.find_fit
>
>
>
> On Sunday, August 26, 2012 1:06:17 AM UTC+1, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to work out how to solve an engineering problem. I'm hoping
>> Sage can help me, but I can't work out the maths of i
I'm trying to work out how to solve an engineering problem. I'm hoping
Sage can help me, but I can't work out the maths of it. I'm hoping
someone here might be able to.
A vector network analyzer (VNA) is a bit of electronic test equipment
which measures complex impedance values as a function of fr
On 20 July 2012 18:57, Keshav Kini wrote:
> David Kirkby writes:
>> The usual reccomenedation when people get problems is to build Sage
>> from source code. That normallly works without problems. You are
>> unlikely to need to install any other packages, as Sage come
On 20 July 2012 18:26, tvn wrote:
> I am trying to run Sage 5.1 from a computer at work running Debian and it
> crashes right when starts up ..
>
>
> wooly Fri Jul 20:13:26:00 (210)
> ~/Src/Devel/SAGE/sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_12.04_lts-x86_64-Linux
> $ uname -a
> Linux wooly 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1
On 26 June 2012 14:57, Eric Kangas wrote:
> Yea I think your right about the version before 6. However if I already paid
> for the program then I should be able to re-format my drive and reinstall it
> without having to pay for it again.
Agreed. And have you asked Wolfram Research about moving it
On 26 June 2012 12:56, Eric Kangas wrote:
> I first started using Mathematica 5.8 before I bought my student edition of
> 6.0 as a physics student at CWU.
There was no version 5.8 of Mathematica. To the best of my knowledge,
the latest in the 5 series was 5.2 (probably with a 5.2.1 or similar
wit
On 17 May 2012 16:57, Rob McMahon wrote:
> Answering my own question: it's this line from
> spkg/build/prereq-1.0/configure{,.ac}
>
> if test "x`file $SAGE_FORTRAN_LIB | grep 32-bit | grep \"dynamic lib\" `"
> = 'x'
>
> Having set my path up to get GNU make, it was also picking up a different
>
On 17 May 2012 01:30, Jim Clark wrote:
> Update: I downloaded and installed sage 5.0 again.
>
> The sequence of commands below induces the same SIGILL crash.
>
> I find it hard to blame a defective download.
Why not just look at the md5 checksum? That would have saved you
downloading it a second
On 14 May 2012 05:23, William Stein wrote:
>> * Code is depreciated quite regularly,
>
> deprecated. "depreciated" is a completely different word.
Sorry. An unfortunate error, though I could think of worst words with
a similar spelling!
Dave
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-supp
On 05/13/12 06:36 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
I think that Sage can be a very hard sell for sysadmin/ops type people in
industry, because it is a very big install
Sage is similar in size to Mathematica, and probably MATLAB and Maple too. The
binary installations for all of these packages are 100
William,
I think you are being overly negative, although I agree the question
could have been put a little better.
If someone is thinking of using Sage in industry, they are likely to
want to know how much it is used in industry.
I think I'd answer this by pointing out some of the advantages
com
On 10 April 2012 19:15, rvaug...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sage 4.3.4 runs fine on SL 5.4.
>
> Sage 4.8 complains:
> (/lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found ).
>
> -Richard Vaughn
As Dima suggested, you are using an old version, but the fact you say
it working on a later version, suggested you
On 02/29/12 12:40 AM, deSitter wrote:
Hello,
Two issues, one solved by brute force, the other needs a new cvxopt-1.1.3
package.
I am using gcc 4.6.2 newly built and tested, and the Sun linker. I have Sun
Studio 12 installed. I built gcc4 with the gcc 3.4.6 package from Sunfreeware.
During th
On 14 February 2012 03:40, juaninf wrote:
> Hi everybody.
>
> Exists any command in SAGE to get the spent cpu-cycles per second in
> SAGE?
What do you mean by "spent cycles per second"? Time must be measured in
seconds, not inverse seconds, so I assume you don't mean time.
I believe you will f
On 26 December 2011 19:51, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 26 December 2011 19:28, William Stein wrote:
>> What problems? Are there any corresponding open trac tickets or bug
>> reports about your problems?
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10968
>
> Note t
On 26 December 2011 19:28, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:03 AM, David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> On 24 December 2011 18:27, Sony wrote:
>>> In section 4.2 of the SageLaTeX manual (page 11) explains how to
>>> create a LaTeX document with a Mathem
On 24 December 2011 18:27, Sony wrote:
> In section 4.2 of the SageLaTeX manual (page 11) explains how to
> create a LaTeX document with a Mathematica plot using SageLaTeX. I
> tried the following code but no output is produced. I get an error
> message "Example3 not found."
I don't think the i
I got an email from the publisher today confirming the book on Sage has been
published, although the web site still says to be published in May 2011.
http://www.packtpub.com/sage-beginners-guide/book
Some fraction of sales will go to Sage, though I'm not sure what fraction, or if
there needs t
On 05/ 4/11 10:19 PM, John Cremona wrote:
Simon,
I have tried and failed to load the large SW database (and complained
about this to William yesterday). All the spkg_install scripts is to
move a whole lot of files, but it uses the command "mv -r" which is
illegal on my machines (ubuntu linux).
On 04/30/11 09:59 PM, Alex Lara wrote:
The command ./sage -f python (after install libssl-dev) did not work,
but sage -f python-2.6.4.p10.spkg did work (I think).
I ran make test. The following test failed:
sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/
number_field.py"
Do yo
On 27 April 2011 17:20, David Kirkby wrote:
> I believe others have built Sage with Ubuntu 10.10, so I think it's
> safe to say there's a problem with your setup, and not with Sage.
Sorry, I mean ?I believe,others have built Sage with Ubuntu 10.04 - I
myself have built it w
On 27 April 2011 13:46, jean-pierre.peigneux
wrote:
> Ok I tried without success ,below there is the ouput of the try,could
> you make other suggestions,thanks:
To me it seems your Fortran compiler is not functioning properly.
It would help if you configured your system to show error messages in
On 04/26/11 05:27 PM, jean-pierre.peigneux wrote:
Thank you for fast answer ;I am joining the output of cat /proc/cpuinfo
just below:
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+
stepping: 1
cpu MHz
On 04/23/11 04:41 PM, kcrisman wrote:
This is a little OT, but just for reference, the R devels have made it
clear that without an X and display actually present, Cairo is the
only way to go to get this to work. With your setup, you presumably
have a display in your VM, so your solution makes s
On 12 April 2011 17:55, H wrote:
> Hi-
> I have been trying to install Sage on my laptop running Ubuntu 10.10.
> I downloaded the binary tar files and extracted them. I ran Sage in a
> terminal, after it is done resetting paths there is ImportError
> Traceback (most recent call last) and then it s
On 9 April 2011 16:27, Olalékan ABOU BAKAR wrote:
> I felt that I have provided enough details..
> Sage version: 4.6.2
> OS: Centos 5 32 bits
> Error encountered: Re: [sage-support] An error occurred while installing
> cddlib-094f.p8
> That was the only error.. And it didn't build..
> I have succe
On 04/ 6/11 09:33 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
Hello,
Well I have tried to compile sage on OpenIndiana and it does not compile. In
particular, it stops as follows
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -DSQLITE_THREADSAFE=0
-DSQLITE_ENABLE_FTS3 -DSQLITE_ENABLE_RTREE -g -O2-o sqli
On 4 April 2011 20:09, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
>> Can you give me the output of
>>
>> $ command -v file
>
>
> What command?
drkirkby@hawk:~$ command -v file
/usr/bin/file
drkirkby@hawk:~$
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
I'm forwarding this to sage-support.
On 4 April 2011 14:27, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
Hell Apostolos
> I am trying to build sage on OpenSolaris and it fails.
What version of OpenSolaris? What build?
> I have installed in my system
> gcc-4.5.2 and I have used the compiler to co
On 03/31/11 05:44 AM, Roy Joshua wrote:
Hi,
I tried the suggestion to use the command
SAGE64=yes
export SAGE64
that was suggested as response to my last message by David Kirkby.
(My last message was that I could not install sage-4.6.2 to a machine
running Centos 5.5. This is a 64 bit machine
On 03/31/11 05:44 AM, Roy Joshua wrote:
Hi,
I tried the suggestion to use the command
SAGE64=yes
export SAGE64
that was suggested as response to my last message by David Kirkby.
(My last message was that I could not install sage-4.6.2 to a machine
running Centos 5.5. This is a 64 bit machine
On 03/30/11 02:33 AM, Roy Joshua wrote:
Hi,
I have a Dell 980 optiplex machine with i7 processor (8 core), 16GB RAM.
I tried to install sage on it with OS: Centos 5.5.
That's an impressive machine. Clearly not an old relic.
CLEANM -DATL_UCLEANN -DATL_UCLEANK -O -fomit-frame-pointer -fPIC -m
On 14 March 2011 19:05, Daniel M. wrote:
> My Hard Disk don't need defragmentation(ive checked either windows and
> linux), and have a little less more than a year since i bough it
> cuold it be a bug?
Sage is known to start up quite slowly on some hardware/software.
I personally find it takes o
On 4 March 2011 11:30, Volker Braun wrote:
> MPI is more comparable to Mathematica's underlying MathLink C libraries. We
> also have an mpi4py optional spkg that maps the C to a Python API,
> essentially one-to-one. Its not pretty, but if you know MPI then you can
> immediately use it. There is a
On 3 March 2011 21:56, Calcpage wrote:
> Well, I'd like to expose my Computing Independent Study (aka CIStheta) class
> to MPI. I was wondering if it is easier to set up under SAGE.
> I have run live Linux CD solutions for clustering for years now such as
> ClusterKnoppix, BCCD and Quantian for op
On 03/ 3/11 01:46 AM, A. Jorge Garcia wrote:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8537
Thanx for this ticket info. It looks like this MPI pkg is now
installable as a special pkg? How do I do that? How do I use openMPI and
mpi4py in SAGE after the install?
TIA,
A. Jorge Garcia
Applied Math
On 03/ 2/11 11:34 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
I have the SAGE binary installed on 25 Ubuntu boxes in my classroom.
I wonder if there's anyway to use this as a cluster to run python code
in parallel? I recall some work to that end some time ago with dSAGE
and the @parallel decorator. However, dS
On 1 March 2011 17:57, sm123123 wrote:
> Sigh.
>
> When I issue a plot() command using the Matlab interface, I get a
> syntax error.
I think the MATLAB interface might be an optional component. Check the docs
Dave
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubsc
On 02/28/11 04:08 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Feb 28, 3:21 am, Andrzej Giniewicz wrote:
Hello,
today I noticed that I cannot access R docs trough notebook, while it
still works like usual from command line. This is what is inside
notebook when viewed as text:
sage: r.lm?
Traceback (most recent
On 02/28/11 05:00 AM, Thomas Rike wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask a question.
Yes it is.
I just downloaded the Sage-4.6.1-OSX-64bit-10.6 app to my 27" iMac and my
MacBookPro. On my iMac I cannot use parametric_plot3d. The Java applet does not
run. I get a black screen t
On 02/10/11 09:27 PM, akm wrote:
On Feb 9, 2:39 pm, Harald Schilly wrote:
e.g.
$ sage -notebook secure=True
ends up as
notebook(secure=True)
in the ipython interpreter.
Thanks for the quick response! I was looking for a way of adding the
adminpassword and hostname as options of the notebook
On 6 February 2011 07:50, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Sunday, February 6, 2011 7:19:29 AM UTC, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>> On 5 February 2011 08:17, Mate Kosor wrote:
>> > I don't know why the checks don't work for package python, but if I
>> > could
On 5 February 2011 08:17, Mate Kosor wrote:
> I don't know why the checks don't work for package python, but if I
> could make a suggestion maybe it would be better that the check ships
> that package because now the check is nonfunctional.
IMHO that would be a bad idea. It's better to be aware o
On 12/24/10 06:23 AM, vijay sharma wrote:
Hello
Could you help me to install the binaries of SAGE?
I downloaded the SAGE binary for Fedora.
But when I ran *./sage* command, I am getting the following error:
- cannot execute the binary.
Regards
Vijay
I'm not sure why you are running
*./sag
On 6 December 2010 19:43, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 6 December 2010 19:33, Mike Hansen wrote:
>>> Here's the same sort of thing in Mathematica.
>>>
>>> In[3]:= 12 == 2
>>>
>>> Out[3]= False
>>>
>>> In[4]:= 1 == 1
>
On 6 December 2010 19:33, Mike Hansen wrote:
>> Here's the same sort of thing in Mathematica.
>>
>> In[3]:= 12 == 2
>>
>> Out[3]= False
>>
>> In[4]:= 1 == 1
>>
>> Out[4]= True
>>
>> In[5]:= AcrSin[x] == 2 ArcTan[x/(1+Sqrt[1+x^2])]
>>
>> x
>> Out[5]= AcrSin[x] ==
On 6 December 2010 19:23, David Kirkby wrote:
> As you can see, when Mathematica does not know if the expression is
> true or false, it returns the expression, not "True" or "False".
>
> Dave
>
What I meant to say was that if Mathematica does not know if
On 13 November 2010 04:36, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Derrick wrote:
>> Any clue why bool(arcsin(x) == 2*arctan(x/(1+sqrt(1-x^2 returns
>> false where the expressions are mathematically equivalent.
>
> Because an expression being equal to zero is, in general, an
On 30 November 2010 09:12, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
> On 30 nov, 00:34, David Kirkby wrote:
>> On 29 November 2010 14:49, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>>
>> > It now fails when building sqlite:
>>
>> > /usr/local/gcc4/bin/gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\&
On 29 November 2010 14:49, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> It now fails when building sqlite:
>
> /usr/local/gcc4/bin/gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"sqlite\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=
how are you getting Sage to build with a gcc in /usr/local/gcc4/bin/ ?
If you are doing what seems a logical thing to do (set the CC
The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is responsible for
maintaining the official assignments of port numbers for specific uses
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
IThe default port for a Sage server (8000) is officia
On 18 November 2010 13:07, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> You were right, there is something wrong with the libgfortran file
> under SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/ .
> It was a symlink to "./../lib/libgfortran.so", strange.
>
> Sage is working with the libraries you posted above. Thanks !
I'll need to make sur
On 18 November 2010 09:01, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Can you send me the output of
>>
>> $ gcc -v
>> $ gfortran -v
>> $ command -v gcc
>> $ cmmand -v gfortran
>>
>> on your system.
>>
> Here it is:
> bash-3.00$ gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/local/packages/gcc3/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun
On 18 November 2010 00:59, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 17 November 2010 23:56, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> PS, when you first run Sage, you will need to have /opt/ccs/bin in
> your path, so Sage can find 'm4', which it needs whenever a build of
> Sage is moved.
>
> Dav
On 17 November 2010 23:56, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> Thanks for taking care of this !
>
> I was just trying to run tests on Solaris for the next Ecl and Maxima
> spgk's...
>
> I'll try downlaoding your lib tomorrow, I'm not at work right now and
> am too tired to ssh and etc...
No problem.
> Ju
On 17 November 2010 16:35, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I unpacked Sage 4.5.1 binaries on Solaris, but when I try to launch
> Sage, it complains about missing libgfortran:
>
> ImportError: ld.so.1: python: fatal: libgfortran.so.3: open failed: No
> such file or directory
>
> I searched a bit
On 17 November 2010 16:35, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I unpacked Sage 4.5.1 binaries on Solaris, but when I try to launch
> Sage, it complains about missing libgfortran:
>
> ImportError: ld.so.1: python: fatal: libgfortran.so.3: open failed: No
> such file or directory
>
> I searched a bit
On 11/15/10 07:29 PM, Mike Witt wrote:
On 11/15/2010 10:57:39 AM, Colombel Bruno wrote:
Hi,
As sage-4.6 doesn't work, i try to install sage-4.4.4 which was
working on Fedora13 :
Host system
uname -a:
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.6-48.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 22
15:36:08 UTC 2010 x86_64
On 11/ 2/09 08:11 PM, svanshaar wrote:
Thanks Jason! That works perfectly.
I don't know if any of this uses the GNU Scientific library, but there are
reports of bug in the Bessel functions on there.
"gsl_sf_bessel_lnKnu overflows for large nu"
which the developers have acknowledged and ha
On 11/10/10 04:14 PM, doug5y wrote:
Is it required to download and install Macaulay 2 for sage to use it?
Yes, it is optional. I created a ticket the other day
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10117
to say this should be documented, as its not clear from reading the
documentation th
On 11/ 9/10 06:52 PM, Geoff wrote:
Hello
Mathematica has a symbolic product so that means Sage should. I don't
think Sage does.
I found symbolic sum but not symbolic product in the reference files.
I need to be able to define a function of a variable x which involves
several symbolic products
Assume I have some data of the distance a car will travel (y) vs the
amount of fuel in a car (x). For small amounts of fuel, one would
expect the distance y to be linearly related to x. But if a lot of
fuel is added, the weight of the fuel would then become significant,
and the distance would not i
On 10/26/10 05:09 PM, todd rme wrote:
Currently the sage build farm only has openSUSE 11.1 builds available.
However, openSUSE 11.2 came out almost a year ago and openSUSE 11.3
came out several months ago. With fixes now being implemented for
Sage 4.6, (see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/t
On 10/23/10 12:51 AM, Michael Welsh wrote:
The root password doesn't work with sudo, you need to login as "su" (just type
that) first. However, sudo is much easier.
HTH,
Michael
In general there is no user called "su", so one can't log in as "su".
su is a command to 'switch user'. By defau
On 10/21/10 01:07 PM, Dumont Thierry wrote:
One of my colleague want Macaulay2.
Macaulay2 does not appear in the list of optional packages.
BUT: sage -i macaulay2 downloads the packages.
It says: need gdbm. Ok, we install it.
then: sage -i macaulay2 fails again: no correct autoconf available.
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
