Automatic reply: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-10 Thread Clarke, Garry
Hi, I am out of the office on Friday the 10th of July and will be back in the office on Monday. Regards, Garry If you print this email, please recycle it. Paper is renewable, recyclable and the natural support of ideas. NOTICE This email (including any attachments) is confidential, and ma

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-10 Thread Turner, Peter
31.16696167[4844] saWeb : /saweb 1918131.92556763[4844] saWeb : /saweb -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of dirk Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 4:10 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-08 Thread dirk
. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of dirk Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 9:45 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior Just to let you know I'm still trying to find a solution for this. Normaly i

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-08 Thread dirk
issue (by setting Pragma and not pragma). Dirk. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Turner, Peter Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 9:35 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior >>>

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-08 Thread Turner, Peter
site @ Fort HealthCare peter.tur...@forthc.com | Sr Sys Integration Architect | Fort HealthCare | O:920-568-5137 | C:414-861-7205 or 414-467-7543 | www.forthealthcare.com -----Original Message- From: dirk [mailto:d...@woodstone.nu] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 1:21 PM To: Turner, Peter Su

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-08 Thread Turner, Peter
ive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of dirk Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 8:25 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior The wslogcom issue is something we sometimes see and the only work-around is indeed to kill it. As for debugview, that's a separate

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-08 Thread dirk
e Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On > Behalf Of dirk > Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:05 AM > To: Servers Alive Discussion List > Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior > > Http : // beta . Woodstone . Nu that's the site > (beta-dot-woodstone-dot-nu) > >

Automatic reply: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-08 Thread Roderick Garcia
Thank you for your email. Unfortunately, I will be out of the office until Frday 071015. Please contact SSBC Shared Services Customer Service if you need addtional assistance at 866-293-2906 Best Regards, Rod Garcia Roderick Garcia | Senior Systems Support Engineer American Cancer

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-08 Thread Turner, Peter
..@forthc.com | Sr Sys Integration Architect | Fort HealthCare | O:920-568-5137 | C:414-861-7205 or 414-467-7543 | www.forthealthcare.com -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of dirk Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:05 AM To: Servers

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-06 Thread dirk
- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of dirk Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 12:50 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior Can you try it with the version from http://cp.mcafee.com/d/5fHCMUe41ASyMOUDtZ6XxKVIsztc

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-06 Thread Turner, Peter
live Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of dirk Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 12:50 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior Can you try it with the version from ht

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-06 Thread dirk
Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Turner, Peter Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 4:00 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior I have to change my claim that it "works" with FQDN. It does work - has worked - but then it stops. I can

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-06 Thread Turner, Peter
Turner, Peter Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:25 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior >>> do you see that request (that you do via saWeb) in the logfile? When it is successful ( when I use the FQDN instead of hostname ) the click "set maintenance

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-06 Thread Turner, Peter
tone.nu] On Behalf Of dirk Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2015 11:20 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior If you enable logging in Sa, do you see that request (that you do via saWeb) in the logfile? dirk CONFIDENTIALITY NOTI

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-05 Thread dirk
Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior Thanks for the response The device is down. Just clicking the set maintenance link SAWeb in IE doesn't set it to maintenance mode. It will continue to show as down in a generated ( with a template ) web page. If I use properties for the link and retriev

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-04 Thread Turner, Peter
ehalf Of dirk Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2015 10:30 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior How do you detect that the SET MAINTENANCE is not working? -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Turn

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-04 Thread dirk
How do you detect that the SET MAINTENANCE is not working? -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Turner, Peter Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2015 4:40 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] SAWeb behavior I am

[SA-list] SAWeb behavior

2015-07-04 Thread Turner, Peter
I am trying to get some remote client functionality going. (V 7.2.0.2638) I can run SAWeb but "set maintenance" doesn't operate. I don't think it is anything with SAWeb per se, because I can fire off a wget and switch an item to and from maintenance - just about has to be some 'save me from mys

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb improvements

2011-03-28 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
dirk From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of ian.g...@okieurope.com Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 10:46 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] SAWeb improvements Dirk asked for suggestions for improving SAWeb. I've

[SA-list] SAWeb improvements

2011-03-28 Thread ian . gray
Dirk asked for suggestions for improving SAWeb. I've been giving this some thought, and have come up with the following list. This is based on the premise that SAWeb is aimed at people who are not SA specialists, but who need to do basic work with it - in our case, that would be our Service Desk

RE: [SA-list] saweb (and rest of the built-in web server) and SSL

2011-03-18 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
Stone Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 3:16 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] saweb (and rest of the built-in web server) and SSL yes, many places won't let anything but https in or out. -Kevin On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Dirk Bulinckx mailto:d...@woodstone.nu)&g

RE: [SA-list] saweb (and rest of the built-in web server) and SSL

2011-03-18 Thread Laatz, Anthony
: [SA-list] saweb (and rest of the built-in web server) and SSL We would like to know if there is any interest in have HTTPS instead HTTP access for the built-in web server. dirk To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to salive@woodstone.nu If you use auto-responders

Re: [SA-list] saweb (and rest of the built-in web server) and SSL

2011-03-18 Thread Kevin Stone
yes, many places won't let anything but https in or out. -Kevin On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Dirk Bulinckx mailto:d...@woodstone.nu)> wrote: We would like to know if there is any interest in have HTTPS instead HTTP access for the built-in web server. dirk To unsubscribe send a message wi

RE: [SA-list] saweb (and rest of the built-in web server) and SSL

2011-03-18 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
yep -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Barry George Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 2:46 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] saweb (and rest of the built-in web server) and SSL As the internal webserver

RE: [SA-list] saweb (and rest of the built-in web server) and SSL

2011-03-18 Thread Barry George
As the internal webserver grows in functionality I think this would be a good addition. Is this inclusive of SAWeb? Barry -Original Message- From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:d...@woodstone.nu] Sent: March-18-11 9:31 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] saweb (and rest of

[SA-list] saweb (and rest of the built-in web server) and SSL

2011-03-18 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
We would like to know if there is any interest in have HTTPS instead HTTP access for the built-in web server. dirk To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to salive@woodstone.nu If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that they are n

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2011-03-14 Thread Barry George
Many moon’s ago and used Java as an engine. Long disused now... I’m showing my SA age Barry From: ian.g...@okieurope.com [mailto:ian.g...@okieurope.com] Sent: March-14-11 10:16 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb Is there more than one version of

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2011-03-14 Thread Barry George
Peal script actually... From: Barry George Sent: March-14-11 10:33 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb Many moon’s ago and used Java as an engine. Long disused now... I’m showing my SA age Barry From: ian.g...@okieurope.com [mailto:ian.g

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2011-03-14 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
No that wasn't possible with the original saWeb … From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Barry George Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 2:46 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb Correct me if I’m wrong but didn’t M

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2011-03-14 Thread ian . gray
: "Barry George" To: Servers Alive Discussion List Date: 14/03/2011 13:51 Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb Sent by: Servers Alive Discussion List Correct me if I’m wrong

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2011-03-14 Thread Barry George
understand there will be some big limitations... Barry From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:d...@woodstone.nu] Sent: March-14-11 8:35 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb I agree that it should have some more "features". If "the list" can give me some prop

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2011-03-14 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
1:01 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] SAWeb Hi Dirk, I know you want to keep the built-in webserver/SAWeb functionality as streamlined as possible, but would it be possible to have some limited template or formatting capability for that? Even simply to the level of changi

[SA-list] SAWeb

2011-03-14 Thread ian . gray
Hi Dirk, I know you want to keep the built-in webserver/SAWeb functionality as streamlined as possible, but would it be possible to have some limited template or formatting capability for that? Even simply to the level of changing the size/style of the font? (Having a Serif font for that page

RE: [SA-list] saweb built into product now????

2010-02-09 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
o:sal...@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Heath Abbate Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 6:40 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] saweb built into product now Yes or No? If yes….. If I already have saweb setup with my salive is there any advantage of moving to the “all in one” i

[SA-list] saweb built into product now????

2010-02-09 Thread Heath Abbate
Yes or No? If yes….. If I already have saweb setup with my salive is there any advantage of moving to the “all in one” if you will. Or is functionality exactly the same? Please advise. Thanks. --

[SA-list] Saweb

2008-04-14 Thread Jason Passow
I have been having some trouble with SAweb for some time now. I just finally am getting (read:making) the time to get it resolved. It asks for my username and password which I enter correctly and it says "Error. You could not be authenticated." I have checked with salive and it authenticates

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb ques.

2007-01-31 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
:26 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb ques. Eric, Just a quick note to let you know that I’m rebuilding SAWeb into a .Net app, so things will be changing in the near future (hopefully). I guess this is an official call for suggestions if you guys have

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb ques.

2007-01-31 Thread Mark Bradshaw
for clogging up the list. Mark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wuichner, Eric Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:11 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] SAWeb ques. I'm new to SA and

Re: [SA-list] SAWeb ques.

2007-01-31 Thread Jason Passow
It works fine on 2003.If you have a working perl installation it is a no brainer to get it working. If you do not have a working perl installation you need be sure to authorize the perl ISAPI extension. Jason Passow Mississippi Welders Supply [EMAIL PROTECTED] ph: (507) 494-5178 fax: (507

[SA-list] SAWeb ques.

2007-01-31 Thread Wuichner, Eric
I'm new to SA and just discovered the SAWeb addon. What's the best/easiest way to get it to work well. We mostly use 2003 servers with IIS but I see that this app only works with 2000. Any suggestions would be great. Thanks, Eric To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to s

[SA-list] SAWEb

2007-01-25 Thread Jason Passow
I am looking for a copy of SAweb 1.7.3. It doesn't seem to be downloading from the network simplicity site. If anyone has a copy they could throw on a server or if Mark Bradshaw (or whoever is in charge of network simplicity) would fix it and message me that would be great thanks. --

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2004-04-13 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
configure it via that. Dirk. Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Helfer Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 3:50 AM To:

[SA-list] SAWeb

2004-04-12 Thread Ben Helfer
I've installed SA 4.1 and SAWeb 1.73 on Windows 2000 server using IIS, all on the same system. I configured SA 4.1 with some entries, configured it to run as a service, turned on logging, closed the app and confirmed monitoring entries being written to the log file. I opened SA 4.1 again, config

RE: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6

2004-02-11 Thread Walker, Chuck
] SAWEB on IIS6 How much interest would there be in a .Net version? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 3:54 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6 Hi Dilek, I've install

RE: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6

2004-02-11 Thread roland . schmid
      cc:        (bcc: Roland Schmid/BBL/MS/PHILIPS)         Subject:        RE: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6         Classification:         The big advantages would be that it'd be easier for me to maintain, and less kludge work on the backend.  I'd HOPE that more folks would be willing to g

RE: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6

2004-02-11 Thread Mark Bradshaw
efore dark and mysterious.  Plus I use perl less and less.  And I geek out over .Net. :o) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 10:57 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6 Hi Ma

RE: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6

2004-02-11 Thread roland . schmid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11.02.2004 15:06 Please respond to salive                 To:        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:        (bcc: Roland Schmid/BBL/MS/PHILIPS)         Subject:        RE: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6         Classification:         How much interest would there be in a .Net v

RE: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6

2004-02-11 Thread Dilek Scott
esday, February 11, 2004 3:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6 Hi Dilek, I've installed it 2 day's ago and it run fine now. Have you installed ActivePerl and then checked, that the Perl

RE: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6

2004-02-11 Thread Mark Bradshaw
How much interest would there be in a .Net version? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 3:54 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6 Hi Dilek, I've installed it 2 day&

Re: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6

2004-02-11 Thread roland . schmid
  cc:        (bcc: Roland Schmid/BBL/MS/PHILIPS)         Subject:        [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6         Classification:         Has anyone installed saweb 1.7.3 on IIS6? SA version 4.1. Both on the same server. Any issues? Saweb does not launch. I have entries.pl for the document, telnet enabl

Re: [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6

2004-02-11 Thread roland . schmid
  cc:        (bcc: Roland Schmid/BBL/MS/PHILIPS)         Subject:        [SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6         Classification:         Has anyone installed saweb 1.7.3 on IIS6? SA version 4.1. Both on the same server. Any issues? Saweb does not launch. I have entries.pl for the document, telnet enabl

[SA-list] SAWEB on IIS6

2004-02-10 Thread Dilek Scott
Has anyone installed saweb 1.7.3 on IIS6? SA version 4.1. Both on the same server. Any issues? Saweb does not launch. I have entries.pl for the document, telnet enabled, iusr has access. I'm using a virtual directory and the path is correct. i get a "page cannot be found error" although entries.p

[SA-list] SAWeb 1.7.3

2003-11-11 Thread Mark Bradshaw
I've released a new version of SAWeb (1.7.3) that should deal with Servers Alive's new telnet server better.  Download it at http://www.networksimplicity.com/ and let me know how it works.   Mark

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2003-07-25 Thread Doug Sampson
Ah, I see. I also see that after changing into maintenance mode, I can do a Force Update and it'll update the web data. Simply refreshing right away after changing modes simply doesn't do the trick unless SAlive does it's check in between. Thanks for this great software, Mark! ~Doug > > > Just

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2003-07-25 Thread Mark Bradshaw
nal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Kevin Kruithof > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb > > > Put this: > > > > in the header portion of your webpage template and it&

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2003-07-25 Thread Kevin Kruithof
Put this: in the header portion of your webpage template and it'll refresh every 120 seconds. Kevin -Original Message- From: Richard Temple [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 2:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb If I remember rightly

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2003-07-25 Thread Richard Temple
23 July 2003 23:43 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [SA-list] SAWeb I've got SAWeb 1.7.2 running on a Servers Alive installation (4.0.1376) on a Win NT 4.0 SP6a Pro workstation using PWS 4.0. Am using ActivePerl 5.8.0 Build 806. All SAWeb functions seem to work except for an issu

[SA-list] SAWeb

2003-07-23 Thread Doug Sampson
I've got SAWeb 1.7.2 running on a Servers Alive installation (4.0.1376) on a Win NT 4.0 SP6a Pro workstation using PWS 4.0. Am using ActivePerl 5.8.0 Build 806. All SAWeb functions seem to work except for an issue as follows: When I check an entry to put into maintenance mode by clicking on the ch

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2003-07-22 Thread Doug Sampson
It is now. Thanks. > -Original Message- > From: Mark Bradshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb > > > I had router trouble over night. The site should be back up now. >

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2003-07-22 Thread Mark Bradshaw
I had router trouble over night. The site should be back up now. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Doug Sampson > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:58 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subjec

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb

2003-07-22 Thread Jason Passow
I can email you the file if you reply to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Sampson Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [SA-list] SAWeb The www.networksimplicity.co

[SA-list] SAWeb

2003-07-22 Thread Doug Sampson
The www.networksimplicity.com web site appears to be down. I need the file of saweb-1.7.2.zip in order to install SAWeb on a version 4.x SA installation. Does anyone know what happened to the site? Does anyone have this file handy? ~Doug To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PR

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7.2 authenticate logins?

2003-02-19 Thread Ryan White
Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7.2 authenticate logins? A user that needs to be able to logon to an IIS sites need to have to right to do a "local login". And a local admin has that right and thus it works fine with a local admin. C

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7.2 authenticate logins?

2003-02-19 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ryan White Sent: Wed Feb 19 11:00 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7.2 authenticate logins? I've installed SAWeb on my SA 4.0 machine [fully registered :)], and I'm noticing an odd behavior: When I configured directory se

[SA-list] SAWeb 1.7.2 authenticate logins?

2003-02-19 Thread Ryan White
I've installed SAWeb on my SA 4.0 machine [fully registered :)], and I'm noticing an odd behavior: When I configured directory security in IIS to ask for basic authentication, it worked just fine for me. However, then I had someone else test it that wasn't a local admin on that machine, and it wou

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-12 Thread Mark Bradshaw
OK.  1.7.2 is on the site.  Fixes the entry maintenance script. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark BradshawSent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:13 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7 Man goes to

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-12 Thread Mark Bradshaw
esday, February 12, 2003 10:03 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7 Unfortunatly, the problem has now shifted to hanging when you click on "Entries Maintenance" -Original Message-From: Mark Bradshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sen

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-12 Thread Mark Bradshaw
esday, February 12, 2003 9:48 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7 Ok.  I was able to reproduce it and hopefully have the bug fixed.  Please download 1.7.1 off the site (http://www.networksimplicity.com/saweb/).  The only script that's changed is common.pl, but you can

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-12 Thread Andy Toby
Unfortunatly, the problem has now shifted to hanging when you click on "Entries Maintenance" -Original Message-From: Mark Bradshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 12 February 2003 14:48To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7 Ok.  I was able to re

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-12 Thread Mark Bradshaw
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy TobySent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:29 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7 I am getting the same thing.  I start SA v4 all fine, as soon as SAWEB kicks in, CPU usage shoots up to 95%

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-12 Thread Andy Toby
I am getting the same thing.  I start SA v4 all fine, as soon as SAWEB kicks in, CPU usage shoots up to 95% and SA is dead. -Original Message-From: Woznicki, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 12 February 2003 11:26To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [SA-list]

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-12 Thread Woznicki, Doug
alive in gui mode full screen on a Windows XP SP1 Laptop   Doug Woznicki     -Original Message- From: Ryan White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:07 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7   Mark,   Might want to updat

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-11 Thread Ryan White
:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7   I've updated the SAWeb scripts and released v.17 to go along with Servers Alive v4.  There are significant changes in the way SA v4 handles the telnet service which makes this a break-away version.  You can't use old version

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-11 Thread Mark Bradshaw
TECTED]]On Behalf Of Woznicki, DougSent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:30 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7 Same here   Doug   -Original Message-From: Kevin Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:0

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-11 Thread Woznicki, Doug
Title: Message Same here   Doug   -Original Message- From: Kevin Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7   Every time I go to the entries page it locks SA up tight.  Task manager

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-11 Thread Mark Bradshaw
I think it's up to 1295 now.  Just got a new one.  That's the one you want. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of WheelsSent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:28 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7L

Re: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-11 Thread Wheels
] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7   Make sure you've overwritten the old version with the new scripts.  Check the top of the script for it's modified date, and make sure it's current.  If you still have issues write me off list. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-11 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Title: Message Oh.  I forgot.  One more thing.  You MUST have the latest beta.  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark BradshawSent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:51 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-11 Thread Mark Bradshaw
L PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin StoneSent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:09 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7 Every time I go to the entries page it locks SA up tight.  Task manager shows SA in a "Not Responding" state and using exactly 50% of the

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-11 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
Title: Message What version of SA are you using?   dirk. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin StoneSent: Tue Feb 11 5:09 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7 Every time I go to the entries page it

RE: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-11 Thread Kevin Stone
adshawSent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:31 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SA-list] SAWeb 1.7 I've updated the SAWeb scripts and released v.17 to go along with Servers Alive v4.  There are significant changes in the way SA v4 handles the telnet service which makes this a bre

[SA-list] SAWeb 1.7

2003-02-11 Thread Mark Bradshaw
I've updated the SAWeb scripts and released v.17 to go along with Servers Alive v4.  There are significant changes in the way SA v4 handles the telnet service which makes this a break-away version.  You can't use old versions of SAWeb with SAv4, and you can't use the new version of SAWeb wit