Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
>
>
> I know that everybody
cus
A man is known by the company he avoids.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for
A man is known by the company he avoids.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
The same
lf Of Dirk Bulinckx
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 1:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
>
>
> The purchase page says nothing about the free version. The
> free version is an evaluation version, and let'
OTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
The purchase page says nothing about the free version. The free version
is an evaluation version, and let's you evaluate all features (and thus
also the enterprise features).
dirk.
-Original Message---
Sent: Tue Oct 21 11:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
I hate to disagree with you about your own program, but per this page:
http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/purchase.asp
"With the Standard Edition you can check upto 1000 entries
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
The same way as the enterprise version
The free version
-1032
-Original Message-From: Brent G. Ozar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 2:36
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish
List - Multiple threads for servers alive
N, no no no. Mind your language. You
should never use the FF word in
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
KruithofSent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:00 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple
threads for servers alive
A better solution
would be to put all of the data in flat files and eliminate all the registry
entries all
Behalf Of Michael Shook
Sent: Tue Oct 21 10:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
How do you get a freeware version to write to a database?
Mike
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/21/03 03:36PM >>>
They do. I run an enterprise ve
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Tue Oct 21 11:42 AM>To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads
for servers alive>>>Dirk,>>I currently
have 505 out of 1000 checks running on servers alive, a >
---
A man is known by the company he avoids.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk
BulinckxSent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:00 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple
threads for servers alive
sure
just give us a
y the company he avoids.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Shook
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
How do you get a freeware version to wri
l his hard work).
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 4:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
&
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
How do you get a freeware version to write to a database?
Mike
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/21/03 03:36PM >>>
They do. I run an enterprise version(to c
CTED] On >Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Tue Oct 21 11:42 AM>To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads
for servers alive>>>Dirk,>>I currently
have 505 out of 1000 checks running on servers alive, a >check cycle
takes
9 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
Would it be helpful to split the SMTP send and the POP receive portions
of the SMTP2POP3 program up? You could then send the message on one
iteration, and receive it on the next. One nice side affect of t
gs that identifies the host that added
the entry, so I would say yes.
dirk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Shook
Sent: Tue Oct 21 8:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers a
>
> And having a different registry for each too? Let's call
> Bill (Gates) and ask to get several registries
>
>
>
>
>
> dirk.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
I am not sure about the specific checks this person is doing, but have a
5
different mail servers that I want to verify mail is flowing
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 2:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
>
>
> But you can however have multiple copies runn
t;>>>-Original
Message->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Tue Oct 21 11:42 AM>To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for
servers alive>>>Dirk,>>I currently
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 2:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
>
> Ofcourse you can run multiple copies on multiple machines IF you have
> licenses for it.
> We added a field to all db l
Michael Shook
Sent: Tue Oct 21 8:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
But you can however have multiple copies running on multiple machines
right? Will the databases correctly merge data from multiple sources?
Michael Shook
Business
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Greg A Weigold
Sent: Tue Oct 21 7:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
I can understand the difficulties in multi-threaded approach, but what
about being able to run multiple
rpose.
"Dirk Bulinckx"
@woodstone.nu>
Sent by: salive-owner
10/21/2003 13:30
Please respond to salive
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for serv
gt;>-Original
Message->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Tue Oct 21 11:42 AM>To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for
servers alive>>>Dirk,>>I currently have
TED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
Comment as author: I know
dirk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Greg D. Moore
Sent: Tue Oct 21 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Comment as author: I know
dirk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Greg D. Moore
Sent: Tue Oct 21 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
At 11:45 AM 10/21/2003 +0200, you
ould be helpful' comment. :-)
dirk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue Oct 21 11:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
Dirk,
I currently have 505 out of 10
PROTECTED]
Subject: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive
Dirk,
I currently have 505 out of 1000 checks running on servers alive, a
check cycle takes approx 10-15 mins to run with a 5 min delay between
checks.
As such it can be upto 30-35 mins before we see a service as being dow
Dirk,
I currently have 505 out of 1000 checks running on servers alive, a check
cycle takes approx 10-15 mins to run with a 5 min delay between checks.
As such it can be upto 30-35 mins before we see a service as being down.
I have managed to shorten the check cycle by making some of the less
cr
32 matches
Mail list logo
