]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 17:13:27 -
From : B. Smith
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Well I'm late to the party but I have to say that I really, really, really
enjoyed the new movie. It was definitely a good time at the movies
Martin,
when u going? i need 2 see it again, so i will tag along with u.
Fate.
--- On Tue, 5/12/09, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@lycos.com wrote:
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@lycos.com
Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date
for that thrill.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 19:31:00 -0400
From : Justin Mohareb justinmohareb@ gmail.com
To : scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
I'm sorry, you'll have to find out
Ah. Too busy staring at Seven's Two Little Friends...
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : Re: [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 01:01:20 -0400
From : wlro...@aol.com
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Maybe they were too busy
Marian, I've heard that the notion you posit has been discussed at the highest
levels. No word on whether it happens in reality or not.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 23:22:46 -
From
Forgive the implication, Exalted List Goddess -- ne'er shall this one stray.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : RE: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 16:16:46 -0700
From : Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
Nonononononono... I called first.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 17:01:11 -
From : ravenadal ravena...@yahoo.com
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Okay, Martin, I was with you all the way
Martin,
I'll take it if you don't want it, especially wrapped in those C-notes. You
can, of course keep Gabrielle, my flow don't go THAT way.:)
Meta
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... wrote:
Not even if you were to buy me the Special Edition DVD when it came
Meta,
Just let me know who you want to bring it to your door, and I'll have Gabrielle
hand it off.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 18:57:48 -
From : Meta hett...@yahoo.com
know even called it channeling DeForrest Kelley.
Spoil one thing for me, though. Does Urban-as-McCoy say The Line?
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 17:13:27 -
From : B. Smith daikaij
Okay. Getting real Trek geek here...
SPOILERS!
SPOILERS!
SPOILSRS!
Where are the Temporal Authorities? In a Deep Space 9 episode, we got to see
guys from the future who monitor time. I figure they must be able to remain
unaltered outside the timeline. Shouldn't some alarm (or however
That, sir, is a DAMN good point. But then, I return to Abrams' own words.
If you're a Star Trek fan, you won't like this movie.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 08:36:17 -
From : sincere1906
Well, I caught two of the ads that you mentioned and I did shake my head. I
liked it better when we didn't have ads embedded within our movies but those
are the times that we live in.
** spoilers ***
It disturbed me that it two genocides to reboot this franchise, but I accepted
the
Great commentary! Pleasure to have you back in our universe, Black
Galactus(you should have sent your (black) herald to prepare us for your long
awaited uncloaking)!
~rave!
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, sincere1906 sincere1...@... wrote:
Okay it's 4am, I saw the new Trek movie about 8
.
If you're a Star Trek fan, you won't like this movie.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 08:36:17 -
From : sincere1906 sincere1...@gmail.com
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Okay. Getting
Baxter truthseeker...@lycos.com wrote:
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@lycos.com
Subject: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:55 AM
That, sir, is a DAMN good point
...@lycos.com
wrote:
That, sir, is a DAMN good point. But then, I return to Abrams' own
words.
If you're a Star Trek fan, you won't like this movie.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 08:36:17 -
From
] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 08:36:17 -
From : sincere1906 sincere1...@gmail.com
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Okay. Getting real Trek geek here...
SPOILERS!
SPOILERS!
SPOILSRS!
Where are the Temporal Authorities? In a Deep Space 9 episode, we
got
10, 2009 8:46 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Yeah, but a lot of people have decided that, sight unseen, they're not going
to like this film.
I, personally, don't have the time or energy to debate or cajole or even
-Original Message-
From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of ravenadal
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:00 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Tracey! I was just thinking to myself: where IS our Exalted
GW,
The Galactica Syndrome... I like that! :)
I should state, I really *like* what was done with the new Galactica. That was
a true rebooting that borrowed elements of the original and came up with
something fresh and new. And I might argue that BSG's changes were appreciated
by people like
Daryle,
Those are some great points! True indeed, how many times has the timeline been
altered already with flagrant offenders like Kirk (old Kirk)? And, one more
time, what about those Temporal Authorities that exist in the far future that
attempt to assure the timeline remains generally
ROTFL. Man just the image of Picard in that scene has me laughing. But recall
that Picard's Ahab-like obstinance had to be tempered by Alfree Woodard... You
broke your little ships. See the movie, please, if only so I can find a
like-minded person who likes Trek's vision and principles to gripe
:
That, sir, is a DAMN good point. But then, I return to Abrams' own
words.
If you're a Star Trek fan, you won't like this movie.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 08:36:17 -
From
AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Yeah, but a lot of people have decided that, sight unseen, they're not going
to like this film.
I, personally, don't have the time or energy to debate or cajole or even
to Abrams' own
words.
If you're a Star Trek fan, you won't like this movie.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 08:36:17 -
From : sincere1906 sincere1906
For me it indeed 'felt' like Trek. I guess its a case of YMMV.
Meta
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, sincere1906 sincere1...@... wrote:
GW,
You've hit the proverbial nail on the head. It was a good movie, I enjoyed
much of it, but it didn't *feel* like Trek. And when some people hear
: Sunday, May 10, 2009 8:46 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Yeah, but a lot of people have decided that, sight unseen, they're not going
to like this film.
I, personally, don't have the time or energy to debate
, and the lives of
three other people. It also tried to save me from making a disastrous bet on
the Iggles in SB XV. I trust it.)
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 20:40:41 -
From
sin, I had a hit off the whisper-stream a few months back, that a crossover
with the original Trek timeline was a possible go.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 20:32:20 -
From : sincere1906
Tracey, you should change your post-name to that.
Truth in advertising, after all... ;-D
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : RE: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 11:45:00 -0700
From : Tracey de Morsella tdli
Of sincere1906
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 1:41 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
ROTFL. Man just the image of Picard in that scene has me laughing. But
recall that Picard's Ahab-like obstinance had to be tempered by Alfree
Woodard... You broke your
return to Abrams' own
words.
If you're a Star Trek fan, you won't like this movie.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 08:36:17 -
From : sincere1906
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 8:46 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Yeah, but a lot of people have decided that, sight unseen, they're not
going
to like this film.
I, personally, don't have the time or energy
:46 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
I have seen the movie and I loved it. My feelings about this
non-issue is the same as yours. I just will not be drawn into a
convoluted argument about Trek loyalties.
Meta
--- In scifinoir2
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
I was a near instance Picard fan, mainly because he was the total opposite
of Kirk. If Kirk had been killed at anytime during TOS, I'd
have leaped for joy.:) I really didn't like him until the movies appeared.
Watching the movie
]--
Subject : [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 21:03:28 -
From : sincere1906 sincere1...@gmail.com
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
But this is scifinoir...where we can get into convulted arguments about
everything from individuality and consciousness in the Borg
With all of the discussion of alternative timestreams here
Are people thinking that future movies might try to mingle the two alternative
Star Trek histories? I certainly hope not. (Mr. Shatner might yet talk
himself into the new Trek!)
If this is the new history, I hope they go forward
Wasn't Tom Baker briefly married to Lalla Ward (one of the Romanas)?
Yeah...1980 to 1982 according to Wiki.
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdli...@... wrote:
Don't forget that she ended up dating Tennant who played her dad. That
kinda made it worse for me
Some elegant chess playing there. You are thinking 10 moves ahead!
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Daryle Lockhart dar...@... wrote:
Yeah see, once Spock spilled the trans-warp equation, I knew he
was going to be a problem. He proved to BE said problem by having a
conversation
Damn. You just made some red matter suck my brain into a black hole... those
are alot of conundrums unleashed by this timeline/alternate reality change. I
hadn't thought of any of those, and now there must be hundreds of others. Alot
of Trek geeks are out of a job, and we've entered an ultimate
Maybe they were too busy watching to see if Janeway and Seven was going to
break it again.
--Lavender
--
From: sincere1906 sincere1...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:36 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek
42 matches
Mail list logo
