My first suggestion is to get off of Win95/98/ME.
Second - do what the webpage for handle suggest
http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/handle.shtml
Read about object managers in Inside Windows 2000, and/or use winobj.
As you don't say where you picked up 'handle', I can only assume this
is
// I am looking for Masters degree programs in "Information
// Security", "Information Assurance" or "Information Warfare".
//
// I live in the Washington, DC area. Now I'm aware of three local
// institutions that have some form of this type of program,
// George Mason,
// James Madison and
// My company has a VERY distributed user base with many people
// working from small satellite sites and/or from home. I would
// love suggestions for a PC level firewall that would protect
why only a pc level firewall?
// from intrusions and also whether hardware v. software solutions
//
> |___ 1025 network blackjack
possible trojan
could be an RPC request that is hitting on 1025
are you running BIND? do you have 1 - 1024 locked down?
> |___ 1031 BBN IAD
might be inetinfo.exe. are you running IIS?
> |___ 1048 Sun's NEO Object Request Broker
self explanatory. this is the port
> That stance is indefensible. The reasons against this stance are
> thus:
Oh Please. All stances are defensible. They may not be rational or possible
to implement from our point of view; they can certainly be defended.
>
> 1. Strong encryption is already available to the gener
PowerQuest does not sell single licenses for this product.
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 11:54, Scott A Runnels wrote:
> Look into DataGone, it's not free, but it is the NSA/DoD standard for
> removal of information. Once datagone hits it, there is no getting it
> back.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 09:41:18AM -0500, Michael Bulebush wrote:
> Anyway... here is my new question. Has anyone out there every
deployed the McAfee WebShield E250/E500? If so, did you notice any
gotchas with the boxes that I should be aware of in implementing ours.
I've been having problems
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 13:02, Wheeler, Bill wrote:
> NAI has dropped the PGP line of products. According to a rep
> from NAI, they are hoping that another company picks up the product and
> integrates it into their app or OS. Apparently NAI was not making a lot of
> $$ on the product and people
http://www.ideafarm.com/
I believe this is like the MOO environment. I could be wrong.
No comment about how I found this.
mark
Michael Seele wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> can anybody explain to me, what IDEAFARM-CHAT is?
>
> Thanks,
>
> M. Seele
>
>
>
jeremy wrote:
> If you do that.. you will no longer be able to access
> windowsupdate.microsoft.com to download updates.
Actually you could allow scripting on sites in the trusted domains
(sites I believe they are called within I.E.), while disabling it for
'normal' sites. You could also put
>>start X with the "-nolisten tcp" , if you're starting x manually with startx
>>the format would be "startx -- -nolisten tcp", if you have the system start X
>>automagically edit /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers and change:
Tried this on Mandrake 7.1, and it completely blocks all TCP. Could not
browse,
generally 6050
http://support.ca.com/techbases/asnt/NASNT427.html
/* -Original Message-
/* From: Calhoun, Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
/* Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:01 AM
/* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/* Subject: ArcServIT 6.5 Enterprise
/*
/*
/* Does anyone know what port
old news.
>From ISS's website:
---
You can download a product update to solve this problem at
http://www.iss.net/support/consumer/BI_downloads.php
If you are unable to download the product update for some reason, the
following workaround will protect systems r
Does any one have any idea what this is (see below)? This particular
example is only a minute. I have noticed that others have been in excess
of an hour. At the time of this connection I was running ethereal to see
if I could see any packets that should not be there. I could not find
any that look
> This is a gray area in American Law. It's legal as soon as you have
> informed all of your employees of what you're doing. Also,
Not true, see below.
> make certain
> that you have them sign something to the affect that they are aware of
> it. I had a case similar to that where the company
> just my opinion:
>
> a) there are lots more apaches than IIS
More Sioux than Apaches also. (j/k)
Apache has been around longer and resides on systems that
are geek friendly. considering the number of installations,
the time it has been around, and that Apache is on systems
that geeks love; doe
I have been running it for over a year on a 2 year old laptop,
running win2k, with all sorts of tweaked up software; all without
any problems.
> I would like to note that here @ work, out of about 50 end
> users, we are
> noticing that about 5% of the time tiny personal firewall is
> causing blue
win2k ports:
TCP/53 DNS zone xfer
TCP/135 RPC/DCE Endpoint mapper
UDP/137 NetBIOS name service
TCP/139 NetBIOS session service (SMB)
TCP/445 SMB over TCP (direct to host)
UDP/161 SNMP
TCP/UDP 389 LDAP
TCP/1433 MSSQL
UDP/1434 MSSQL instance mapper
TCP/3268 AD Gloabel catalog
TCP/3269 Global catalog
http://www.foundstone.com/rdlabs/tools.php?category=Scanner
fscan and superscan should work under XP. Have not tried them, but
I see no reason for them not to function.
> I`m looking for a good port scanner that will run under Windows XP. My
> wishlist for it that it scans TCP, UDP and stealth
> Besides this, Does it really matter what web server you
> choose?
Yes it does.
> I have worked with many and would answer this with,
> the system is as secure as the administrator of that system
> is knowledgeable. I know administrators who can secure an
> IIS server and others who can secure
> I have 2 friends who own ISPs (in partnership with
> others), and we have been discussing the possibilities
> of their using my services as an independent security
> consultant.
This sounds bad already.
>
> What I need help with is information on how to compose
> valid legal documents which al
> Let us keep in mind that the NSA has computer systems
> that are at
> least a decade advanced beyond what we have in the commercial/civilian
How do you figure this? guess?
> sector. This may seem unremarkable at first blush, but
> consider that in
> 1991, we were all running on machines
> > > I got about thirty employees outside the office that access our
> > > exchange server through IMAP to get their email. Relaying was left
> > > open so that it is possible for them to send out through our email
> > > server regardless of how they are connected through the internet.
bad idea
> several threads from University Computing staff at other Universities and
> was wondering what their policies regarding running portscans on student
> computers were. Thanks in advance.
You might want to check your University policies. I would guess it is
spelled
out that this is o.k. Most Uni
> Where can I find information on the current HIPAA Security Standards?
http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/Index.htm --- U.S. Health and Human Svcs. Two
pages off this page that discuss security and privacy rules (proposed and
otherwise). There is also a link to implementation guides, that are more
b
Can anyone recommend a good product that will monitor users traffic and
activity on the servers? I have too many users logging onto the servers and
I need a tool that will allow me to monitor more closely.
Thank you.
_
Get your FR
Hello All,
Sorry if this is not the right place to post.
I am trying to implement an IDS and not sure on which brand to
implement, currently we use Checkpoint Firewall-1 for our firewall. I
have heard that real secure IDS is good for integrating with Checkpoint.
My question is doe
> Start at the vendor's site http://www.microsoft.com/security.
just remember where the info is coming from. MS is not open about
security issues.
> >I'm a unix / Mac guy. I agreed to set up a test installation of W2K
> >Advanced Server because the M$ rep has always been nice.
I would advise r
> NT does not have a built in time sync. They added that utility in the NT
> 4.0 Resource Kit. Windows 2000 (NT 5.0) does have it built in.
Been using this for years.
---
rem set time on machine
rem
@echo off
net time /set /yes
rem share out folders
rem
Recently I recommended the PGP E-pliance with regards to this thread. This
morning my channel partner informed me that PGP is being folded into Mcafee
(due to not being able to sell the division I presume). I was told that the
entire PGP staff was given 'final checks' and sent home. With that in m
>
> I'm just a student, so this is probably a dumb question.
> In a lecture, it was mentioned that ipx was the "older way"
> oppose to ... maybe vpn... i don't remember, but I was wondering
> what ipx is and the benifits of using it over newer options? I
> remember people on this list talking abo
31 matches
Mail list logo
