[sipx-users] Dialing Extensions Internally

I am running SipXecs on Centos 5 with Aastra 57i phones. I am having difficulty when trying to call one extension to another. I dial the extension from the phone and it gives me a call failed. And it does the same if I try from the other phone. However if I dial extension 100 it will se

[sipx-users] Effects of Hard Drive Performance

Has anybody done any testing on the effect of hard disk speed? I'm thinking of using a 64GB compact flash instead of a hard drive for my next 4.0.1 install but was wondering if it would be quick enough to keep. -M ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-us

Re: [sipx-users] VMWare

On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 14:20 -0400, Dan Mongrain wrote: > Regarding number (2), instead of having different ports to demultiplex > incoming traffic, couldn't sipXecs utilize a "virtual name space" > mechanism (I do not know if there is a correct term for this, but it is > similar to Apache's virt

Re: [sipx-users] Fwd: Patton smartnode 463x : is 25ms echocancel tai

Hi Pawel, > > echo tail for far is around 100 to 500ms no EC chip can correct for > that. > That is why EVERYBODY needs to cancel near-end echo. > 100 to 500 ms, even for national calls on the same telco ? Wow if that's the case I should stop worrying about EC tail length indeed, nothing c

Re: [sipx-users] VMWare

Regarding number (2), instead of having different ports to demultiplex incoming traffic, couldn't sipXecs utilize a "virtual name space" mechanism (I do not know if there is a correct term for this, but it is similar to Apache's virtual web service which looks at the network name of the URL to

Re: [sipx-users] Fwd: Patton smartnode 463x : is 25ms echocancel tai

Hi Scott Thank you very much. Indeed on a recording of conversations, with a standalone gateway or a card in an asterisk server, I can see a huge amplitude imbalance between rx/tx on most installation here in Belgium. In this one the amplitude difference is even greater. Iirc in the past

Re: [sipx-users] Error in HA sipxecs-setup

On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 04:44 +0200, Carlos Robotti wrote: > I am trying to configure a secondary server. > > When i run the sipxecs-setup (version 4.1.0-016340) , i receive a > first error connecting to the master server (The sipxecs-setup is not > passing the password to the master) > Please -

Re: [sipx-users] Error in sipxecs-setup HA initial configuration

1) The DNS resolves OK to the master server. 2) The first issue is related with sipxecs-setup is not passing the password you enter in the dialog to the http request. The failure shows Failure fetching configuration from: https://sipx1.mydomain.com:8443/si

Re: [sipx-users] VMWare

On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 08:18 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 23:16 -0400, John Buswell wrote: > > You can achieve (1) by using separate chroot environments (one per > > instance). I set this up about a year ago for a client, had no > > problems with it. > > When using chroot,

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 601 with sipXecs 4.0.1

I was able to mitigate this problem by disabling Music on Hold and re-sending the profile to the phones... stayed with 3.1.3c firmware. Thanks, Mike From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Picher, Michael Se

Re: [sipx-users] Fwd: Patton smartnode 463x : is 25ms echocancel tai

This may be obvious, but I've solved the far-end echo problems at my company by decreasing the transmit volume on my Polycom phones. Polycom does not recommend this, but it did work. In etc/sipxpbx/polycom/polycom_sip.cfg, change voice.gain.tx.analog.handset to 0 (from 6). The transmit volume

Re: [sipx-users] Fwd: Patton smartnode 463x : is 25ms echocancel tai

>> > > Try Sangoma Cards (128ms carrier grade EC). Cheaper then Digium if > You buy from us ;) Well we had pretty good prices on Digium but still the A500 models with EC chip are a bit more expensive for the same port density. I'm however still open to discussion about this of-list :) We stil

Re: [sipx-users] Error in HA sipxecs-setup

Bug has been raised for this issue. Please go through the issue number XX-6446 .* *Thanks, Shobha* * Picher, Michael wrote: Try to putty to that server during the install and verify that DNS can properly resolve the name of the primary server...

Re: [sipx-users] How to pure receive FAX form SipXecs in Median1000 (noFSX port)

Not at this time. There is a feature request in that you can vote for: http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-4989 -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Winson (Elabram) Sent: Wednesday, September 09,

[sipx-users] How to pure receive FAX form SipXecs in Median1000 (no FSX port)

I just want to purely receive FAX is it SipXecs possible can Do it? --Winson ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/s

Re: [sipx-users] Fwd: Patton smartnode 463x : is 25ms echocancel tai

On 2009-09-09, at 11:41, Gaëtan Minet wrote: > Hi > > Thank you very much for your feedback. > Do you mean the EC is not active at all (even the low 25ms) for the > far-end side when we use the gateway in TE mode to connect a local > sip system to the pstn using BRAs ? > Damned, I must have m

Re: [sipx-users] Fwd: Patton smartnode 463x : is 25ms echocancel tai

Hi Thank you very much for your feedback. Do you mean the EC is not active at all (even the low 25ms) for the far-end side when we use the gateway in TE mode to connect a local sip system to the pstn using BRAs ? Damned, I must have missed this in the datasheet :( So you're not using the gate

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 450

I really don't think 4.2 will be an October release. Judging by the amount of items left there I'd look to end of the year... I'd of course be pleasantly surprised if it were sooner. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Todd

[sipx-users] Polycom 450

I see there is a patch for the Polycom 450 that is now in 4.2 release. There isn't much of a description with it. Has anyone tried these phones with 4.0.1 and know what the issues are with that release? Or if they can be configured to work with 4.0.1. Has anyone seen a rough guess for a tim

[sipx-users] Polycom 601 with sipXecs 4.0.1

Is anybody else successfully using Polycom 601's with sipXecs 4.0.1? I have a problem with call transfer that is as described in http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-554 . Basically, caller is getting disconnected on transfer (blind or supervised). Have tried both Polycom Firmware 3.1.1 a

Re: [sipx-users] Error in HA sipxecs-setup

Try to putty to that server during the install and verify that DNS can properly resolve the name of the primary server... From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Robotti Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:44 PM To: Sip