Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.0.4 default yum repos

You need to go into the sipx repo on the system and edit the url for centos from 5.2 to 5 and save it, then yum update it again. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Burden, Mike wrote: > Are the yum repos that are installed by the sipXecs 4.0.4 install ISO > correct? > > I'm getting 404'd by eve

[sipx-users] sipXecs 4.0.4 default yum repos

Are the yum repos that are installed by the sipXecs 4.0.4 install ISO correct? I'm getting 404'd by everything when I try to yum install wireshark or even just yum update I had wireshark installed on the virtual sipXecs server, and I don't remember doing anything different there, but the virt

[sipx-users] SipX with OpenSIPS?

Has anyone done a project utilizing SipX in conjunction with OpenSIPS? Are there any gotchas? The goal is to provide a central means of accounting/CDR for billing purposes for my entire customer base. -- Robert ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@

[sipx-users] Recommendations for wholesale VoIP origination/termination?

I know there is a list of pre-configured SIP providers in sipXecs, but I am curious if anyone has any recommendations on them through a wholesale relationship (or any other providers)? I've looked at Flowroute.com and VTwhite, both have very competitive pricing. I'm really just looking for fee

Re: [sipx-users] Migrating Virtual to Physical -- what did I miss?

Make sure to do your DNS tests... -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden, Mike Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:56 PM To: Burden, Mike; Tony Graziano; scott.lawre...@nortel.com Cc: sipx-users@lis

Re: [sipx-users] Migrating Virtual to Physical -- what did I miss?

Iptables was running. I disabled Iptables, but the phones are still not registering. I'm loading tshark now. Mike Burden Lynk Systems, Inc e-mail: m...@lynk.com Phone: 616-532-4985 -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list

Re: [sipx-users] Request for the next release

Right. I was planning to search first to make sure it's not a duplicate request, but I won't have time to do that today (for obvious reasons!) Mike Burden Lynk Systems, Inc e-mail: m...@lynk.com Phone: 616-532-4985 -Original Message- From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@n

Re: [sipx-users] Request for the next release

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:49 -0500, Burden, Mike wrote: > I'm not saying that you should leave extra disks on the system that > might confuse things later > I'm just saying that the install might want to say, "Hey, you've got > extra disks here... did you do that on purpose?" before wiping them.

Re: [sipx-users] Request for the next release

On the upside, our disaster recovery plans worked. (Although we did have a moment of panic because some of our Outlook Clients were in Online Cached mode, which caused some email received by our secondary mail store during the time our Exchange server was down to appear to be missing...)

Re: [sipx-users] Migrating Virtual to Physical -- what did I miss?

I did load from the 4.0.4 ISO. Thanks for the "heads up" I'll check that. Mike Burden Lynk Systems, Inc e-mail: m...@lynk.com Phone: 616-532-4985 -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:13 PM To: Burde

Re: [sipx-users] Migrating Virtual to Physical -- what did I miss?

I ran into something weird installing 4.0.4 from ISO... Iptables loaded. Did you check to make sure iptables is not running on your server? Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and

Re: [sipx-users] Migrating Virtual to Physical -- what did I miss?

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:54 -0500, Burden, Mike wrote: > Is this enough information for someone to point out what dumb mistake > I made, or do I need to install Wireshark again? You need to install Wireshark, always. One thing to check is if the REGISTER requests are showing up in the log of the

Re: [sipx-users] Request for the next release

LOL woopsie!! This belongs on http://www.thedailywtf.com Josh Patten Assistant Network Administrator Brazos County IT Dept. (979) 361-4676 Burden, Mike wrote: I'm not saying that you should leave extra disks on the system that might confuse things later I'm just saying that the instal

Re: [sipx-users] Request for the next release

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:49 -0500, Burden, Mike wrote: > Like when the network admin turns a system over to you to use as a > test platform and forgets to disconnect the fiber channel to the > SAN. I take it that the Fiber Channel interface makes the SAN appear as a local disk? That's "intere

Re: [sipx-users] Migrating Virtual to Physical -- what did I miss?

Yes, same hostname, network domain, and SIP domain. Mike Burden Lynk Systems, Inc e-mail: m...@lynk.com Phone: 616-532-4985 -Original Message- From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:05 PM To: Burden, Mike Cc: Sipx-users list Sub

Re: [sipx-users] Migrating Virtual to Physical -- what did I miss?

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:54 -0500, Burden, Mike wrote: > After some of the suggestions made on this list, we decided to move > sipXecs to a physical server, at least temporarily to see of any of > the “quirks” were VM related. > > > > I backed up the configuration of our virtual sipXecs server,

Re: [sipx-users] Migrating Virtual to Physical -- what did I miss?

Some other things that might be useful to know: -I can ping the phones from the sipXecs server -The ARP entry for my phone is correct on the sipXecs server -The phones and the sipXecs server are on the same subnet - no router or firewall between them From: sipx-users-bou

[sipx-users] Migrating Virtual to Physical -- what did I miss?

After some of the suggestions made on this list, we decided to move sipXecs to a physical server, at least temporarily to see of any of the "quirks" were VM related. I backed up the configuration of our virtual sipXecs server, installed sipXecs on a physical server (with a slight detour when th

Re: [sipx-users] Request for the next release

I'm not saying that you should leave extra disks on the system that might confuse things later I'm just saying that the install might want to say, "Hey, you've got extra disks here... did you do that on purpose?" before wiping them. Like when the network admin turns a system over to you to u

Re: [sipx-users] Request for the next release

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 13:31 -0500, Scott Lawrence wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:20 -0500, Burden, Mike wrote: > > In the installer, if more than one disk is detected, force > > manual-format instead of just formatting all the disks that it > > finds. > > > > > > > > Please don’t ask me wh

Re: [sipx-users] Dialing plan with polycom phones

You could create all those gateways but they'd all be in the same dial plan entry. So, a local call goes out from a user in location A, gateway A1 is restricted to location A, call goes out that gateway and gets those callerid settings set &/or those number transforms. Mike -Original Message

Re: [sipx-users] Request for the next release

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:20 -0500, Burden, Mike wrote: > In the installer, if more than one disk is detected, force > manual-format instead of just formatting all the disks that it > finds. > > > > Please don’t ask me why I’m requesting this (it has *NOT* been a good > morning!) Sorry Mike..

Re: [sipx-users] How to set trunk setting: qualify=yes

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > That's because the ITSp assumes you are using asterisk, perhaps they are > too? > That was my assumption as well. I forgot to mention this in my initial post. > > http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+sip+qualify > >

Re: [sipx-users] How to set trunk setting: qualify=yes

That's because the ITSp assumes you are using asterisk, perhaps they are too? http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+sip+qualify I think this means "send keepalive". It would help if you explained who your ITSP and what settings you a

[sipx-users] How to set trunk setting: qualify=yes

Hello, I opened a support issue with my ITSP for an issue I was experiencing. They responded with the following: You may put this line in your trunk setting : qualify=yes I checked the gateway settings for the ITSP in sipXecs and did not find anything that appears to be related. Is it possible to

Re: [sipx-users] PC Console for sipXecs

Here is their response to me about the product. Here is a link to our trial version: http://www.voiceoperatorpanel.com/trial/VoiceOperatorPanel-setup.exe To help getting started with the application, check the videos here: http://www.voiceoperatorpanel.com/videos.shtml The price

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX withoutgiving public addresses to the phones

Tony Graziano Wrote: The server, with a public IP address and no firewall, is a bad BAD idea. I wouldn't do that, no matter who I was. The sipXecs server will not be behind NAT, but it WILL be behind a firewall (see below.) Todd Hodgen Wrote: If the Server is on a Public Addre

[sipx-users] Request for the next release

In the installer, if more than one disk is detected, force manual-format instead of just formatting all the disks that it finds. Please don't ask me why I'm requesting this (it has *NOT* been a good morning!) Mike Burden Lynk Systems, Inc e-mail: m...@lynk.com Phone: 616-532-

Re: [sipx-users] Dialing plan with polycom phones

I was able to get the Polycom based dial plan doing what I needed at our corporate with a few modifications to their default plan: 9[2-9]11|90T|100|101|9011xxx.T|91[2-9]x||9[2-9]xx|*xx|[1-8]xxx9[2-9]11|90T|100|101|9011xxx.T|91[2-9]x||9[2-9]xx|*xx|[1-8]xxx My company is very

Re: [sipx-users] pickup group

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 19:40 +0800, Sen Heng wrote: > But If Ext 100 call to 101, 101 was not on his desk, I am on 102, can I > pickup and answer call from 100 ? Yes -- in the default configuration, dialing "*78 101" on phone 102 will pick up the call that is ringing on 101. Dale ___

Re: [sipx-users] Cisco router as PSTN Gateway

Staffan- Thanks for this document. It has been a great help. Do you by any chance have anything related to diagnosing the sip config, such as show commands to tell if SIPX is pushing calls to the router and vice-versa or debug info for dial-peers? Thanks Dylan Ebner, Network Engineer Consul

Re: [sipx-users] Dialing plan with polycom phones

Had I RTFM a little more... It might have helped me. I think I'm good to go. http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Digit_Maps_used_to_Define_the_Dial_Plan#Polycom_Phone_Default_Dial_Plan mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote: > I guess what I mean is I need to make the '9' and '1' do what they are >

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 Time

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:14 +, Scott Richesson wrote: > The problem: With this new firmware, I lose 5 seconds per day on the > phone clock. I checked with Polycom, and they said they never heard > of this problem. The SNTP server is loaded in there just fine. (I > can verify this in the phon

Re: [sipx-users] Dialing plan with polycom phones

I guess what I mean is I need to make the '9' and '1' do what they are designed to do in our current key system dial plan. If someone dials 4 digits, it is known to be an internal extension and begins ringing with no timeout, no pause, or anything. If someone dials 9 +7 digits or 9,1, + 10 digi

Re: [sipx-users] Dialing plan with polycom phones

Or pickup the handset to send the call. Or enable a timeout function on the phone (stop dialing and it sends the call after xx seconds). Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Con

Re: [sipx-users] Dialing plan with polycom phones

So, if I had 110 locations and only one real gateway, I would create 110 gateways with the same settings but bound to separate dialing plans? Are the server dialing plans enough to prevent the user from having to hit 'Send' on the phone? Picher, Michael wrote: > I'd put them into location groups

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 Time

Two things. 1. 3.2.1 has other known bugs, so very few people use it. Losing 5 seconds per day is difficult to notice until 20 or more days pass for a normal user. So asking this on the dev list, where one would find more people testing it might be helpful, since as you have found its not a good i

[sipx-users] sipxacd returning "Invalid ACD Line Offered"

Hi, I'm trying to get SipX into a state where we can load test it a little and I've run afoul of this error. Despite having agents signed in and queue's setup I get the following: "2009-12-08T15:03:36.405869Z":71:SIPXTAPI:INFO:sip0.domain.tld:Call-40:4 41A8940:sipxacd:"sipxFireCallEvent pSrc=0x1

[sipx-users] Polycom 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 Time

I've been experimenting with the latest Polycom firmware. (The main reason, is because it shows the callee name on the display when an extension is dialed---something that our old phone system did, and our users have been clamoring for ever since.) The problem: With this new firmware, I lose 5

Re: [sipx-users] Fw: voicemail status does not update in the user portal?!?!

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 06:37 -0800, arda savran wrote: > > > Good day, > > We have a cluster of 4 SIPX servers (CentOS 4.0.2) in our > network and the role assignments is as follows: > > SIPX1: sip trunking, call center, managemen

Re: [sipx-users] Optional UI

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 06:57 -0800, Jordan Turner wrote: > Just thought I'd share this nice UI for a IP PBX system - > http://www.askozia.com/images/screenshots/pb13.png - I'm sticking with > sipXecs but this is nice from an Asterisk spin off. It would be helpful to hear what it is that you think m

Re: [sipx-users] Dialing plan with polycom phones

I'd put them into location groups and then use location based gateways to pre-pend any necessary area codes. Easily done. Mike -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com Sent: Tues

Re: [sipx-users] Dialing plan with polycom phones

I have to change the handsets. At corporate (phase 1) we have Nortel digital handsets. I don;t mind presenting 10 digit dialing as an option, but it won't go over to well if I'm also telling them that 7 digit isn't. that simply wouldn't;t fly with non technical management in my company. they wri

[sipx-users] Optional UI

Just thought I'd share this nice UI for a IP PBX system - http://www.askozia.com/images/screenshots/pb13.png - I'm sticking with sipXecs but this is nice from an Asterisk spin off. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List

[sipx-users] Fw: voicemail status does not update in the user portal?!?!

Good day,   We have a cluster of 4 SIPX servers (CentOS 4.0.2) in our network and the role assignments is as follows:   SIPX1: sip trunking, call center, management, primary sip router SIPX2: sip trunking, redundant sip router SIPX3: conferencing SIPX4: voicemail   They are all connected to the

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBXwithoutgiving public addresses to the phones

Generally, you need to enable the remote NAT traversal feature when at least one of these conditions is true: 1- Your sipXecs has a private IP address and is deployed behind a NAT; AND/OR 2- At least one phone is deployed behind a remote NAT (e.g. home user, remote branch office, ...) The remote

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX withoutgiving public addresses to the phones

No. If it is on a public IP in a DMZ, something else HAS the public IP (firewall), not the DMZ itself. A DMZ denotes that is has a private address space and it independent space from your trusted LAN and the PUBLIC internet. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Burden, Mike wrote: > Getting from a ho

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX withoutgiving public addresses to the phones

Getting from a host on a public IP to a host on a private IP does not necessarily require NAT, just a static route. The sipXecs server could be at a public IP on a DMZ, and the phones could be on a subnet with private addresses attached to that DMZ via a router. NAT may or may not be enabled at th

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones

Its not NAT if your DMZ "IS" a zone, meaning your route between them without NAT. As long as the ZONES (phones and sipx) are trusted and allow all traffic to pass. I'll be clear here, if the ZONES are routed and trusted, and all traffic passes, NAT is not involved. This is a private routed netwo

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX withoutgiving public addresses to the phones

The phones could be on a subnet that has private IP addresses that are routable from the DMZ where the sipXecs server is (without NAT), but not routable from the Internet. +--+ | Internet | +--+ | Firewall | +-DMZ-+ | sipXecs | Public IP +-+ | Router (NAT may

Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX without giving public addresses to the phones

Sorry, I wasn't talking about running the sipXecs server without putting it behind a firewall - I was just talking about putting the sipXecs server on a DMZ without NAT. The firewall will still limit inbound connections so that they are only allowed from our ITSP. Mike Burden Lynk Systems

Re: [sipx-users] How to unregister a client from SIPX immediately

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 13:54 +0800, Wen Jun wrote: > Hi, how to make my client unregister from SIPX immediately ? > > I am trying to use SIP Register from my client to SIPX with contact * and > expire 0 but seems it not work yet. It should work - what response are you getting from the server? Not

Re: [sipx-users] Interim Hotelling Feature (XX-4987)

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 11:50 +, Abdul Mayat wrote: > > Just to confirm then, are we saying the current capability of SipXivr > doesnt allow us to build a vxml script to build this? I wasnt sure > what Tony meant by a dependence on the new VM in 4.2 or any other > dependency on 4.2, unless it i

Re: [sipx-users] block some internal extensions from making calls

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 08:57 +0200, muhammad akl wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Scott Lawrence > wrote: > On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:19 +0200, muhammad akl wrote: > > > > otherwise , when a call received by sipxecs from asterisk > server all > >

Re: [sipx-users] pickup group

We don't have pickup groups in sipXecs... only directed call pickup (grab the ringing extension #). -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Sen Heng Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 6:40 AM To: 'Nikol

Re: [sipx-users] Interim Hotelling Feature (XX-4987)

Hi All, Thanks for the responses so far Todd - your suggestion of going into the portal is what led to this idea, I just wanted a way of achieving the same thing via the TUI. It just seemed a shame that the functionality was already there but needed exploiting. Scott - will copy

Re: [sipx-users] pickup group

Thanks Nikolay. But If Ext 100 call to 101, 101 was not on his desk, I am on 102, can I pickup and answer call from 100 ? Cisco has pickup group can do this, I just wonder can Sipx do this as well. Thanks, Sen -Original Message- From: Nikolay Kondratyev [mailto:k...@nstel.ru] Sent: 2

Re: [sipx-users] Dialing plan with polycom phones

Good luck. IF you had sipx at each branch you could do this (as you have a branch pbx or key system at each branch now). When you centralize the pbx functuon it obviously changes. I would recommend not changing the handsets at all. Telling your users to dial 10 digits, and implmenting location ba

Re: [sipx-users] PC Console for sipXecs

Todd, I didn't find pricing info on their site. Can you shed some light on how much does it cost? Thanks in advance, Nikolay. _ From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Todd Hodgen Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 8:5

Re: [sipx-users] pickup group

Try pickup, directed to a hunt group extension number. It should work as group pickup. Nikolay. > -Original Message- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users- > boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Sen Heng > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:17 PM > To: sip

[sipx-users] pickup group

Hi, I wonder, can I setup pickup group using Sipx ? Thanks, Sen ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users