On 7/27/10 2:40 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
including enhanced cisco phone
support.
I have a couple of minor Jira's on this. (on the old system?)
one is a patch to allow a more normal length on cisco display.
one is a bug (once you change the default proxy from 'domain.com' you
can't add it
For those of you who reported DOS type attacks from sipvicious scans on
your public SIP ports, looks like the author has taken pity on you and
has a tool that could block repeated attacks, thus freeing up your
bandwidth for calls. it looks like python is already installed on sipx,
so, all
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 49593
Message-ID: c1b9.4c500...@forum.sipfoundry.org
Hello All,
I am attempting to setup a standalone voicemail server which
will integrate into
Hi,
I have removed the subnet 10.0.0.0. from the list..
In system - internet calling - intranet subnets is just the subnet
192.168.1.0/24
that didn't resolved the problem..
i have one more concern..
Do I have to tell the provider to return the sip packets to sbc on port 5080
or can I translate
Why is your dial string sending a mailto: in its dial command?
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Abdul Mayat abdul_ma...@hotmail.comwrote:
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 49593
The provider should send you the packets on port 5080 if possible.
5080 is for receiving calls from ITSP's, while when sending calls to the
ITSP you send them on 5060.
Please see:
http://blog.myitdepartment.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Call-Setup-Example-sipXecs-through-ITSP1.pdf
On Wed,
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: aanlktimmicyjgv4hjn=evhqaprstakijruxlgxt+k...@mail.gmail.com
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 49597
Message-ID: c1bd.4c501...@forum.sipfoundry.org
Tony, ignore the
On 7/28/10 7:58 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
The provider should send you the packets on port 5080 if possible.
5080 is for receiving calls from ITSP's, while when sending calls to
the ITSP you send them on 5060.
Please see:
It seems to me that your server cannot locally resolve DNS. I had this
issue before where /etc/resolv.conf didn't have the correct entries in
it. Check /etc/resolv.conf to see what's there, then do a DIG test from
that server (view the testing section of
Maybe not exactly. Once a call is established it communicates with the proxy
on 5060.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: 4c502998.3060...@co.brazos.tx.us
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 49603
Message-ID: c1c3.4c503...@forum.sipfoundry.org
Hi Josh,
Thanks for the reply...
I have looked
Hi all,
the old
http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/LatestStable/CentOS/5/$basearch/RPM;
repository seems to be no more working.
Please, what is the correct link to put in
CentOS /etc/yum.repos.d/sipxecs.repo as
baseurl?
Thanks,
Claudio
--
Claudio Succa
PERTEL - Torino - Italy
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Claudio Succa claudio.su...@pertel.it wrote:
the old
http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/LatestStable/CentOS/5/$basearch/RPM;
repository seems to be no more working.
Yes, I will restore the URL momentarily, but I need to send a warning
out first, look
I'm going to restore a URL that would update your sipXecs installation
to the community build when you perform your next yum update. This
assumes you have a yum repository setup for updates. This includes
systems installed from the CD. If you no don't wish for this to
happen, please delete or
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Positively Optimistic
[positivelyoptimis...@gmail.com]
Can anyone advise of the correct URI string when using Cisco 5XX phones and
sipXecs.. Our
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael Scheidell
[scheid...@secnap.net]
I have two packet traces.
one for each different ITSP.
inbound call from ITSP1, to a local extention with
On 7/28/10 11:09 AM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
Can you set logging to INFO (or even better, DEBUG) and take a snapshot with
logs covering a call to ITSP 2? If you could make that snapshot accessible to
me, I could look at it and perhaps discover what is going on.
thanks, maybe
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Talbot, Peter
[peter.tal...@nrtnortheast.com]
Is there any better documentation on the sipviewer? I’m just trying to get a
better handle on what the
Not if the providers SBC is performing NAT (NAT helper).
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427
Helpdesk
are you saying that in this one instance I should tell the provider to
nat me?
On 7/28/10 11:15 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Not if the providers SBC is performing NAT (NAT helper).
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
--
Michael
On 7/28/10 10:52 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
I'm going to restore a URL that would update your sipXecs installation
to the community build when you perform your next yum update. This
is this different than the one thats been bugging us since yesterday?
is there a readme file listing the old
Thank you for the response Dale. We get a 501 Not implemented when
following those instructions with that specific line of phones..
Currently running 4.2.1...
We've posted on sipx-dev as well.. there is an issue out there, XX-7011,
that relates to this.. I was unable to identify the it was
Is this wiki still closed? I couldn't access it.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:02, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) dwor...@avaya.com wrote:
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Positively Optimistic
Thanks for your replies too Matt and Dale,
I have put the sipstatus log into debug mode and re-sent a
voicemail to the account - debug attached (I have tried to
filter out event before and after test, in addition I have
removed some site specific info and substituted with generic
terms e.g.
Please can anyone supply me the 'default' initial password and username.
I'm stuck at the login screen. I have tried to type in the username and
password I set earlier but that's just for centos.
Help is welcome
___
sipx-users mailing list
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tran, Ly V.
[lt...@rrtgi.com]
This is in regards to this thread I had started before -
I have successfully burned sipx (telephony software) /centos 5.4
livecd bundle (an iso file) onto usb pendrive using fedora live cd
creator. My server is hp dl140. When I restart the server, the boot
process works and I am prompted to press enter to continue with
installation. This implies that
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Michael Scheidell
scheid...@secnap.net wrote:
On 7/28/10 10:52 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
I'm going to restore a URL that would update your sipXecs installation
to the community build when you perform your next yum update. This
done, folks can now update if
If you installed from ISO it is displayed on the terminal for you.
It is displayed so you never have to ask it.
root/setup
Why are you asking instead of looking at your screen? Are you installing
without access to a terminal?
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone:
I have tried that but no joy
Also typed in the username and password I set before but no joy
Thanks,
Vic
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:29 AM
To: Vic Hindocha; dhub...@ezuce.com;
so username root password setup doesn't work?
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 7/28/2010 11:31 AM, Vic Hindocha wrote:
I've not even got that stage, it goes straight to this screen
Thanks,
Vic
-Original Message-
From: Josh
Then you need to pay more attention to what you did.
The username is not set here. The root password is set. That's all.
What are you trying to do? Access shell? If so it is usrrname root and
whatever you set your password during the install script. If you are not
aware of the password you set,
OK, I think the best suggestion at this point is to start over since you
haven't configured any users.
Take note of whether or not the installation ever asks you for a
password of any kind. If it does not and you still can't login with
username root password setup then you probably either have
Thanks, I'm starting installation now
Thanks,
Vic
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Josh Patten
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:43 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re:
The script never asks you to set your own username. I don't understand how
you got yourself here.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone:
Hi
Since yesterday I am being bombarded with all the postings in the sipx forum
Can you please remove my name from the forum for now ?
Thanks
_
Game on: Challenge friends to
We recently installed Sipx 4.2 (currently on build 4.2.1-018932
2010-06-22T03:27:31 build34). The phones that are in use are all LG-Nortel
LIP-68xx models, currently running 1.2.38sp firmware.
Music on hold is not working.
Thanks,
Danny Shay
Norlem Technology Consulting
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Danny Shay ds...@norlemtc.com wrote:
We recently installed Sipx 4.2 (currently on build 4.2.1-018932
2010-06-22T03:27:31 build34). The phones that are in use are all LG-Nortel
LIP-68xx models, currently running 1.2.38sp firmware.
Music on hold is not working.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Anand Boni sab...@hotmail.com wrote:
Since yesterday I am being bombarded with all the postings in the sipx forum
Can you please remove my name from the forum for now ?
It's possible your settings to receive digest or no email were lost.
Can you log into your
Seems if you make lots of user change, the GUI will hang.
top show 100% 'java'.
how do I reboot the GUI without rebooting a live system?
if I reboot httpd /etc/init.d/httpd, when I got to the gui, I get
'Apache HTTP Server Test Page powered by CentOS'
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone:
Actually it's 2008 R2 that has NAPTR records. Plain 2008 does not have them as
far as I know.
Geoff Van Brunt
Information Technology Manager
DST Consulting Engineers
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael Scheidell
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Michael Scheidell scheid...@secnap.net wrote:
Seems if you make lots of user change, the GUI will hang.
top show 100% 'java'.
this is not the first time this has been reported, but no one has been
able to find a simple way to reproduce it. if you do, please
Douglas,
This is a new install, no regression. This didn't work for us out of the box.
Danny
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Hubler [mailto:dhub...@ezuce.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 12:17 PM
To: Danny Shay
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Music on
just make changes to several users.
MAYBE, when moving back and forth between screens, hit the esc key to
top it.
then hit another screen.
its MOSTLY while doing lots of updates. in fact, I think I can crash it
almost at will if I change dial plans a lot.
On 7/28/10 1:29 PM, Douglas
The majority of phones at this site are flashing red/yellow BLF lights. ALL
the lights that are set up as speed dial / BLF are flashing.
Speed dials were set up per user. Name and number are identical (extension
number for both), subscribe to presence is checked. Using firmware 1.2.38sp on
Also, I see several threads where users have much newer phone firmware for
these LG Nortel units than I am using. I have read a changelog from 1.2.47
that I found in the SipFoundry site and several small issues we have
experienced have been fixed with the newer firmware. I have scoured every
Also, I see several threads where users have much newer phone firmware for
these LG Nortel units than I am using. I have read a changelog from 1.2.47
that I found in the SipFoundry site and several small issues we have
experienced have been fixed with the newer firmware. I have scoured every
On 7/28/10 1:29 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
This should work for all services, run this to see all process names
and their current state
sipxproc
yes, I just knocked our CFO off of the phones, not sure who else, but
CFO made a big deal about it.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone:
We cannot upload the sipX certificate via the web ui, and there's not
much we can find in logs that tells us why. (If you have log hints, let
me know.)
We created a new CA on sipX. We generated the CSR via the sipX web ui,
created and signed the certificate, then went back into the web ui to
has anyone tried this yet?
We just cut over to sipx (4.2.0) and are not going to make any changes
till we figure out what we broke already, but once done, I think $40 for
4 concurrent G.729 paths couldn't hurt. (if it works, and doesn't get
overridden by sip restore).
I suppose we should
This is really weird:
It's now stuck at r...@localhost?
Thanks,
Vic
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Joe
Micciche
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:38 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users
You are responding to emails on other subject and leaving out almost every
possible relevant detail...
-Original Message-
From: Vic Hindocha hindo...@selex-si-us.com
Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:16:45
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject:
Is this the correct format:
Sip:t...@test.local?
Thanks,
Vic
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
On 07/28/2010 04:05 PM, Vic Hindocha wrote:
Sorry to bother you again, but now I’m stuck at this…. I don’t understand why
it’s not loading straight to the web? Can anyone help me please?
What sayeth ps -aux | grep sipx? Have you started sipXecs?
cli doesn't load straight to web - you need to
You need to access the IP of the server in a web browser on a
different machine running a GUI.
Wow 'your product is CRAP' is not the most pleasant way to ask for
help.
On 7/28/2010 3:05 PM, Vic Hindocha wrote:
Sorry to bother you again, but now I’m stuck at this…. I don’t
Finally got it working.
Thanks,
Vic
From: Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) [mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 3:11 PM
To: Vic Hindocha; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] r...@localhost command line
You need to access the IP of
There were two earlier issues like this:
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7349
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7249
What version are you running? Looking at the sipxconfig.log would likely
reveal the issue.
--martin
-Original Message-
From:
Has anyone done this?
Thanks,
Vic
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Yes. See:
http://tinyurl.com/3xlpp26
On 7/28/2010 3:24 PM, Vic Hindocha wrote:
Has anyone done this?
Thanks,
Vic
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
On 07/28/2010 04:16 PM, Martin Steinmann wrote:
There were two earlier issues like this:
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7349
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7249
What version are you running? Looking at the sipxconfig.log would likely
reveal the issue.
Thanks Martin. We're
--- On Wed, 7/28/10, Joe Micciche jmicc...@redhat.com wrote
I'm seeing this in our sipxconfig.log:
2010-07-28T13:27:26.962000Z:1151:JAVA:ERR:xxx.xxx.xxx:pool-249-thread-1::XmlRpcClientInterceptor:XML/RPC
error:
org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcException: File
I tried logging in to change it back to the digest option ... not sure
where that option is, though. I, too, would much rather have everything
in the digest rather than a million individual emails.
Jake Ballamis
Technical Support Manager
p. 801-566-TECH (8324)
f. 801-208-9317
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Jake Ballamis
jballa...@alliancetechsolutions.com wrote:
I tried logging in to change it back to the digest option ... not sure
where that option is, though. I, too, would much rather have everything
in the digest rather than a million individual emails.
Jake
See, I'm just blind. I stared at that page for a good 10 minutes and didn't
see that password field.
Jake Ballamis
Technical Support Manager
p. 801-566-TECH (8324)
f. 801-208-9317
jballa...@alliancetechsolutions.com
This e-mail is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Jake Ballamis
jballa...@alliancetechsolutions.com wrote:
See, I'm just blind. I stared at that page for a good 10 minutes and didn't
see that password field.
It's not the most user friendly UI, but I have seen worse. And I
could have just gone in and fixed
Hello all -
I'm new to sipx and have been trying to figure this one out all day and my
google foo is failing me.
I have a polycom ip450 phone (extension 4330) that can place and receive calls
from the PSTN just fine; but CFNA doesn't send callers to voicemail like it
should.
If I manually
66 matches
Mail list logo
