On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com wrote:
XX-9672 effects initial system configuration. This really is useful mostly
if installing from ISO. Do you think it would be appropriate to build a new
ISO?
you have a good point here. Folks won't yum update until
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com wrote:
XX-9672 effects initial system configuration. This really is useful mostly
if installing from ISO. Do you think it would be appropriate to build
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Yuri Kurkarewicz sipx...@kapten.com.br wrote:
When I make calls with the softphone BRIA 3.1 to another extension and
so no attendant, CDR says that the connection is completed (when the
connection was interrupted intentionally by Bria softphone 3.1),
I think gor actually wants to relay to media thru sipxecs to control it.
gor, what end user feature are you looking to achieve?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
If your ua is properly configured and your ua is local to sipx it will setup
the
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking to put together voice recognition system using mod_unimrcp.so
and mod_pocketsphinx.so modules on sipx server. Is there any issues doing
that as it is used by sipx server? When developing voice recognition
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
Are there any plans to test or supply a working repo for centos 6.0?
If anyone has any points to bump up this as a priority, please post.
___
sipx-users mailing list
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Philippe Laurent p...@ideos.com wrote:
6 has some hardware requirements that may not be met by some 5
installations.
Would the CentOS 6 efforts negatively impact resource allocation towards the
improvement of the sipX base product?
a bit, but many developers
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Todd Hodgen thod...@frontier.com wrote:
But to integrate, test and release falls
well within the goals of the project, and I believe how it should be done.
... standard FOSS response, I'm not sure if this addresses your point
* Goal of project: I would say yes
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Norman Branitsky
nor...@cherniaksoftware.com wrote:
There are lots of brand new messages in his mailbox - XX-9461 talks about
messages with bad date stamps.
I emptied out his INBOX at one point to no avail.
that may not address the improper xml. Look at the
1.) I lose random emails from dave deutchmen. They do not wind up in spam.
2.) after sending an email, i randomly lose my copy of the email in my
sent folder.
anyone else have these issues or am i going nuts?
___
sipx-users mailing list
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Philippe Laurent p...@ideos.com wrote:
I've not observed any issues...
thanks everyone. I actually meant to send this internally ;) but your
input was helpful.
___
sipx-users mailing list
is list working?
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
resending...
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
Update #8 : Wed, 22 June 2011
==
- ** No security updates in this update **
- ISO has *not* been rebuilt as decided in release policy. Yum update
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:29 AM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net wrote:
Tony, you're heavy into development. Have you heard of any RTMP (like red5)
apps that would work with sipx in terms of being able to have a browser based
phone? I know of a few apps but none that look very usable to
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Nihar nihar.ra...@planet1world.com wrote:
When I tried to make an outgoing call from SipXezPhone
found that call failed with CAUSE_NO_RESPONSE event and call
is disconnected with remote phone.I can see that there is
nothing wrong with remote x-lite phone.It's
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Norman Branitsky
nor...@cherniaksoftware.com wrote:
I don't see much difference.
Suggestions, please.
Did you upgrade from 4.0.4? It's possible you hit this
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9461
there is a workaround posted
Tony,
I'm not sure if this is the same, but...
There was a customer that had an issue where 50 percent of about 100
polycoms would randomly lockup. They were not on calls at the time,
just out of the blue lock-ups. I never tracked down the ultimate
problem, but did come up with a workaround.
Update #8 : Wed, 22 June 2011
==
- ** No security updates in this update **
- ISO has *not* been rebuilt as decided in release policy. Yum update
after installation is recommended for getting these updates
- Thank you George for your
resending
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
Update #8 : Wed, 22 June 2011
==
- ** No security updates in this update **
- ISO has *not* been rebuilt as decided in release policy. Yum update
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
srtp was just added yesterday. you might consider waiting g for someone to
do test and create the wiki pages.
it was confirmed that media relay doesn't properly proxy srtp. That
means SRTP won't work with NAT
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:19 AM, George Niculae geo...@ezuce.com wrote:
There is a fix committed by Joegen and Douglas triggered RPMs build,
we'd really appreciate if you could update and give it a try later
today when available
I will post link to build when available
Summary of issue
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:19 AM, George Niculae geo...@ezuce.com wrote:
There is a fix committed by Joegen and Douglas triggered RPMs build,
we'd really appreciate if you could update and give it a try later
today when
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Alex Brown alex...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Is it possible to increase the amount of time users have to enter their
authorization codes and numbers they wish to dial? The current time
limit is a little too short for several of our users.
i don't think so. i
Update #7 : Tue, 21 June 2011
==
- ** No security updates in this update **
- ISO has *not* been rebuilt as decided in release policy. Yum update
after installation is recommended for getting these updates
- Thank you Baris, Kemal, Joegen
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Paul Curtis pcur...@uws.edu wrote:
This is a known issue with Polycom, I worked with them to resolve the
missing PRACK. This also had to do with the on-hold issue I had posted a
while back. That was when Polycom noticed the missing PRACK. They do
have a
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:07 AM, George Niculae geo...@ezuce.com wrote:
Tony, could you take snapshot and raise a critical in JIRA?
Yes, please. Even if it's related to a polycom bug Paul Curtis points
out, if it doesn't happen in sipxecs 4.2.1, then we should at a
minimum learn what the issue
Update #6 : Fri, 17 June 2011
==
- ** No security updates in this update **
- ISO has *not* been rebuilt as decided in release policy. Yum update
after installation is recommended for getting these updates
- Thank you Joegen and George
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
Thanks for the fixes!
Thanks for testing, i should have given you credit. It really helps out a lot.
still all phones are rebooting when applying a patch...
I just increased the rank for this and left a comment
2011/6/17 Kumaran thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com:
I tried OpenACD in Fresh ISO 4.4.0 but it didn't work for me...I
don't know whats wrong in my configuration.For me calls are not going to
queue only.Hope I had done some mistake in setting.Again when I have
time I will retest it and
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Tjardick van der Kraan
tjard...@vanderkraan.net wrote:
First of all compliments to the developers on the project as it seems to
have come a long way with loads of great new features, so keep up the good
work guys.
Welcome back and thanks for kind words.
But
I think you want the sipxtapi project. There is no email list active,
but if you go to http://sipez.com/contact.html maybe you can find an
email address to ask your questions.
2011/6/15 Rajan, Nihar nihar.ra...@planet1world.com:
h t m l h e a d m e t a h t t p - e q u i v = C o n t e n t
2011/6/14 Sven Evensen sven.even...@onrelay.com:
How can I use SIP viewer (i.e. sip-trace …) to look at old files, either the
likes of sipxBridge.log.1 etc, or even
sipxbridge.log.2.gz etc…
review the shell script and if it doesn't support it, consider
submitting a patch that will allow a
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com wrote:
I have Linksys SPA-3102 which successfully registered with sipx 4.2.1.
After the upgrade, it is failing to register.
Are there settings changes?
I don't recall many changes, but you can download the source and see.
I
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Adrien Guillon aj.guil...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyways, I just wanted to voice that I'm here and ready for ipv6. I
have noticed that in many projects (I'm looking at you ClearOS) there
is this mentality that nobody is using ipv6, so we won't do it until
one day
Update #5 : Mon, 13 June 2011
==
- ** No security updates in this update **
- ISO has *not* been rebuilt as decided in release policy. Yum update
after installation is recommended for getting these updates
- Thank you Mircea and George
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Levend Sayar levendsa...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course there is another solution, you can change the url in the
script with the ip number of master instead of master fqdn. Because
you already have this info.
i like it. maybe you can come up with a simple patch for
2011/6/9 Kemal Eroğlu k.erogl...@gmail.com:
Here is the patch. The setup script constructs the Configuration URL with
masterSystemName. Now it is changed with masterSystemAddr. We had tried it
manually before and it was working.
Kemal
One more request, can you create a jira describing the
These will push out to release shortly. If anyone would like to
validate these changes before they go live, please do so shortly or
let me know you would like some time.
CentOS 5
URL:
baseurl=http://ec2-50-17-110-224.compute-1.amazonaws.com:40100/CentOS_$releasever/$basearch
Fedora 14
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
These will push out to release shortly. If anyone would like to
validate these changes before they go live, please do so shortly or
let me know you would like some time.
CentOS 5
URL:
baseurl=http://ec2-50-17-110
i had to take web site down, but let me know if you were planning to test it.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
These will push out to release shortly. If anyone would like
Picher and Mircea Carasel for your fixes
and everyone
for your bug reports!
Build Log
commit e0ec89136a02a53d4876db35bfaae2d4c9e5e718
Author: Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com
Date: Fri Jun 3 13:06:05 2011 -0400
Revert XX-9639: missing TLS SRV
This reverts commit
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com wrote:
eZuce would like to welcome Josh Patten to the eZuce team as a Solutions
Architect. As of the 13th of this month he'll be working with our partners
and customers to plan, implement and maintain openUC / sipxecs systems
I just purchased my tickets so I should be attending. I would encourage
anyone with an inclination to tinker with FreeSWITCH to go, you do learn
some good stuff. If anyone is going, let me know, maybe we can try to get
together, I met a few of you last year.
http://www.cluecon.com/
Update #3 : Thu, 2 June 2011
==
- ** No security updates in this update **
- ISO has *not* been rebuilt as decided in release policy. Yum update
after installation is recommended for getting these updates
- Thank you Hoa Nguyen and George
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.netwrote:
I have a recent 4.4.0 upgrade that at boot consumes just under 2GB of
ram at bootup. I rebooted the system at 5pm, and with very few actual
call flows, consumes the rest of the memory overnight (8GB). The only
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
I've disabled it for now in lieu of another method which should yield
more results tomorrow on whether or not it can be backed up without
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Mircea Carasel mirc...@ezuce.com wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Mircea Carasel mirc...@ezuce.com
wrote:
With regard to XX-8779 the thing is that sipXconfig certificate
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
what I have seen is that the busier the environnment the more frequent the
stops occur. That made me think it was related to the RLS patch. I tried
taking the RLS patch and related components separately from
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Irena Dolovčak
irena.dolov...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Tony,
you were right, myBuddy offeres only PCMU.
we opened a jira..
Is there perhaps a way to hack the codec and force myBuddy to use the PCMA
codec?
did anybody tried something like this?
grep/modify
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Henry Dogger h.dog...@telecats.nl wrote:
I installed patch as you proposed, but sipXecs crashed overnight
I put new snapshots on the FTP from before installing patch - reboot -
and then ran test again.
did it resolve the cdr unique id errors? do you still
We're switching you back and forth from new ACD (Call Center/OpenACD
based) and old ACD (ACD/sipXacd). Laurentiu was talking about new
one. Two systems are implemented completely separately. FYI: You
can use both at the same time, but no good reason to that i know of
unless you want to slowly
Back in december I recommended you apply this patch
http://forum.sipfoundry.org/index.php?t=msggoto=55127S=ad60d822e4f20cdb6a33400e600ecaa8
i can see you're still getting the same unique id errors in logs so
i'm wondering if you ever applied the patch. The theory is the cdr
script aborts
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Henry Dogger h.dog...@telecats.nl wrote:
I changed the time zone, and restarted the secondary machine, but still a
crash on sending profiles...
can you make a snapshot available somewhere?
___
sipx-users mailing list
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Douglas
Hubler
Sent: donderdag 26 mei 2011 18:20
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] weird log problem on snapshots
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Henry Dogger h.dog...@telecats.nl
wrote:
I
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Jim Canfield jcanfi...@emstar.com wrote:
We've been fighting a strange issue where gateway calls (patton 4960 pri)
are taking 2-5 seconds before they begin to ring. Display shows the
incoming call and it can even be picked up. Internal calls work fine.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
Disabling the plugin resolves the issue.
Jim or Tony, can you please file a bug in the external project
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XTRN
We need to get to the bottom of the issue, but whether the
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:11 AM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net wrote:
I haven't updated my 4.2.1 in a while so when doing it I get the following
error.
Thought I would check with the list before rebooting, just in case.
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/local/freeswitch/bin/fsxs
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:28 AM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net wrote:
Bit nervous about doing that because it removes others at the same time and
I'm not sure if I should use nodeps or not.
Too easy to break the system when things get into dep problems.
CAVEAT: I haven't tried
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:34 PM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net wrote:
Well, interesting then because my system didn't get updated to 4.4.0 when I
ran the update, it only updated 4.2.1.
This is also a departure how sipxecs release eng ran in the past I
think. You have to explicitly
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
I am now seeing phone lockup issues when the sipx hostname is the same as
the sip domain name.
mike p. and i saw a similar thing and strangely for this customer,
removing the SRV records from DNS actually
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Josh M. Patten jpat...@co.brazos.tx.uswrote:
It’s *78 where is the extension you wish to pick up. Again,
there is no global call pickup. If you want you can create hunt groups and
use the pickup code on that hunt group. Also, if this doesn’t work,
ezuce has started developing a few internally and was curious if there
were other efforts out there.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
!
Build Log
==
commit 83f662810ddfa7b8f3f320f002e22faf1d103cb8
Author: Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com
Date: Tue May 24 11:40:22 2011 -0400
(On behalf of joegen)
HttpConnection recyles HttpMessage. However, the request object is
declared outside
there is a link to download a tool to run on a windows machine to test
the network the windows laptop is on. It tests the same thing that
the web page in sipxecs does. The windows installer adds a lot of
complexity to the build process, anyone care if i stop building it?
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Joe Micciche jmicc...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to upgrade 2 servers to 4.4, from sipXconfig
4.2.1-018971.dhubler 2010-08-21T04:59:18 build34. Both experience the
same problem, sipx-freeswitch and
Notes
=
- ** No security updates in this update **
- ISO has *not* been rebuilt as decided in release policy. Yum update
after installation is recommended for getting these updates
- Thank you Mircea and George for your fixes and everyone
for your bug reports!
For past
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Peter van der Salm
peter.vanders...@smart-future.nl wrote:
The current phone plug in for the Unidata WPU-7700 phone does not work in
4.4.0 of 2011-04-19.
The .jar file is not the correct version.
Can you put together a patch so we can get it fixed in future
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Henry Dogger h.dog...@telecats.nl wrote:
No one knows what this could mean?
I’m still experiencing this problem…
Joegen might be the only one that knows. Are you experiencing any
other problems that you know of beside the log file entries?
I think not, but I have to update the RPMs and I lost the ability to
build on Fedora 12 so I'd rather take down the rpms if no one is using
them, then keep out of date ones.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Mircea Carasel mirc...@ezuce.com wrote:
With regard to XX-8779 the thing is that sipXconfig certificate authority
page for uploading certificates rejects non trusted certificates
(certificates signed by a trusted authority)
Therefore, self signed certificates
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Anders Mydland and...@mydland.info wrote:
Is there any way to indicate the direction of calls to be processed in the
dial plan rules?
E.g. for inbound calls from gateway XXX, strip first 3 digits and for
outbound calls to gateway YYY, add prefix 123
I can't
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
and do some custom freeswitch programming which will allow you to do anything.
and by freeswitch programming i mean messing w/FS dial-plans, not
C/C++ coding.
___
sipx-users
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Carl Farrington c...@css-networks.com wrote:
Hi. I now have a trunk set up, and can make outgoing calls.
I am using the sipXbridge (Use built-in SIP Trunk SBC = yes).
I'm still a little confused by all the multitude of SIP
servers/proxies/clients running
there were no changes to paging for 4.4 so i'd bet it's the same
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote:
Old thread, but still relevant to me at least.
Does anyone have any updated info on paging limits within 4.4? Does the
info below
I'm having trouble understanding when the problem began. Can you
reformat this focusing on the very last change you made when the
problem started to occur.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a fun one. I need some pointers
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public)
mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry. We switched from auto attendant to user at ext 10 handling most calls.
That is when the problems began. 7 to 8 calls per day now are unable to be
answered, and 50% of pages are
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. This problem. About 7-8 times a day when the main line rings, I go
to answer it and no one is there, but on the LED screen the first button
says “answer”. You cannot pick up the call at all and
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Carl Farrington c...@css-networks.com wrote:
Thanks very much. It worked, although there is some inconsistency on the
operator AA and voicemail - once says square and the other says hash.
I'll probably find the square.wav or whatever, and symlink to hash.wav.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:24 AM, George Niculae geo...@ezuce.com wrote:
Can you check permissions for var/sipxdata/tmp/imdb.*
You may also want to try stop sipxrls, delete these files and restart sipxrls
keep in mind if you delete these, you'd loose registrations and phones
wouldn't know to
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:04 PM, James Walsh james-li...@jws.ca wrote:
A VM I made is spewing 404 errors every six seconds, and a log file nearly
triple the size of the other machine.
check for errors in registrar.log. i think it's trying to connect to
a presence plugin
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Carl Farrington c...@css-networks.com wrote:
Are the localized voice prompts (i.e. British English) from the 4.0
directory on the download server still OK for 4.4? Any known issues, or
files that I might need to rename/symlink or anything?
all i can say is that
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:55 AM, pierre.du...@swisscom.com wrote:
I have find in the documentation where are the localized template, under
/etc/sipxpbx/region_xx
I want to change the region_ch template.
How can I add a custom rule ?
Pierre, sorry for missing your post before. There is a
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Josh M. Patten
jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us wrote:
It appears my assumption might be correct. That CA is from when this system
was originally built and I think the SSL certs being created are based on a
different CA. So how do I go about taking the CA that
fixed
y, found it missing for 64bit.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
can someone fix it?
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive:
I could not duplicate this. On a system w/4.4.0 installed i ran
yum clean all
yum erase sipx*
yum install sipxecs
Anyone else?
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:22 PM, James Walsh james-li...@jws.ca wrote:
One of the first things I tried, I'm afraid...
-Original Message-
From:
/
$basearch
gpgcheck=0
Next???
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Douglas
Hubler
Sent: May-13-11 2:47 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] YUM UPDATE Error
Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Hubler
Sent: May-13-11 3:49 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] YUM UPDATE Error
can you show me command and output
yeah, beware of this issue we found w/spark client
http://community.igniterealtime.org/thread/42976
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Kyle Haefner
kyle.haef...@colostate.edu wrote:
Aaron,
Did you do anything special.I have not been able to get Spark to
authenticate at all!
Thanks!
Kyle
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:03 AM, barisyanar barisya...@gmail.com wrote:
I managed to make TLS signal and SRTP transport to another client.
But whenever I try to make an IVR call, FreeSwitch crashes.
Attached are the necessary logs.
nothing in the logs pertaining to a crash that i can see.
By
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
devel packages. So I think it's only 10 that were pushed out in the patch.
yep
To a certain degree, you have to trust yum is configured correctly and
you tell you if you have the latest. Paranoid admins (which
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/12/2011 3:20 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
I
do wonder why they are not archived in another repo (the previous 4.4.0-192
packages. It makes the onus on the superadmin to have saved it as its
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
versioning the repo is perhaps the most straightforward method in my mind.
an archive of the initial release any any patches that are not the most
recent version.
I'm not sure what you mean here.
The policy now
Weren't we supposed to get descriptions on those fields?
I think it means call will ring until agent is available. That is, folks
don't get put on hold. Yet another way to think about it: kinda like a be
hunt group.
This is how it was explained to me, I never tried it though.
On May 11, 2011
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
Please note: this will repush profiles to end user devices as well as reboot
them, so shedule/apply accordingly.
Would everyone agree we should change this so it only happens on major
version upgrades?
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
I had planned that. What I didn't understand is why none of the logging
components failed to capture the issue and why there was a reported
ConfigurationMismatch.
While everything reported properly in services,
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Dave Deutschman
ddeutsch...@innovational.net wrote:
+1
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9609
FYI: It would be very hard to base this on context of bug fixes.
___
sipx-users mailing list
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/10/2011 11:24 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
This is a notice in accordance with bug fix release policy
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Bug+Fix+Release+Policy
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
I hear it I think about that upgrading from unstable versions is supported.
well I am making my own point and maybe only to myself, upgrading from
unstable versions is not implicitly supported until these
This is a notice in accordance with bug fix release policy
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Bug+Fix+Release+Policy
Notes
=
- ** No security updates in this update **
- ISO has *not* been rebuilt as decided in release policy. Yum update
after installation
refuse its going to voicemail.
There are so many option for monitoring the agent calls in old ACD by
Agent wrap-up time
Agent Non-Responsive time
Maximum Bounce Count
But in OpenACD I never came through any of the above option.
Regards
Kumaran T
Douglas Hubler wrote:
On Fri
301 - 400 of 831 matches
Mail list logo
