s/sipXcommons/xpp3.jar:/usr/share/java/sipXecs/sipXrest/plugins/sipXcallController.jar:/usr
> /share/java/sipXecs/sipXrest/plugins/sipxcdrLog.jar
> org.sipfoundry.sipxrest.RestServer --start
>
> -M
>
>>>> "M. Ranganathan" 09/14/12 8:34 AM >>>
>
> Please describe
it doesnt affect system usage.
>
> Setting the call control logs to debug dont show any additional detail.
>
> Is there a good way to debug the sipxrest process.
>
> -M
>
>>>> Matt White 08/13/12 12:14 PM >>>
> Thanks, you just answered the questions in m
Attached is a jar file for jain-sip. Ieplaced the jar and tested it out.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:36 AM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
> Please download the source code from svn and build it.
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:31
gt;
> 4.4 or 4.6?
> if it were me, i'd test compile first, make you get that far. Then
> replace the jain sip jar on a test system and see if problem goes
> away.
> _______
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.
Please update jsip (as I've suggested a few times before ). Then see if
there is issues with it and please post s new trace. I'll post a new jsip
jar here soon but you can roll your own as well
On Aug 2, 2012 12:26 PM, "Sven Evensen" wrote:
> I dont have a whole lot of info, but the customer repo
t
>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-us
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
a similar (closed source) project called Karoo Bridge and previously
>> with the defunct OpenSBC project.
>>
>> Joegen
>>
>> On 07/08/2012 06:40 AM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
>> > The following is just an IDEA at this point (not reality) :
>> >
>>
ping that if we make some changes to sipxbridge code we might ask
> you a few questions if they would ever have them.
>
> Hope you hang around and see where this is going!
> On Jul 3, 2012 8:48 AM, "M. Ranganathan" wrote:
>
>> Hello all!
>>
>> I don't know
t and it was underpinning that.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
unable to service your request due to maintenance
downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.
So where does your source code live these days and what are you guys up to ?
Ranga
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users
milar, for instance, with the error message that globally appears when
> a
> > file replication failed
> > Mircea
> >
> >>
> >> Looking for some feedback,
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> George
> >>
st Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Irena Dolovčak
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and
> those who don't.
>
> mpic...@gmail.com
> blog: http://www.sipxecs.info
> call: sip:mpic...@sipxecs.info
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
iz/>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
computer.
> Registered in England No 04006093 ¦ Registered Office 1st Floor, 236 Gray's
> Inn Road, London WC1X 8HB
>
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
t; This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap®.
> For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
> --
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
t; --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
should make
> sipXbridge behave more like 4.0.4 with respect to codec negotiation?
>
> Thanks as always,
> Matthew
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/s
e correct and
can be handled by sipXbridge.
>
> Dale
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
__
Hello all,
Is anybody using bandwidth.com trunks? What is their SIP address? I
just tested and much to my surprise, found I could not resolve that
name.
Has this changed?
Thanks
Ranga
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users
t; In my case ITSP is independent FS profile on the same machine (i use it
>>>>> as
>>>>> sip-h323 gateway).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That is i was not able to reproduce the problem.
>>&g
org/archive/sipx-users/
>> ___
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
> _________
proxy which will then faithfully relay the request to
sipXbridge (without challenge)? Is this part of the "other tests" you
refer to above?
Ranga
> _______
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.o
e │ 39 York Road, London SE1 7NQ, UK │ +44 (0) 207 902 8131 │
> seshu.ku...@onrelay.com │ www.onrelay.com
>
> This electronic message transmission contains information from OnRelay,
> Ltd., that may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended
> sol
s@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
_
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>
rk Security Corporation
>
> Certified SNORT Integrator
> 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
> Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
> Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
> King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
>
>
>
> This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap®.
> For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
>
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
redundancy and load balancing strategy. SIpxbridge will reject one of
these with a LOOP DETECTED.
The "Over and Over" part is because the ITSP is not ACKing the LOOP
Detected (at least that is my guess). Please look at the logs using
sipviewer and check if that is the case.
If y
rap®.
> For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
>
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.o
Office 1st Floor, 236 Gray's
> Inn Road, London WC1X 8HL
>
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-
ecurity and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> - Original Message -
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>
> To: M. Ranganathan
>
ndry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http:
sers
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
Friday, June 25, 2010 10:44 AM
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: [sipx-users] bandwidth.com problems
> Importance: High
>
>
>
> Anyone having a problem with Bandwidth.com right now?
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-user
___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ran
takes top spot.
>>
>> Open Source client - WxCommunicator?
>>
>> Mobile Client - ??
>>
>> Many Thanks
>> Abdul
>>
>>
>> ___
>> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>> Lis
nks
> Abdul
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- ht
e the flag has been set to false.
>
> Is it true to say that people that venture into using ITSPs that require ths
> strict protocol enforcement to be false should not expect the level of
> support you and your team have been providing up to now WRT interop issues?
Me and my team
d SIP protocol practice to route by To header but
it does not break the protocol in the same way as not supplying a SDP
in an OK to an INVITE.
Regards,
Ranga
>
>>
>>I am seeing this same type of thing in Columbia. Of course I can
>>always use an external SBC.
>&g
eople may be depending on such ITSPs to work
90% of the time by now. I will leave the hacks in there but they will
be guarded by a hidden boolean flag in sipxbridge.xml called
strict-protocol-enforcement.
That flag will be hidden and set to "true" by default and I highly
re
t problem could
> multiply. Therefore, I continue to believe that in order for us to play in
> a market and especially as an open source solution, it is up to us to adapt.
> --martin
There is a point there and I am not being religious either. Anything
can be hacked with enough effort
t problem could
> multiply. Therefore, I continue to believe that in order for us to play in
> a market and especially as an open source solution, it is up to us to adapt.
> --martin
There is a point there and I am not being religious either. Anything
can be hacked with enough effort
soft or some other
> monopolist you can expect the world to adapt to you, but for everyone else
> that is not a good strategy.
> --martin
Microsoft and other monopolists may choose to deviate from the SIP
protocol and get away with it. I am
provider from that list
which is known to exhibit such errors.
Please note that for sipxbridge to work, the provider must correctly
implement the SIP protocol.
Thanks
Ranga.
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list
ipXecs
Ranga
> ------
> From: "M. Ranganathan"
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 7:55 AM
> To: "Sven Evensen"
> Cc: "Bimpe Adedotun" ;
>
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] One DID, multiple comferences
>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Sven Evensen
434.984.8430
> sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepar
your computer.
> Registered in England No 04006093 ¦ Registered Office 1st Floor, 236 Gray's
> Inn Road, London WC1X 8HL
>
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/si
> -Original Message-
> From: WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) [mailto:dwor...@avaya.com]
> Sent: 01 June 2010 19:03
> To: Sven Evensen; M. Ranganathan
> Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: RE: SIP trunk stops registering
>
>
> From
We probably should have a more sophisticated algorithm for restoring service
> on a trunk. On the other hand, this does seem to be an ITSP problem and they
> should fix it.
>
> Dale
I have a snapshot from Sven. I'll look into it again some tim
-----Original Message-
> From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:mra...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 31 May 2010 23:01
> To: Sven Evensen
> Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: SIP trunk stops registering
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:33 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
>> On Mon,
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:33 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Sven Evensen
> wrote:
>> Hi Ranga,
>>
>> The problem is a little more subtle, I will try to explain. And I will send
>> you a snapshot too.
>>
>> sipX sends RE
ar from the pcap I attached.
>
> NB So the 500ms timer is a generic SIP timer. That sounds pretty short if you
> have a little latency to your ITSP.
>
> Regards,
> Sven
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:mra...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 31 M
se Support PH; entsupp...@cordiaip.com; Mike Patterson
>
> Subject: Re: Registration Problem - 42035028
>
>
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> I see the following DIDs:
>
>
>
> 85230519805 Online
>
> 85230519811 Online
>
> 85230519814 Online
>
> 85230519815 Onl
Courthouse, Oakland, Maryland 21550
> www.garrettcounty.org
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/s
___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
rg/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.s
er would not have been
> inserted by sipXecs (providing a value for the 'lr' parameter is
> incorrect, and sipXecs does not use a 'did' parameter).
>
> _______
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://
nklin, TN 37067
> Direct:615-468-2945
> Cell: 615-693-2833
> Fax: 615-628-5698
> Email:gca...@franklinamerican.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "M. Ranganathan"
> To: "ROBERT JOLY (ROBERT)"
> Cc: "Gabe Casey" , "sipx-
___
>> > sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List
>> Archive:
>> > http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>> > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>> > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www
//list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscrib
.x.x.x1;0
>
>
> /Staffan
>
>
> --
> Staffan Kerker
> mail/sip/xmpp: staf...@kerker.se
>
> "There is absolutely no money above the 5th fret..." /Donald "Duck" Dunn
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@l
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
1.4mb - I doubt that is appropriate to
> email to the list. Let me know how you'd like me to proceed.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:mra...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 6:11 AM
> To: Nathan Nieblas
> Cc: Tony
.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list s
ver half full - count = 1599, max = 1600"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nathan Nieblas
>
> SACA Technologies, Inc.
>
> 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102
>
> Anaheim Hills, CA 92807
>
>
>
> p: 714-777-3222 x113
>
> f: 888-603-9033
>
> e: nathan
r header or sometimes in the SDP.
Thank you
Ranga
>
> Ken
>
> -Original Message-
> From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:mra...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:39 PM
> To: Ken Fulmer
> Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SIP Diversi
nsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-u
gt; session.
>
>
> Is it possible to achieve one of these possibilities without needing another
> build of SipXbridge?
> It would be great, just for testing the provider.
No. This would need some code changes.
Ranga
>
> Rene
--
M. Ranganathan
___
know what these issues
are.
Thanks
Ranga
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs
a
>
> Thanks in advance
> René
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-us
e: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Li
://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscri
pXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
>
>
>
>
> _______
>
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Ken Fulmer
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 1:44 PM
> To: 'M. Ranganathan'
> Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Two Issues with 4.2
>
on Hold. When we move the VM services to the primary server in the
> cluster, MoH works properly.
Is this behavior observed for bridged calls only? Have you been able
to get MOH for intra pbx calls?
Thanks
Ranga
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:
ve/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoun
k you
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Ken Fulmer
>
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/lis
/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.s
gt; For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
>
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive
razi...@myitdepartment.net
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> - Original Message -
> From: M. Ranganathan
> T
s@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailin
undry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list sip
at it, not to avoid it
>>> altogether.
>>>
>>> Josh Patten
>>> Assistant Network Administrator
>>> Brazos County IT Dept.
>>> (979) 361-4676
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/15/2010 9:25 AM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
>>>
>>>
&
y.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sip
gt;>> Fax: 434.984.8431
>>>
>>> Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
>>>
>>> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
>>> Telephone: 434.984.8426
>>> Fax: 434.984.8427
>>>
>>> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
>>
hematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
> Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
>
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.o
org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
g list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
any kind
> of alarm--calls just didn't work anymore.
This is a good point and I will add an alarm for this in version 4.2.
I have also tightened up the locking and sycnrhonization on shared
data strcutures.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff
> On Mar 16, 2010, at 4:57 PM, M. Rangan
1:51.474000Z":5300:JAVA:ERR:choicevoip.ev.ithaca.ny.us:SslListen
> er0-3::symmitron:"Ports not available 1 parity 1"
> "2010-03-16T17:31:59.245000Z":5301:JAVA:INFO:choicevoip.ev.ithaca.ny.us:SslListe
> ner0-3::symmitron:"destroyBridge: sip
Thanks,
>
> Jeff
> ___________
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- ht
>
>
> Marcello
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- htt
than Nieblas
>
> SACA Technologies, Inc.
> 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102
> Anaheim Hills, CA 92807
>
> p: 714-777-3222 x113
> f: 888-603-9033
> e: nathan.nieb...@sacatech.com
> -Original Message-
> From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:mra...@gmail.com]
> Sent
-3222 x113
>
> f: 888-603-9033
>
> e: nathan.nieb...@sacatech.com
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailm
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 11:19 -0500, M. Ranganathan wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Ken Fulmer
>> wrote:
>> > The design doc mentioned one sipXbridge per cluster. The link above
>> > suggests
&
gt; Thanks,
>
>
>
> Ken Fulmer
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
&
>
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfo
1 - 100 of 471 matches
Mail list logo
