ocal. Most cheap ITSPs charge per minute for all
calls, inbound and outbound, local and LD.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
On 02/17/2012 09:25 AM, Kyle Haefner wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Sorry to hear you've had trouble...I remember when we first g
My apologies to Todd. I didn't see that his last two messages were
private messages to me, and I posted them to the group on accident.
Sorry, Todd. I hope you'll forgive me.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
On
Thanks Nate. Maybe Tony just missed Martin's offensive comment. I'll
give him the benefit of the doubt.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
On 02/17/2012 09:30 PM, Nate wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>charset="utf-8"
> Co
can't acknowledge that he had it coming. Why aren't
you asking Martin to apologize? Do you really defend him? If so, I would
encourage everyone on the list to ignore you, too. I don't have a beef
with you, but neither do I feel the need to be bullied.
My intent here is to be pro
se share. If you are just itching for a flame war, I'll pass. I
didn't come here for a war or to be attacked by people. I came here
for answers.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
On 02/
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
On 02/18/2012 12:03 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Tim Ingalls wrote:
>> I appreciate your feedback. You're right. Being specific is helpful.
>> However, I was trying to not
Martin,
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
On 02/17/2012 08:30 PM, Martin Steinmann wrote:
Tim – we really appreciate the
feedback. The following might help add some
use a product that does work well with ITSPs.
To any whose fragile sense of security and/or superiority has been
shattered by the ideas in this very reasonable thread, my apologies,
but you might want to grow up and take charge...of your company.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Sh
paying someone to do the
technical stuff for me? This is an opportunity for you if you see it
that way.
Happy birthday.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
On 02/17/2012 09:25 PM, Todd Hodgen wrote:
Douglas,
On 02/17/2012 07:29 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> Tim, I welcomed your frank email, but I'm weird like that ;)
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Tim Ingalls wrote:
>> Routing inbound calls to an auto-attendant worked great for a long time and
>> then ju
may be difficult to investing lots of time
updating the wiki since that would take away some of the value of
buying the book. I'm not sure how I would deal with that.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
On 02/17/2012 10:12 AM, Michael Pi
connections, you get
tier 3 service. If you
> want top quality voice connections, get a top quality
ITSP on a dedicated
> link or get traditional service and bring it in with
a gateway.
>
>
Todd,
Great points. So before I totally give up on the idea of using an
ITSP and SIP trunking, do you know of any ITSPs that really do a
good job and are compatible/certified with sipXecs?
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
Thanks,
Mike
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Tim
Ingalls <t...@sharedcom.net>
wrote:
Hi Everyone. I promise I am not
trying to be a troll. I have some serious questions that
I
onomy, saving a customer 50% of their monthly phone bill can make
the difference between selling a system and not selling one.
I have a few questions, below:
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
On 02/16/2012 09:19 PM, Becker, Jesse wrote:
you use? What configs work with them and which ones
don't?
I'm not looking to just dump on sipXecs. I really like the platform.
I really really want it to work out. My only issue is that it keeps
me up at night worrying that if I deploy it to any customers I'
I did read the book. There are lots of important technical details
that are not in the book.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
On 02/16/2012 07:29 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
You should read the book.
On Feb 16, 2012
the same reliability issues?
Also, is anyone willing to have a phone conversation about this
and impart some wisdom or have a partnership conversation?
--
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Thanks Tony. I'll give that a shot. We'll see how it works tomorrow morning.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
On 01/25/2012 12:05 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> what the trace does not show is if any of your accounts/subaccounts
> are registered
I've seen this problem too. What I've noticed is that after about 11
minutes the service tries to register again. It might be as simple
as just reducing the timeout before it retries.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
. Is
there a different place where the setting is found? I looked under every
section and couldn't find it.
I set this up correctly several months ago, but it seems that when I
rolled back the device files to the previous BootROM/SIP app files, the
TLS setting went away.
--
Thanks,
Tim
e
(i.e., maybe multiple gateways in sipXbridge are registering at the
same time and that's why it gets confused?). If it is a timing issue, I
wonder if changing the re-registration timing between the accounts to
minimize registrations happening at the same time would be an effective
counterm
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/30/11 11:27 AM, Tim Ingalls wrote:
Bluebox
would be an improvement over Trixbox since its not using Asterisk as
the back-end.
except BB is not freepbx+
I'm not sure what you mean. FreePBX is a front-end for Asterisk. When
they started to make Fr
I think that choosing a NAT/STUN setting/server should be a step in the
installation process right after choosing the DNS and DHCP settings.
That way there is no default setting that people are unaware of and
have to troubleshoot or post questions about to this list.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
rnal extensions, it's a toss-up. I've got a Trixbox server at
my home running on a Pentium4 2.66GHz w/ 512MB RAM, and it's run just
fine for 3 years (after the initial bug workarounds), so the server
doesn't have to be as powerful as you'd need for sipXecs.
Thanks,
Tim Ing
be needed at least if someone has dynamic DNS.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
Todd R. Hodgen wrote:
-1
Having a default stun address to me seems important. If during setup you
don't add one, and you don't have a static address on the router, y
send me
calls. Is that correct? I sometimes see a bunch of incoming calls from
weird addresses to non-existent users, so I wonder if that is not the
case. I'm basically wondering if using static IP routing on my Vitelity
trunk is going to circumvent some important security apparatus.
Th
ecs it doesn't indicate which SIP trunk is
having the problem. It just gives me the server address
(inbound7.vitelity.net) for the trunk. That doesn't help, since I have
3 trunks set up with the same address. Short of creating a SIP trace
xml file, I don't know what tr
. Hooray!
The skipping is still audible, but barely. It's mostly noticeable now
when I use the speakerphone.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
Tim Ingalls wrote:
Tony, the system is a testing system in service for my home office with
only a few phones.
t more with less RAM than Asterisk.
Would it help to switch the kernel to a realtime version for CentOS?
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
Tony Graziano wrote:
Your ram setting is a bit small. I run 2GB in a lab environment with
2-3 phones for testing, I wou
e
configuration guidelines on their site like they have for some other
systems (i.e., Asterisk, Trixbox, etc.).
-Tim
Tim Ingalls wrote:
I've been having problems when my sipXecs
4.2.1 platform sends SIP registration attempts to Vitelity.
Periodically throu
d out
www.voip.ms, but I don't know how their service is.
3. Why would I be getting a 401 Unauthorized back from Vitelity?
--
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
www.sharedcom.com
801-618-2102 Office
z9hG4bKa4b9d288b72e0e833f2a9081df4ae6e1363132
2011-03-
them to make sure they aren't bad
somehow.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
www.sharedcom.com
801-618-2102 Office
Michael Picher wrote:
is this just at the very beginning of the message?
could you download the message to your PC to see if the actual message
like th
Thanks Tony. I just removed the port forwarding rule on my router and
changed the RTP ports back to 3-31000 and everything is working fine
now.
Can I also remove the port forwarding rule for SIP (5060 and 5061) and
have it work fine, too? I'd like to have a test sipXecs server running
behi
I'm wondering if changing FreeSwitch's 15060 port will really be all
that needs to be changed. Does anyone have a reliable list of all ports
being used on the sipXecs server?
On a side note, it would be really great to have some kind of a config
page in sipXconfig that would list all of the por
ket.bind(DatagramSocket.java:372)
at java.net.DatagramSocket.(DatagramSocket.java:211)
at java.net.DatagramSocket.(DatagramSocket.java:262)
at
org.sipfoundry.sipxrelay.SymmitronServer.start(SymmitronServer.java:1779)
at
org.sipfoundry.sipxrelay.SymmitronServer.main(SymmitronServer.java:
27;s status page. What's the correct way to roll
back the firmware?
By the way, when you say "firmware" are you referring to the sip.ld
application or the BootROM?
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
Tony Graziano wrote:
Most importantly, there ar
ge.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?
--
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
supported by all current Polycom models is 4.2.2.
If this is incorrect, please tell me. I relied on that info and
installed 3.2.3 on my phones. They seem to be working well, but I
haven't tested everything yet. I have a Soundpoint IP 670 and a
Soundpoint IP 450.
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
S
I'm wanting to sell and service PBX systems based on
sipXecs. I'm pretty busy with that, but I can help a little here and
there on the Web site content.
-Tim Ingalls
Does anyone know how to fix the current indexing?
auto-indexing, y, still broken. ;) Those that are a
ctness, etc. If you look at Wikipedia, they had to create a ton of
standards and processes to keep the information from becoming a chaotic
mess.
The first thing I would do is to logically map out the structure of all
of the information that needs to be presented and catalog how the
exis
Hi. I tried to register as a new user at the JIRA site, but I got a
server error.
--
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102 Office
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http
pxecs-release, so I'm assuming that the
package name is wrong.
Does anyone else have that issue?
Thanks,
Tim Ingalls
Shared Communications, Inc.
801-618-2102
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: htt
43 matches
Mail list logo
