Picher
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 3:18 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes Mediant 1000-MSBG and SipXecs
webinterfaces
Daniel,
This firmware is way out of date for the 1000 MSBG. I'd suggest moving up
to 6.4 at a minimum. The 1000
I think what you are describing is a matter of your PC with 3 interfaces.
BUT at least two of the interfaces are on the same subnet but with two
different gateway/routers.
The most likely scenario is that you need to change the PC to the same
gateway and the AC to see if it is pingable.
Why would
Hello,
after trying different things, I had one idea. I scanned the IP Addresses
of my network, and it follows that I choosed 192.168.1.10 for AudioCodes
server, but after SipXecs installation it changes by itself to other IP
address (192.168.1.254) . So, now it's possible to open both interfaces
Daniel,
This firmware is way out of date for the 1000 MSBG. I'd suggest moving up
to 6.4 at a minimum. The 1000 MSBG (i.e., the M1000b) is a bit of a
different animal and the configuration plugin is not designed to work with
it.
You may be able to use the M1000 template to get a bit of a leg up
>
> Hello,
>
I have looked the ARP cache, and after doing ping from my PC to my IP
address of AudioCodes Interface (192.168.1.10) I can see that HWaddress is
incomplete. I add manually the MAC address but still not working. However
the SipXecs server works good (192.168.1.50). I explain you the sc
Hello,
I have checked with "arp -a" and the IP: 192.168.1.10 isn't in the table.
But it was before I configure SipXecs. Now after SipXecs configuration I
can only ping to 192.168.1.50, which is SipXecs server.
I try to add the IP and MAC address manually to arp cache but I can't. I'm
using Window
Did you check your arp cache? Did you check your arp AFTER trying to ping
it? Can you ping the m1000 from with SSH in sup?
On May 31, 2012 9:26 AM, "Daniel Peinado Lopez"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> maybe the problem is that SipXecs is installed in a module inside the
> AudioCodes M 1000 and I need to de
Hello,
maybe the problem is that SipXecs is installed in a module inside the
AudioCodes M 1000 and I need to define 2 Gateways, one for the AudioCodes
and other one for the SipXecs. When I launch SipXecs service, I can't ping
the AudioCodes IP Address (x.x.x.10).
Thank you
*
Managing the gateway by Sipx is optional. Either Sipx can
manage it or you can manage it yourself directly.
If for some reason sipx configured the web interface off by turning it off
in the config file you can verify this by looking at the config file itself
(download via sipxconfig). You can edit
Hello,
Yes, I try to Open in two webbrowsers both interfaces.
Thank you very much for your answer
* *
Daniel Peinado López
*IANT - APPLIED NGN-TECHNOLOGIES
**Turn-Key VoIP/UC Solutions and More...
*Fon: +49 (5331) 6794 400
Fax: +49 (5331) 6794
Siopx does not support multiple interfaces. Is this what you are trying to
do?
On May 31, 2012 8:22 AM, "Daniel Peinado Lopez"
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm configuring Audiocodes Mediant 1000-MSBG (Firmware 6.00AL.018.003)
> with SipXecs - 4.4.0 - centos.
>
> First I have installed the CentOS in the
Hello,
I'm configuring Audiocodes Mediant 1000-MSBG (Firmware 6.00AL.018.003) with
SipXecs - 4.4.0 - centos.
First I have installed the CentOS in the Audiocodes Hard Drive and next
Sipxecs (but I didn't configure yet).
I want to make a local scenary without WAN, and these are the details:
I conn
Actually, you need to check what is the hookflash timing on the maxattach
as well. You might need to change either on AC or on maxattach in order to
match each other.
-
MM
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Paul Needham wrote:
> When trying to create a conference call using the flash key on an an
When trying to create a conference call using the flash key on an analog
clearone maxattach speaker phone connected to an audiocodes mp118, it rings
to the operator.
Scenario:
Dial first number - call established
hit flash - phone immediately rings the operator
The maxattach also has a conferen
to:
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Robert Schroeder
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 20, 2012 5:07 PM
> *To:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Request Terminated
> ** **
> Do you have an account with AudioCod
rch 20, 2012 5:07 PM
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Request Terminated
>
> Do you have an account with AudioCodes. You should be able to download from
> them.
>
> Rob
>
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Robert Schroeder
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 5:07 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Request Terminated
Do you have an account with AudioCodes. You should be able to download from
them.
Rob
ist.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Jorge E.
> Fernandez
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 5:00 PM
> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Request Terminated
>
> Where c
software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Request Terminated
Where can I get version 6.0?
--
Jorge
On Mar 20, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Mark Wood wrote:
Version 6.2.x has given us all kinds of problems. We always downgrade to a
6.0 version
Thanks,
Mark W. Wood
office: (760
> www.redphonetech.com
>
>
>
>
> From: Jorge E. Fernandez [mailto:jorge.fernan...@j9consultants.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 12:53 PM
> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Request Terminated
&g
...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Mark Wood
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:15 PM
To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Request Terminated
Version 6.2.x has given us all kinds of problems. We always downgrade to a
6.0 versio
]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 12:53 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Request Terminated
Im running an even higher version
Version ID: 6.20.A022.003
DSP Type: 0
DSP Software Version: 62008
DSP Software Name: 204IM
Flash Version: 199
sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hodgen
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 20, 2012 3:43 PM
> *To:* 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Request
sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Todd Hodgen
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 3:43 PM
> To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Request Terminated
>
t;
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Todd Hodgen
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 3:43 PM
> To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Req
Flash Version:
208
Rob
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Todd Hodgen
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 3:43 PM
To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 4
cs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Request Terminated
>
> Do you have an internal dns table setup on the gateway?
>
> I would turn up the logging level on the gateway and review that to see where
> it leads you.
>
> On Mar 20, 2012 3:27 PM, &q
.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 12:32 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP118 487 Request Terminated
Do you have an internal dns table setup on the gateway
Schroeder
IT Manager
Information Systems
Member First Mortgage
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Jorge E. Fernandez
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 3:27 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Audiocodes
Do you have an internal dns table setup on the gateway?
I would turn up the logging level on the gateway and review that to see
where it leads you.
On Mar 20, 2012 3:27 PM, "Jorge E. Fernandez" <
jorge.fernan...@j9consultants.com> wrote:
> Im experiencing an issue with apparently random calls whe
Im experiencing an issue with apparently random calls where they go straight
busy tone... It only happens on about 50% of calls that go out through the
gateway. When I trace the calls the gateway returns a "487 Request Terminated"
after the INVITE and when I go through the syslog from the gatewa
You should be able to get through your distributor.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Aaron Pursell wrote:
> Now I guess the question is how to get this from audiocodes, I can't
> even find a number to call them to even see how much this will cost us.
>
> Thanks for the info, its what I thought.
Where did you purchase it from ?
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Pursell
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 11:20 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP114 FXO 6.2
Now I guess the question is how to get this from audiocodes, I can't even find
a number to call them to even see how much this will cost us.
Thanks for the info, its what I thought.
Aaron Pursell
Network Systems Administration
Easter Seals-Goodwill Northern Rocky Mountain, Inc.
4400 Central A
I'd downgrade to 6.0
Should be fine...
Mike
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Aaron Pursell wrote:
> Audiocodes MP114 FXO 6.2 Firmware and SIPXECS 4.4
>
> As the subject reads, I noticed there is a JIRA on this. Does anyone have
> MP114's with 6.2 firmware working on SIPX 4.4? I ask because we
Audiocodes MP114 FXO 6.2 Firmware and SIPXECS 4.4
As the subject reads, I noticed there is a JIRA on this. Does anyone have
MP114's with 6.2 firmware working on SIPX 4.4? I ask because we just ordered 3
new fxos and 3 new fxs and all have 6.2 firmware.
So not sure if this will work or if
Hmm, too rush.
There's already a JIRA open for that:
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XTRN-1072
-
MM
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 21:02, Melcon Moraes wrote:
> Does anyone got issues with the new 320HD phones, regarding MWI?
>
> It seems that the SIP URI in SUBSCRIBE used by the phone contains t
ipXecs.
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Rhon
> *Sent:* Sunday, July 24, 2011 8:25 PM
>
> *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP-11
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP-118_6.0 Firmware
I made the update directly from my laptop to AC118 (no switch) but still get
the same problem. I even tried update via AudioCodes BootP program but no
use.
I suppose I needed to update from 5.6 > 5.8 > 6.0?
Thanks
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011
t;> www.redphonetech.com
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> * *
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Josh Patten [mailto:jpat...@ezuce.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, July 22, 2011 6:23 AM
>> *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs softwa
ion: New Image.BMP]*
>
> www.redphonetech.com
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> * *
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Josh Patten [mailto:jpat...@ezuce.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, July 22, 2011 6:23 AM
> *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Audio
Hi Josh,
Thanks for your reply. Actually, I got my AC via ebay so I don't have
so may not be able to get any fw from them.
Was hoping someone can share them?
Thanks.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Josh Patten wrote:
> Sounds like you've got a corrupt download. Try redownloading the firmware o
...@ezuce.com]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 6:23 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP-118_6.0 Firmware
Sounds like you've got a corrupt download. Try redownloading the firmware or
get with your audiocodes vendor to determine why you can
Sounds like you've got a corrupt download. Try redownloading the firmware or
get with your audiocodes vendor to determine why you can't upload the file.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:13 AM, Rhon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem updating my firmware from 5.6 to 6.0. The error shows
> when uploading
Hi,
I have a problem updating my firmware from 5.6 to 6.0. The error shows
when uploading my cmp file:
"Unrecognized CMP file was detedted. File Upload aborted"
Can anyone here would like to share their MP118 6.0 firmware please?
Thanks
___
sipx-users
none exists.
On Jul 20, 2011 3:44 AM, "John Pi" wrote:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Organization: SipXecs Forum
> In-Reply-To:
> X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <61534>
> Message-ID:
>
>
>
> Thank you all for your responses!
>
>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <61534>
Message-ID:
Thank you all for your responses!
Can you suggest me an analog media gateway that supports
this feature (a SIP
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Josh Patten wrote:
> I believe what he is asking is if a user on a SIP phone could subscribe to
> the presence of an audiocodes FXS port.
>
> The answer is no, this does not work. Audiocodes doesn't support the
> necessary method(s) for the sipXecs RLS server to s
I believe what he is asking is if a user on a SIP phone could subscribe to
the presence of an audiocodes FXS port.
The answer is no, this does not work. Audiocodes doesn't support the
necessary method(s) for the sipXecs RLS server to subscribe to the presence
of the FXS port
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011
Um. No. An analog phone does not have a way to display BLF or subscribe to
it. You need a real sip phone to do this.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:20 AM, John Pi wrote:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Organization: SipXecs Forum
> X-FUDforum: 080
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <61528>
Message-ID:
Is it possible to retrieve BLF status from an Audiocodes FXS
port, on sipXecs 4.4?
__
This is great Josh. Thanks!
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Josh M. Patten
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 11:47 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Audiocodes backup script
My gift to those
My gift to those managing Audiocodes gateways manually:
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Audiocodes+Gateways+Backup+Script
Enjoy
Josh Patten
Brazos County Network Engineer
979.361.4676
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.or
half Of Ricardo Martins
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 9:08 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes mp114fxo gateway
I'm using the version 6.2...
Work's fine for me
2011/5/4 Josh M. Patten
mailto:jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us>>
Back
neer
> 979.361.4676
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:14 PM
> To: Wayne A. Green; Discussion list for users of sipXecs s
-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:14 PM
To: Wayne A. Green; Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes mp114fxo gateway
look at the syslog on the gateway and determine what the reason is for the BYE.
On Tue, May 3, 20
look at the syslog on the gateway and determine what the reason is for the BYE.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Wayne A. Green wrote:
> I have the following scenario:
> 1. I am running 4.4 code. Centos 5.6
> 2. Audiocodes MP114-FXO version 6.0 code
> 3. Snom 821 hand-sets with snom821-SIP 8.4.18
I have the following scenario:
1. I am running 4.4 code . Centos 5.6
2. Audiocodes MP114-FXO version 6.0 code
3. Snom 821 hand-sets with snom821-SIP 8.4.18 42604 code
Internal calls work perfectly but I have an issue with external calling.
External call initiation works perfect but call are t
Interesting - after I RTFM, I found a setting - "VM TONE DETECT", which
was OFF! (even though manual says default is ON). So turned it on and
it works - but it still requires that "external MWI" setting.
Thanks,
-Bob
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 17:20 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> You may be assumin
You may be assuming the phone supports the MWI (light) at the supplied
voltage... read on.
Not all analog phones support the same MWI light. I "think" the AC
supplies 100V DC to activate the lamp. If the phone does not support
90-100v dc for the MWI lamp it ain't gonna turn on. You might need to
d
Having trouble with the AudioCodes MP-124 FXS (5.80A.023.006) and
Message Waiting Indication.
No matter what settings I try under SipX "Supplementary Services" for
MWI, I get no notification on my analog Panasonic KX-TSC11B.
The only way I can get some indication is if I goto "Users -> (user) ->
n (Tony Graziano)
6. Re: SipX-Alcatel integration (Domenico Chierico)
Subject:
Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP114 FXO Call Transfers
From:
Rhon
X-Alcatel integration (Domenico Chierico)
Subject:
Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP114 FXO Call Transfers
From:
Rhon
Date:
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:38:21 +0800
rtin
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From:
>> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org<mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
>> [mailto:sipx-users-<mailto:sipx-users->
>> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org<mailto:boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
ration (Domenico Chierico)
Subject:
Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP114 FXO Call Transfers
From:
Rhon
Date:
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:38:21 +0800
To:
sipx-users
gt; > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> > boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Kyle Haefner
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 2:46 PM
> > To: sipx-users
> > Subject: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP114 FXO Call Transfers
> >
>
s,
Nikolay.
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Gmb
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:28 PM
> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: [sipx-users] Audiocodes
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Gmb wrote:
> Hi all,
> has anyone tried Audiocodes 3x0HD IP phones?
> Is the provisioning mask of these phone in roadmap? I haven't found
> nothing about that...
i have a 320HD i'd love to put to use one day. only thing i've heard
negative was that the speed-dial
Hi all,
has anyone tried Audiocodes 3x0HD IP phones?
Is the provisioning mask of these phone in roadmap? I haven't found
nothing about that...
Bye
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archiv
Hello,
Off topic, but can somebody send (or link) me the Audiocodes CPT (Call
Progress Tones) Wizard for the MP 118 FXO? I have a situation where
I need the .dat file for Australia, but my vendor can't get it to me for
a couple of days.
Any help would be great.
Thanks,
Jeff
__
y 27, 2011 3:57 PM
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: [sipx-users] Audiocodes call handling
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using an Audiocodes MP 118 FXO gateway with firmware
> 5.60A which is working well with sipXecs 4.2.
>
> I have a situation where I need to route all
Hello,
I am using an Audiocodes MP 118 FXO gateway with firmware 5.60A which is
working well with sipXecs 4.2.
I have a situation where I need to route all outbound (from sipX to
PSTN) calls through only four of the eight gateway line ports, while
keeping all ports available to receive incomin
) 791-0769 - office
(317) 946-1899 - cell
_
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Wayne A. Green
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 4:58 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP-114 FXO
...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Wayne A. Green
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 1:58 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP-114 FXO Assistance
I am in the early stages of deploying our 1st sipx system. We are using version
4.2.1 code and audiocodes MP-114 FXO gateways
I am in the early stages of deploying our 1st sipx system. We are using version
4.2.1 code and audiocodes MP-114 FXO gateways. Internal calls for function fine
but I am not able to route call to the PSTN via the MP-114 Gateway. I am very
new to the configuration of the MP-114 and I am not certai
Does anybody have experience with the Audiocodes Mediant 600 gateway (with
PRI) and SipX?
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Marcello
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://li
I use 5.8
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Watkins
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:25 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: [sipx-users] Audiocodes MP-118 firmware
I have an
I have an audiocodes mp-118 I need to start utilizing. I'm currently running
firmware 5.4 - is there a recommended firmware?
Nathaniel Watkins
IT Director
Garrett County Government
203 South 4th Street, Room 210
Oakland, MD 21550
Telephone: 301-334-5001
Fax: 301-334-5021
E-mail: nwatk...@garret
Never mind. Ignore the request.
On 9/1/2010 11:53 AM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote:
> Can someone tell me the name of the firmware file for version 6.0 on
> and Audiocodes MP-114? From past experience, I assume it is actually
> named with 118 instead of 114 and the 2 models use the
fails. Mike will likely be
able to try this.
--martin
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Kyle Haefner
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 2:46 PM
> To: sipx-users
> Subject:
if you turn on loggin from a pc connected to it, does the logging from
the AC gateway tell you anything (stupid question, because you are
remote).
Did you ever have this working at all?
How did you setup the gateway (manually or let sipx generate the config file)?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:36 PM,
No it doesn't seem to complete, the remote office phone never rings.
I see the REFER come into the gateway from sipx, the gateway follows
with a NOTIFY back to sipx, then a 202 Accepted. I feel like I should
see an INVITE from the gateway in there after the REFER, but I never do.
Tony,
For s
I don't use AC gateways if I can help it. ;>)
You never mentioned if it successfully connects the call. It's an
audio or MOH issue for sure. Have you done anything differently in
this system regarding MOH?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Kyle Haefner wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have spXecs 4.2.1 and
Hi All,
I have spXecs 4.2.1 and an Audiocodes MP114 FXO device (version 5.8)
for a remote office. When I call into the FXO device from the PSTN to
an auto-attendant, I can push a digit and I hear "Please hold while I
transfer your call" then dead air and no phones ring in the remote
office. If I
Can someone tell me the name of the firmware file for version 6.0 on
and Audiocodes MP-114? From past experience, I assume it is actually
named with 118 instead of 114 and the 2 models use the same firmware.
If anyone wants to send me an offline note with a link to the firmware,
that would b
: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Audiocodes 6.0 firmware
Is Audiocodes 6.0 firmware "officially" supported by sipX? I remember
reading on JIRA some time back about issues with 6.0 and wanted to know if
testing it would be a was
Is Audiocodes 6.0 firmware "officially" supported by sipX? I remember reading
on JIRA some time back about issues with 6.0 and wanted to know if testing it
would be a waste of time.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive
The audiocodes firmware is 5.8
Cyrand Corp
3-4170 Sladeview Crescent
Mississauga, ON L5L 0A1
905-817-8208 x237
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe:
Still a bit new to the technology, but I believe I had exactly the same
issue.
It seems that the autoconfiguration part in 4.2 is not quite right for the
AudioCodes. Log on to the AudioCodes device, and look in the autodial
section of the AudioCodes device's configuration... it's probably blank at
I am installing a sipx system with audiocodes FXO gateways MP114and MP118
outbound dialling is working, but incoming calls are answered then returns
dial tone , I can then dial 0 and get to the operator and then dial my
extension numbers
Thanks
Bob Anderson
Cyrand Corp
3-4170 Sladevie
e 15, 2010 9:34 AM
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes some echo changing firmware to 5.8?
>
> In my opinion upgrading from 5.4 to 5.8 reduced my echo considerably.
> I'm not sure about 5.6, I skipped over it.
>
> Josh Patten
> Assis
y.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Josh Patten
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 9:34 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes some echo changing firmware to 5.8?
In my opinion upgrading from 5.4 to 5.8 reduced my echo considerably.
I&
In my opinion upgrading from 5.4 to 5.8 reduced my echo considerably.
I'm not sure about 5.6, I skipped over it.
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 6/15/2010 7:56 AM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
> http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8500?page=com
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Aall-tabpanel#issue-tabs
It looks like they added 5.8 to the template recently (we of course haven't
seen this yet). There a some lines that have echo on the polycom side - you
can hear yourself. I
-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
>> Josh Patten
>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 7:00 PM
>> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes gateways disable voice detection
>>
>> I'm at my wits end. If I turn off
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
> Josh Patten
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 7:00 PM
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes g
ssage-
>> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
>> Josh Patten
>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 6:30 PM
>> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>> Subject: [sipx-users] Audiocodes gateways
nal Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
> Josh Patten
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 6:30 PM
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: [sipx-users] Audiocodes gateways disable voice dete
tment.net
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Josh Patten
> To: Tony Graziano
> C
om: Josh Patten
To: Tony Graziano
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Sent: Thu Jun 10 19:30:31 2010
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes gateways disable voice detection
Let's not turn this into a gateway manufacturer comparison
Let me rephrase the question:
What happens on you Polycom
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
