OK, no problem, will sent to you soon. Thanks in advance.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Joly [mailto:rj...@nortel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:44 PM
To: jun,wen; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet
subnets
Ok
Joly, Robert (CAR:9D30); sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second
> intranet subnets
>
> Yes, it is still one-way speech path, from remote worker to
> sip client inside intranet. The router well terminates VPN
> tunnel f
...@nortel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:06 PM
To: jun,wen; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet
subnets
Ok, we are making progress. Still you get one-way speech path? What about
the routers terminating the VPN tunnels for
, July 21, 2009 10:03 AM
> To: Joly, Robert (CAR:9D30); sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second
> intranet subnets
>
> I made my eyebeam as you pointed. Now it gives me
> "x-sipX-privcontact" in the Registration.
&
nt: Monday, July 20, 2009 11:00 PM
> To: jun,wen; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet
> subnets
>
> >
> > Yes I observed x-sipx-nonat of remote worker in the contact of
> > registration menu. Let me check
s that if you choose to rely on
> sipXecs solving your NAT traversal issues, please disable any
> other NAT traversal features in your deployment.
>
>
>
>
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robert Joly [mailto:rj...@nortel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, J
-
From: Robert Joly [mailto:rj...@nortel.com]
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 11:00 PM
To: jun,wen; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet
subnets
>
> Yes I observed x-sipx-nonat of remote worker in the contact of
> registration men
[mailto:rj...@nortel.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 10:27 PM
> To: jun,wen; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second
> intranet subnets
>
> Ok, next thing to check then is whether or not there is some
> SIP-aware equipment at
, 2009 10:27 PM
To: jun,wen; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet
subnets
Ok, next thing to check then is whether or not there is some SIP-aware
equipment at the remote worker site. The simplest way to tell is to check
the registration
ay up to 'DEBUG' to put my finger on it.
> -Original Message-
> From: jun,wen [mailto:jun@msn.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 10:20 AM
> To: Joly, Robert (CAR:9D30); sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second
ubject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet
subnets
Please make sure that your 192.168.8.0/24 and 192.168.10.0/24 appear in your
intranet subnet list under System->Intranet Calling. The rule of thumb here
is that the Intranet Subnets section should contain all the
Please make sure that your 192.168.8.0/24 and 192.168.10.0/24 appear in
your intranet subnet list under System->Intranet Calling. The rule of
thumb here is that the Intranet Subnets section should contain all the
subnets that describe your intranet.
>
> Hi, I have three intranet subnets by a cen
Hi, I have three intranet subnets by a central site with sipx server
(192.168.2.0/24 ) and two of branch sites (192.168.8.0/24 and
192.168.10.0/24) with VPN tunnel interconnections of hub-and-spoke.
The sip phones inside these three intranet subnets can make call to each
other without problem, and
13 matches
Mail list logo
