Video has been deleted...
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Gregory
Ducatel
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 4:17 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: 3delight for softimage 4.0 preview
Hi,
Sorry
video has been deleted?
Rob
\/-\/\/
On 29-5-2013 4:16, Gregory Ducatel wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply...
So since even in better resolution it is hard to read the setting
panel, I have done an extra video: http://vimeo.com/67174304 just to
show the settings
I'm throwing one more question into this conversation.. I'd like to know if
1. when you use the new path tracing method, do you have the same speedups
when you turn on depth of field as you'd have with the REYES method? Cause
that's a bit of a problem with arnold atm.
2. And I guess I know the
I got to watch it :) blah :)
::Christopher
Rob Wuijster wrote:
video has been deleted?
Rob
\/-\/\/
On 29-5-2013 4:16, Gregory Ducatel wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply...
So since even in better resolution it is hard to read the setting
panel, I have
Hi,
The video is back sorry about that: http://vimeo.com/67206997 ( rendering
option classroom )
Regarding depth of field, displacement and motion blur the impact between
REYES and Path Tracing isn't drastic or anything unacceptable..
Cheers,
Greg
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Christopher
I like how the tiles render so fast, Mental Ray is not like this.
::Christopher
Gregory Ducatel wrote:
Hi,
The video is back sorry about that: http://vimeo.com/67206997 (
rendering option classroom )
Regarding depth of field, displacement and motion blur the impact
between REYES and Path
They offer a free dual-core license too, which I think is pretty cool
rather than having watermarks or size limitations. (though the wonky
licensing scheme still seems unnecessary)
It's great to see all these different render engines being available for
this lowly particle system (hahaha!).
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Paul Griswold
pgrisw...@fusiondigitalproductions.com wrote:
They offer a free dual-core license too, which I think is pretty cool
rather than having watermarks or size limitations. (though the wonky
licensing scheme still seems unnecessary)
I wouldn't say
1. when you use the new path tracing method, do you have the same speedups
when you turn on depth of field as you'd have with the REYES method? Cause
that's a bit of a problem with arnold atm.
Before replying to this question, one remark: in 3Delight, increasing the AA
samples doesn't
The video look Promising Aghiles , keep up the rendering engain coming to
Softimage , waiting the trail of the version 4.
Here is a quick update regarding the hair/fur...
http://vimeo.com/67238243
Only 1 million hair on my laptop, the draw back is that Softimage is slow
to export that many hair strand... On my workstation I was able to perform
the same test with 20 millions hair strands.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at
Hi Guys,
In case you did not had a chance to look into the next version of 3dfs,
here is a little test I did.
http://vimeo.com/66105781
Cheers,
Greg
Looks interesting Greg. Two questions:
1. What is your hardware setup ?
2. Could you upload it in higher resolution so we can read the menus?
MB
Den 28. maj 2013 kl. 15:37 skrev Gregory Ducatel gduca...@gmail.com:
Hi Guys,
In case you did not had a chance to look into the next version of
Is it as fast as Arnold :) ?
Morten Bartholdy wrote:
Looks interesting Greg. Two questions:
1. What is your hardware setup ?
2. Could you upload it in higher resolution so we can read the menus?
MB
Den 28. maj 2013 kl. 15:37 skrev Gregory Ducatel gduca...@gmail.com:
Hi Guys,
That entirely depends on the use-case.
Arnold is in faster most raycasting situations, but 3Delight will be faster
for for example motion graphics or character animations with unrealistic
shading.
And even then it can very much depend on the complexity of the scene and on
of what kind that
I haven't tried 3Delight, but Arnold is **way** too good. My gut feeling is
Arnie is probably faster overall.
That said, they're entirely different rendering architectures so it's not
fair to compare. 3Delight is (as I understand it) renderman-compliant which
implies they probably use the Reyes
True, it originated as a REYES renderer, but now it may be better thought
of as a hybrid renderer taking advantage of both techniques when needed.
I like working with Arnold too, but I don't think fast renders are one of
its strongest selling points.
Ciaran
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Alan
I thought Development on 3Dlight got bricked on account of some American
copyright/patent law pertaining to algorithms ?
As a Ray-tracer it will never beat Arnold at its own game, but maybe it has
other tricks up its sleeve...
I've always heard that despite its legacy in the industry PRman is a
Hello Ciaran,
Next release of 3Delight for Sotimage is a path-tracer. REYES is optional. (You
can select one or the other).
The path-tracer introduces some novel sampling techniques, such as nice
sampling across multiple bounces, high quality environment sampling (no need to
blur your maps)
Very cool! I stand corrected. :)
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Aghiles Kheffache aghil...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello Ciaran,
Next release of 3Delight for Sotimage is a path-tracer. REYES is optional.
(You can select one or the other).
The path-tracer introduces some novel sampling
never say never :)
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Sebastien Sterling
sebastien.sterl...@gmail.com wrote:
As a Ray-tracer it will never beat Arnold at its own game, but maybe it
has other tricks up its sleeve...
Great! Looking forward to it.
Ciaran
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Aghiles Kheffache aghil...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello Ciaran,
Next release of 3Delight for Sotimage is a path-tracer. REYES is optional.
(You can select one or the other).
The path-tracer introduces some novel sampling
Wow. Looks amazing @_@. I used to use 3delight for production till 3.1 and
changed to Arnold, but I like to try it again.
Do you know when it is going to be released? I still can see only 3.1.17
version is available on their website.
Cheers
Daniel
On 29/05/2013, at 1:37 AM, Gregory Ducatel
Thanks for the video and heads up Gregory,
it's refreshing to see that 3DL for Softimage is still actively being
developed, and from the looks of the change list relentlessly being bug-fixed
and optimized too.
You say this is a 4.0 preview, in how far does it differ from the latest
official
@Aghiles: You need to advertise your product more, I didn't even know you
implemented incremental updates!
Yes, we are working on that. The website/docs/communication will change so that
it becomes easier to see what's going on in the team and with the products.
I suppose you are doing
Wow. Looks amazing @_@. I used to use 3delight for production till 3.1 and
changed to Arnold, but I like to try it again.
Do you know when it is going to be released? I still can see only 3.1.17
version is available on their website.
It will be release somewhere between now and mid-June
Hey Aghiles.
Of course I like to try. What should I do to try the new one?
Daniel
On 29/05/2013, at 10:04 AM, Aghiles Kheffache
aghil...@gmail.commailto:aghil...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow. Looks amazing @_@. I used to use 3delight for production till 3.1 and
changed to Arnold, but I like to try it
Good comparison, I shall remember that :)
Arnold vs Mental Ray, the battle wages on.
Does 3Delight require shader dev or can a small to individual get what
needs to be done fast. Everyone doesn't use Arnold, some are able to
get there hands on it for whatever reason, excluding illegal methods.
28 matches
Mail list logo
