Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-16 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I think, eventually, and I really hate to say this b/c classloading is a : nightmare, but we may want to look into isolated classloaders or OSGi or : something for the Solr Home lib directory. The benefits being that I already : see library collisions in our future. we already have clasloaders

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-15 Thread Yonik Seeley
gt; >> Otis >> -- >> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch >> >> >> >> - Original Message >>> >>> From: Chris Hostetter >>> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org >>> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 2:12:

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-15 Thread Grant Ingersoll
ely no need for. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Chris Hostetter To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 2:12:01 AM Subject: Re: ant example, tika : The only issue I see now is that DIH has been rele

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-15 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
- Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Chris Hostetter > To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 2:12:01 AM > Subject: Re: ant example, tika > > > : The only issue I see now is that DIH has been released as part of the core, > so

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-12 Thread Chris Hostetter
: The only issue I see now is that DIH has been released as part of the core, so : I would vote that it stays in there. It is also quite popular, I think, so : I'd hate to break people. ...which is why having a kitchen-sink war with all the contribs might make sense. But frankly i don't see it

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-12 Thread Grant Ingersoll
It occurred to me that we could also add a "core-example" target that only builds the core example for those impatient types w/ slow machines ;-) On Dec 12, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:50 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : Ignoring the JSP dilemma... DIH's

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-12 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:50 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : Ignoring the JSP dilemma... DIH's JAR doesn't need to be in the WAR, but can : ship in a lib/ directory outside the WAR and come in as a plugin. And Solr : can ship with all of the contribs wired in to a kitchen-sink example : config

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-11 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Ignoring the JSP dilemma... DIH's JAR doesn't need to be in the WAR, but can : ship in a lib/ directory outside the WAR and come in as a plugin. And Solr : can ship with all of the contribs wired in to a kitchen-sink example : configuration. : : There is merit to keeping Solr's WAR and core to

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-08 Thread Erik Hatcher
Regarding DIH: On Dec 8, 2008, at 3:00 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् wrote: it is not a part of the war, the first users will have trouble in 'getting started' It is already used by most of the first time users. So do we want to change the expectation ? Ignoring the JSP dilemma... DIH's JAR

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-08 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
it is not a part of the war, the first users will have trouble in 'getting started' It is already used by most of the first time users. So do we want to change the expectation ? On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 8, 2008, at 2:33 AM, Shalin Shekhar

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-07 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Dec 8, 2008, at 2:33 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Also, it looks like DataImportHandler puts itself in the war file -- I don't think we want that either. One big difference between DataImportHandler and ot

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-07 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, it looks like DataImportHandler puts itself in the war file -- I > don't think we want that either. One big difference between DataImportHandler and other contribs is that it has zero extra dependencies and it con

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Dec 7, 2008, at 5:56 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The jars aren't checked in to the example. But "ant example" puts them there - doesn't matter from a user perspective. The thing is, the extraction stuff is a cont

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-07 Thread Ryan McKinley
On Dec 7, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: The jars aren't checked in to the example. The thing is, the extraction stuff is a contrib and not on by default and not packaged into the WAR. DIH currently does package into the WAR, but I don't think contribs should do that. Frankly

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-07 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The jars aren't checked in to the example. But "ant example" puts them there - doesn't matter from a user perspective. > The thing is, the extraction > stuff is a contrib and not on by default and not packaged into the W

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll
The jars aren't checked in to the example. The thing is, the extraction stuff is a contrib and not on by default and not packaged into the WAR. DIH currently does package into the WAR, but I don't think contribs should do that. Frankly, I think the better answer is an overhaul of the exam

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-07 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tika shouldn't be in the example. It just puts the libs there but is not > hooked into the config. Hmmm, so it's half installed. Seems like we should either add in the extraction handler (perhaps lazily loaded if it tak

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-07 Thread Ryan McKinley
On Dec 7, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: On Dec 7, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: On Dec 7, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: I notice that SOLR-284 (extraction data handler + tika) is in the default example now. scriplet Is this what we want? I don't think so. Also,

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-07 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Dec 7, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: On Dec 7, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: I notice that SOLR-284 (extraction data handler + tika) is in the default example now. Is this what we want? I don't think so. Also, it looks like DataImportHandler puts itself in the war file

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Tika shouldn't be in the example. It just puts the libs there but is not hooked into the config. On Dec 7, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: On Dec 7, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: I notice that SOLR-284 (extraction data handler + tika) is in the default example now. Is thi

Re: ant example, tika

2008-12-07 Thread Ryan McKinley
On Dec 7, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: I notice that SOLR-284 (extraction data handler + tika) is in the default example now. Is this what we want? I don't think so. Also, it looks like DataImportHandler puts itself in the war file -- I don't think we want that either. On th

ant example, tika

2008-12-07 Thread Yonik Seeley
I notice that SOLR-284 (extraction data handler + tika) is in the default example now. Is this what we want? On the topic of "example", it used to be much faster in the past to use for debugging... now when I do "ant example", I go get a cup of coffee. -Yonik