Any help on this? Could this error be because of something else (not
remote streaming issue)?
Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:04 AM, vivek sar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying using CSV (Solr 1.4, 03/29) for indexing following wiki
> (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV). I've updated the
> sol
Hi all,
I'm encountering a problem when I try to add records with a date field
to the index.
The records I'm adding have very little date precision, usually
MMDD but some only have year and month, others only have a year.
I'm trying to get around this by using a text pattern factory
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Mark Allan wrote:
>
> My thinking is that Solr is trying to add the field directly as '1953'
> before doing the text factory stuff and is therefore not in the right format
> for indexing. Does that sound like a reasonable assumption and am I missing
> something w
On 16 Apr 2009, at 9:00 am, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Mark Allan
wrote:
My thinking is that Solr is trying to add the field directly as
'1953'
before doing the text factory stuff and is therefore not in the
right format
for indexing. Does that sound
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Mark Allan wrote:
>
> Hi, thanks for your prompt reply. I'm a bit confused though - the only way
> to do this is a two-step process?
>
> I have to write code to munge the XML into another document which is
> exactly the same except for the format of the Date fiel
Hi,
I am analyzing the memory usage for my Solr setup. I am
testing with 500 text documents of 2 MB each.
I have defined a field for displaying the teasers and storing 1 MB of
text in it. I am testing with just 128 MB maxHeap(I know I should be
increasing it but just testing the
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Mark Allan wrote:
>
> Hi, thanks for your prompt reply. I'm a bit confused though - the only way
> to do this is a two-step process?
>
> I have to write code to munge the XML into another document which is
> exactly the same except for the format of the Date fiel
Thanks Hoss. I haven't had time to try it yet, but that is exactly the
kind of help I was looking for.
Brent
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: As for the second part, I was thinking of trying to replace the standard
: SolrIndexSearcher with one that employs a MultiSearcher. But I'm not very
: famili
I'm using the DataImportHandler and my database is in "latin1". When i
retreive documents that i have indexed in solr they seem to have been
converted in utf-8. Is it normal ? Is it possible to store in latin1 in
solr ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Stored-Document-enc
Hi
I am new to Solr, but have been using Lucene for a while. I am trying
to rewrite
some old lucene indexing code using the Jdbc DataImport i Solr, my
problem:
I have Entities that can be marked in the db as "deleted", these i
don't want to index
and thats no problem when doing a full-imp
No there is no such file there.
How can i configure more detailed error reporting for this message?
2009/4/15 Shalin Shekhar Mangar :
> From the log it seems like there is a solr.xml inside
> var/lib/tomcat5/webapps/ which tomcat is trying deploy and failing. Very
> strange. You should remove that
Hi,
Have you tried:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#head-2ca22f63cb8d1b2ba3ff0cfc05e85b94898c59cf
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: "Gargate, Siddharth"
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday
Hi,
Are you absolutely sure you are changing the correct config file?
What is the 20090414_1 part in your URL? The name of the core? Be sure to
change ITS config (you can get to it from Solr Admin page) and to restart Solr.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
Hi,
No, you typically truncate (i.e. index first N terms) them while indexing using
maxFieldLength setting in solrconfig.xml. You can, however, limit how many
characters (or bytes?) to copy when using copyField functionality.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
Hi,
Lots of little things to look at here.
You should do lsof as root, and it looks like you aren't doing that.
You should double-check Tomcat's maxThreads param in server.xml.
You should give Jetty a try.
I don't think you said anything about looking at the container's or solr logs
and finding
I don't think you gain anything on the Solr end of things by using multiple
threads if you are already using StreamingUpdateSolrServer.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: vivek sar
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Th
I know of a company that used it, but then determined it was this component
that was slowing down their search. They might have modified it some, too, I
don't recall now.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Matthew Runo
> T
Roman,
This depends on multiple factors - amount of data, type of data/analysis, query
rate and query complexity, etc.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Roman Dissertori
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday,
Hi,
I'm using the Solr 1.4 (03/29 nightly build) and when searching on a
large index (40G) I get the same exception as in this thread,
HTTP Status 500 - 13724 java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException:
13724 at org.apache.lucene.search.TermScorer.score(TermScorer.java:74)
at org.apache.lucene.s
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 7:28 PM, vivek sar wrote:
> lsof at
> this point usually shows at 1400, but my ulimit is much higher than
> that.
Could you be hitting a kernel limit?
cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
http://www.netadmintools.com/art295.html
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimag
Hi,I have followed the procedure given on this blog to setup the solr
Below is my code. I am trying to index the data but I am not able to connect
to server and getting authentication error.
HttpClient client=new HttpClient();
client.getState().setCredentials(new AuthScope("localhost", 80,
AuthS
did you try the deletedPkQuery?
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Ruben Chadien wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am new to Solr, but have been using Lucene for a while. I am trying to
> rewrite
> some old lucene indexing code using the Jdbc DataImport i Solr, my problem:
>
> I have Entities that can be marked in
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Allahbaksh Asadullah
wrote:
> Hi,I have followed the procedure given on this blog to setup the solr
>
> Below is my code. I am trying to index the data but I am not able to connect
> to server and getting authentication error.
>
>
> HttpClient client=new HttpClien
Thanks Noble.Regards,
Allahbaksh
2009/4/16 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Allahbaksh Asadullah
> wrote:
> > Hi,I have followed the procedure given on this blog to setup the solr
> >
> > Below is my code. I am trying to index the data but I am not able to
> connect
I guess strings are stored by lucene in utf-8 always. BTW As you pass
the Object as a String the encoding is lost
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:37 PM, AlexxelA wrote:
>
> I'm using the DataImportHandler and my database is in "latin1". When i
> retreive documents that i have indexed in solr they seem
Not sure if you got the answer - QTime represents the number of milliseconds it
took Solr to execute a search. It does not include the time it takes to send
back the response (that depends on its size, network speed...)
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
Let me second this. People ask for this pretty often.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Erik Hatcher
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2009 8:33:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Phrase Query Issue
>
>
> On
Hi,
It looks like your spellchecker index did get created (doesn't it get created
automatically when Solr starts?), but it looks rather empty. :)
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Anoop Atre
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.o
I have an issue with garbage collection on our solr servers. We have an
issue where the old generation never gets cleaned up on one of our
servers. This server has a little over 2 million records which are
updated every hour or so. I have tried the parallel GC and the
concurrent GC. The
I have a query that yields results binned in several facets. How can I boost
the results that fall in certain facets over the rest of them that do not
belong to those facets? I use the standard query format. Thank you
- ashok
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Boosting-by-fac
Personally, I'd start from scratch:
-Xmx -Xms...
-server is not even needed any more.
If you are not using Java 1.6, I suggest you do.
Next, I'd try to investigate why objects are not being cleaned up - this should
not be happening in the first place. Is Solr the only webapp running?
Ot
This worked great. Thanks!
The only catch is you have to (eventually) call CoreContainer.shutdown(),
otherwise the app just hangs.
Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
>
> To reply to my own message.
>
> The following worked starting from scratch (example):
> -
: I need index/search words extracted from pdf files with coordinates and page
: number, so I have this structure:
:
:- index the document id
:- a document has many pages
:- a page has many words
:- a word has geometry[w,h,x,y](inside of page)
:
: Is this possible with solr?
: For instance, my dictionary holds the following terms:
: 1 - a b c d
: 2 - c d e
: 3 - a b
: 4 - a e f g h
:
: If I put the sentence [a b c d f g h] in as a query, I want to recieve
: dictionary items 1 (matching all words a b c d) and 3 (matching words a b)
: as matches
this is a pretty hard
Greetings,
Would anybody be willing to join a PNW Hadoop and/or Lucene User Group
with me in the Seattle area? I can donate some facilities, etc. -- I
also always have topics to speak about :)
Cheers,
Bradford
: the special characters but the issue is while the document which I am
: going to index contains any of these special characters it is throwing
: query parse exception. Can anyone give pointer over this? Thanks in
your question is kind of vauge ... for instance: it seems like you are
saying
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Personally, I'd start from scratch:
-Xmx -Xms...
-server is not even needed any more.
If you are not using Java 1.6, I suggest you do.
Next, I'd try to investigate why objects are not being cleaned up - this should
not be happening in the first place. Is Solr the
Hello, I'm using solr 1.3 with solr.py. We have a basic schema.xml,
nothing custom or out of the ordinary.
I need the following the feature from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/CHANGES.txt
SOLR-911: Add support for multi-select faceting by allowing filters to be
tagged
: I installed Solr on tomcat 6 and whenever I click search it displays the xml
: like I am editing it?
:
: is that normal?
I'm afraid i don't really understand your question ... if you mean you get
an XML formated response when you click the "Search" button on the admin
screen, then yes -- tha
If you're using java 5 or 6 jmap is a useful tool in tracking down
memory leaks.
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/tools/share/jmap.html
jmap -histo:live
will print a histogram of all live objects in the heap. Start at the
top and work your way down until you find something susp
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:03 AM, ashokc wrote:
>
> I have a query that yields results binned in several facets. How can I
> boost
> the results that fall in certain facets over the rest of them that do not
> belong to those facets? I use the standard query format. Thank you
I'm not sure what yo
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> this is a pretty hard problem in general ... in my mind i call it the
> "longest matching sub-phrase" problem, but i have no idea if it has a real
> name.
>
> the only solution i know of using Lucene is to construct a phrase query
> for
Hi all,
Can someone of you tell me how to implement a faceted search?
Thanks,
Regards,
Sajith Vimukthi Weerakoon.
Hi all,
I am developing a search tool and it uses solr as the key querying
technique. At the moment I have got a very much stable version and I need to
enhance the application by introducing a faceted search. I went through the
documentation and did some modifications to my code. I could not get
a
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Sajith Weerakoon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am developing a search tool and it uses solr as the key querying
> technique. At the moment I have got a very much stable version and I need
> to
> enhance the application by introducing a faceted search. I went through the
>
What you indicated here is for a different purpose, is it not? I already do
something similar with my 'q'. For example a sample query logged in
'catalina.out' looks like
webapp=/search path=/select
params={rows=15&start=0&q=(+(content:umts)+OR+(title:umts)^2+OR+(urltext:umts)^2)}
when the search
I tried hl.maxAnalyzedChars=500 but still the same issue. I get OOM for
row size 20 only.
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 9:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: OutofMemory on Highlightling
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:32 AM, ashokc wrote:
>
> What we need is for the white_papers & pdfs to be boosted, but if and only
> if such doucments are valid results to the search term in question. How
> would I write my above 'q' to accomplish that?
>
Thanks for explaining in detail.
Basically,
I have now :-)
Thanks , missed that in the Wiki.
Ruben
On Apr 16, 2009, at 7:10 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ् wrote:
did you try the deletedPkQuery?
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Ruben Chadien > wrote:
Hi
I am new to Solr, but have been using Lucene for a while. I am
trying to
rewri
Hi all,
Have any one try to use CollapseFilter with the latest version of Solr in
trunk? However, it looks like Solr 1.4 doesn't allow calling setFilterList()
and setFilter() on one instance of the QueryCommand. I modified the code in
QueryCommand to allow this:
public QueryCommand setFilterL
I have built the trunk code as of Revision: 765826 and tried !tag=/!ex=
which is what I need to work. And IT WORKS! That's great.
Now, is it unwise to release 1.4 into production for this feature (based
on my explanation below)?
thanks
gene
-- Forwarded message --
From: ristr
51 matches
Mail list logo
