Hi All,
I have a use case where I have to tag facet queries.
Here is the code snippet for what I tried:
query.addFilterQuery({!tag=NE}med:Blog AND slev:neutral);
query.addFacetQuery({!tag=NE key=BLOG}med:Blog AND slev:neutral);
query.addFilterQuery({!tag=P}med:Review AND slev:neutral);
Hi,
where can I find more information about a failure of a Java replication
in Solr 1.4?
(Dashboard does not seem to be the best place!?)
Regards,
Peter.
Hello !
I am trying to apply the solr-236 patch to the sources I got from svn. I
downloaded the sources from path-to-repository/tags/release-1.4.0
I tried to apply this patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12444611/SOLR-236-trunk.patch
and this one :
You've tagged facet queries, but looks like you might want to use the
exclude capability on your filter queries also. Filter queries are
additive, constraining the results further for each one, and by
default faceting is based off the search results. Use excl to have
facets count outside
Hi,
Does the field that is used for spellchecker indexing need to be stored
and/or indexed? These fields became fairly large in my index, and php wont
parse/decode the documents returned.
--
--
Dejan Noveski
Web Developer
dr.m...@gmail.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/dekomote | LinkedIn:
A field used to build a spellcheck index only needs to be indexed, not
stored.
But, your PHP issue could be alleviated anyway by simply customizing
the fl parameter and excluding the large stored field. This is often
desirable for large fields that are never needed fully in the UI, but
Thank you very much!
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.comwrote:
A field used to build a spellcheck index only needs to be indexed, not
stored.
But, your PHP issue could be alleviated anyway by simply customizing the fl
parameter and excluding the large
I had success with a previous version (~ 12/2009). Try to ask directly
in the comments of the patch.
I got immediately help there.
Regards,
Peter.
Hello !
I am trying to apply the solr-236 patch to the sources I got from svn. I
downloaded the sources from
Here's a slider example that narrows down how many tags/facets are
displayed: http://www.nines.org/tags
How about a tree map? See my slides from the prototyping preso at
EuroCon last week: http://lucene-eurocon.org/sessions-track2-day2.html#4
Pie in the sky, how about pie charts? I
Ok I will have a look on the comments and I will post if necessary.
Thanks ^^
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Applying-collapse-patch-tp851121p851170.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Erick,
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.comwrote:
You've tagged facet queries, but looks like you might want to use the
exclude capability on your filter queries also. Filter queries are
additive, constraining the results further for each one, and by
With embedded solr (1.3.0) sometime a SolrException happens.
I don't understand why : I have not been able to find a scenario.
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: No such core: core0
at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.EmbeddedSolrServer.request(EmbeddedSolrServer.java:112)
at
The trunk should work with the latest patch (SOLR-236-trunk.patch).
Did patching go successful? What compilation errors you get?
On 28 May 2010 11:10, Sophie M. sop...@beezik.com wrote:
Ok I will have a look on the comments and I will post if necessary.
Thanks ^^
--
View this message in
Hi,
I am getting the trunk, I try to apply the patch, to compile and I tell you
what I get.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Applying-collapse-patch-tp851121p851222.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It is ok for applying the patch, thanks Martin. When I start Solr I get this
logs in my console :
C:\Users\Sophie\workspace\lucene-solr\lucene-solr\solr\solrjava -jar
start.jar
2010-05-28 12:09:30.037:INFO::Logging to STDERR via
org.mortbay.log.StdErrLog
2010-05-28
Have you executed: ant example after building? (Assuming that this
is the example solr)
On 28 May 2010 12:17, Sophie M. sop...@beezik.com wrote:
It is ok for applying the patch, thanks Martin. When I start Solr I get this
logs in my console :
ok,but is there an easy way to influence the format of json output?
eg field order, names etc. maybe i want to group the result differently or add
some infos
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jon Baer [mailto:jonb...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Mai 2010 19:39
An:
I don't know how, but it works now. Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Applying-collapse-patch-tp851121p851502.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ah, ok. Well, the fieldType was text, untouched from the Solr default.
hth,
Darren
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 22:06 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Hi Koji,
:Well, its quite simple. Here is the field returned from my query:
: fox
Actually what Koji was asking for was the fieldtype/
Dejan,
How are you making the calls from PHP to Solr?
I am curious to know why the documents could not be parsed
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Dejan Noveski dr.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much!
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
A
Hello everyone,
I'm new to Solr but have been asked to do an evaluation as an
alternative for a commercial search engine.
I have some experience with Lucene and a java background so I'm not
afraid to dive into code :-)
The application now has a very particular way of sorting results using
Hi,
I need to sort query results by the output of some function which takes
score and couple other fields as an input (50% of the total score comes
from similarity score and 50% comes from document's popularity). Is there a
workaround which does not involve installation of any patches.
I have
i am wondering why a search term with hyphen doesn't match.
my search term is prof-auskunft. in WordDelimiterFilterFactory i have
catenateWords, so my understanding is that profi-auskunft would search
for profiauskunft. when i use the analyse panel in solr admi i see that
profi-auskunft matches a
Hi,
how to achieve custom ordering of the documents when there is a general query?
Usecase:
Interleave documents from different customers one after the other.
Example:
Say i have 10 documents in the index belonging to 3 customers (customer_id
field in the index ) and using query *:*
so all the
Hello,
I am having some problems with solr 1.4. I am indexing and querying data
using the following fieldType:
fieldType name=text_de_de class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
filter
Thanks Geert,
Trip Advisor was interesting, I also see another sliders site was sent
around.
But I don't think all their Facets are binding.
For example, to test no-results, I set it to 4 start hotels in SF with a max
of $50 / night - obviously not reasonable.
But it showed some hotels. At
Hi Lukas,
Displaying 2 numbers is an interesting variant. Not for a casual consumer
site, but actually pretty cool for a site appealing to engineers.
On the formatting front though, the (nn/mm) is a bit visually dense.
Might I suggest some tweaks:
1: Drop the parenthesis, in favor of some
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to change the schema without having
to reindex? I want to change the stored fields specifically. Any help
would be appreciated, thanks.
Haha! Important tooltips are now deprecated in Web Applications.
This is nothing official, of course.
But it's being advised to avoid important UI tasks that require cursor
tracking, mouse-over, hovering, etc. in web applications.
Why? Many touch-centric mobile devices don't support hover.
Hi Guys,
Is there a way to store 2 types of things in Solr. We have a list of
consultants and a list of consultation requests. and I want to store
them as separate documents. Can I do this with one instance of Solr or
do I have to have two instances?
Thanks,
MOazzam
Good read here: http://mysolr.com/tips/denormalized-data-structure/ .
Are consultation requests unique to each consultant? In that case you could
represent the request as a Json String and store it as a multi-valued string
field for each consultant, though that makes querying against requests
Hi.
I am building up a query with quite a bit of logic such as parentheses, plus
signs, etc... and it's a little tedious dealing with it all at a string
level. I was wondering if anyone has any thoughts on constructing the query
in lucene and using the string representation of the query to send
Sounds like you'll want to use a multiple core setup. One core fore each type
of document
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Storing-different-entities-in-Solr-tp852299p852346.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
Multi-core is an option, but keep in mind if you go that route you will need to
do two searches to correlate data between the two.
-Kallin Nagelberg
-Original Message-
From: Robert Zotter [mailto:robertzot...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 12:26 PM
To:
Hi Pillip,
could you give me some more information of your environment? A first idea
that comes to my mind is to use the SearchComponents for the solution of
your problem. You could either replace the whole QueryComponent (not re-
commended) or write a (probably small) SearchComponent that
Interesting -- I don't think there is anything that does this.
Though it seems like something the XML Query syntax should be able to
do, but we would still need to add the ability to send the xml style
query to solr.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Phillip Rhodes
rhodebumpl...@gmail.com
You can keep different type of documents in the same index. If each
document has a type field. You can restrict your searches to specific
type(s) of document by using a filter query, which is very fast and
efficient.
Bill
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Nagelberg, Kallin
Hi, I'm a solr newbie, and I'm hoping someone can point me in the right
direction.
I'm trying to index a bunch of documents with Greek text in them. I can
successfully index documents by generating add xml and using curl to send them
to my server, but when I use solrj to create and send
On May 28, 2010, at 9:23am, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
Hi.
I am building up a query with quite a bit of logic such as
parentheses, plus
signs, etc... and it's a little tedious dealing with it all at a
string
level. I was wondering if anyone has any thoughts on constructing
the query
in
How would this be any different than simply using the function to alter the
scoring of the final results and then sorting by score?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sort-by-function-workaround-for-Solr-1-4-tp851922p852471.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Thanks for all your answers guys. Requests and consultants have a many
to many relationship so I can't store request info in a document with
advisorID as the primary key.
Bill's solution and multicore solutions might be what I am looking
for. Bill, will I be able to have 2 primary keys (so I can
The problem with using query functions is that I don't know how to equally
scale similarity score and output of the function. What I mean is that query
output would be in the range from 0..1 and function output would be in the
range from 0..1. Well I think I do know how to scale function output to
Hi,
So for your use case are you wanting to search for a consultant then
look at all of his or her request or pull both at the same time? In
both cases one index should suffice. In you define a primary key field
and use it for both doc types it shouldn't be an issue. Unless your
dataset
Hmmm, I don't really see the problem here. I'll have to use English
examples...
Searching on the* (assuming the is a stopword) will search on
(them OR theory OR thespian) assuming those three words are in
your index. It will NOT search on the. So I think you're OK, or are
you seeing anomalous
No. You can add new documents which will reflect the new schema, but
you can't retroactively update your index.
In your specific example, it's not possible to losslessly recreate the data
to store from the indexed fields. Consider stopword removal, or lowercasing.
HTH
Erick
On Fri, May 28, 2010
: ok,but is there an easy way to influence the format of json output?
: eg field order, names etc. maybe i want to group the result differently or
add some infos
Wouldn't that be easier to do on the cliend side once you have the json
structure?
if not: then using the velocity writer to
You most certainly *can* store the many-many relationship, you
are just denormalizing your data. I know it goes against the grain
of any good database admin, but it's very often a good solution
for a search application.
You've gotta forget almost everything you learned about how data
*should* be
I agree with Erick,
Could you show us what these two entities look like, and the total count of
each? That might shed some light on the appropriate approach.
-Kallin Nagelberg
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 2:36 PM
: Hi, I'm trying to build from source to apply the field collapsing patch.
: 'Ant dist' runs just fine, no errors, but at startup I get a
: NoSuchFieldError: submap exception (stack trace:
: http://pastebin.com/NXsf0KJS ). This is before sending any requests. I don't
: have any 'submap' field
Hi,
We use Drupal as the CMS and Solr for our search engine needs and are
planning to have Solr Master-Slave replication setup across the data
centers. I am in the process of testing my replication - what is the
best means to delete the index on the Solr slave and then replicate a
fresh copy from
: No. You can add new documents which will reflect the new schema, but
: you can't retroactively update your index.
:
: In your specific example, it's not possible to losslessly recreate the data
: to store from the indexed fields. Consider stopword removal, or lowercasing.
To put it another
I had a similar problem a few days ago and I found that the documents where not
being loaded correctly as UTF-8 into Solr. In my case, the loader program was
a Java.jar I was executing from a cron job. There I added this:
java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar /home/tim/solr/bin/loadSiteSearch.jar
Yeah, I just figured out that if I set
export JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS=-Dfile.encoding=UTF8
Everything works. The OutputStreamWriter used by StreamingUpdateSolrServer
uses the default encoding. UTF-8 might be better, but maybe there are reasons
not to hard-code it.
Thanks,
Hugh
On May 28, 2010,
: Perhaps you could show the 'nr of items left' as a tooltip of sorts when the
: user actually drags the slider.
Years ago, when we were first working on building Solr, a coworker of mind
suggested using double bar sliders (ie: pick a range using a min and a
max) for all numeric facets and
On 28.05.2010, at 21:31, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Perhaps you could show the 'nr of items left' as a tooltip of sorts when the
: user actually drags the slider.
Years ago, when we were first working on building Solr, a coworker of mind
suggested using double bar sliders (ie: pick a
--- On Fri, 5/28/10, efr...@gmail.com efr...@gmail.com wrote:
From: efr...@gmail.com efr...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Does SOLR Allow q= (A or B) AND (C or D)?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Friday, May 28, 2010, 4:42 AM
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks again for the feedback. We will be searching
: I need to use Lucene's `minimum number should match` option of BooleanQuery
: on Solr.
unfortunately, the Lucene QueryParser doesn't support any way of
manipulating the minNumberSHouldMatch property of BooleanQueries specified
in that syntax.
I'm not sure of anyway to do what you're
: I am just using the sor.war file that came with the Solr 1.4 download on
: weblogic.
: did not add any jar or remove any jar
i'm not sure what to tell you then -- somehow you have another copy of
some classes in your classpath.
did you copy the solr.war on top of an older solr.war? is it
: Years ago, when we were first working on building Solr, a coworker of mind
: suggested using double bar sliders (ie: pick a range using a min and a
: max) for all numeric facets and putting sparklines above them to give
: the user a visual indication of the spread of documents across the
: Everything works. The OutputStreamWriter used by
: StreamingUpdateSolrServer uses the default encoding. UTF-8 might be
: better, but maybe there are reasons not to hard-code it.
no, this was a big thta's been fixed in svn...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1595
...it
: Searching on the* (assuming the is a stopword) will search on
: (them OR theory OR thespian) assuming those three words are in
: your index. It will NOT search on the. So I think you're OK, or are
: you seeing anomalous results?
i think the missing pieces to hte puzzle here are:
1) wildcard
: Hi to everyone, I'm really sorry for the s3tupid question I'm doing, but I
: didn't understand how to set the java system property solr.solr.home to my
: solr home.
first off: you don't neccessarily *have* to set the solr.solr.home system
property -- there are two other ways of telling Solr
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: Years ago, when we were first working on building Solr, a coworker of
mind
: suggested using double bar sliders (ie: pick a range using a min and a
: max) for all numeric facets and putting sparklines above
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Lukáš Vlček lukas.vl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org
wrote:
: Years ago, when we were first working on building Solr, a coworker of
mind
: suggested using double bar sliders (ie: pick a
: you mean something like the following?
: http://hledani.rozhlas.cz/?query=jazzback=defaultNavigation=;
: Also http://markmail.org has some nice chart
Yeah ... those are close to what i mean -- but in both cases there is
really one big visual graph of a single numeric value (ironicly it's a
: I have found a user comment at this page
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1297 (Enable sorting by function
: query) where he has mentioned that there is a workaround (main query)^0
: func(...) that can be used to sort results by function without having to
: install SOLR-1297 patch.
: When a person searches for keywords eg value1 value2 value3 we want to
: apply boosting so that a document is boosted according to which of the
: keywords it has.
: eg of url : q=value1^4.0 OR value2^2.0 OR value3
...
: I have a requesthandler set up to just search on our Keyword
Hi Ahmad,
Thanks for this. So do we need this:*defType=luceneq.op=ORfl=Title* at
the end?
Also, I'm guessing we will need to install EdgeNGramFilterFactory?
Here are the analyzers / filters we currently are using (just the default
stuff):
*Index Analyzer:
You probably want to store these as numbers instead of text. The
DataImportHandler allows you to take apart text blocks and save the
parts in number fields. The text analysis stack inside basic indexing
will not do this.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
Both use the same HTML stripper. The DIH lets you run multiple
documents in parallel in one request if that helps.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Blargy zman...@hotmail.com wrote:
There will never be any need to search the actual HTML (tags, markup, etc) so
as far as functionality goes it
Please file a JIRA.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Smiley, David W. dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
I'd like to warn people about the default configuration of Jetty in the Solr
trunk release (not present in Solr 1.4 and prior). There is a difference in
the jetty configuration which is for the
Wow, thanks for the heads-up David!
This probably got inadvertently changed when Jetty was upgraded...
sounds like we should prob change back to BoundedThreadPool as a
default!
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Smiley, David W. dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
I'd
The size of the join table is the number of documents, if you
denormalize the two tables.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Nagelberg, Kallin
knagelb...@globeandmail.com wrote:
I agree with Erick,
Could you show us what these two entities look like, and the total count of
each? That might
: Wow, thanks for the heads-up David!
: This probably got inadvertently changed when Jetty was upgraded...
: sounds like we should prob change back to BoundedThreadPool as a
: default!
it seems to have been a deliberate choice miler made, it was a distinct
commit 20 minutes after the jetty
74 matches
Mail list logo
