On 3 April 2013 10:52, amit amit.mal...@gmail.com wrote:
Below is my query
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=subject:session management in
phpfq=category:[*%20TO%20*]fl=category,score,subject
[...]
Add debugQuery=on to your Solr URL, and you will get an
explanation of the score. Your
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 17:08 +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Most of the time I facet on one field that has about twenty unique
values.
They are likely to be disk cached so warming those for 9M documents
should only take a few seconds.
However, once per day I would like to facet on the text field,
I have been dragging the same solrconfig.xml from Solr 3.x to 4.0 to
4.1, with no customization (bad, bad me!). I'm now looking into
customizing it and I see that the Solr 4.1 solrconfig.xml is much
simpler and shorter. Is this simply because many of the examples have
been removed?
In particular,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Andre Bois-Crettez
andre.b...@kelkoo.com wrote:
warmupTime is available on the admin page for each type of cache (in
milliseconds) :
http://solr-box:8983/solr/#/core1/plugins/cache
Or if you are only interested in the total :
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Toke Eskildsen t...@statsbiblioteket.dk
wrote:
However, once per day I would like to facet on the text field,
which is a free-text field usually around 1 KiB (about 100 words), in
order to determine what the top keywords / topics are. That query
would take up
Thanks for the response. I found the issue. The data was being ingested
correctly it just being echoed incorrectly. while inspecting the final HTML
output I was able to find that the richtext-doc.vm file was used to display
my data. The code in this file generated the links to local files. I did
Hi,
I have strange problem with Solr query. I added to my Solr Index new
document with behave! word inside content. While I was trying to search
this document using behave search term it was impossible. Only behave!
returns result. Additionaly search debug returns following information:
debug: {
Thanks David - I suppose it is an AWS question and thank you for the pointers.
As a further input to the MLT question - it does seem that 3.6 behavior is
different from 4.2 - the issue seems to be more in terms of the raw query that
is generated.
I will some more research and revert back with
This is called 'stemming', and is caused by this:
filter class=solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory
language=English/
It means that all of these terms would match:
behave
behaving
behaved
(and possibly more)
because they would all stem down to 'behav'.
This stemming will happen at
So why Solr does not return proper document?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-parser-cuts-last-letter-from-search-term-tp4053432p4053435.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
So, all in all, is there anybody who can write down just main steps of
Solr(including parsing, stemming etc.)?
2013/4/2 Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
I think about myself as an example. I have started to make research about
Solr just for some weeks. I have learned Solr and its related
I'm having issues with highlighting DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilterFactory
in Solr 3.6.1/3.6.2.
It's duplicating/adding words in the highlighted snippet. For example, my
dictionary (dutch) has the following words: premie, beter, ring.
If I search for 'verbetering', results with
Hi all,
I have a running Hadoop + HBase cluster and the HBase cluster is running
it's own zookeeper (HBase manages zookeeper).
I would like to deploy my SolrCloud cluster on a portion of the machines on
that cluster.
My question is: Should I have any trouble / issues deploying an additional
Clear out it's tlogs before starting it again may help.
- Mark
On Apr 2, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
I brought the bad one down and back up and it did nothing. I can clear the
index and try4.2.1. I will save off the logs and see if there is anything
else odd
No, not that I know if, which is why I say we need to get to the bottom of it.
- Mark
On Apr 2, 2013, at 10:18 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark
It's there a particular jira issue that you think may address this? I read
through it quickly but didn't see one that jumped out
On
Sure, yes. But... it comes down to what level of detail you want and need
for a specific task. In other words, there are probably a dozen or more
levels of detail. The reality is that if you are going to work at the Solr
code level, that is very, very different than being a user of Solr, and at
The standard tokenizer recognizes ! as a punctuation character, so it will
be treated as white space.
You could use the white space tokenizer if punctuation is considered
significant.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: vsl
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 6:25 AM
To:
Thank you for the response, unfortunately it didn't change that I'm still
getting no highlighting hits for this query.
...hl.q={!dismax}text_it_IT:l'assieme...
-Original Message-
From: Koji Sekiguchi [mailto:k...@r.email.ne.jp]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 9:00 PM
To:
Ok, so clearing the transaction log allowed things to go again. I am going
to clear the index and try to replicate the problem on 4.2.0 and then I'll
try on 4.2.1
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
No, not that I know if, which is why I say we need to get
hi upayavira
you mean to say that I dont have to follow this :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
and directly I can create spell check field from copyfield and use it...I
dont have to build dictionary on the fieldjust use copyfield for spell
suggetions?
thanks
regards
Rohan
On 3/29/2013 12:07 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
What are folks using for this?
I don't know that this really answers your question, but Solr 4.1 and
later includes a big chunk of codahale metrics internally for request
handler statistics - see SOLR-1972. First we tried including the jar
and
On 3/29/2013 12:14 PM, Plamen Mihaylov wrote:
Can I ask you another question: I have Magento + Solr and have a
requirement to create an admin magento module, where I can add/remove
synonyms dynamically. Is this possible? I searched google but it seems not
possible.
If you change the synonym
Hi All,
I have a requirement where in exact matches for 2 fields (Series Title,
Title) should be ranked higher than the partial matches. The configuration
looks like below:
requestHandler name=assetdismax class=solr.SearchHandler
lst name=defaults
str name=defTypeedismax/str
Thanks. I added a copy field and that fixed the issue.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Gora Mohanty-3 [via Lucene]
ml-node+s472066n4053412...@n3.nabble.com wrote:
On 3 April 2013 10:52, amit [hidden
email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=4053412i=0
wrote:
Below is my query
Something interesting that I'm noticing as well, I just indexed 300,000
items, and some how 300,020 ended up in the index. I thought perhaps I
messed something up so I started the indexing again and indexed another
400,000 and I see 400,064 docs. Is there a good way to find possibile
duplicates?
Hello, Amit:
My guess is that, if HBase is working hard, you're going to have more
trouble with HBase and Solr on the same nodes than HBase and Solr
sharing a Zookeeper. Solr's usage of Zookeeper is very minimal.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions
18
There are three books on Solr, two with that in the title, and one,
Taming Text, each of which have been very valuable in understanding
Solr.
Jack
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
Sure, yes. But... it comes down to what level of detail you want and
Trouble in what why ? If I have enough memory - HBase RegionServer 10GB and
maybe 2GB for Solr ? - or you mean CPU / disk ?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Michael Della Bitta
michael.della.bi...@appinions.com wrote:
Hello, Amit:
My guess is that, if HBase is working hard, you're going to
Solr heavily uses RAM for disk caching, so depending on your index
size and what you intend to do with it, 2 GB could easily not be
enough. We run with 6 GB heaps on 34 GB boxes, and the remaining RAM
is there solely to act as a disk cache. We're on EC2, though, so
unless you're using the SSD
On 4/1/2013 12:19 PM, feroz_kh wrote:
Hi Shawn,
I tried optimizing using this command...
curl
'http://localhost:/solr/update?optimize=truemaxSegments=10waitFlush=true'
And i got this response within secs...
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
response
lst name=responseHeaderint
Yes... the str.. / is what I see in the admin console when I perform a
search for the document. Currently, I am using solrj and the addBean()
method to update the core. Whats strange is in our QA env, the document
indexed correctly. But in prod, I see hash symbols and thus any user search
And another one on the way:
http://www.amazon.com/Lucene-Solr-Definitive-comprehensive-realtime/dp/1449359957
Hopefully that help a lot as well. Plenty of diagrams. Lots of examples.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jack Park
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:25 AM
To:
Show us the exact query URL as well as the request handler defaults.
Make sure to try to do an explicit query on the field that has the #
value.
QA and prod may differ because maybe QA got completely reindexed more
recently and maybe prod hasn't gotten fully reindexed recently. Maybe the
So we have 3 servers in a SolrCloud cluster.
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4053506/Cloud1.png
We have 2 shards for our collection (classic_bt) with a shard on each of the
first two servers as the picture shows. The third server has replicas of the
first 2 shards just for high
On 4/1/2013 3:02 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
I want to separate my cloud into two logical parts. One of them is indexer
cloud of SolrCloud. Second one is Searcher cloud of SolrCloud.
My first question is that. Does separating my cloud system make sense about
performance improvement. Because I
Since I don't have that many items in my index I exported all of the keys
for each shard and wrote a simple java program that checks for duplicates.
I found some duplicate keys on different shards, a grep of the files for
the keys found does indicate that they made it to the wrong places. If you
We're suddenly seeing an error when trying to do updates/commits.
This is on Solr 4.2 (Tomcat, solr war deployed to webapps, on Linux SuSE 11).
Based off of some initial searching on things related to this issue, I have set
ulimit in Linux to 'unlimited' and verified that Tomcat has enough
I looked at the text via the admin analysis tool. The text appeared to be
ok! Unfortunately, the description is client data... so I can't post it
here, but I do not see any issues when running the analysis tool.
--
View this message in context:
It will be limited by disk IO until you get the caches full. Then it will be
limited by CPU.
wunder
On Apr 3, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Amit Sela am...@infolinks.com wrote:
Trouble in what why ? If I have enough memory - HBase RegionServer 10GB and
maybe 2GB for Solr ? - or you mean CPU / disk ?
On 4/3/2013 1:48 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I have been dragging the same solrconfig.xml from Solr 3.x to 4.0 to
4.1, with no customization (bad, bad me!). I'm now looking into
customizing it and I see that the Solr 4.1 solrconfig.xml is much
simpler and shorter. Is this simply because many of the
Jack,
Is that new book up to the 4.+ series?
Thanks
The other Jack
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
And another one on the way:
http://www.amazon.com/Lucene-Solr-Definitive-comprehensive-realtime/dp/1449359957
Hopefully that help a lot as well.
We're using the 4.x branch code as the basis for our writing. So,
effectively it will be for at least 4.3 when the book comes out in the
summer.
Early access will be in about a month or so. O'Reilly will be showing a
galley proof for 200 pages of the book next week at Big Data TechCon next
no, my thought was wrong, it appears that even with the parameter set I am
seeing this behavior. I've been able to duplicate it on 4.2.0 by indexing
100,000 documents on 10 threads (10,000 each) when I get to 400,000 or so.
I will try this on 4.2.1. to see if I see the same behavior
On Wed,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013, at 11:36 AM, vsl wrote:
So why Solr does not return proper document?
You're gonna have to give us a bit more than that.
What is wrong with the documents it is returning?
Upayavira
I have been trying to use the MultiWordSpellingQueryConverter.java since I
need to be able to find the document that correspond to the suggested
collations. At the moment it seems to be producing collations based on word
matches and arbitrary words from the field are picked up to form collation
On 4/2/2013 3:09 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I notice that this only occurs on queries that run facets. I start
Solr with the following command:
sudo nohup java -XX:NewRatio=1 -XX:+UseParNewGC
-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSParallelRemarkEnabled
-Dsolr.solr.home=/mnt/SolrFiles100/solr -jar
Hello Vytenis,
What exactly do you mean by aren't distributing across the shards?
Do you mean that POSTs against the server for shard 1 never end up
resulting in documents saved in shard 2?
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions
18 East 41st Street, 2nd
Here is a query that should return 2 documents... but it only returns 1.
/solr/m7779912/select?indent=onversion=2.2q=description%3Agatewayfq=start=0rows=10fl=descriptionqt=wt=explainOther=hl.fl=
Oddly enough, the description of the two documents are exactly the same.
Except one is indexed
I am researching Solr and seeing if it would be a good fit for a document
search service I am helping to develop. One of the requirements is that we
will need to be able to customize how file contents are parsed beyond the
default configurations that are offered out of the box by Tika. For
Thanks for digging Jamie. In 4.2, hash ranges are assigned up front when a
collection is created - each shard gets a range, which is stored in zookeeper.
You should not be able to end up with the same id on different shards -
something very odd going on.
Hopefully I'll have some time to try
I just posted a similar error and discovered that decreasing the Xmx fixed the
problem for me. The free command/top, etc. indicated I was flying just below
the threshold for my allowed memory, and with swap/virtual space available, so
I'm still confused as to what the issue is, but you may try
You have specified spellcheck.q in your query. The whole purpose of
spellcheck.q is to bypass any query converter you've configured giving it raw
keywords instead.
But possibly a custom query converter is not your best answer?
I agree that charles charlie is an edit distance of 2, so if
Michael Della Bitta-2 wrote
Hello Vytenis,
What exactly do you mean by aren't distributing across the shards?
Do you mean that POSTs against the server for shard 1 never end up
resulting in documents saved in shard 2?
So we indexed a set of 33010 documents on server01 which are now in
Where is this information stored in ZK? I don't see it in the cluster
state (or perhaps I don't understand it ;) ).
Perhaps something with my process is broken. What I do when I start from
scratch is the following
ZkCLI -cmd upconfig ...
ZkCLI -cmd linkconfig
but I don't ever explicitly
It should be part of your clusterstate.json. Some users have reported trouble
upgrading a previous zk install when this change came. I recommended manually
updating the clusterstate.json to have the right info, and that seemed to work.
Otherwise, I guess you have to start from a clean zk state.
: So we indexed a set of 33010 documents on server01 which are now in shard1.
: And we kicked off a set of 85934 documents on server02 which are now in
: shard2 (as tests). In my understanding of how SolrCloud works, the
: documents should be distributed across the shards in the collection. Now
On 3/11/13 6:15 PM, 李威 wrote:
in org.apache.solr.parser.SolrQueryParserBase, there is a function: protected Query
newFieldQuery(Analyzer analyzer, String field, String queryText, boolean quoted) throws
SyntaxError
The below code can't process chinese rightly.
BooleanClause.Occur
The router says implicit. I did start from a blank zk state but perhaps
I missed one of the ZkCLI commands? One of my shards from the
clusterstate.json is shown below. What is the process that should be done
to bootstrap a cluster other than the ZkCLI commands I listed above? My
process right
Chris Hostetter-3 wrote
I'm not familiar with the details, but i've seen miller respond to a
similar question with reference to the issue of not explicitly specifying
numShards when creating your collections...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201303.mbox/%
Hi,
I am using DIH to index some database fields. These fields contain html
formatted text in them. I use the 'HTMLStripTransformer' to remove that
markup. This works fine when the text is like for example:
liItem One/li or *This is in Bold*
However when the text has HTML entity names like in:
On 4 April 2013 00:30, Ashok ash...@qualcomm.com wrote:
[...]
Two questions.
(1) Is this the expected behavior of DIH HTMLStripTransformer?
Yes, I believe so.
(2) If yes, is there an another transformer that I can employ first to turn
these html entities into their usual symbols that can
Shawn, thanks for your detailed explanation. My system will work on high
load. I mean I will always index something and something always will be
queried at my system. That is why I consider about physically separating
indexer and query reply machines. I think about that: imagine a machine
that
If you don't specify numShards after 4.1, you get an implicit doc router and
it's up to you to distribute updates. In the past, partitioning was done on the
fly - but for shard splitting and perhaps other features, we now divvy up the
hash range up front based on numShards and store it in
Well, the database field has text, sometimes with HTML entities and at other
times with html tags. I have no control over the process that populates the
database tables with info.
--
View this message in context:
ah interestingso I need to specify num shards, blow out zk and then try
this again to see if things work properly now. What is really strange is
that for the most part things have worked right and on 4.2.1 I have 600,000
items indexed with no duplicates. In any event I will specify num
With earlier versions of Solr Cloud, if there was any error or warning
when you made a collection, you likely were set up for implicit
routing which means that documents only go to the shard you're talking
to. What you want is compositeId routing, which works how you think
it should.
Go into the
Then, I would say, you have a bigger problem
However, you can probably run RegEx filter and replace those known escapes
with real characters before you run your HTMLStrip filter. Or run,
HTMLStrip, RegEx and HTMLStrip again.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
On 4/3/2013 1:13 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Shawn, thanks for your detailed explanation. My system will work on high
load. I mean I will always index something and something always will be
queried at my system. That is why I consider about physically separating
indexer and query reply machines.
Hi Ashok,
HTMLStripTransformer uses HTMLStripCharFilter under the hood, and
HTMLStripCharFilter converts all HTML entities to their corresponding
characters.
What version of Solr are you using?
My guess is that it only appears that nothing is happening, since when they are
presented in a
Michael Della Bitta-2 wrote
With earlier versions of Solr Cloud, if there was any error or warning
when you made a collection, you likely were set up for implicit
routing which means that documents only go to the shard you're talking
to. What you want is compositeId routing, which works how
answered my own question, it now says compositeId. What is problematic
though is that in addition to my shards (which are say jamie-shard1) I see
the solr created shards (shard1). I assume that these were created because
of the numShards param. Is there no way to specify the names of these
If you can work with a clean state, I'd turn off all your shards,
clear out the Solr directories in Zookeeper, reset solr.xml for each
of your shards, upgrade to the latest version of Solr, and turn
everything back on again. Then upload config, recreate your
collection, etc.
I do it like this,
Thanks for your explanation, you explained every thing what I need. Just
one more question. I see that I can not make it with Solr Cloud, but I can
do something like that with master-slave replication of Solr. If I use
master-slave replication of Solr, can I eliminate (filter) something
(something
I had thought you could - but looking at the code recently, I don't think you
can anymore. I think that's a technical limitation more than anything though.
When these changes were made, I think support for that was simply not added at
the time.
I'm not sure exactly how straightforward it would
ok, so that's not a deal breaker for me. I just changed it to match the
shards that are auto created and it looks like things are happy. I'll go
ahead and try my test to see if I can get things out of sync.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
I had
Hi Steve,
Fabulous suggestion! Yup, that is it! Using the HTMLStripTransformer twice
did the trick. I am using Solr 4.1.
Thank you very much!
- ashok
--
View this message in context:
I need to implement some SearchComponent that will deal with metrics on the
response. Some things I see will be easy to get, like number of hits for
instance, but I am more worried with this:
We need to also track the size of the response (as the size in bytes of the
whole xml response tat is
with these changes things are looking good, I'm up to 600,000 documents
without any issues as of right now. I'll keep going and add more to see if
I find anything.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, so that's not a deal breaker for me. I just changed
Cool, glad I was able to help.
On Apr 3, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Ashok ash...@qualcomm.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
Fabulous suggestion! Yup, that is it! Using the HTMLStripTransformer twice
did the trick. I am using Solr 4.1.
Thank you very much!
- ashok
--
View this message in context:
Michael Della Bitta-2 wrote
If you can work with a clean state, I'd turn off all your shards,
clear out the Solr directories in Zookeeper, reset solr.xml for each
of your shards, upgrade to the latest version of Solr, and turn
everything back on again. Then upload config, recreate your
Can you show us your *_ci field type? Solr does not really have a way to tell
whether a match is exact or only partial, but you could hack around it with
the fieldType. See https://github.com/cominvent/exactmatch for a possible
solution.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS -
The search components can see the response as a namedlist, but it is only
when SolrDispatchFIlter calls the QueryResponseWriter that XML or JSON or
whatever other format (Javabin as well) is generated from the named list for
final output in an HTTP response.
You probably want a custom query
You'd probably want to work on the XML output from Tika's PDF parser, from
which you can identify which page and context.
Personally I would build a separate indexing application in Java and call Tika
directly, then build a SolrInputDocument which you pass to solr through SolrJ.
I.e. not use
From what I can tell, the Collections API has been hardened
significantly since 4.2 and now will refuse to create a collection if
you give it something ambiguous to do. So if you upgrade to 4.2,
things will become more safe.
But overall I'd find a way of using the Collections API that works and
On Apr 3, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Michael Della Bitta
michael.della.bi...@appinions.com wrote:
From what I can tell, the Collections API has been hardened
significantly since 4.2
I did a lot of work here for 4.2.1 - there was a lot to improve. Hopefully
there is much less now, but if anyone
On 4/3/2013 1:52 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Thanks for your explanation, you explained every thing what I need. Just
one more question. I see that I can not make it with Solr Cloud, but I can
do something like that with master-slave replication of Solr. If I use
master-slave replication of Solr,
Is it possible to stream search results from Solr? Seems that this feature is
missing.
I see two options to solve this:
1. Using search results pagination feature
The idea is to implement a smart proxy that will stream chunks from search
results using pagination.
2. Implement Solr plugin
That sounds great. I'll check out the bug, I didn't see anything in the docs
about this. And if I can't find it with a search engine, it probably isn't
there. --wunder
On Apr 3, 2013, at 6:39 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 3/29/2013 12:07 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
What are folks using for
It's there! :)
http://search-lucene.com/?q=percentilefc_project=Solrfc_type=issue
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
That sounds great. I'll check out the bug, I didn't see anything in the
In the Jira, but not in the docs.
It would be nice to have VM stats like GC, too, so we can have common
monitoring and alerting on all our services.
wunder
On Apr 3, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
It's there! :)
http://search-lucene.com/?q=percentilefc_project=Solrfc_type=issue
just an update, I'm at 1M records now with no issues. This looks promising
as to the cause of my issues, thanks for the help. Is the routing method
with numShards documented anywhere? I know numShards is documented but I
didn't know that the routing changed if you don't specify it.
On Wed,
The following query is doing a word search (based on my previous post)...
solr/spell?q=(charles+and+the+choclit+factory+OR+(title2:(charles+and+the+choclit+factory)))spellcheck.collate=truespellcheck=truespellcheck.q=charles+and+the+choclit+factory
It produces a lot of unwanted matches.
In
I am occasionally seeing this in the log, is this just a timeout issue?
Should I be increasing the zk client timeout?
WARNING: Overseer cannot talk to ZK
Apr 3, 2013 11:14:25 PM
org.apache.solr.cloud.DistributedQueue$LatchChildWatcher process
INFO: Watcher fired on path: null state: Expired type
Yeah. Are you using the concurrent low pause garbage collector?
This means the overseer wasn't able to communicate with zk for 15 seconds - due
to load or gc or whatever. If you can't resolve the root cause of that, or the
load just won't allow for it, next best thing you can do is raise it to
This shouldn't be a problem though, if things are working as they are supposed
to. Another node should simply take over as the overseer and continue
processing the work queue. It's just best if you configure so that session
timeouts don't happen unless a node is really down. On the other hand,
I am not using the concurrent low pause garbage collector, I could look at
switching, I'm assuming you're talking about adding -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
correct?
I also just had a shard go down and am seeing this in the log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: I was asked to wait on state
On Apr 3, 2013, at 8:17 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not using the concurrent low pause garbage collector, I could look at
switching, I'm assuming you're talking about adding -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
correct?
Right - if you don't do that, the default is almost always the
Minor issues - It seems that the hl.usePhraseHighlighter is enabled by
default, which definitely makes sense but the wiki says it's default value
is false and the checkbox is unchecked by default on the Query form. This
gives the impression this parameter defaults to false.
I'm assuming the code
Thanks I will try that.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 3, 2013, at 8:17 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not using the concurrent low pause garbage collector, I could look
at
switching, I'm assuming you're talking about
OK, This could be a so easy question but I want to learn just a bit more
technical detail of it.
When I use Nutch to send documents to Solr to be indexing there are two
parameters:
-index and -reindex.
What Solr does at each one different from the other one?
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
