HI
iam using solr 4.7.1 and trying to do a full import.My data source is a
table in mysql. It has 1000 rows and 20 columns.
Whenever iam trying to do a full import solr stops responding. But when i
try to do a import with a limit of 40 or less it works fine.
If i try to import more than
Dear Team,
I am trying to implement nested boosting in solr using map function.
http://www.example.com:8984/solr/collection1/select?q=laundry
servicesboost=map(query({!dismax
qf=titlex !v=$ql3 pf=}),0,0,1,map(query({!dismax qf=city v='mumbai'
pf=}),0,0,1,15))ql3=laundry services.
But this is
Hi,
Solr version 4.8.1
I download the Solr and run via the start.jar and i am able to index the
json data through post.jar and i read the solr in action book and follow the
instruction of book and copy the example and rename the realEstate and
collection1 to real and then change the
Hi,
Solr version 4.8.1
I download the Solr and run via the start.jar and i am able to index the
json data through post.jar and i read the solr in action book and follow the
instruction of book and copy the example and rename the realEstate and
collection1 to real and then change the
Hello,
im trying to implement a user friendly search for phone numbers. These numbers
consist out of two digit-tokens like 12345 67890.
Finally I want the highlighting for the phone number in the search result,
without any concerns about was this search result hit by field tel or
What collection are you using and what URL are you giving to post.jar?
Unless it's a default collection1, you need to have the collection
name in the URL.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr
Hello,
im trying to implement a user friendly search for phone numbers. These numbers
consist out of two digit-tokens like 12345 67890.
Finally I want the highlighting for the phone number in the search result,
without any concerns about was this search result hit by field tel or
function also can be use.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boost-documents-having-a-field-value-tp4139342p4139486.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Evidently I didn't understand enough about the synonym filter.
I'm not sure anyone would be able to determine the impact based on the example
queries below.
However I'm curious what the best practice is for synonyms.
We have 179 lines of synonyms each with 2 - 6 synonyms per line [all
Hi,
Please tell us what you are trying to in a new treat. Your high level goal.
There may be some other ways/tools such as ( https://stanbol.apache.org ) other
than OpenNLP.
On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 8:31 AM, Vivekanand Ittigi vi...@biginfolabs.com
wrote:
We'll surely look into UIMA
Hi,
I have changed the code. But now it is showing the following errors:
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.ExtendedNameFilterFactory.init(java.util.Map)
Here's the new java code : http://pastebin.com/J8q4JLgP
A urgent help is appreciated. :)
Thanks
Kamal
Are you sure you are compiling with the same version of Java and Solr
libraries that you are executing with? I would double-check your
CLASSPATH for those two environments.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating
normal, rewrite filter.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Custom-filter-not-working-with-solr-4-7-1-tp4136824p4139506.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/31/2014 1:54 PM, Aniket Bhoi wrote:
Caused by: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: The result
set is closed.
I still think this is an indication of the source of the problem.
Something closed the
Entire goal cant be said but one of those tasks can be like this.. we have
big document(can be website or pdf etc) indexed to the solr.
Lets say field name=content will sore store the contents of document. All
i want to do is pick name of persons,places from it using openNLP or some
other means.
I m working on solr. i m interested in getting added to solr user group.
Can you please add me to the group ?
Even after making the same java version, it is not working. I am using
java.runtime.version:1.7.0_55-b13
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:05 PM, rulinma ruli...@gmail.com wrote:
normal, rewrite filter.
--
View this message in context:
Hi Ahmet,
I followed what you said
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/UIMA+Integration. But how
can i achieve my goal? i mean extracting only name of the organization or
person from the content field.
I guess i'm almost there but something is missing? please guide me
Thanks,
Vivek
11 * 11 or 121 query terms, which shouldn't be so bad.
But... maybe the Lucene FST for your synonym list is huge. Someone with
deeper Lucene knowledge would have to address that.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Branham, Jeremy [HR]
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 3:57 AM
To:
Hi Madhav,
Just a guess, try using batchSize=-1
dataSource type=JdbcDataSource driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
batchSize=-1/
Ahmet
On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 12:48 PM, madhav bahuguna madhav.bahug...@gmail.com
wrote:
HI
iam using solr 4.7.1 and trying to do a full import.My data source is a
On 3 June 2014 11:22, Manoj V manojv1...@gmail.com wrote:
I m working on solr. i m interested in getting added to solr user group.
Can you please add me to the group ?
If mail from your address is reaching this list, you are already subscribed
to it. Presumably, you did that from under
Hi Vivekanand,
I have never use UIMA+Solr before.
Personally I think it takes more time to learn how to configure/use these uima
stuff.
If you are familiar with java, write a class that extends
UpdateRequestProcessor(Factory). Use OpenNLP for NER, add these new fields
(organisation, city,
Hi,
I have two questions about upgrading Solr:
- We upgrade Solr often, to match the latest version. We have a number
of servers in a Solrcloud and prefer to upgrade one or two servers first
and upgrade the other server a few weeks later when we are sure
everything is stable. Is this the
Kamal,
Alexandre was pointing not to what java version you are compiling with, but
what are the lucene and solr jar files you compile and run against.
What is your build system -- ant or maven or ..?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
Even
Okay, but i dint understand what you said. Can you please elaborate.
Thanks,
Vivek
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Vivekanand,
I have never use UIMA+Solr before.
Personally I think it takes more time to learn how to configure/use these
uima stuff.
Hi Otis,
We saw some improvement when increasing the size of the caches. Since then, we
followed Shawn advice on the filterCache and gave some additional RAM to the
JVM in order to reduce GC. The performance is very good right now but we are
still experiencing some instability but not at the
Hi All,
Has anyone came across the maximum threshold document or size wise for each
core of solr to hold.
As I have indexed some 10 Million Documents of 18Gb and when I index
another 5 (9Gb)Million Documents on top of these indexes it responds little
slow with Stats query.
Considering I have
On 6/3/2014 12:57 AM, binaychap wrote:
Solr version 4.8.1
I download the Solr and run via the start.jar and i am able to index the
json data through post.jar and i read the solr in action book and follow the
instruction of book and copy the example and rename the realEstate and
collection1
On 6/3/2014 3:04 AM, Aniket Bhoi wrote:
I changed the value of removeAbandoned to false,this time the indexing
failed due to a different exception:
snip
Caused by: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: Connection
reset
This is really the same error, but now the dataimport
On 6/3/2014 12:00 AM, madhav bahuguna wrote:
iam using solr 4.7.1 and trying to do a full import.My data source is a
table in mysql. It has 1000 rows and 20 columns.
Whenever iam trying to do a full import solr stops responding. But when i
try to do a import with a limit of 40 or
On 6/3/2014 6:18 AM, Martin de Vries wrote:
I have two questions about upgrading Solr:
- We upgrade Solr often, to match the latest version. We have a number
of servers in a Solrcloud and prefer to upgrade one or two servers first
and upgrade the other server a few weeks later when we are
Can you extract names, locations etc using OpenNLP in plain/straight java
program?
If yes, here are two seperate options :
1) Use http://searchhub.org/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/ as an example to
integrate your NER code into it and write your own indexing code. You have the
full power
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks a ton.
You were absolutely right the moment i added the line batchsize=-1 it
worked .
Thank you so much its been 7 days and i just could not figure out what the
issue was.
Its working like a charm now.
Thanks Again
regards
Madhav Bahuguna
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Ahmet
I think you need to use parameter substitution for those nested queries
since the boost parameter takes a white-space delimited sequence of
function queries.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 2:22 AM
To:
I followed this link
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/UIMA+Integration to
integrate solr+uima.
I'm succeeded in integrating. SentenceAnnotation is working fine but i want
use openCalasis annotation so that i can fetch person, place,organization
name. Nowhere its mentioned about
Hi,
Have you seen https://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollapsingQParserPlugin ? May
help with the field collapsing queries.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Jean-Sebastien Vachon
Good question, Mikhail. I started by putting that logic in the prepare()
function by sheer force of habit, but have since moved it first to
distributedProcess() (my system is sharded) and now to handleResponses() (as
in MoreLikeThisComponent.java, which I am mimicking without understanding).
As
Yes we are already using it.
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com]
Sent: June-03-14 11:41 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour when tuning the caches
Hi,
Have you seen
Thanks for all of your suggestions.
I will use *bq=field:value *and it's working well, I dont think I'll need
to use *bf*.
2014-06-03 8:42 GMT+01:00 rulinma ruli...@gmail.com:
function also can be use.
--
View this message in context:
Hi see comments inline below…
On Jun 2, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Vineet Mishra clearmido...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Thanks for your response, can you quote some running example of
MapReduceIndexerTool
for indexing through csv files.
If you are referring to
How much free system memory do you have for the OS to cache file system
data? If your entire index fits in system memory operations will be fast,
but as your index grows beyond the space the OS can use to cache the data,
performance will decline.
But there's no hard limit in Solr per se.
--
Hello,
I am migrating from single node Solr to SolrCloud and have run into a problem.
I have timeAllowed set to 5 minutes and am trying to facet on a string field.
With grouping enabled and group.truncate set to true, I consistently get the
following exception as soon as I fire the query. If I
On 05/30/2014 08:29 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
I see errors in both cases. Do you
1 have schemaless configured
or
2 have a dynamic field pattern that matches your non_exist_field?
Maybe
!--dynamicField name=* type=ignored multiValued=true /--
is un-commented-out in schema.xml?
Kuro
On 05/20/2014 11:31 AM, Geepalem wrote:
Hi,
What is the filter to be used to implement stemming for Chinese and Japanese
language field types.
For English, I have used filter class=solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory
language=English / and its working fine.
What do you mean by working fine?
Try
On 6/3/2014 12:54 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
How much free system memory do you have for the OS to cache file
system data? If your entire index fits in system memory operations
will be fast, but as your index grows beyond the space the OS can use
to cache the data, performance will decline.
Anybody care to forecast when hardware will catch up with Solr and we can
routinely look forward to newbies complaining that they indexed some data
and after only 10 minutes they hit this weird 2G document count limit?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent:
Want to follow up on this...I suppose I need to file an issue?
From: tky...@hotmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Using multiple facet.prefix on same field with facet.threads
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 10:27:32 -0700
Sorry didn't format it correctly.. here is the output without
On 6/3/2014 1:47 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Anybody care to forecast when hardware will catch up with Solr and we
can routinely look forward to newbies complaining that they indexed
some data and after only 10 minutes they hit this weird 2G document
count limit?
I would speculate that Lucene
If I run a query like this,
fq=text:lol
fq=created_at_tdid:[1400544000 TO 1400630400]
It takes about 6 seconds. Following queries take only 50ms or less, as
expected because my fqs are cached.
However, if I change the query to not cache my big range query:
fq=text:lol
Hi,
first I'd like to thank those who've spent their time reading this,
especially Erick, Jason and Shawn. Thank you!
I've finally got it working. Shawn was right, I needed to enable updateLog
in solrconfig.xml and create the tlog directory. After doing, so I could
index documents sent on any
I want to follow up on the ClassCastException issue with custom Plugins.
Turns out that the exception is not happening because an older version of
Solr could be some how loaded in the classpath.
I had to dig down the rabbit hole which brought me to SolrResourceLoader.
turns out that the new
On 6/3/2014 2:44 PM, Brett Hoerner wrote:
If I run a query like this,
fq=text:lol
fq=created_at_tdid:[1400544000 TO 1400630400]
It takes about 6 seconds. Following queries take only 50ms or less, as
expected because my fqs are cached.
However, if I change the query to not cache my big
In this case, I have 400 million documents, so I understand it taking a
while.
That said, I'm still not sure I understand why it would take *more* time.
In your example above, wouldn't it have to create an 11.92MB bitset even if
I *don't* cache the bitset? It seems the mere act of storing the
This is seemingly where it checks whether to use cache or not, the extra
work is really just a get (miss) and a put:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/trunk/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java#L1216
I suppose it's possible the put is taking 4 seconds, but
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Brett Hoerner br...@bretthoerner.com wrote:
If I run a query like this,
fq=text:lol
fq=created_at_tdid:[1400544000 TO 1400630400]
It takes about 6 seconds. Following queries take only 50ms or less, as
expected because my fqs are cached.
However, if I change
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@heliosearch.com wrote:
So try:
q=*:*
fq=created_at_tdid:[1400544000 TO 1400630400]
vs
So try:
q=*:*
fq={!cache=false}created_at_tdid:[1400544000 TO 1400630400]
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.org - facet functions, subfacets, off-heap
Hi,
I'm sorry if this is a frequently asked question.
In default Solr's schema.xml file we define an author field like
following:
field name=author type=text_general stored=true indexed=true/
But this field seems not parsed (by nutch) and indexed (by Solr).
My query is always return null
Hi Bayu,
I think this is a nutch question, no?
Ahmet
On Wednesday, June 4, 2014 1:13 AM, Bayu Widyasanyata bwidyasany...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry if this is a frequently asked question.
In default Solr's schema.xml file we define an author field like
following:
field name=author
mark.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-maximum-Optimal-Index-Size-per-Shard-tp4139565p4139698.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
use one is ok. solrCloud will route it, but use cloudserver is a good choice.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-distributed-indexing-tp4138600p4139700.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yonik, I'm familiar with your blog posts -- and thanks very much for them.
:) Though I'm not sure what you're trying to show me with the q=*:* part? I
was of course using q=*:* in my queries, but I assume you mean to leave off
the text:lol bit?
I've done some Cluster changes, so these are my
Hi Ahmet,
I just refering to Solr's schema.xml which described this field definition.
In this case for example author field.
Then also refer to Solr query's result which I queried through Solr Admin
page that didn't response author field.
CMIIW.
Thanks.-
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:19 AM, Ahmet
Are you looking for the 'fl' parameter by any chance:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Common+Query+Parameters#CommonQueryParameters-Thefl(FieldList)Parameter
?
It's in the Admin UI as well.
If not, then you really do need to rephrase your question. Maybe by
giving a very
Hi,
I don't know nutch, but I will answer as if you were using solr cell :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler
When a pdf file is sent to extracting request handler, several meta data are
extracted from pdf. These metadata are assigned to fields. I usually enable
dynamic
Hi Alexandre,
I've already play with fl parameter in Admin UI but the result is not I
expected.
From what I understand that Solr database structure is defined on Solr's
schema.xml.
On that file we defined in example author field to store author content
in Solr database.
Even I put author as fl
Ok, the question was if I understood it now:
I am importing data from Nutch into Solr. One of the fields is
author and I have defined it in Solr's schema.xml. Unfortunately, it
is always empty when I check the records in the Solr's AdminUI. How
can I confirm that the field was actually indexed
I meant of course, Ahmet's answer. Sorry, both.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr proficiency
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, the question was
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Brett Hoerner br...@bretthoerner.com wrote:
Yonik, I'm familiar with your blog posts -- and thanks very much for them.
:) Though I'm not sure what you're trying to show me with the q=*:* part? I
was of course using q=*:* in my queries, but I assume you mean to
Thank you Alexandre!
I will check my configurations again.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok, the question was if I understood it now:
I am importing data from Nutch into Solr. One of the fields is
author and I have defined it in Solr's
Hi all,
We launched our new production instance of SolrCloud last week and since
then have noticed a trend with regards to disk usage. The non-leader
replicas all seem to be self-optimizing their index segments as expected,
but the leaders have (on average) around 33% more data on disk. My
I have a following field in SOLR schema.
fieldType name=integer class=solr.IntField omitNorms=true/
field name=id type=integer indexed=true stored=true
required=false multiValued=false/
If I issue following query:
id:(1234 OR 2345 OR 3456)
SOLR does not return the documents in that order. It
Hello,
Try to boost every sub clause accordingly I.e. id:(34^1000 45^100 76^10) if
you can not just sort by id.
04.06.2014 8:29 пользователь sachinpkale sachinpk...@gmail.com написал:
I have a following field in SOLR schema.
fieldType name=integer class=solr.IntField omitNorms=true/
field
Assuming that you just want to sort - have you tried using
sort=id desc
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 04 Jun 2014, at 06:19, sachinpkale sachinpk...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a following field in SOLR schema.
fieldType name=integer class=solr.IntField omitNorms=true/
field name=id
73 matches
Mail list logo
