tor?
Kind regards,
Xavier Schepler
is ticket.
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:15 PM, xavier jmlucjav
> wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> I am facing this situation:
>> - I have a 3 node Solr 6.1 with some 1 shard, 1 node collections (it's
>> just
>> for dev work)
>> - the collections wher
hi,
I am facing this situation:
- I have a 3 node Solr 6.1 with some 1 shard, 1 node collections (it's just
for dev work)
- the collections where created with:
action=CREATE&...&createNodeSet=EMPTY"
then
action=ADDREPLICA&...&node=$NODEA&dataDir=$DATADIR"
- I have taken a BACKUP of the collec
d
in all cases, so it reflects reality. We, for instance, are looking at this
piece of information in order to do other stuff.
I could not find any mention of this on Jira, so I wonder if this is
intented or just nobody had an issue with it?
xavier
how-to-install-solr-as-a-service-in-any-platform-including-solr-5-8e4a93cc3909
thanks
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/9/2017 5:24 AM, xavier jmlucjav wrote:
> > I always wondered, if this was not really needed, and I could just call
> > 'restart
config, and then doing the above
> > (just restart nodes in a loop). For example, what if I change a config G
> > used in collection C, and I restart just one of the nodes (N1), leaving
> the
> > rest alone. If all the nodes contain a shard for C, what happens, N1 is
> > using the new config and the rest are not? how is this handled?
> >
> > thanks
> > xavier
> >
>
G
used in collection C, and I restart just one of the nodes (N1), leaving the
rest alone. If all the nodes contain a shard for C, what happens, N1 is
using the new config and the rest are not? how is this handled?
thanks
xavier
query
this way?? It would be extremelly handy in my situation.
thanks
xavier
Hi
Is there somewhere a sample of some solrj code that given:
- a collection
- the id (like "IBM!12345")
returns the shard to where the doc will be routed? I was hoping to get that
info from CloudSolrClient itself but it's not exposing it as far as I can
see.
thanks
xavier
done, with simple patch https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9697
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:21 PM, xavier jmlucjav wrote:
> sure, will do, I tried before but I could not create a Jira, now I can,
> not sure what was happening.
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Shalin Sh
we'd have to hurry if this fix has to go in.
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:32 PM, xavier jmlucjav
> wrote:
>
> > Correcting myself here, I was wrong about the cause (I had already messed
> > with the script).
> >
> > I made it work by commenting out line 1261
IF "%ZK_OP%"=="cp" (
goto set_zk_dst
)
IF "%ZK_OP%"=="mv" (
goto set_zk_dst
)
set ZK_DST="_"
) ELSE IF NOT "%1"=="" (
set ERROR_MSG="Unrecognized or misplaced zk argument %1%"
Now upconfig works!
Jira anymore?
xavier
fine.
xavier
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Aristedes Maniatis
wrote:
> On 13/09/2016 1:29am, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> > I am using Solr 5.5 and wanting to add JNDI settings to Solr (for data
> import). I'm new to Solr Cloud setup (previously I was running Solr running
> as a
major issues?
For us, SOLR-7864 (where timeAllowed is broken) is a major bug, which
prevents us from finishing migration to solr 5 (we are currently using
4.3). For our use case, correct operation of timeAllowed is critical.
Best regards,
Xavier
--
Trovit
Twitter <http://twitter.com/trovit&
d("text");
for (Count field : facetField.getValues()) {
System.out.println(field.getName());
}
Xavier.
Le 20/08/2015 22:20, Upayavira a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015, at 04:34 PM, Jean-Pierre Lauris wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to obtain indexed tokens from a document
I mean for: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FrontPage
My username is XavierMorera
Regards,
Xavier
--
*Xavier Morera*
Entrepreneur | Author & Trainer | Consultant | Developer & Scrum Master
*www.xaviermorera.com <http://www.xaviermorera.com/>*
office: (305) 600-4919
cel:
you are looking for above
> > mentioned users list or other contacts list for your campaigns.
> >
> > Waiting for a positive response!
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > *Aaron Susan*
> > Data Specialist
> >
> > If you are not the right person, feel free to forward this email to the
> > right person in your organization. To opt out response Remove
> >
>
--
*Xavier Morera*
email: xav...@familiamorera.com
CR: +(506) 8849 8866
US: +1 (305) 600 4919
skype: xmorera
terprise Search used to be neither for the faint of heart,
nor for those with a thin wallet. However, since the introduction of Apache
Solr, the name of the game has changed. Don't leave home without it!
--
*Xavier Morera*
email: xav...@familiamorera.com
CR: +(506) 8849 8866
US: +1 (305) 600 4919
skype: xmorera
You saved my life Shawn! Thanks!
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/28/2014 7:54 PM, Xavier Morera wrote:
> > Would anyone be so kind to explain what are the "Raw query parameters"
> > in Solr's admin UI. I can't find an explanatio
Hi,
Would anyone be so kind to explain what are the "Raw query parameters" in
Solr's admin UI. I can't find an explanation in either the reference guide
nor wiki nor web search.
[image: Inline image 1]
A bit confused on what it actually is for
[image: Inline image 3]
Thank
Hi,
A couple of times I found myself in the following situation: I had to work
on a Solr schema, but had no docs to index yet (the db was not ready etc).
In order to start learning js, I needed some small project to practice, so
I thought of this small utility. It allows you to generate fake docs
I am confused, wouldn't a doc that match both the phrase and the term
queries have a better score than a doc matching only the term score, even
if qf and pf are the same??
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> There'd be no point having them the same.
>
> You're likely to include
I knew I could do that at jetty level with a servlet for instance, but the
user wants to do this stuff inside solr code itself. Now that you mention
the logs...that could be a solution without modifying the webapp...
thanks for the input!
xavier
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Amit Nithian
t; The QueryResponseWriter class and in solrconfig.xml.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: xavier jmlucjav
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:22 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: do SearchComponents have access to response contents
>
>
>
streamed, with stored fields and all). I was a
bit worried cause I am wondering if a searchcomponent will actually have
access to the response bytes...
Can someone confirm one way or the other? We are targeting Sorl4.0
thanks
xavier
right?
thanks for the help!
xavier
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> : > public class NoTfSimilarity extends DefaultSimilarity {
> : > public float tf(float freq) {
> : > return freq
Steve,
yes, as I already included (though maybe is not very visible) I have this
before element:
I can see explain info is indeed different, for example I have [] instead
of [DefaultSimilarity]
thanks
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Hi xavier,
>
> Have yo
could be:
>
> indexed="true" stored="true" multiValued="false" omitNorms="true" />
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:35 AM, xavier jmlucjav
&
uct of:
1.0 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
8.5082035 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=56511)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=440)
anyone sees what I am missing?
I am on solr4.0
thanks
xavier
Hi Shawn,
I am using DIH with commit at the end...I'll investigate further to see if
this is what is happening and will report back, also will check 4.2 (that I
had to do anyway...).
thanks for your input
xavier
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/17/2013
but found nothing.
xavier
Here is a thread dump:
2013-03-17 17:58:33
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (23.7-b01 mixed mode):
"JMX server connection timeout 30" daemon prio=6 tid=0x0bbf9000
nid=0x3b4c in Object.wait() [0x1df3e000]
java.lang.Th
Steve, worked like a charm.
thanks!
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4843
>
> Let me know if it works for you.
>
> Steve
>
> On Mar 16, 2013, at 5:35 PM, xavier jmlucjav wrote:
>
> > I read too
I read too fast your reply, so I thought you meant configuring the
LimitTokenPositionFilter. I see you mean I have to write one, ok...
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:33 PM, xavier jmlucjav wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Yes, I want only "one", "one two", and "one two three&
nly from the edge.
thanks!
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Hi xavier,
>
> It's not clear to me what you want. Is the "edge" you're referring to the
> beginning of a field? E.g. raw text "one two three four" with
> EdgeShingleFilter
This is absolutely a sintax error, I had the same problem, and with
dih.delta.id it solves all my problems. Thanks to god and the special
person who post the answer in this page.
You have to revise your sintax in queries for delta import and watch the
catalina (i use tomcat) log file for any error
debug score info
- upgrade to griffon1.2.0
- allow using another handler (besides /select) enhancement
You can check it out here: https://github.com/jmlucjav/vifun
Binary distribution:
http://code.google.com/p/vifun/downloads/detail?name=vifun-0.6.zip
xavier
qf and mm, and you should be able to tweak them. Of course If you
were using a real Solr installation with a sizable number of documents and
some complex usage of edismax, you would be able to see much better what
the tool can do.
xavier
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mark Bennett
wrote:
>
they returned 0 documents.
I need this for SEO management, and because i want to test this facets
values (with 0 documents) without requesting my database.
Best Regards,
Xavier
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-all-possible-facets-values-even-if-there-
; those both way of getting facets values
in an only one facet !
Thanks for advance,
Xavier
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-merge-an-autofacet-with-a-predefined-facet-tp3763988p3769121.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
You totally get it :)
I'v deleted thoses dynamicField (though it was just an exemple), why didn't
i read the comment above the line !
Thanks alot ;)
Best regards,
Xavier.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/location-fieldType-indexation-
I'm not sure to understand your solution ?
When (and how) will be the 'word' detection in the fulltext ? before (by my
own) or during (with) solr indexation ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-merge-an-autofacet-with-a-predefined-facet-tp3763988p3767059.h
isnt working because, it was working on my
local server with the same configuration (Solr 3.5.0) and the same database
!!!
If i try to use "geohash" instead of "location" it is working for
indexation, but my geodist query in front isnt working anymore ...
Any ideas ?
Best reg
base fully prepared to be indexed ... but i had hope that solr
could handle it ... so if anyone see any solution to handle it directly with
solr you are welcome :p
Anyways thanks for your help Em ;)
Best regards,
Xavier
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-t
tically from a given wordslist by searching in the document text as
shown in my previous post
Why i want to do that ? because sometimes my 'predefined_facets' is not
defined, and even if it is, i want to defined it the more as possible.
Best regards,
Xavier
--
View this message in
Thanks for this answer.
I have posted my new question (related to this post) into a new topic ;)
(
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-merge-an-quot-autofacet-quot-with-a-predefined-facet-td3763988.html
)
Best regards
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/H
Hi everyone,
Like explained in this post :
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-index-a-facetfield-by-searching-words-matching-from-another-Textfield-td3761201.html
I have created a dynamic facet at indexation by searching terms in a
fulltext field.
But i don't know if it's possible to merg
Seems that's an error from the documentation with the 'Factory' missing in
the classname !!?
I found
That is working fine !!!
Conclusion i have this files :
*synonymswords.txt :*
php,mysql,html,css=>web_langage
And
*keepwords.txt :*
web langage
With this fieldType :
That's it ! Thanks :)
First time i see that documentation page (which is really helpfull) :
http://lucidworks.lucidimagination.com/display/solr/Filter+Descriptions#FilterDescriptions-KeepWordsFilter
So, now i want to "associate" a wordslist to a value of an existing facets
So i tried i combine
Hi everyone,
I'm a new Solr User but i used to work on Endeca.
There is a modul called "TextTagger" with Endeca that is auto indexing
values in a facetfield (multivalued) when he find words (from a given
wordslist) into an other TextField from that document.
I didn't see any subjects or any ways
Yes thanks. This works fine :
log4j.rootLogger=INFO, SOLR
log4j.appender.SOLR=org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.SOLR.file=/home/quetelet_bdq/logs/bdq.log
log4j.appender.SOLR.datePattern='.'-MM-dd
log4j.appender.SOLR.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.SO
I added it to /etc/default/tomcat6.
What happened is that the same error message appeared twice in
/var/log/tomcat6/catalina.out.
Like the same file was loaded twice.
--
Tous les courriers électroniques émis depuis la messag
A_HOME/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/classes/log4j.properties
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
> On 10. feb. 2011, at 09.41, Xavier Schepler wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I added “slf4j-log4j12-1.5.5.jar” and “log4j-1.2.
sn't found.
Could someone help me to have it working ?
Thanks in advance,
Xavier
Since it seems to be no voodoo available I did it on the client side.
I send a first request to get the facets and a second to get the documents and
their highlighting.
It works well but requires more processing.
>
> From: Xavier SCHEPLER
> Sent
ur examples! If you explain what you want to do, someone may
> be able to tell you how. From the hints in your last message, I suspect
> nested queries _might_ be helpful to you.
>
> On 1/19/2011 3:46 AM, Xavier SCHEPLER wrote:
> > Ok I was already at this point.
> >
Ok I was already at this point.
My facetting system use exactly what is described in this page. I read it from
the Solr 1.4 book. Otherwise I would'nt ask.
The problem is that the filter queries doesn't affect the relevance score of
the results so I want the terms in the main query.
> -
You're right the second query didn't result in an error but neither gave the
expected result.
I'm gone to have a look at the link you gave me.
Thanks !
>
> From: Markus Jelsma
> Sent: Tue Jan 18 21:31:52 CET 2011
> To:
> Subject: Re: Local param tag vood
Hey,
here are my needs :
- a query that has tagged and untagged contents
- facets that ignore the tagged contents
I tryed :
q=({!tag=toExclude} ignored) taken into account
q={tag=toExclude v='ignored'} take into account
Both resulted in a error.
Is this possible or do I have to try another
> query ... it's the same. In terms of the score of the results no,
> since, if you are using the first query, the documents that will match both
> the "a" and the "b" terms, will match higher then the ones matching just the
> "a" term.
>
> O
Hi,
with the Lucene query syntax, is :
a AND (a OR b)
equivalent to :
a
(absorption)
?
need to do it, but you can automatically
restart it once a day.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Xavier Schepler
wrote:
Hi,
We are in a beta testing phase, with several users a day.
After several days of waiting, the solr server didn't respond to requests
that require a lot of proce
t.
After restarting Tomcat all went fine again.
I'm trying to understand why I had to restart tomcat and what should I
do to have it working 7/7 24/24.
Xavier
lues inside. It takes 200 or 300 ms because of highlighting.
After restarting tomcat all went fine again.
I'm trying to understand why I had to restart tomcat and solr and what
should I do to have it working 7/7 24/24.
Xavier
On 04/10/2010 16:40, Robert Muir wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Xavier Schepler<
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Hi,
does the more like this search uses terms positions information in the
score formula ?
no, it would be nice if it did use them though (base
Hi,
does the more like this search uses terms positions information in the
score formula ?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Xavier Noria wrote:
>> Let's suppose we have a regular search field body_t, and an internal
>> boolean flag flag_t not exposed to the user.
>>
>> I'd like
>>
&
Let's suppose we have a regular search field body_t, and an internal
boolean flag flag_t not exposed to the user.
I'd like
body_t:foo AND flag_t:true
to be an intersection, but if "foo" is a stopword I get all documents
for which flag_t is true, as if the first class was dropped, or if
techn
On 08/09/2010 12:21, Grijesh.singh wrote:
see the analysis.jsp with debug verbose and see what happens at index time
and search time during analysis with your data
Also u can use debugQuery=on for seeing what actually parsed query is.
-
Grijesh
I've found a first solution by myself, usi
t file :
...
PS,Parti socialiste
...
and here's the query :
"PS et".
It returns no result, whereas "Parti socialiste et" returns the results.
How can I have both queries working ? I'm thinking about different
configurations but I didn't found any solution at the moment.
Thx for reading,
Xavier Schepler
On 03/09/2010 15:31, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
On 03/09/2010 14:47, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 6:02 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
no, jopsin isn't in the index.
I tryed this with other words and I had the
On 03/09/2010 14:47, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 6:02 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
When I take the two letters from the middle of a word and put the first in place
of the second and the second in place of the first, ex : jospin => jopsin, I
don't get any suggest
Hi,
When I take the two letters from the middle of a word and put the first
in place of the second and the second in place of the first, ex : jospin
=> jopsin, I don't get any suggestion from the spellchecker component.
I tryed the default algorithm and the Jaro Winkler Distance, with a
coef
On 01/09/2010 13:54, Xavier Schepler wrote:
On 01/09/2010 12:38, Markus Jelsma wrote:
I think you need to enable usePhraseHighlighter in order to use the
highlightMultiTerm parameter.
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 12:12:11 Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
can the highlighting component
On 01/09/2010 12:38, Markus Jelsma wrote:
I think you need to enable usePhraseHighlighter in order to use the
highlightMultiTerm parameter.
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 12:12:11 Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
can the highlighting component highlight terms only if the distance
between them
Hi,
can the highlighting component highlight terms only if the distance
between them matches the query ?
I use those parameters :
hl=on&hl.fl=qFR,iFR,mFR,vlFR&hl.usePhraseHighlighter=false&hl.highlightMultiTerm=true&hl.simple.pre=&hl.simple.post=<%2Fb>&hl.mergeContiguous=false
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: how could I have the highlighting component return only the terms that were
: matched, without any surrounding text ?
I'm not a Highlighter expert, but this is somethign that certainly
*sounds* like it should be easy.
I took a shot at it and this is hte best i could c
Hi,
several documents from my index contain the phrase : "PS et".
However, PS is expanded to "parti socialiste" and a phrase search for
"PS et" fails.
A phrase search for "parti socialiste et" succeeds.
Can I have both queries working ?
Here's the field type :
Hi,
how could I have the highlighting component return only the terms that
were matched, without any surrounding text ?
(I'm assuming DIH, but you don't state that anywhere).
> If it *is* DIH, providing that configuration would help.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Xavier Rodriguez
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a SOLR installed on a Tomc
ation, and manually remove dataimport.properties
because it's the only metadata i found. Is there any other file to check or
modify just to get all 300 rows indexed?
Of course, I tried to find one of that oracle fields, with no results.
Thanks a lot,
Xavier Rodriguez.
Hi,
Here's a field type using synonyms :
synonyms="french-synonyms.txt" ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
mapping="mapping-ISOLatin1Accent.txt"/>
mapping="mapping-ISOLatin1Accent.txt"/>
Here are the contents of 'french-synonyms.txt' that I used for testing :
PC,parti co
7; in A and C
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/5/17 Xavier Schepler
Hey,
let's say I have :
- a field named A with specific contents
- a field named B with specific co
Le 17/05/2010 16:57, Xavier Schepler a écrit :
Hey,
let's say I have :
- a field named A with specific contents
- a field named B with specific contents
- a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField.
Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance :
(the lazy fox)
??
Thanks,
Xavier
Le 23/04/2010 17:08, Otis Gospodnetic a écrit :
Xavier,
0-1000 QPS is a pretty wide range. Plus, it depends on how good your
auto-complete is, which depends on types of queries it issues, among other
things.
100K short docs is small, so that will all fit in RAM nicely, assuming those
other
omplete.
Is a standard server (3ghz proc, 4gb ram) with the client application
(apache + php5 + ZF + apc) and Tomcat + Solr enough ???
Do I need more hardware ?
Thanks in advance,
Xavier S.
My parameters :
&mlt.fl=question,&mlt.mintf=1&mlt.mindf=&mlt.minwl=4
The "question" field contains between 15 and 50 terms.
Xavier S.
Hello,
this field would not be searched, but it would be used to display results.
A query could be :
q=table&hl=true&hl.fl=htmlfield&hl.fragsize=0
It would be tokenized with the HTMLStripStandardTokenizerFactory, then
analyzed the same way as the searcheable fields.
Could this result in hig
Xavier Schepler wrote:
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Xavier,
Thanks for your feedback
the firewall rule for the trusted IP is not fessiable for us because the
application is open for public so we can not work through IP banning.
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Group,
I need some feedback on solr
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Xavier,
Thanks for your feedback
the firewall rule for the trusted IP is not fessiable for us because the
application is open for public so we can not work through IP banning.
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Group,
I need some feedback on solr security.
For Making
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Group,
I need some feedback on solr security.
For Making by solr admin password protected,
I had used the Path Based Authentication form
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrSecurity.
In this way my admin area,search,delete,add to index is protected.But Now
when I make s
(term1 AND
term3 AND term4) OR ...
With a good list of stop words, and well thought thresholds for the
numbers of terms, the queries should not become too long.
3 - working with a stop word list and more like this parameters
I would have time to develop a solr's plugin, but I don't know
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Hey,
I'm thi
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Hey,
I'm thinking about using dynamic fields.
I need one or more user specific field in my schema, for example,
"concept_user_*", and I will hav
r result.
How would it impact query performance ?
Thanks,
Xavier S.
30
9
Non réponse
18
Why are the "lst" tags from the "lst highlighting" list self closing
when matches are found in variableEltDDIXML contents ?
Thanks in advance,
Xavier
10 at 7:47 AM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to highlight short text values. The field they came from has a
type shared with other fields. I have highlighting working on other fields
but not on this one.
Why ?
Thanks for your re
Hi,
I'm trying to highlight short text values. The field they came from has
a type shared with other fields. I have highlighting working on other
fields but not on this one.
Why ?
99 matches
Mail list logo
