devices.
-Original Message-
From: Ere Maijala
Sent: 01 March 2021 12:53
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Potential Slow searching for unified highlighting on Solr
8.8.0/8.8.1
EXTERNAL EMAIL - Be cautious of all links and attachments.
Hi,
Whoa, thanks for the heads-up! You
and its
attachments from all devices.
-Original Message-
From: Ere Maijala
Sent: 01 March 2021 12:53
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Potential Slow searching for unified highlighting on Solr
8.8.0/8.8.1
EXTERNAL EMAIL - Be cautious of all links and attachments.
Hi
Hi,
Whoa, thanks for the heads-up! You may just have saved me from a whole
lot of trouble. Did you file a JIRA ticket already?
Thanks,
Ere
Flowerday, Matthew J kirjoitti 1.3.2021 klo 14.00:
Hi There
I just came across a situation where a unified highlighting search under
solr 8.8.0/8.8.1
Hi There
I just came across a situation where a unified highlighting search under
solr 8.8.0/8.8.1 can take over 20 mins to run and eventually times out. I
resolved it by a config change - but it can catch you out. Hence this email.
With solr 8.8.0 a new unified highlighting parameter
Hi Lucene team,
I have been using Solr 8.4.0 and I encountered an issue where suggest
highlight feature in “BlendedInfixLookupFactory” is not working whenever I
am using “contextField”. While searching online, I came across below page
which does indicate a similar issue but for different
rase query is to be
highlighted using the "exact" analysis as opposed to stemmed/approximate
analysis. As one can imagine, there was a lot of custom code involved here
for many search requirements; this complexity wasn't just for the
highlighting matter. Any way, using one stored field and mul
Hello folks,
I am currently working on an issue where we need to enable exact highlighting
on a text field.
Only problem is that it should also be possible to have also parts of the query
which don't need to be exact.(e.g. "Hello World" Test, so "Hello World" needs
Hi David
Just reindexed everything and it appears to be performing well and giving
me highlights for the matched text.
Thanks for your help.
Shaun
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021, 21:00 David Smiley, wrote:
> The last update to highlighting that I think is pertinent to
> whether highlights
The last update to highlighting that I think is pertinent to
whether highlights match or not is v7.6 which added that hl.weightMatches
option. So I recommend upgrading to at least that if you want to
experiment further. But... uh.weightMatches highlights more accurately and
as such is more
lrconfig.xml on the wrong core doh!! That's why
> > highlighting wasn't being turned off.
> >
> > I think I've got the unified highlighter working.
> > storeOffsetsWithPositions was already configured on my field type
> > definition, not the field definition, so that was ok.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:08 PM Shaun Campbell
wrote:
> Hi David
>
> Getting closer now.
>
> First of all, a bit of a mistake on my part. I have two cores set up and I
> was changing the solrconfig.xml on the wrong core doh!! That's why
> highlighting wasn't being turned
Hi David
Getting closer now.
First of all, a bit of a mistake on my part. I have two cores set up and I
was changing the solrconfig.xml on the wrong core doh!! That's why
highlighting wasn't being turned off.
I think I've got the unified highlighter working.
storeOffsetsWithPositions
s been absorbed
> into the Unified highlighter. I find your book easier to follow than the
> official documentation though.
>
Thanks :-D. I do maintain the Solr Reference Guide for the parts of code I
touch, including highlighting, so I hope what's there makes sense too.
> I am going to t
highlighting off and it was still giving me
highlights.
Actually just re-reading your email again, are you saying that you can't
configure highlighting in solrconfig.xml? That's where I always configure
original highlighting in my dismax search handler. Am I supposed to add
highlighting to each request
Hello!
I worked on the UnifiedHighlighter a lot and want to help you!
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:58 AM Shaun Campbell
wrote:
> I've been using highlighting for a while, using the original highlighter,
> and just come across a problem with fields that contain a large amount of
> tex
I've been using highlighting for a while, using the original highlighter,
and just come across a problem with fields that contain a large amount of
text, approx 250k characters. I only have about 2,000 records but each one
contains a journal publication to search through.
What I noticed
Hi All,
pushing the query to the top.
Does anyone have any idea about it?
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:49 AM Ajay Sharma wrote:
> Hi Community,
>
> This is the first time, I am implementing a solr *highlighting *feature.
> I have read the concept via solr documentation
&
Hi Community,
This is the first time, I am implementing a solr *highlighting *feature.
I have read the concept via solr documentation
Link- https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_2/highlighting.html
To enable highlighting I just have to add *=true=* *in our solr
query and got the snippet
tored (no
match on stored field doc_text...). Is there any way to make it highlighted
without also storing doc_text_morph field?
Thanks again...
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2020 at 3:39 PM
From: "Erick Erickson"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting values of no
When highlighting, the stored data for the field is re-analyzed against the
query based on the field you’re highlighting. My bet is that if you query just
“q=doc_text:mosh” you will not get a hit. Check your text_ws fieldType, it’s
probably case sensitive. So if you changed the doc_text type
method' param to 'unified' and 'fastVector' but no
luck either. My conclusion was that 'hl.fl' param should be set to
'doc_text_lw' and it must be also stored...
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 at 3:15 PM
From: "Erick Erickson"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting val
e then one "variation" and
> query is executed with edismax query parser. Things are working alright, but
> now a new feature is requested by the customer - highlighting.
> To enable highlighting every field must be stored, including all variations
> of the big text field. This push
"variation" and
query is executed with edismax query parser. Things are working alright, but
now a new feature is requested by the customer - highlighting.
To enable highlighting every field must be stored, including all variations
of the big text field. This pushes our storage to the limit (and p
iginal Message-
> From: Jörn Franke [mailto:jornfra...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 1:22 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: highlighting a whole html document using Unified highlighter
>
> hl.fragsize=0
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_
All clear.
Thanks David,
> On 24 May 2020, at 18:57, David Smiley wrote:
>
> These strategies are not mutually exclusive. Yes I do suggest having the
> HTML in whole go into one searchable field to satisfy your highlighting
> use-case. But I can imagine you will also wan
These strategies are not mutually exclusive. Yes I do suggest having the
HTML in whole go into one searchable field to satisfy your highlighting
use-case. But I can imagine you will also want some document metadata in
separate fields. It's up to you to parse that out somehow and add it. You
,
-Original Message-
From: David Smiley [mailto:dsmi...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 5:26 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: highlighting a whole html document using Unified highlighter
Instead of stripping the HTML for the stored value, leave it be and remove
it during the analysis stage
whole html
> document?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Serkan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörn Franke [mailto:jornfra...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 1:22 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: highlighting a whole html document using Unified highlight
, May 24, 2020 1:22 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting a whole html document using Unified highlighter
hl.fragsize=0
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_5/highlighting.html
> Am 24.05.2020 um 11:49 schrieb Serkan KAZANCI :
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
hl.fragsize=0
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_5/highlighting.html
> Am 24.05.2020 um 11:49 schrieb Serkan KAZANCI :
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I use solr to search over a million html documents, when a document is
> searched and displayed, I want to highlight the keywords that are used to
>
Hi,
I use solr to search over a million html documents, when a document is
searched and displayed, I want to highlight the keywords that are used to
find and access the document.
Unified highlighter is fast, accurate and supports different languages but
only highlights passages with given
c Allen - Software Devloper, NetDocuments
> eric.al...@netdocuments.com | O: 801.989.9691 | C: 801.989.9691
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sasarun
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 2:45 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Highlighting Solr 8
>
>
0 at 3:39 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using highlighting feature in solr 8.3 with default method. With
> > current behaviour, main search results and highlighted results are shown in
> > different blocks. Is there a way we can implemented
any update on this guys
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 3:39 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using highlighting feature in solr 8.3 with default method. With
> current behaviour, main search results and highlighted results are shown in
> different blocks. Is the
Hi,
I am using highlighting feature in solr 8.3 with default method. With
current behaviour, main search results and highlighted results are shown in
different blocks. Is there a way we can implemented highlighting within the
search main results, without having to return extra block
Hello Dev Team,
I found some problem in highlighting module. Not all the search terms are
getting highlighted.
Sample query: q={!complexphrase+inOrder=true}"pos1 (pos2 OR pos3)"~30=true
Indexed text: "pos1 pos2 pos3 pos4"
please find attached response xml screen shot fro
I may be wrong here, but the problem may be that the match was on your
terms pos1 and pos2 (you don't need the pos3 term to match, due to the
OR operator) and thus that's what's been highlighted.
There's a hl.q parameter that lets you supply a different query for
highlighting to the one
Hello Dev Team,
I found some problem in highlighting module. Not all the search terms are
getting highlighted.
Sample query: q={!complexphrase+inOrder=true}"pos1 (pos2 OR pos3)"~30=true
Indexed text: "pos1 pos2 pos3 pos4"
please find attached response xml screen shot fro
I haven't worked with highlighting much but what's the need to store terms
in multivalued field?
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 20:04, Nicolas Franck
wrote:
> I'm trying to use highlighting on a multivalued text field (analysis not
> so important) ..
>
>
> { text: [ "hell
I'm trying to use highlighting on a multivalued text field (analysis not so
important) ..
{ text: [ "hello", "world" ], id: 1 }
but I want to match across the string boundaries:
q=text:"hello world"
This works by setting the attribute
positionIncrementGap to
NGrams
<https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_3/tokenizers.html#edge-n-gram-tokenizer>
on the index side. Using this, your highlighting should work as expected
and as you do in normal searching.
3. You also have Suggester
<https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_3/sugges
r of Solr.
>
> For the visualization part: Angular has a suggestion box that can ingest
> the results from Solr.
>
> > Am 21.11.2019 um 16:42 schrieb rhys J :
> >
> > Are there any recommended APIs or code examples of using Solr and then
> > highlighting results below th
sing Solr and then
> highlighting results below the search box?
>
> I'm trying to implement a search box that will search solr as the user
> types, if that makes sense?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rhys
you can modify the result in this SO question to fit your needs:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16742610/retrieve-results-from-solr-using-jquery-calls
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:42 AM rhys J wrote:
> Are there any recommended APIs or code examples of using Solr and then
> highli
Are there any recommended APIs or code examples of using Solr and then
highlighting results below the search box?
I'm trying to implement a search box that will search solr as the user
types, if that makes sense?
Thanks,
Rhys
r-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting Solr 8
Hi Eric,
Unified highlighter does not have an option to provide alternate field when
highlighting. That option is available with Orginal and fast vector
highlighter. As indicated in the Solr documentation, Unified is the recommended
Hi Eric,
Unified highlighter does not have an option to provide alternate field when
highlighting. That option is available with Orginal and fast vector
highlighter. As indicated in the Solr documentation, Unified is the
recommended method for highlighting to meet most of the use cases. Please do
Use case
I am querying a catchall field and then would like to highlight that term in 3
other fields say a, b, and c. I already have full term vectors.
>From my reading and limited testing the fastest choice would be
hl.method unified
hl.termVectors true
hl.termPositions true
hl.termOffsets
Ah, multi-threaded highlighting. I implemented that once as a precursor to
ultimately other better things -- the UnifiedHighlighter.
Your ExecutorService ought to be a field on the handler. In inform() you
can call SolrCore.addCloseHook to ensure this executor is shut down.
I suggest looking
Hi all.
In our team we thought about some tricky solution for queries with long time
highlighting. For example, highlighting that takes more than 25 seconds. So,
we created our component that wraps highlighting component of SOLR in this
way:
public void inform(SolrCore core
Hi Everybody,
we are using Apache Solr strongly with nested documents feature. But in
version 8 we noticed that the highlighting which has been worked in Version 7
doesn't work properly in Version 8 . It works only for root parent element but
not for childs? Is this an known open issue
,
Govind
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:45 PM Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> Hi Govind,
>
> Highlighting is the easiest way to detect it. You can find a similar
> question at here:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9629147/how-to-return-column-that-matched-the-query-in-solr
>
> Kind
Hi Govind,
Highlighting is the easiest way to detect it. You can find a similar
question at here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9629147/how-to-return-column-that-matched-the-query-in-solr
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:28 PM govind nitk wrote:
> Hi Furkan KAM
vance.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 5:48 PM govind nitk
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > How to get more details for highlighting ?
> > >
> > > I am using
> > >
> >
> hl.method=unified&
govind nitk wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > How to get more details for highlighting ?
> >
> > I am using
> >
> hl.method=unified&=title,url,paragraph=true=true
> >
> > So, if query words not matched, I am getting defaultSummary, which is
> >
get more details for highlighting ?
>
> I am using
> hl.method=unified&=title,url,paragraph=true=true
>
> So, if query words not matched, I am getting defaultSummary, which is
> great. *Can we get more info saying whether it found matches or default
> summary? How to get su
Hi all,
How to get more details for highlighting ?
I am using
hl.method=unified&=title,url,paragraph=true=true
So, if query words not matched, I am getting defaultSummary, which is
great. *Can we get more info saying whether it found matches or default
summary? How to get such informa
Hi Edwin,
Thanks for your explanation, makes sense now.
Best regards
Martin
Internal - KMD A/S
-Original Message-
From: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
Sent: 30. juni 2019 01:57
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Hi,
If you are using the type
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 14:52, Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ) wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I have tested a bit and I was wondering if the highlighter requires a
> field to be of type "text"? Whenever I try highlighting on fields which are
> of type "string" nothing gets ret
Hi again,
I have tested a bit and I was wondering if the highlighter requires a field to
be of type "text"? Whenever I try highlighting on fields which are of type
"string" nothing gets returned.
Best regards
Martin
Internal - KMD A/S
-Original Message-
From: J
Hi Edwin,
Yes the field is defined just like the other fields:
BR
Martin
Internal - KMD A/S
-Original Message-
From: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
Sent: 4. juni 2019 10:32
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Hi Martin,
What fieldType are you
-Original Message-
From: Jörn Franke
Sent: 11. juni 2019 08:45
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Could it be a stop word ? What is the exact type definition of those fields?
Could this word be omitted or with wrong encoding during loading
Could it be a stop word ? What is the exact type definition of those fields?
Could this word be omitted or with wrong encoding during loading of the
documents?
> Am 03.06.2019 um 10:06 schrieb Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ) :
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having some difficulties making hi
Hi David,
Thanks for your response and sorry my late reply.
Still the same result when using hl.method=unified.
Best regards
Martin
Internal - KMD A/S
-Original Message-
From: David Smiley
Sent: 10. juni 2019 16:48
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Please try hl.method=unified and tell us if that helps.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:06 AM Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having some difficulties making highlighting work. For so
Hi Martin,
What fieldType are you using for the field “Sagstitel”? Is it the same as
other fields?
Regards,
Edwin
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 16:06, Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having some difficulties making highlighting work. For some reason
> the highlighting
Hi,
I am having some difficulties making highlighting work. For some reason the
highlighting feature only works on some fields but not on other fields even
though these fields are stored.
An example of a request looks like this:
http://localhost/solr/mytest/select?fl=id,doc.Type,Journalnummer
On 4/15/2019 11:36 AM, Mike Phillips wrote:
I don't understand why highlighting does not return anything but the document
id.
I created a core imported all my data, everything seems like it should be
working.
From reading the documentation I expect it to show me highlight information
I don't understand why highlighting does not return anything but the document
id.
I created a core imported all my data, everything seems like it should be
working.
From reading the documentation I expect it to show me highlight information for
assetName around Potter, but I never get anything
Range queries against mutivalued string fields produces useless highlighting,
even though "hl.highlightMultiTerm":"true"
I have uncovered what I believe is a bug. At the very lease it is a difference
in behavior between Solr v5.1.0 and v7.5.0 (and v7.7.1).
I have a Field
my query (=give me document that have a parent which contain
"apache" term):
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/col/query -d '
fl=id
=on
=*
={!child of="type_s:parent"}type_s:parent AND content_txt:apache'
And here is the result:
{
...
"response":{"numFound":1,"
I want to get highlighted results for more like this queries. More like
this doesn't support highlighting.
So what I did was ran a more like this query (I have the source document A
and say I get three similar documents back A1, A2, and A3). I then create
a second query where I use the contents
Is it possible to get highlighting in more like this queries? My initial
attempts seem to indicate that it isn't possible (I've only attempted this
via modifying MLT query urls)
(I'm looking for something similar to hl=true=field1,field5,field6 in
a normal search)
Thanks,
Matt
re isn't one already
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018, 19:49 Karthik Ramachandran <
> kramachand...@commvault.com> wrote:
>
> > We are using Solr 7.2.1, highlighting is not working with docValues only
> > String field.
> >
> > Should I open a JIRA for this?
olr 7.2.1, highlighting is not working with docValues only
> String field.
>
> Should I open a JIRA for this?
>
> Schema:
>
> id
>
>required="true"/>
>stored="true"/>
>stored="false"/>
>
>
>
> Data:
&
We are using Solr 7.2.1, highlighting is not working with docValues only String
field.
Should I open a JIRA for this?
Schema:
id
Data:
[{"id":1,"name":"Testing line 1"},{"id":2,"name":"Testing line
2"},{"i
, but its not
working. Am I missing something?
Thanks
Renuka Srishti
On Wed 1 Aug, 2018, 12:05 Nicolas Franck, wrote:
> Nope, that is how it works. It is not in place.
>
> > On 31 Jul 2018, at 21:57, Renuka Srishti
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I was
Nope, that is how it works. It is not in place.
> On 31 Jul 2018, at 21:57, Renuka Srishti wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was using highlighting in solr, solr gives highlighting results within
> the response but not included within the documents.
> Am i missing somethin
Hi All,
I was using highlighting in solr, solr gives highlighting results within
the response but not included within the documents.
Am i missing something? Can i configure so that it can show highlighted
keywords matched within the documents.
Thanks
Renuka Srishti
Good evening solr community. I have not had a lot of luck on another community
source seeking advice on using the unified highlighter so I thought I'd try my
luck with the solr experts. Any recommendations would be appreciated when you
get time.
Apache Solr 6.4 saw the release of the
am
not yet sure how to express myself clearly using the language of the forum
and (ii) I was not sure what impact it has if other component is selected
(like FastVector Highlighter). Deep inside I had a feeling that some solr
configurations would allow highlighting even without the "stored"
Thanks for your review!
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:56 AM Arturas Mazeika <maze...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
> What I missed at the beginning of the documentation is the minimal set of
> requirements that is reacquired to have highlighting sensible: somehow I
> have a feeling that
also agree that it is hard to document the problem and give a
solution to my problem. I see at least two reasons why this becomes very
challenging in this case: (i) the document aims to cover all options and
possibilities of highlighting in solr, (ii) the documents aims to teach the
reader how to use
atching of the substrings from the original text to last
> filter/tokenizer/analyzer in the analyze-chain to map the terms of the
> query
> 4. Emulate CTRL+F highlighting
>
> Web Interface of Solr offers quite a bit to advance towards this goal. If
> one fires this request:
>
Arturas:
Thanks for the "atta boy's", but I have to confess I poked a
developer's list and the person (David Smiley) who, you know, like
understands the highlighting code replied, and I passed it on ;
I have great respect for the SO forum, but don't post to it since
there's only so
the original text to last
filter/tokenizer/analyzer in the analyze-chain to map the terms of the query
4. Emulate CTRL+F highlighting
Web Interface of Solr offers quite a bit to advance towards this goal. If
one fires this request:
* analysis.fieldvalue=Albert Einstein (14 March 1879 – 18 April
you'll see entries like:
my_field
Also when I changed the "df" parameter to the field I was highlighting
on, I didn't need to specify the field on the hl.q parameter.
hl.q=Kundigung
or
hl.q=Kündigung
The default field is usually "text", which knows nothing about
the German-specific
are saying that the
analyzer-chain needs to be applied for the highlighting queries as well.
The tragedy is that I am not able to get this for a german collection: if
the query is set (no explicit highlighting query), the highlighting is
correct. It is also correct, if I replace the umaults
e one
analysis chain for the query and another for highlighting on the
_same_ field".
You can use two different fields with different analysis chains, one
for each purpose. So something like
q=f1:something=f2,f3=other
is certainly reasonable. It'll search for "something" in f1, and
hig
of discussions that she saw before).
What I was not able to achieve so far is: (i) combine query term for
filtering and highlighting, (ii) using the analyzer-chain from the
attribute to rewrite the highlight query (or define one in the search)
CTR+F technique is a very powerful one, indeed. Works most
From your
> answer I understand that this is not really the case. My current
> understanding came from [1] that says:
>
> hl.q
>
> A query to use for highlighting. This parameter allows you to highlight
> different terms than those being used to retrieve documents
ent
understanding came from [1] that says:
hl.q
A query to use for highlighting. This parameter allows you to highlight
different terms than those being used to retrieve documents.
what I hear from you is something different: i.e., that this is not enough
just to combine the q with h
Basically you need to use a copyField, but in several variants:
If you use the field _exclusively_ for highlighting then store the raw
content there and have the field use whatever analyzer you want. You
do _not_ need to have indexed="true" set for the field if you're
highlighting on t
Hi Solr-Users,
I've been playing with a german collection of documents, where I tried to
search for one word (q=Tag) and highlighted another: (hl.q=Kundigung). Is
this a "legal" use case? My key question is how can I tell solr which query
analyzer to use for highlighting? Strictly s
It's possible to use highlighting over date fields ?
We've tried but we've got no highlighting response for the field.
available in the
document at the bottom. Due to which it is not shown in highlighting blob.
Is there a way to highlight the keywords which are not in close proximity
Thanks
Arun
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
schema.
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>>
>>> On Jan 16, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Aashish Agarwal <aaashi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am using solr highlighting feature on multivalued fi
ion of Solr are you using?
>
> Please share your configuration: highlighter and schema.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Jan 16, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Aashish Agarwal <aaashi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am using sol
Hi Aashish,
Which version of Solr are you using?
Please share your configuration: highlighter and schema.
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Jan 16, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Aashish Agarwal <aaashi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using solr highlighting feature
Hello,
I am using solr highlighting feature on multivalued field containing korean
words.The feature is not working as expected. Search is working fine but in
case of highlighting it gives response as .
I am storing term vector for the field and it is also stored=true.
Please reply soon. Need
1 - 100 of 1278 matches
Mail list logo
