Re: Term highlighting with MoreLikeThisHandler?

OK - I understand your point. However - I believe that it can be both effective and useful, depending on the nature of the application and the users. If the usual hl parameters to enable snippet highlighting for MLT interesting terms were available, you would have the choice to enable, disable

Re: Term highlighting with MoreLikeThisHandler?

wrote: Any luck on this? I am experiencing the same issue. Highlighting works fine on all other request handlers, but breaks when I use the MoreLikeThisHandler. Thanks, Matt Weber On Apr 28, 2009, at 5:29 AM, Eric Sabourin wrote: Yes... at least I think so

Re: Term highlighting with MoreLikeThisHandler?

Yes, I understand you can't highlight a documented within a document. However, with MLT you a using the interesting terms from the source document(s) to find similar results. An obvious solution would be highlighting the interesting terms that matched and thus made the result similar

Highlighting using XML instead of strings?

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters I can specify the strings to highlight matched text with using hl.simple.pre and hl.simple.post, for example b and /b. The result looks like this: strlt;bgt;Eumellt;/bgt; NDR Ländermagazine/str However, what if as the result of favouring XML

Re: highlighting html content

Hi Matt, On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Matt Mitchell goodie...@gmail.com wrote: I've been toying with setting custom pre/post delimiters and then removing them in the client, but I thought I'd ask the list before I go to far with that idea :) this is what I do. I define the custom

Re: Term highlighting with MoreLikeThisHandler?

Yes... at least I think so. the highlighting works correctly for me on another request handler... see below the request handler for my morelikethishandler query. Thanks for your help... Eric requestHandler name=/mlt class=solr.MoreLikeThisHandler lst name=defaults str name=fl

Re: highlighting html content

Hi Christian, I decided to do something very similar. How do you handle cases where the highlighting is inside of html/xml tags though? I'm getting stuff like this: ?q=jackson entry type=song author=Michael emJackson/emBad by Michael emJackson/em/entry I wrote a regular expression to take care

highlighting html content

Hi, I've been looking around but can't seem to find any clear instruction on how to do this... I'm storing html content and would like to enable highlighting on the html content. The problem is that the search can sometimes match html element names or attributes, and when the highlighter adds

Re: Term highlighting with MoreLikeThisHandler?

Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 10:31:38 AM Subject: Term highlighting with MoreLikeThisHandler? I submit a query to the MoreLikeThisHandler to find documents similar to a specified document. This works and I've configured my request handler to also return the interesting terms

Re: Highlighting not stored fields

because of many solved enterprise features. I have to say It is great project! I've downloaded Solr 1.3 + SolrJ and have tried to use as embedded one. Everything works fine but one thing is missing - or I can not find it. In pure Lucene, I can do highlighting after searching. Field values

Highlighting wildcard search results.

Does Solr support highlighting for wildcard searches?. Like I search for tele* and all words matching 'tele' should get highlighted ex: telephone, telex etc. I am trying to get the highlighting using ressponse.getHighlighting(). But It returns empty list. Would appreciate any help. Thanks.

Re: Highlighting wildcard search results.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Narayanan, Karthikeyan karthikeyan.naraya...@gs.com wrote: Does Solr support highlighting for wildcard searches?. Like I search for tele* and all words matching 'tele' should get highlighted ex: telephone, telex etc. I am trying to get the highlighting using

Highlighting the searched term in resultset

I was wondering if there is any way of highlighting the searched term in the resultset directly instead of having it as a separate lst element. Doing it through xsl transformation would be one way. Has anybody implemented any other better solution ? e.g result name=response numFound=293 start

Highlighting on Prefix-Search Bug/Workaround (Re: query with stemming, prefix and fuzzy?)

Mark Miller wrote: Currently I think about dropping the stemming and only use prefix-search. But as highlighting does not work with a prefix house* this is a problem for me. The hint to use house?* instead does not work here. Thats because wildcard queries are also not highlightable now

Re: Highlighting Oddities

(gap) fragmenter with some simple, single-word queries on a patched 1.3.0 release populated with some real-world data. (I think the primary quirk in my setup is that I'm using ShingleFilterFactory to put word bigrams (aka shingles) into my index. I was worried that this might mess up highlighting

Re: Highlighting does not work?

to get highlighting working, with no luck so far. Query with params q=cyrusfl=*,scoreqt=standardhl=truehl.fl=title+description finds 182 documents in my index. All of the top 10 hits contain the word cyrus, but the highlights list is empty. The fields title and description are stored

Re: Highlighting does not work?

-01-27, o godz. 13:09, przez Jarek Zgoda: Solr 1.3 I'm trying to get highlighting working, with no luck so far. Query with params q=cyrusfl=*,scoreqt=standardhl=truehl.fl=title+description finds 182 documents in my index. All of the top 10 hits contain the word cyrus, but the highlights

Re: Highlighting does not work?

I'm trying to get highlighting working, with no luck so far. Query with params q=cyrusfl=*,scoreqt=standardhl=truehl.fl=title+description finds 182 documents in my index. All of the top 10 hits contain the word cyrus, but the highlights list is empty. The fields title and description

Highlighting does not work?

Solr 1.3 I'm trying to get highlighting working, with no luck so far. Query with params q=cyrusfl=*,scoreqt=standardhl=truehl.fl=title +description finds 182 documents in my index. All of the top 10 hits contain the word cyrus, but the highlights list is empty. The fields title

Re: Highlighting does not work?

I turned these fields to indexed + stored but the results are exactly the same, no matter if I search in these fields or elsewhere. Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2009-01-27, o godz. 13:09, przez Jarek Zgoda: Solr 1.3 I'm trying to get highlighting working, with no luck so far. Query

Re: Highlighting does not work?

, no matter if I search in these fields or elsewhere. Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2009-01-27, o godz. 13:09, przez Jarek Zgoda: Solr 1.3 I'm trying to get highlighting working, with no luck so far. Query with params q=cyrusfl=*,scoreqt=standardhl=truehl.fl=title +description finds 182 documents

Re: Highlighting does not work?

godz. 13:09, przez Jarek Zgoda: Solr 1.3 I'm trying to get highlighting working, with no luck so far. Query with params q=cyrusfl=*,scoreqt=standardhl=truehl.fl=title+description finds 182 documents in my index. All of the top 10 hits contain the word cyrus, but the highlights list

Re: Highlighting Trouble With Bigram Shingle Index

wrote a highlighter: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1522 I'm not shingle expert, but my highlighter has some pluggable interfaces, a plugin may be written to solve your problem. regards, Koji Chris Harris wrote: I'm running into some highlighting issues that appear to arise only

Improving Readability of Hit Highlighting

I'm indexing text from an OCR of an old document. Many words get read perfectly, but they're typically embedded in a lot of junk. I would like the hit highlighting to show only the 'good' words, in the order in which they appeared in the original document. Is it possible to use output

Re: Improving Readability of Hit Highlighting

- Original Message From: Terence Gannon butzi0...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 11:00:31 AM Subject: Improving Readability of Hit Highlighting I'm indexing text from an OCR of an old document. Many words get read perfectly, but they're

Re: Improving Readability of Hit Highlighting

To answer your questions specifically, here is an example of the raw OCR output; CONTRACTORINMPRIMENTAYIVE : mom Ale ACCEPT INFORMATIONON TOUR SHEET TO ea to which I would like to see; mom ale access tour sheet to in the hit highlight. My schema for this field is pretty much standard, as

Highlighting Trouble With Bigram Shingle Index

I'm running into some highlighting issues that appear to arise only when I'm using a bigram shingle (ShingleFilterFactory) analyzer. I started with a bigram-free situation along these lines: field name=body type=noshingleText indexed=false stored=false / !-- Stored text for use

Re: Improving Readability of Hit Highlighting

4:07:57 PM Subject: Re: Improving Readability of Hit Highlighting To answer your questions specifically, here is an example of the raw OCR output; CONTRACTORINMPRIMENTAYIVE : mom Ale ACCEPT INFORMATIONON TOUR SHEET TO ea to which I would like to see; mom ale access tour sheet

Highlighting not working

Hi, I cant get highlighting to work. I tried everything mentioned about it on the forum. PLEASE HELP... We use solrJ; search a field called content, it is the default search field, indexed and stored. Its type is text, has analyzer associated with it. There is no uniqueKey in the schema

Re: highlighting and stemming

. If the user searches for him by author, we get correct highlighting in the author field, but only Joe and not Bloggs is highlighted in the main body field. Conversely, if the user searches for Joe Bloggs in the main body field, the highlighting is correct in that field but this time only Joe

Re: highlighting and stemming

by author. Now, suppose we have an author named Joe Bloggs whose name appears in both the fields. If the user searches for him by author, we get correct highlighting in the author field, but only Joe and not Bloggs is highlighted in the main body field. Conversely, if the user searches

Re: highlighting and stemming

to avoid unexpected matches when searching by author. Now, suppose we have an author named Joe Bloggs whose name appears in both the fields. If the user searches for him by author, we get correct highlighting in the author field, but only Joe and not Bloggs is highlighted in the main body field

highlighting and stemming

an author named Joe Bloggs whose name appears in both the fields. If the user searches for him by author, we get correct highlighting in the author field, but only Joe and not Bloggs is highlighted in the main body field. Conversely, if the user searches for Joe Bloggs in the main body field

Highlighting broken? String index out of range: 35

config, enable per-query with hl=true -- str name=hl.fltext features name/str !-- for this field, we want no fragmenting, just highlighting -- str name=f.name.hl.fragsize0/str !-- instructs Solr to return the field itself if no query terms are found -- str name

Re: Highlighting broken? String index out of range: 35

2lt;-1 5lt;-2 6lt;90% /str int name=ps100/int str name=q.alt*:*/str !-- example highlighter config, enable per-query with hl=true -- str name=hl.fltext features name/str !-- for this field, we want no fragmenting, just highlighting -- str name

Re: Highlighting broken? String index out of range: 35

!-- for this field, we want no fragmenting, just highlighting -- str name=f.name.hl.fragsize0/str !-- instructs Solr to return the field itself if no query terms are found -- str name=f.name.hl.alternateFieldname/str str name=f.text.hl.fragmenterregex/str !-- defined below

Highlighting wildcards

Hi, i'm using solr 1.3.0 and SolrJ for my java application I need to highlight my query words even if I use wildcards for example q=tele* i need to highlight words as television, telephone, etc I found this thread

Re: Highlighting wildcards

To do it now, you'd have to switch the query parser to using the old style wildcard (and/or prefix) query, which is slower on large indexes and has max clause issues. I think I can make it work out of the box for the next release again though. see

Re: Highlighting wildcards

On 21-Nov-08, at 3:45 AM, Mark Miller wrote: To do it now, you'd have to switch the query parser to using the old style wildcard (and/or prefix) query, which is slower on large indexes and has max clause issues. An alternative is to query for q=tele?*, which forces wildcardquery -Mike

Highlighting Oddities

that this might mess up highlighting, but highlighting is *mostly* working.) There are some oddities here, and I'm wondering if people have any suggestions for debugging my setup and/or trying to make a good, reproducible test case. 1. The main weird thing is that, the vast majority of the time

Re: Highlighting and fields

Hi Lars, Thanks for it: it works great. BR Christophe Lars Kotthoff wrote: I'm doing the following query: q=text:abc AND type:typeA And I ask to return highlighting (query.setHighlight(true);). The search term for field type (typeA) is also highlighted in the text field. Anyway to avoid

Highlighting and fields

Hi, I'm doing the following query: q=text:abc AND type:typeA And I ask to return highlighting (query.setHighlight(true);). The search term for field type (typeA) is also highlighted in the text field. Anyway to avoid this ? Thanks Christophe

Re: Highlighting and fields

christophe wrote: Hi, I'm doing the following query: q=text:abc AND type:typeA And I ask to return highlighting (query.setHighlight(true);). The search term for field type (typeA) is also highlighted in the text field. Anyway to avoid this ? Thanks Christophe I havn't used solrj really

Re: Highlighting and fields

I'm doing the following query: q=text:abc AND type:typeA And I ask to return highlighting (query.setHighlight(true);). The search term for field type (typeA) is also highlighted in the text field. Anyway to avoid this ? Use setHighlightRequireFieldMatch(true) on the query object [1]. Lars

highlighting problem

Hello. I enabled highlighting and it works perfect, but not for all queries. For example if ?q=canon+powershot I get this response: --- { responseHeader:{ status:0, QTime:4}, response:{numFound:296,start:0,maxScore:4.3135004,docs

Re: solr is highlighting wrong words

Researching more, it was already an issue. Sorry for the inconvenience. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-42 Pako Francisco Sanmartin wrote: Highlighting in Solr has a strange behavior in some items. I attach an example to see if anyone can throw some light at it. Basically solr

Highlighting Unindexed Fields

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase says that a field needs to be both stored and indexed for highlighting to work. Unless I'm very confused, though, I just tested and highlighting worked fine (on trunk) for a stored, *non-indexed* field. So is this info perhaps out of date

Re: Highlighting Unindexed Fields

On 3-Sep-08, at 1:29 PM, Chris Harris wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase says that a field needs to be both stored and indexed for highlighting to work. Unless I'm very confused, though, I just tested and highlighting worked fine (on trunk) for a stored, *non-indexed

Re: Highlighting returns incorrect text on some results?

-- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: pdovyda2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:56:42 PM Subject: Highlighting returns incorrect text on some results? This is kind of a strange

Highlighting returns incorrect text on some results?

This is kind of a strange issue, but when I submit a query and ask for highlighting back, sometimes the highlighted text includes a question mark at the beginning, although a question mark character does not appear in the field that the highlighted text is taken from. I've put some sample XML

Re: Highlighting returns incorrect text on some results?

PM Subject: Highlighting returns incorrect text on some results? This is kind of a strange issue, but when I submit a query and ask for highlighting back, sometimes the highlighted text includes a question mark at the beginning, although a question mark character does not appear

Re: Highlighting Output

I tried to post it myself, got the address wrong, thanks for re-posting. the problem we have with highlighting outside of the indexer is that the systems we use that store co-ords are... based on term string (in one case) and the specific term offset in another. Both of which break horribly when

Re: Highlighting Output

Martin, You may want to follow Mark Miller's effort https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1286 as it develops -- perhaps even help with it. He's developing a Lucene highlighter which would run through query terms by using their offsets making highlighting large documents much more

Highlighting Output

Martin, I've been over some of the same thoughts you present here in the last few years. The path of least resistance ended up being to deal with the highlighting portion of OCRed images outside of Solr. That's not to say it couldn't or shouldn't be done differently. I briefly even pursued

range query highlighting

Hi, I'm using solr built from trunk and highlighting for range queries doesn't work. If I search for 2008 everything works as expected but if I search for [2000 TO 2008] nothing gets highlighted. The field I'm searching on is a TextField and I've confirmed that the query and index analyzers

Re: range query highlighting

in global-idf for distributed search). -Yonik On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Stefan Oestreicher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm using solr built from trunk and highlighting for range queries doesn't work. If I search for 2008 everything works as expected but if I search for [2000 TO 2008

Re: highlighting fragment

On 5-Jun-08, at 8:31 PM, Kevin Xiao wrote: Hi, I have a question about highlighting fragment. I set hl.fragsize to 100, but the return is cut off from a middle of a sentence with correct search term highlighting though. Is there a way to make the cutoff to the beginning of a sentence

Highlighting and Synonyms

to contain the text CPR which is not the case. Any ideas? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Highlighting-and-Synonyms-tp17665705p17665705.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Highlighting and Synonyms

AM Subject: Highlighting and Synonyms I have some data that contains phrases such as 1) Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Model Information Leaflet. British Medical Association 2) to ensure that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may safely proceed The data

highlighting fragment

Hi, I have a question about highlighting fragment. I set hl.fragsize to 100, but the return is cut off from a middle of a sentence with correct search term highlighting though. Is there a way to make the cutoff to the beginning of a sentence? Set some flag? How does highlighting cutoff work

phrase highlighting

Hi, in order to use phrase highlighting I built a war from the current svn trunk. (http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Commented:-(SOLR-553)-Highlighter-does-not-mat ch-phrase-queries-correctly-p17234014.html) It deployed without problems and the info section in the admin panel correctly (?) reports

Re: phrase highlighting

Implementation Version: 1.3-dev. However there's no difference at all if I use hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true in my select request, phrase terms are still highlighted individually. That's a different issue, SOLR-553 was to fix the bug that highlighting would return snips that did not match

AW: phrase highlighting

: Brian Whitman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 02. Juni 2008 15:57 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: Re: phrase highlighting On Jun 2, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Stefan Oestreicher wrote: (http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Commented:-(SOLR-553)-Highlighter-does-n ot-mat ch-phrase-queries

wildcard highlighting

Hi, I've started to play around with Solr and I'm quite impressed with its performance and features. However it seems to me that highlighting of wildcard terms is not supported, which is somewhat disappointing. Are there any plans to support that or did I miss something? best regards, Stefan

Re: wildcard highlighting

On 30-May-08, at 6:45 AM, Stefan Oestreicher wrote: Hi, I've started to play around with Solr and I'm quite impressed with its performance and features. However it seems to me that highlighting of wildcard terms is not supported, which is somewhat disappointing. Are there any plans

highlighting and hyperlink

Hi I am not sure if there are any discussions about this, I could not find the search function in mailing list archives. :) Anyway, here is my problem: In my document, I have a hyperlink, say, a href=../home/home.nb?q=breast+cancerbreast cancer/a, but when I applied solr highlighting

Re: highlighting and hyperlink

cancer/a, but when I applied solr highlighting on search term 'cancer', that hyperlink becomes: a href=../home/home.nb?q=breast+span class=TermHighlightcancer/ spanbreast span class=TermHighlightcancer/span/a. Obviously I don't want highlighting the first cancer (in red). Is there a flag

Highlighting - field criteria highlights in other fields

TO 20080520]start=0rows=11hl=onhl.fl=body_nlhl.snippets=3hl.fragsize=320hl.simple.pre=stronghl.simple.post=/strongsort=publishdateAsString desc,publicationname descfl=id,score,introduction we get nice highlighting from the body_nl field but Solr also highlights 3430 and 3451 if there is such a word

Re: Highlighting - field criteria highlights in other fields

)) )fq= +publishdateAsString:[20070520 TO 20080520 ]start = 0 rows = 11 hl = on hl .fl = body_nl hl .snippets=3hl.fragsize=320hl.simple.pre=stronghl.simple.post=/ strongsort=publishdateAsString desc,publicationname descfl=id,score,introduction we get nice highlighting from

solr highlighting

, but at the end of document added: lst name=highlighting −lst −arr name=ABST −str -gestational anemia as a consequence of a reduction in the number of primitive erythroid cells. emGATA/em-em1/em mRNA is /str /arr /lst … /lst The content of ABST of highlighting is much smaller than that of the original. I am

RE: solr highlighting

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 5:55 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: solr highlighting On Wednesday 14 May 2008 09:21:36 Kevin Xiao wrote: Hi there, I am new to solr. I want search term to be highlighted on the results. I thought it is pretty simple, but could

Re: solr highlighting

@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: solr highlighting On Wednesday 14 May 2008 09:21:36 Kevin Xiao wrote: Hi there, I am new to solr. I want search term to be highlighted on the results. I thought it is pretty simple, but could not make it work. I read a lot of solr documents and mail archives (I wish

RE: Slow Highlighting - CopyField maxSize property

Koji, The patch is now available at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-538 Tell me if it fits your needs. Nicolas -Message d'origine- De : Koji Sekiguchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : vendredi 21 mars 2008 16:50 À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org Objet : Re: Slow Highlighting

Re: Slow Highlighting - CopyField maxSize property

Hello Nicolas, Thank you for letting me know this. Yes, your patch will solve my problem (highlighter performance w/ large doc). BTW, I posted similar ticket to solve my another problem (hl.alternateField w/ large field). https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-516 Thank you again, Koji

Re: Highlighting Quoted Phrases

Hi, Would it be easier if you turn off the highlighting while viewing full document (but summary highlighting is still available) and use javascript to do the matching? (As long as we are need highlighting only when looking at specific document in runtime) Thank you, Vinci Brian Whitman wrote

Re: Highlighting Quoted Phrases

the same thing. There's a patch in lucene (not in trunk yet) to support this. Oh dear, you did ask the same question very recently. Sorry to re-ask the same thing, everybody. For the record, that thread is called highlighting pt2: returning tokens out of order from PhraseQuery, and it's (currently

RE: Slow Highlighting - CopyField maxSize property

Objet : Re: Slow Highlighting - CopyField maxSize property Hello Nocolas, This has been in the back of my mind for a time. Can you make a patch for it? I'd like to use it. Thank you, Koji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I would like to propose a new property on copy fields that limit

Highlighting Quoted Phrases

I'm using the standard Solr query language and the normal highlighting parameters documented at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters. Snippet generation and highlighting is working pretty well, but my testers have discovered something they find borderline unacceptable. If they search

Re: Highlighting Quoted Phrases

On Mar 25, 2008, at 6:31 PM, Chris Harris wrote: working pretty well, but my testers have discovered something they find borderline unacceptable. If they search for stock market (with quotes), then Solr correctly returns only documents where stock and market appear as adjacent words. Two

Re: highlighting: requireFieldMatch not returning anything even if field matches

: A query with highlighting and requireFieldMatch like so: : .../select?q=%22U2%22hl=truehl.fl=content : hl.requireFieldMatch=truehl.fragsize=500hl.snippets=5hl.simple.pre= : %3Cspan%3Ehl.simple.post=%3C/span%3E : : does not return highlighting for this document (it is returned as a query

Re: Slow Highlighting - CopyField maxSize property

case is the following: Among other documents, we index very big documents (several Mo of text) and want to be able to use highlighting. However, as soon as one or more big documents are included in the matches, the response time is awful. The maxAnalyzedChars is not enough as the full document

Re: highlighting pt2: returning tokens out of order from PhraseQuery

On Mar 19, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Brian Whitman wrote: Can we somehow force the highlighter to not return snips that do not exactly match the query? Unfortunately not with the current highlighter. But there has been a great deal of work towards fixing this here: http://

Re: highlighting pt2: returning tokens out of order from PhraseQuery

Unfortunately not with the current highlighter. But there has been a great deal of work towards fixing this here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794 ah, thanks Eric, didn't think to check w/ the lucene folks. I see they have somewhat working patches -- does this kind of

Re: highlighting pt2: returning tokens out of order from PhraseQuery

On Mar 20, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Brian Whitman wrote: Unfortunately not with the current highlighter. But there has been a great deal of work towards fixing this here: http:// issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794 ah, thanks Eric, didn't think to check w/ the lucene folks. I see they

highlighting: requireFieldMatch not returning anything even if field matches

on a solr text fieldtype called content, I have text like the following: Bono (L), Irish lead singer of the band U2 and Kurt Beck, chairman of the German Social Democratic Party (SPD) address the media at the party?s headquarters in Berlin May 14, 2007. A query with highlighting

Re: Highlighting Default Fields

you can see this code arround line 362 of DisMaxRequestHandler.java... /* * * Highlighting/Summarizing * * */ if(HighlightingUtils.isHighlightingEnabled(req) parsedUserQuery != null) { String[] highFields = queryFields.keySet().toArray(new String[0]); NamedList

Highlighting Default Fields

Hi, The Solr Highlighting docs says the following when it comes to picking the default fields: A comma- or space- delimited list of fields to generate highlighted snippets for. If left blank, the fields highlighted for the StandardRequestHandler are the defaultSearchField (or the df param

Re: Seeing strange highlighting in multi-valued field (was: Why does highlight use the index analyzer)

: which is the behavior that I expected, irrespective of whether the field has : one or more values. : : Any idea what could be going on here? not really ... but like i said, i'm not really a highlighter guy. I can't think of any reason why having multiple values would cause this behavior

Seeing strange highlighting in multi-valued field (was: Why does highlight use the index analyzer)

On Wednesday 27 February 2008 03:58:14 Chris Hostetter wrote: I'm not much of a highligher expert, but this *seems* like it was probably intentional ... you are tlaking abouthte use case where you have a stored field, and no term positions correct? ... so in order to highlight, the highlighter

Re: Highlighting the search results

: I have created a Index of some xml files (xml's was created from mysql : database) with solr. In xml's I have one text field. (more than 1000 : characters). Its searches fine, but solr result page is too long. I have : tried highlight (hl=onhl.fl=fname), its shows highlighting results at end

Highlighting the search results

Hello, I have created a Index of some xml files (xml's was created from mysql database) with solr. In xml's I have one text field. (more than 1000 characters). Its searches fine, but solr result page is too long. I have tried highlight (hl=onhl.fl=fname), its shows highlighting results at end

Re: matching fields and highlighting

after the fact) : I would also like to have highlighting/snippets over all fields without : appending all of them with hl.fl= . Something like hl.fl=* (would this be a : big performance issue?) it's not neccessarily a performance issue .. it's just not soemthing that was ever really considered

highlighting marks wrong words

Hi all, I have a query like this: q=(auto) AND id:(100 OR 1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 5 OR 6)fl=scorehl.fl=contenthl=truehl.fragsize=200hl.snippets=2hl.simple.pre=%3Cb%3Ehl.simple.post=%3C%2Fb%3Estart=0rows=10 Default field is content. So, I expect, that only occurrencies of auto will be marked. BUT:

Re: highlighting marks wrong words

Thank you! It works correct with filter query Charlie Jackson schrieb: I believe changing the AND id: etc etc part of the query to it's on filter query will take care of your highlighting problem. In other words, try a query like this: q=(auto)fq=id:(100 OR 1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 5 OR 6)fl

RE: Field seperater for highlighting multi-value fields

seperater for highlighting multi-value fields : The default field separator seems to be a '.' when highlighting : multi-value fields. Can this be overridden in 1.2 to another character? Default field seperator where? in the response? can you give a specific example of what you are talking about

RE: Solr Highlighting, word index

-Original Message- From: Binkley, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 12/5/2007 4:07 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Solr Highlighting, word index We're doing a similar process using term vectors to look up the bounding-box data in a custom response writer

Re: Field seperater for highlighting multi-value fields

: The default field separator seems to be a '.' when highlighting : multi-value fields. Can this be overridden in 1.2 to another character? Default field seperator where? in the response? can you give a specific example of what you are talking about? -Hoss

Re: Solr Highlighting, word index

On 3-Dec-07, at 10:58 AM, Owens, Martin wrote: You can tell lucene to store token offsets using TermVectors (configurable via schema.xml). Then you can customize the request handler to return the token offsets (and/or positions) by retrieving the TVs. I think that is the best plan of

Re: Solr Highlighting, word index

On 5-Dec-07, at 1:02 PM, Owens, Martin wrote: Thanks Mike, So in essence I need to write a new RequestHandler plugin which takes the query string, tokenises it then perform a some kind of action against the index to return results which I should then be able to get the termVectors from?

RE: Solr Highlighting, word index

looking at using Lucene's new payload functionality. Peter -Original Message- From: Mike Klaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 2:19 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr Highlighting, word index On 5-Dec-07, at 1:02 PM, Owens, Martin wrote: Thanks

<    7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >