emHisto/emry
--- On Tue, 1/11/11, Dan Loewenherz dloewenh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dan Loewenherz dloewenh...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Solr highlighting is botching output
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2011, 7:30 AM
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:19 PM,
Ahmet Arslan
/
combination should solve your problem. Preserving your search within
words.
Searching histo will return : African American emHisto/emry
--- On Tue, 1/11/11, Dan Loewenherz dloewenh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dan Loewenherz dloewenh...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Solr highlighting is botching
Hi all,
I'm implementing Solr for a course and book search service for college
students, and I'm running into some issues with the highlighting plugin.
After a few minutes of tinkering, searching on Google, searching the group
archives and not finding anything, I thought I would see if anyone
I've downloaded
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x
and ran ant there. I've followed the tutorial but
highlighting on analyzer debug screen isn't working.
This link found in the tutorial doesn't show any highlight.
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/analysis.jsp?name
I want to print the highlighting descriptions:
{responseHeader:{status:0,
QTime:2,params:{hl.fl:description,json.wrf:jsonp1293069622009,wt:json,q:target,hl:true}},response:{numFound:7945,start:0,maxScore:6.9186745,docs:[{description:target,url:target,id:269653,score:6.9186745},{description:Target
(10/12/23 11:56), Ruixiang Zhang wrote:
I want to print the highlighting descriptions:
{responseHeader:{status:0,
QTime:2,params:{hl.fl:description,json.wrf:jsonp1293069622009,wt:json,q:target,hl:true}},response:{numFound:7945,start:0,maxScore:6.9186745,docs:[{description:target,url:target,id
Thanks Koji. Actually my question is:
We can use response.response.docs[i].description
to print the description in docs.
What expression should we use to print the description in highlighting?
(10/12/23 14:10), Ruixiang Zhang wrote:
Thanks Koji. Actually my question is:
We can use response.response.docs[i].description
to print the description in docs.
What expression should we use to print the description in highlighting?
Ruixiang,
I cannot understand your question. Is it Solr
Hi Koji
I figured it out. I can use
response.highlighting[response.response.docs[0].id].description[0]
to print the description in highlighting.
(Actually, it's not a solr question, sorry for that.)
Thanks
Ruixiang
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote
We developed a custom Highlighter to solve this issue.
We added a url field in the solr schema doc for our domain and when
highlighting is called, we access the file, extract the information and send
them to the custom highlighter.
If you still need some help, I can provide you, our solution
I'm trying to highlight a field and I'm getting an exception thrown, only on
certain search terms though. I am fairly certain that the cause of the
problem is through having synonyms on the highlighted field as I have had
highlighting working in the past on other fields.
The added complication
(10/12/09 21:22), Shaun Campbell wrote:
I'm trying to highlight a field and I'm getting an exception thrown, only on
certain search terms though. I am fairly certain that the cause of the
problem is through having synonyms on the highlighted field as I have had
highlighting working in the past
Koji
Thanks a lot it's stopped crashing now. Can I ask one other question about
synonym highlighting which looks a bit puzzling?
I enter asset as my criteria and it returns through synonym matching other
terms highlighted as well. My debug output is:
DEBUG
(10/12/09 22:13), Shaun Campbell wrote:
Koji
Thanks a lot it's stopped crashing now. Can I ask one other question about
synonym highlighting which looks a bit puzzling?
I enter asset as my criteria and it returns through synonym matching other
terms highlighted as well. My debug output
OK. I'd switch to FastVectorHighlighter which cured the exceptions and gives
me highlighting so I assumed that you could use this instead of the standard
highlighter on n-grammed fields. I guess my query was how does the
highlighter now highlight synonym terms?
Thanks
Shaun
As I said in my
(10/12/09 22:50), Shaun Campbell wrote:
OK. I'd switch to FastVectorHighlighter which cured the exceptions and gives
me highlighting so I assumed that you could use this instead of the standard
highlighter on n-grammed fields. I guess my query was how does the
highlighter now highlight synonym
highlighting so I assumed that you could use this instead of the
standard
highlighter on n-grammed fields. I guess my query was how does the
highlighter now highlight synonym terms?
Thanks
Shaun
FVH supports fixed-length (minGramSize==maxGramSize) n-gram tokeizer.
I think FVH supports synonym fields
Hi,
when I query solr (trunk) I get numeric character references instead
of regular UTF-8 strings in case of special characters in the
highlighting section, in the result section the characters are presented
fine.
e.g instead of the German Umlaut Ä I get #228;
Example:
arr name
(10/12/08 1:12), getagrip wrote:
Hi,
when I query solr (trunk) I get numeric character references instead of
regular UTF-8 strings in
case of special characters in the highlighting section, in the result section
the characters are
presented fine.
e.g instead of the German Umlaut Ä I get #228
Thanks Lance. I'm storing the original document and indexing all it's
extracted content, but I need to be able to high-light the text within it's
original markup. I'm going to give Uwe's suggestion http://bit.ly/hCSdYZa go.
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
That suggestion says This works, as long as you don't need query
highlighting. Have you found a way around that, or have you decided not to
use highlighting after all? Or am I missing something?
From: Rich Cariens [richcari...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday
Uwe goes on to say:
This works, as long as you don't need query highlighting, because the offsets
from the first field addition cannot be used for highlighting inside the text
with markup. *In this case, you have to write your own analyzer that removes
the markup in the tokenizer
Anyone ever use Solr to present a view of a document with hit-terms
highlighted within? Kind of like Google's cached http://bit.ly/hgudWqcopies?
Set the fragment length to 0. This means highlight the entire text
body. If, you have stored the text body.
Otherwise, you have to get the term vectors somehow and highlight the
text yourself.
I investigated this problem awhile back for PDFs. You can add a
starting page and an OR list of search
Is there a way I can specify separate configuration for 2 different fields.
For field 1 I wan to display only 100 chars, Field 2 200 chars
Yes
Some parameters may be overriden on a per-field basis with the following
syntax:
f.fieldName.originalParam=value
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters
Is there a way I can specify separate configuration for 2 different fields.
For field 1 I wan to display only 100
Is there a way I can specify separate
configuration for 2 different fields.
For field 1 I wan to display only 100 chars, Field 2 200
chars
yes with the parameter accepts per-field overrides. the syntax is
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#HowToOverride
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters?#hl.highlightMultiTerm
If the SpanScorer is also being used, enables highlighting for
range/wildcard/fuzzy/prefix queries. Default is false. Solr1.4. This
parameter makes sense for Highlighter only.
I think this meant 'for PhraseHighlighter
Not sure how to write that subject line. I'm getting some weird behavior out
of the highlighter in Solr. It seems like an edge case, but I'm curious to
hear if this is known about, or if it's something worth looking into further.
Background:
I'm using Solr's highlighting facility to tag
)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
I've noticed in the stack trace that this exception occurs when trying to
build the query for the highlighting; I've confirmed this by copying the
params and changing hl=true to hl=false
(10/11/02 23:14), Ken Stanley wrote:
I've noticed in the stack trace that this exception occurs when trying to
build the query for the highlighting; I've confirmed this by copying the
params and changing hl=true to hl=false. Unfortunately, when using
debugQuery=on, I do not see any details
02 November 2010 16:26:00 Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(10/11/02 23:14), Ken Stanley wrote:
I've noticed in the stack trace that this exception occurs when trying to
build the query for the highlighting; I've confirmed this by copying the
params and changing hl=true to hl=false. Unfortunately, when
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
(10/11/02 23:14), Ken Stanley wrote:
I've noticed in the stack trace that this exception occurs when trying to
build the query for the highlighting; I've confirmed this by copying the
params and changing hl=true to hl
Also, consider what you'd be reconstructing from if you could try it. The
indexed data has been transformed by, say, stemming, casing, etc. So
any attempt to reconstruct the fields for highlighting would necessarily
show the transformed version, which would not be pleasing. Plus you could
have
the highlighting feature. Is this even possible? What
are my options?
I've read about termOffsets, payload that could possibly be used to do this
but I have no idea how this could be done.
Any pointers greatly appreciated. Someone please point me in the right
direction.
I don't mind having to write
Check out this link
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase
You need to store the field if you want to use the highlighting feature.
If you need to retrieve and display the highlighted snippets then the fields
definitely needs to be stored.
To use term offsets, it will be a good idea
Hi,
I understand that I need to store the fields in order to use highlighting
out of the box.
I'm looking for a way to highlighting using term offsets instead of the
actual text since the text is not stored. What am asking is is it possible
to modify the response (thru custom implementation
understand that I need to store the fields in order to use highlighting
out of the box.
I'm looking for a way to highlighting using term offsets instead of the
actual text since the text is not stored. What am asking is is it possible
to modify the response (thru custom implementation) to contain
...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I understand that I need to store the fields in order to use highlighting
out of the box.
I'm looking for a way to highlighting using term offsets instead of the
actual text since the text is not stored. What am asking is is it
possible
to modify the response
solr and/or
lucene. Using the standard highlighting support in solr, we have been
able to retrieve KWIC text fragments for search results, which is
great. But what we would ideally like to do is to apply similar
highlighting logic while preserving the original document structure.
1) When
OK - I read a bit more and it appears an appropriate analysis pipeline
(which would extract text from XML using SAX, say) is all that's
required, and existing highlighting ought to be able to accomplish what
I'm after. So I guess the only question I have now before writing code
is where
OK - I read a bit more and it
appears an appropriate analysis pipeline (which would
extract text from XML using SAX, say) is all that's
required, and existing highlighting ought to be able to
accomplish what I'm after. So I guess the only
question I have now before writing code is where
Yes - that looks right; I was thrown a bit by the name -
Thanks!
On 10/9/2010 5:23 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
OK - I read a bit more and it
appears an appropriate analysis pipeline (which would
extract text from XML using SAX, say) is all that's
required, and existing highlighting ought
Hi all -
Does anyone know how to produce solr results where the match term is
highlighted in bold rather than italic?
thanks in advance,
Brad
Your solrconfig has a highlighting section. You can make that CDATA
thing whatever you want. I changed it to strong.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:54 PM, efr...@gmail.com efr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all -
Does anyone know how to produce solr results where the match term is
highlighted in bold
Check out
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters
and the hl.simple.pre/hl.simple.post options
You may be also able to control the display of the default em/ via CSS
but will depend on your rendering context as to whether this is feasible.
Scott.
On 1/10/10 7:54 AM,
We're using SOLR 1.4.1 with the highlighting formatter
org.apache.solr.highlight.HtmlFormatter. Is there a way to configure the
rules it uses for determining token boundaries? We're getting highlight
markup inserted into the middle of HTML named entities.
For example, if the user searches
:
lst name=highlighting
lst name=artist.artist.241/
lst name=artist.artist.1616/
lst name=track.track.7022/
lst name=album.album.1775/
lst name=album.album.3128/
lst name=album.album.4590/
lst name=album.album.6951/
lst name=album.album.9626/
lst name=artist.artist.10498/
lst name=artist.artist.29631
Hi All
I have an issue in highlighting that if i query solr on more than one fields
like +Contents:risk +Form:1 and even i specify the highlighting field is
Contents it still highlights risk as well as 1, because it is specified in
the
query.. now if i split the query as +Contents:risk
(10/09/17 16:36), Ahson Iqbal wrote:
Hi All
I have an issue in highlighting that if i query solr on more than one fields
like +Contents:risk +Form:1 and even i specify the highlighting field is
Contents it still highlights risk as well as 1, because it is specified in the
query.. now if i
Hi Koji
thank you very much it really works
From: Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, September 17, 2010 7:11:31 PM
Subject: Re: Solr Highlighting Issue
(10/09/17 16:36), Ahson Iqbal wrote:
Hi All
I have an issue
How does highlighting work with JSON output?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Fri, 9/17/10, Ahson Iqbal mianah...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Ahson Iqbal
The same as with other formats. You give it strings to drop in before
and after the highlighted text.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Dennis Gearon gear...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
How does highlighting work with JSON output?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right
Thanks for taking time to read through this. I'm using a checkout from
the solr 3.x branch
My problem is with the highlighter and wildcards
I can get the highlighter to work with wild cards just fine, the problem
is that solr is returning the term matched, when what I want it to do
is
Anybody?
On 09/08/2010 11:26 AM, Jed Glazner wrote:
Thanks for taking time to read through this. I'm using a checkout from
the solr 3.x branch
My problem is with the highlighter and wildcards
I can get the highlighter to work with wild cards just fine, the problem
is that solr is
-gram field for highlighting problem...
But FVH cannot process wildcard query. So you should query wel instead of
wel*. Then this makes you got unwanted hit like voemwel/em.
I don't think there is a solution for both of them with OOTB today.
There is a JIRA issue, but no patches there:
https
+wildcardsubj=Re+old+wildcard+highlighting+behaviour
I can get the highlighter to work with wild cards just fine, the problem
is that solr is returning the term matched, when what I want it to do
is highlight the chars in the term that were matched.
Example:
http://192.168.1.75:8983/solr/music
Hi,
can the highlighting component highlight terms only if the distance
between them matches the query ?
I use those parameters :
hl=onhl.fl=qFR,iFR,mFR,vlFRhl.usePhraseHighlighter=falsehl.highlightMultiTerm=truehl.simple.pre=bhl.simple.post=%2Fbhl.mergeContiguous=false
I think you need to enable usePhraseHighlighter in order to use the
highlightMultiTerm parameter.
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 12:12:11 Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
can the highlighting component highlight terms only if the distance
between them matches the query ?
I use those parameters
On 01/09/2010 12:38, Markus Jelsma wrote:
I think you need to enable usePhraseHighlighter in order to use the
highlightMultiTerm parameter.
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 12:12:11 Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
can the highlighting component highlight terms only if the distance
between them
On 01/09/2010 13:54, Xavier Schepler wrote:
On 01/09/2010 12:38, Markus Jelsma wrote:
I think you need to enable usePhraseHighlighter in order to use the
highlightMultiTerm parameter.
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 12:12:11 Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
can the highlighting component
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: how could I have the highlighting component return only the terms that were
: matched, without any surrounding text ?
I'm not a Highlighter expert, but this is somethign that certainly
*sounds* like it should be easy.
I took a shot at it and this is hte best i could
: how could I have the highlighting component return only the terms that were
: matched, without any surrounding text ?
I'm not a Highlighter expert, but this is somethign that certainly
*sounds* like it should be easy.
I took a shot at it and this is hte best i could come up with...
http
for the displayed results) and a query to compute
clustering-results.
Now, you want to do different things with the result-sets.
The primary-query needs faceting, highlighting, spellcheck and much more,
wheareas the additional query only needs clustering or something like that.
In your case, you do
. one wants to have got several resultsets. I could imagine that one
does
a primary-query (the query for the displayed results) and a query to
compute
clustering-results.
Now, you want to do different things with the result-sets.
The primary-query needs faceting, highlighting, spellcheck and much
/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Alex Baranau alex.barano...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sun, August 22, 2010 7:51:49 AM
Subject: How to limit rows to which highlighting applies
Hello Solr users
I have highlighting working on my project (indexing content for a web app),
but the idea of highlighting with em tags doesn't make sense to me. It
seems that it opens up the system to XSS attacks if you echo search result
data (with highlights) into a web page.
Example: Index the following string
(10/08/21 9:04), Mark E. Haase wrote:
I have highlighting working on my project (indexing content for a web app),
but the idea of highlighting withem tags doesn't make sense to me. It
seems that it opens up the system to XSS attacks if you echo search result
data (with highlights) into a web
Hi All,
I am trying with Solr Highlighting. I have problem in highlighting phrases
consists of special characters
for example, if I search for a phrase like united. states. usa then the
results are displayed matching the exact phrase and also without special
characters means united states usa
about (I didn't use it yet)
bool name=hl.usePhraseHighlightertrue/bool
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Kranti K K Parisa
kranti.par...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
I am trying with Solr Highlighting. I have problem in highlighting phrases
consists of special characters
for example, if I search
Hi,
how could I have the highlighting component return only the terms that
were matched, without any surrounding text ?
The wiki entry for hl.highlightMultiTerm:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.highlightMultiTerm
doesn't appear to be correct. It says:
If the SpanScorer is also being used, enables highlighting for
range/wildcard/fuzzy/prefix queries. Default is false.
But the code
I'm a relative beginner at SOLR, indexing and searching Unicode Tibetan
texts. I am trying to use the highlighter but it just returns, empty
elements, such as:
lst name=highlighting
lst name=kt-d-0103-text-v4p262a/
/lst
What am I doing wrong?
The query that generated
/i18n issue.
Also looks like you're on Solr 1.3 - so it's likely quite worth
upgrading to 1.4.1 (don't know if that directly affects this
highlighting issue, just a general recommendation).
Erik
On Jul 27, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Nathaniel Grove wrote:
I'm a relative beginner at SOLR
(10/07/27 23:16), Stephen Green wrote:
The wiki entry for hl.highlightMultiTerm:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.highlightMultiTerm
doesn't appear to be correct. It says:
If the SpanScorer is also being used, enables highlighting for
range/wildcard/fuzzy/prefix queries
Hi,
Form googling and looking at jira tickets it seems like phrase highlighting
should work out of the box, but even enabling it manually didnt get me the
desired result:
http://resolutionfinder.org/search?q=%22security+council%22=tm=anys=Search
generates the following query:
INFO: [Clause_en
(10/06/26 22:19), Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
Form googling and looking at jira tickets it seems like phrase highlighting
should work out of the box, but even enabling it manually didnt get me the
desired result:
http://resolutionfinder.org/search?q=%22security+council%22=tm=anys=Search
On 26.06.2010, at 16:22, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(10/06/26 22:19), Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
Form googling and looking at jira tickets it seems like phrase highlighting
should work out of the box, but even enabling it manually didnt get me the
desired result:
http
On 26.06.2010, at 16:30, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 26.06.2010, at 16:22, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(10/06/26 22:19), Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
Form googling and looking at jira tickets it seems like phrase highlighting
should work out of the box, but even enabling it manually didnt
with different coordinates.
In fact, you want to store both coordinates for the term solr.
However, on the Solr-side you can add this preprocessed string to a field
with TermVectors.
If your query hits the page, you will get all the coordinates you want to
get.
Unfortunately, highlighting must
-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with highlighting
You need to share with us the Solr request you made, any any custom
request handler settings that might map to. Chances are you just need
to twiddle with the highlighter parameters (see wiki for docs) to get
it to do what you want
with highlighting
You need to share with us the Solr request you made, any any custom
request handler settings that might map to. Chances are you just need
to twiddle with the highlighter parameters (see wiki for docs) to get
it to do what you want.
Erik
On Jun 22, 2010, at 4:42 PM, n
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with highlighting
It looks to me like a tokenisation issue, all_text content and the query
text will match, but the string fieldtype fields 'might not' and therefore
will not be highlighted.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:40 PM, n...@frameweld.com wrote:
Here's my
Hi, I need help with highlighting fields that would match a query. So far, my
results only highlight if the field is from all_text, and I would like it to
use other fields. It simply isn't the case if I just turn highlighting on. Any
ideas why it only applies to all_text? Here is my schema
...@frameweld.com wrote:
Hi, I need help with highlighting fields that would match a query.
So far, my results only highlight if the field is from all_text, and
I would like it to use other fields. It simply isn't the case if I
just turn highlighting on. Any ideas why it only applies to
all_text? Here
Hi,
Here's a field type using synonyms :
fieldtype name=SFR class=solr.TextField
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.StandardFilterFactory/
filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory
synonyms=french-synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/
(10/05/25 0:31), n...@frameweld.com wrote:
Hello,
How am I able to highlight a field that contains a specific value? If I have a field
called type, how am I able to highlight the rows whose values contain something like
title?
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=titlehl=onhl.fl=type
Hi,
The only related topic I found is the following
linkhttp://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/60f592f5ff0de0c5/highlight_arbitrary_text#3799814845ebf002and
played with FieldAnalysisRequestHandler. As it expects the field
value
as an input, this is not really useful. I DO NOT want to
We have Highlighting enabled. We specify that we only
want highlighting on
the body property.
When doing a query like this: (body:tester OR
project_id:704) the text
highlighted in the body includes any text that is tester
and any text that
is 704.
Is there a way to prevent
to say search for terms in the following
properties X,Y, and Z only or do I have to do this:
x:terms OR y:terms OR z.terms
Thanks for the help.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-Issue-tp867567p867876.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-Issue-tp867567p867876.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I have a use case where I have to highlight indexed field values in
arbitrary text without indexing arbitrary text.
Here is an example
*Indexed field values are*
Lucid
Platform
Solr
*Arbitrary text (not indexed)*
Lucid Imagination and Guardian News and Media today announced that the
Ah, ok. Well, the fieldType was text, untouched from the Solr default.
hth,
Darren
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 22:06 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Hi Koji,
:Well, its quite simple. Here is the field returned from my query:
: fox
Actually what Koji was asking for was the fieldtype/
Just set the pre and post tags to be empty strings and you'll get the
result you want, I think. No?
Erik
On May 26, 2010, at 8:36 PM, Blargy wrote:
What are the correct for settings to get highlighting excerpting
working?
Original Text: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy
, highlighting does not seem to work.
No highlights are returned, even though the text exists in one of the
field values returned from the query.
Am I missing a flag or is this a bug?
thanks,
Darren
on. If the field contains more than
one text value, highlighting does not seem to work.
No highlights are returned, even though the text exists in one of the
field values returned from the query.
Am I missing a flag or is this a bug?
As long as I see your setting above, no.
If you can post more information
Hi Koji,
Well, its quite simple. Here is the field returned from my query:
fox
arr name=text_t
str
The bird flies in the sky.
/str
str
The quick brown fox jumped over the fence.
/str
/arr
lst name=highlighting
lst name=doc1/
/lst
No highlighting.
If the field only has one
: Hi Koji,
:Well, its quite simple. Here is the field returned from my query:
: fox
Actually what Koji was asking for was the fieldtype/ declaration for
text (you posted the field/ but not the fieldtype/ so we only have
half a picture of hte settings involved)
That said: the subject of
What are the correct for settings to get highlighting excerpting working?
Original Text: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
Query: jump
Result: fox jumps over
Can you do something like the above with the highlighter or can it only
surround matches with pre and post tags? Can
Hey,
I thought the Highlights would happen in the field of the documents
returned from SOLR J
But it gives new list of Highlighting at below, sorry for the confusion
I was wondering is there a way that the fields returned itself contains
bold characters
Eg : if searched for query
doc
801 - 900 of 1278 matches
Mail list logo
