arse error in solr.
>
> Can any one suggest me how do i handle this?so that entire query is
> considered as uri and also solr respond with appropriate reply.
> thank you.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/problem-during-benchmark
http://old.nabble.com/problem-during-benchmarking-solr-query-tp27926801p27926801.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It seems that Solr's query parser doesn't pass a single term query
to the Analyzer for the field. For example, if I give it
2001年 (year 2001 in Japanese), the searcher returns 0 hits
but if I quote them with double-quotes, it returns hits.
In this experiment, I configured schema.xml so that
the f
: Why would fq=sdate:+20100110 parse via a Solr server but not via
: QueryParsing.parseQuery? Its choking on the + symbol in the sdate
: value.
is it something as simple as the fact that with a Solr Server the "+" is a
URL escaped " " ?
hard to say w/o knowing qhatr exactly it is you are doing
Why would fq=sdate:+20100110 parse via a Solr server but not via
QueryParsing.parseQuery? Its choking on the + symbol in the sdate
value.
I'd use QParserPlugin however it requires passing a SolrQueryRequest,
which is not kosher for testing, perhaps I'll need to bite the bullet
and reproduce using
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:47 PM, fredanthony wrote:
>
> Hi, I have Solr setup to use a DataImportHandler with my database. In the
> data-config.xml file I have one document with two entities as follows:
>
>
>query="SELECT user_id, user_id as pk_field,
>
message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Solr-query-single-entity--tp27244365p27244365.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
My first recommendation would be to do this client-side, just search
again with a new query if there are zero results returned.
However, you can accomplish what you're after with custom
QueryComponent, subclassing the default one, call super, check the
count, if zero, adjust the query and c
Hello All,
I have no complete knowledge of query execution workflow
. I have an issue. I had one approach to edit all the user submitted
queries in the queryparser part ( for every request ), but later I was
suggested to do query modification only if the user submitted query
has no re
Avlesh, thanks those worked, for somre reason I never got your mail,
found it in one of the list archives though.
thanks again
Joel
On Nov 5, 2009, at 9:08 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
Didn't the queries in my reply work?
Cheers
Avlesh
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Joel Nylund wrote:
Hi yes
Didn't the queries in my reply work?
Cheers
Avlesh
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Joel Nylund wrote:
> Hi yes its a string, in the case of a title, it can be anything, a letter a
> number, a symbol or a multibyte char etc.
>
> Any ideas if I wanted a query that was not a letter a-z or a number
Hi yes its a string, in the case of a title, it can be anything, a
letter a number, a symbol or a multibyte char etc.
Any ideas if I wanted a query that was not a letter a-z or a number
0-9, given that its a string?
thanks
Joel
On Nov 4, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Jonathan Hendler wrote:
Hi Joel,
Hi Joel,
The ID is sent back as a string (instead of as an integer) in your
example. Could this be the cause?
- Jonathan
On Nov 4, 2009, at 9:08 AM, Joel Nylund wrote:
Hi, I have a field called firstLetterTitle, this field has 1 char,
it can be anything, I need help with a few queries on
Hi, I have a field called firstLetterTitle, this field has 1 char, it
can be anything, I need help with a few queries on this char:
1.) I want all NON ALPHA and NON numbers, so any char that is not A-Z
or 0-9
I tried:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=NOT%20firstLetterTitle:0%20TO%209%20
: buzz:"baseWord:khat*" => gives no result
> QUERY:buzz:"frequency:[2 TO 10]" =>gives no result
> QUERY: buzz:"baseWord*khatwani" => gives the result (example above)
> QUERY:buzz:"baseWord*khat*" = > gives no results.
> ny pointers?
>
hi
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Feak, Todd wrote:
> Any particular reason for the double quotes in the 2nd and 3rd query
> example, but not the 1st, or is this just an artifact of your email?
>
> -Todd
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rakhi Khatwani [mailto:rkhatw
Subject: using regular expressions in solr query
Hi,
i have an example in which i want to use a regular expression in my
solr query:
for example: suppose i wanna search on a sample :
raakhi rajnish ninad goureya sheetal
ritesh rajnish ninad goureya sheetal
where my content field is of type
Hi,
i have an example in which i want to use a regular expression in my
solr query:
for example: suppose i wanna search on a sample :
raakhi rajnish ninad goureya sheetal
ritesh rajnish ninad goureya sheetal
where my content field is of type text
when i type in
QUERY: content:raa*
RESPONSE
hanks guys!
- Original Message
From: Erik Hatcher
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:26:58 AM
Subject: Re: Solr Query help - sorting
If you're using DataImportHandler, a custom (Java or script)
transformer could do this.
Also an UpdateProcessor could do it
I can because the app
and db that Solr is indexing are not really the best place to add
this type of functionality.
- Original Message
From: Koji Sekiguchi
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 4:04:29 AM
Subject: Re: Solr Query help - sorting
Hi E
ality.
- Original Message
From: Koji Sekiguchi
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 4:04:29 AM
Subject: Re: Solr Query help - sorting
Hi Erik Earle,
Ahh, I read your mail too fast... Erik Hatcher's method should work.
Thanks!
Koji
Erik Hatcher wrote:
> You could
Hi Erik Earle,
Ahh, I read your mail too fast... Erik Hatcher's method should work.
Thanks!
Koji
Erik Hatcher wrote:
You couldn't sort on a multiValued field though.
I'd simply index a max_side field, and have the indexing client add a
single valued field with max(length,width) to it. The
You couldn't sort on a multiValued field though.
I'd simply index a max_side field, and have the indexing client add a
single valued field with max(length,width) to it. Then sort on
max_side.
Erik
On Aug 25, 2009, at 4:00 AM, Constantijn Visinescu wrote:
make a new multivalued fi
make a new multivalued field in your schema.xml, copy both width and length
into that field, and then sort on that field ?
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:40 AM, erikea...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Clever... but if more than one row adds up to the same value I may get the
> wrong order (like 50, 50 and 10, 90
Clever... but if more than one row adds up to the same value I may get the
wrong order (like 50, 50 and 10, 90)
I need a max function but the one provided only compares against a constant.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 24, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
How about using sum() FunctionQu
How about using sum() FunctionQuery, via:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=_val_%3A%22sum%28width%2Clength%29%22
Thanks,
Koji
Erik Earle wrote:
Suppose I have a database of rectangle attributes that I have indexed in Solr
and I want to get the top 10 widest or longest rectangles from on
Suppose I have a database of rectangle attributes that I have indexed in Solr
and I want to get the top 10 widest or longest rectangles from one query.
name | width | length
A | 100| 10
B | 10 | 90
C | 80 | 10
...
My indexed fields are: name, width, length
I
query you need.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Suryasnat Das
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2009 12:16:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Multiple values for custom fields provided in SOLR query
Hi Otis,
Thanks for replying to my query.
My query is, if multiple values are provided for a custom field then how can
it be represented in a SOLR query. So if my field is fileID and its values
are 111, 222 and 333 and my search string is ‘product’ then how can this be
represented in a SOLR
e.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2009 11:31:10 AM
> Subject: Multiple values for custom fields provided in SOLR query
>
> Hi,
> I have a requirement in which i need to have multiple values in my custom
> fields while forming the search query to SOLR. For example,
> fileID
Hi,
I have a requirement in which i need to have multiple values in my custom
fields while forming the search query to SOLR. For example,
fileID is my custom field. I have defined the fileID in schema.xml as .
Now fileID can have multiple values like 111,222,333 etc. So will my query
be of the form
gt; ?q=facetFormat_product_s:"Pfqs Cassette Sfqs"&qt=dismaxrequest -
>> return correct results
>
> I'd attribute that to the "mm" (minimum match) parameter, the meaning
> of which you can understand reading the following page, which it would
> probably
prerna07 schrieb:
I am facing issue with query with dismaxrequest.
?q=facetFormat_product_s:"Pfqs ePub eBook Sfqs" - return correct
results
?q=facetFormat_product_s:"Pfqs ePub eBook Sfqs"&qt=dismaxrequest -
dose not return results, although field facetFormat_product_s is
defined in dismaxreq
;qt=dismaxrequest - return
correct results
Please suggest if there are issues with dismaxrequest or Query mentioned
above.
Thanks,
Prerna
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Query-%7C-Field%3Avalue-with-dismaxquery-tp24069634p24069634.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
0li76
stage:09j1b7) -available_fields_field:*|DEACTIVATION_DATE|*
+(content_authorization_group:0025t4)
Gr, Reza
On May 26, 2009, at 12:46 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Reza Safari
wrote:
One little question: is there any utility that can convert core
Lu
(stage:00li84 stage:00li74 stage:00li76
>> stage:09j1b7) -available_fields_field:*|DEACTIVATION_DATE|*
>> +(content_authorization_group:0025t4)
>>
>> Gr, Reza
>>
>>
>> On May 26, 2009, at 12:46 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Ma
) -available_fields_field:*|DEACTIVATION_DATE|* +
(content_authorization_group:0025t4)
Gr, Reza
On May 26, 2009, at 12:46 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Reza Safari
wrote:
One little question: is there any utility that can convert core
Lucene query
(any type e.q. Ter
> Subject: Re: Solr query performance issue
>
> We actually want OR operator on those values. Filters can only do AND,
> right?
>
> Is it better performance to have the query as field1:01 field1:02 field1:03
> instead of field1:(01 02 03)?
>
> BR,
> Larry
>
Another little optimization would be to flatten the query.
Instead of "field1:(02 04 05) field2:(01 02 03)"
use "field1:02 field1:04 field1:05 field2:01 field2:02 field2:03"
But I'd try and narrow down what queries are taking a long time, and
see if there is a common element that could be optimize
Team
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; yo...@lucidimagination.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: Solr query performance issue
> >
> > Yes, those terms are important in calculating the relevancy scores so
> they
> > are not in the filter queries.
on.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:54:34 PM
> Subject: Re: Solr query performance issue
>
> Yes, those terms are important in calculating the relevancy scores so they
> are not in the filter queries. I was hoping if I can cache everything about
> a field, any combinations on
Yes, those terms are important in calculating the relevancy scores so they
are not in the filter queries. I was hoping if I can cache everything about
a field, any combinations on the field values will be read from cache. Then
it does not matter if I query for field1:(02 04 05), or field1:(01 02)
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Larry He wrote:
> We have about 100 different fields and 1 million documents we indexed with
> Solr. Many of the fields are multi-valued, and some are numbers (for range
> search). We are expecting to perform solr queries contains over 30 terms
> and often the re
Hi All,
We have about 100 different fields and 1 million documents we indexed with
Solr. Many of the fields are multi-valued, and some are numbers (for range
search). We are expecting to perform solr queries contains over 30 terms
and often the response time is well over a second. I found that
y type e.q. TermQuery etc) to solr query? It's is really a lot
of work
for me to rewrite existing code.
Solr internal APIs take Lucene query types.
I guess perhaps you mean transforming a Lucene query into a parameter
for the external HTTP API?
new TermQuery(new Term("foo",&q
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Reza Safari wrote:
> One little question: is there any utility that can convert core Lucene query
> (any type e.q. TermQuery etc) to solr query? It's is really a lot of work
> for me to rewrite existing code.
Solr internal APIs take Lucene query
>
> Also, most (none?) Query objects do not have a parseable toString
> representation so it may not even work at all.
>
IMO, this behavior is limited to the Subclasses of SpanQuery.
Anyways, I understand the general notion here.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mang
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> Point taken, Erik. But, is there really a downside towards using
> Query.toString() if someone is not using any of the complex Query
> Subclasses
> (like a SpanQuery)?
>
Well, you will be relying on undocumented behavior that might change in
ermQueries, BooleanQueries,
>> RangeQueries etc ..) and just do a luceneQuery.toString() when performing
>> a
>> Solr query.
>>
>> Thinking aloud, does it make sense for the SolrQuery object to take a
>> Lucene
>> Query object?
>> I am suggesting something like this -
eries,
RangeQueries etc ..) and just do a luceneQuery.toString() when
performing a
Solr query.
Thinking aloud, does it make sense for the SolrQuery object to take
a Lucene
Query object?
I am suggesting something like this -
SolrQuery.setQuery(org.apache.lucene.search.Query
luceneQuery)
Cheers
Avlesh
O
You missed the point, Reza. toString *has to be implemented* by all
Queryobjects in Lucene. All you have to do is to compose the right
Lucene query
matching your needs (all combinations of TermQueries, BooleanQueries,
RangeQueries etc ..) and just do a luceneQuery.toString() when performing a
Solr
(*myLuceneQuery.toString()*);
QueryResponse response = mySolrServer.query(solrQuery);
Cheers
Avlesh
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Reza Safari
wrote:
Hello,
One little question: is there any utility that can convert core
Lucene
query (any type e.q. TermQuery etc) to solr query? It'
llo,
>
> One little question: is there any utility that can convert core Lucene
> query (any type e.q. TermQuery etc) to solr query? It's is really a lot of
> work for me to rewrite existing code.
>
> Thanks,
> Reza
>
> --
> Reza Safari
> LUKKIEN
> Coperni
Hello,
One little question: is there any utility that can convert core Lucene
query (any type e.q. TermQuery etc) to solr query? It's is really a
lot of work for me to rewrite existing code.
Thanks,
Reza
--
Reza Safari
LUKKIEN
Copernicuslaan 15
6716 BM Ede
The Nether
d for now.
>
> Ankit
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Error--java.net.SocketException%3A-Connection-reset-with-longer-Solr-Query-tp23322549p23340562.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
--Noble Paul
Hi Guys
Solr 1.3 only uses GET never uses POST.
So I started using Sol4 1.4 nightly build for now.
Ankit
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Error--java.net.SocketException%3A-Connection-reset-with-longer-Solr-Query-tp23322549p23340562.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
at
> org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodBase.readStatusLine(HttpMethodBase.java:1973)
> at
> org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodBase.readResponse(HttpMethodBase.java:1735)
> at
> org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodBase.execute(HttpMethodBase.java:1098)
> at
> org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodDirector.executeWithRetry(HttpMethodDirector.java:398)
> at
> org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodDirector.executeMethod(HttpMethodDirector.java:171)
> at
> org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient.executeMethod(HttpClient.java:397)
> at
> org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient.executeMethod(HttpClient.java:323)
> at
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CommonsHttpSolrServer.request(CommonsHttpSolrServer.java:303)
> ... 70 more
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Error--java.net.SocketException%3A-Connection-reset-with-longer-Solr-Query-tp23322549p23322549.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
--Noble Paul
Hi ANKITBHATNAGAR
have you already tried to set up the column36 as sfloat and a query like
column36:[xxx.yy OR zzz.aa OR ... ]
I think it should help to make the decrease the number of characters.
A time ago I have expected problems cause the size of the url passed to
tomcat.
ANKITBHATN
With SolrJ, you can use ClientUtils.escapeQueryChars(str)
Erik
On Mar 18, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Toby Cole wrote:
You'll need to escape the colon with a backslash, e.g.
fileAbsolutePath:file\:///Volumes/spare/ts/ford/schema/data/news/
fdw2008/jn71796.xml
see the lucene query parser synt
You'll need to escape the colon with a backslash, e.g.
fileAbsolutePath:file\:///Volumes/spare/ts/ford/schema/data/news/
fdw2008/jn71796.xml
see the lucene query parser syntax page:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_3_2/queryparsersyntax.html#Escaping%20Special%20Characters
Toby.
On 1
Hello
I have a solr field:-
which an unrelated query reveals is populated with:-
file:///Volumes/spare/ts/ford/schema/data/news/fdw2008/jn71796.xml
however when I try and query for that exact document explicitly:-
http://localhost:8080/apache-solr-1.4-dev/select?q=fileAbsolutePath:fil
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Suryasnat Das wrote:
>
>> I have some queries on SOLR fo which i need immediate resolution. A fast
>> help would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> a.) We know that fields are also indexed. So can we index some specifi
On Mar 5, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Suryasnat Das wrote:
I have some queries on SOLR fo which i need immediate resolution. A
fast
help would be greatly appreciated.
a.) We know that fields are also indexed. So can we index some
specific
fields(like author, id, etc) first and then do the indexing fo
Hi,
I have some queries on SOLR fo which i need immediate resolution. A fast
help would be greatly appreciated.
a.) We know that fields are also indexed. So can we index some specific
fields(like author, id, etc) first and then do the indexing for rest of the
fields(like creation date etc) at a l
ate_field:[NOW TO NOW+45DAYS]
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, prerna07
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> what will be the syntax of this sql query
> >&g
te_field:[NOW TO NOW+45DAYS]
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, prerna07
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> what will be the syntax of this sql query
>> >> SELECT * FROM table WHERE date &g
n 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, prerna07
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> what will be the syntax of this sql query
> >> SELECT * FROM table WHERE date > SYSDATE and date >> in solr format ?
> >>
> >> I need to fetch r
>> SELECT * FROM table WHERE date > SYSDATE and date > in solr format ?
>>
>> I need to fetch records where date is between current date and 45 days
>> from
>> today.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Prerna
>> --
>> View this message in context:
Is this necessary to define date_field as in schema.xml. OR Solr query can work on text field
type ?
Akshay-8 wrote:
>
> You can use DateMath as:
>
> date_field:[NOW TO NOW+45DAYS]
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, prerna07 wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
date is between current date and 45 days
> from
> today.
>
> Thanks,
> Prerna
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Solr-query-for-date-tp21327696p21327696.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Regard
Hi,
what will be the syntax of this sql query
SELECT * FROM table WHERE date > SYSDATE and date http://www.nabble.com/Solr-query-for-date-tp21327696p21327696.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Bhawani'
Ur Query should be *:*.Try this and have fun.!
Bhawani Sharma wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I want to fetch all the data from database.
> so what my Solr query should be to get all documents from database?
> like in mysql syntex is : SELECT * FROM table;
>
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Bhawani Sharma wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I want to fetch all the data from database.
> so what my Solr query should be to get all documents from database?
> like in mysql syntex is : SELECT * FROM table;
> so what will be the syntex of this que
Hi All,
I want to fetch all the data from database.
so what my Solr query should be to get all documents from database?
like in mysql syntex is : SELECT * FROM table;
so what will be the syntex of this query in solr ?
Please reply ASAP.
Thanks in Advance.
Thanks:
Bhawani Sharma
--
View this
ks in advanced
Marc Sturlese
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Customize-solr-query-tp20293029p20293029.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: If the latency is caused by loading and caching of Lucene's segments,
: is there a way to force Lucene's index to preload this? This seems to
configure some static queries in newSearcher and firstSearcher listeners
... it doesn't really matter what the queries are as long as they force
some
Hi Grant,
Thanks for your response. I'm trying to simulate our production
environment's search traffic which has very low cache hit rate.
Turning off the caches can help us better understand query times and
the load of the slave's when distribution occurs with a small list of
pre-canned queries
This is pretty typical. The first query is always more expensive, as
Lucene lazily loads some pieces of the index into memory and you may
see the FieldCache in action, depending on sorting, not to mention you
are also seeing operating system caching take place.
Is there some reason you don
Hi,
I'm using SOLR 1.3 on a index with approximately 8 million
documents. I would like to disable SOLR's cache so that it is easier
for me to test the scenario when there is a small likelihood of cache
hits. I've disabled caching by commenting out the filterCache,
queryResultCache, and documen
There's a solr integration already available -- LocalSolr
http://locallucene.wiki.sourceforge.net/
http://locallucene.wiki.sourceforge.net/LocalSolr+(R1.5)
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Rich Rein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a newbie to this group.
>
>
>
> What is the best wa
IL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 8:48:10 PM
> Subject: Geo question: Need distance from a lat/lon from SOLR query
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a newbie to this group.
>
>
>
> What is the best way to build a SOLR service with geo-location? Would that
>
Hi all,
I'm a newbie to this group.
What is the best way to build a SOLR service with geo-location? Would that
be locallucene?
Also what are the issues with integrating locallucene with SOLR?
Is there a better solution altogether?
Thanks,
Rich
executed.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Cam Bazz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2008 4:14:30 PM
> Subject: solr query syntax
>
> Hello,
>
>
Hello,
how can we specify in query so it will just bring certain field and query in
the default field?
for example can I do a
year:1998 AND searchword
Best Regards,
-C.B.
gt;
> - Original Message
> From: neil22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 5:00:05 PM
> Subject: solr query time
>
>
> It seems that response time to a query is linear with the size of the
> result
>
-- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: neil22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 5:00:05 PM
Subject: solr query time
It seems that response time to a query is linear with the size of the result
set eve
documents that have "feature1" all with the same score
- query time = 30 seconds to get first 10 hits.
Is there any optimization I can do so that query time for first 10 is
constant regardless of result set size?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble
n, thanks a lot for answering that fast.
> > >
> > >
> > > Use Case:
> > > I'm migrating from a proprietary index server (XYZ) to Solr. All my
> > > applications and my customer's applications relay on the query
> > specification
&g
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Shalin, thanks a lot for answering that fast.
> >
> >
> > Use Case:
> > I'm migrating from a proprietary index server (XYZ) to Solr. All my
> > applications and my customer's applications relay on the query
&
r. All my
> applications and my customer's applications relay on the query specification
> of XYZ. It would be hard to modify all those apps to use the Solr Query
> Syntax (although, it would be ideal, Sorl query is a lot superior than that
> of XYZ).
>
> Basically I need
Hi Shalin, thanks a lot for answering that fast.
Use Case:
I'm migrating from a proprietary index server (XYZ) to Solr. All my
applications and my customer's applications relay on the query specification
of XYZ. It would be hard to modify all those apps to use the Solr Query
Syntax (al
Shalin, thanks a lot for answering that fast.
Use Case:
I'm migrating from a proprietary index server (XYZ) to Solr. All my
applications and my customer's applications relay on the query specification
of XYZ. It would be hard to modify all those apps to use the Solr Query
Syntax (al
Hi Ben,
It would be nice if you can tell us your use-case so that we can be
more helpful.
Why does the normal query syntax not work well for you? What are you
trying to accomplish? Maybe there is an easier way.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Ben Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi solr use
Hi solr users,
I need to change the query format for solr a little bit. How can I
accomplish this. I don't wan to modify the underlying lucene query
specification but just the way I query the index through the the GET http
method in solr.
Thanks a lot for your help.
Ben
: The fastest solr query I can find is any query on unused dynamic field name:
: unused_dynamic_field_s:3
: A better ping query would be
:
: q=unused_dynamic_field_s:3
faster isn't neccessarily better for a ping query ... the goal of a ping
query is typically to get a baseline sen
The fastest solr query I can find is any query on unused dynamic field name:
unused_dynamic_field_s:3
Is there another query style that should be faster?
See this line in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml
q=solr&version=2.0&start=0&rows=0
A better ping query would be
+"]";
> -Original Message-
> From: Jack L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 10:32 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Solr Query Language
>
>
> Is the lucene query syntax available in solr? I saw this page
> about
On 4/16/07, Jack L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is the lucene query syntax available in solr? ...
The syntax depends on the request handler used, if you're using the
standard one the docs are at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StandardRequestHandler
-Bertrand
500"
at
java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:48)
at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:447)
at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:497)
If solr query language is different from that of Lucene, is
there a page that documents this?
--
Best regards,
Jack
701 - 799 of 799 matches
Mail list logo
