Hello,
I just can't find the answer in the archives, so I will post it here... I
just migrated from 2.44 to 2.55 on a Red Hat box running SA with procmail
and postfix. I copied my old config-file local.cf which worked very well
with 2.44, and basically everything works as before (I needed to add
I put in my procmail | spamassassin, what is the difference of put spamd
-f???
And... the bayes database is global or for each user???
Thanks.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:42:24AM -0700, Cassandra Lynette
Brockett wrote:
Personally not really liking rhat very much, I'd suggest
another OS, but for
stability, so far 6.2 is the most stable of the rhat
After fighting this, I woke up this morning and bam, it hit me. This is
how I was able to make a spam folder in a users exchange store without
doing it manually for every account:
- Open your inbox and create a new .pst file, call it whatever you want.
- Create a new folder inside that .pst
Thanks for the reply.
id and the user shows the correct uid and gid and getent passwd displays info like it
would be in the passwd file. Openldap is currently working with Sendmail.
Normally the users don't have shell accounts, but I am adding a shell in ldap for my
test user and I can not
In my experience, changing the LANG= did not resolve all of the issues.
Due to UTF-8 issues in redhat, I have switched deployment distrobutions to
Free-BSD where this issue does not seem to exist, or is at least masked by
the ports system.
Frank,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 03 Jun 2003
Keith Olmstead wrote:
id and the user shows the correct uid and gid and getent passwd displays info like it would be in the passwd file. Openldap is currently working with Sendmail.
Normally the users don't have shell accounts, but I am adding a shell in ldap for my test user and I can not su,
As a follow-up, let's go one step further, here is an article on using
VBA to automatically move incoming mail items to a folder, IE, Spam
folder :)
http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=8191
Mission complete:
-Jim
P.s. You can also use vba to create the spam folder in the
Would there be any interest in me posting my current system of spam
filtering and management for an ISP to offer its end users?
Currently the system consists of:
Postfix
Procmail
Openwebmail
WebUserPrefs
and various perl scripts.
What it does...
I am sorry, I just got caught up in something else and forgot to add version #s.
Please forgive me. Believe it or not I don't even believe that pam_ldap is installed.
nss_ldap is 205 and openldap version 2.0.27, running on solaris 9.
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 15:27, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Louis Bohm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am doing about 20k messages a day (inbound from the internet) on two
Sun Netra T1's (1 gig ram, 440 mHz single cpu, mirrored 18 gig drives).
For software I am using Sendmail, MimeDefang and SA. Works
Are any of the network checks (Razor, etc) working? Maybe you're somehow
running in local mode only, due to the way it way built you installed SA?
You might try debug mode:
spamassassin -tD test_msg.mail
and see what it tells you.
Also make sure and 'lint' your rules:
spamassassin
Chadwick L. Sorrell wrote:
Would there be any interest in me posting my current system of spam
filtering and management for an ISP to offer its end users?
To be honest with you, I'd say that you can't have enough how-to
documentation available these days. :) But please, date it and note
version
Keith Olmstead wrote:
I am sorry, I just got caught up in something else and forgot to add version #s. Please forgive me. Believe it or not I don't even believe that pam_ldap is installed. nss_ldap is 205 and openldap version 2.0.27, running on solaris 9.
debug: is spam? score=3.6 required=5
tests=DATE_MISSING,MISSING_HEADERS,NO_REAL_NAME
debug: bayes: 2752 untie-ing
Insecure directory in $ENV{PATH} while running with -T switch at
../spamd/spamd line 1083.
Maybe you need to kill a running spamd process?
Not found: spamflag =
I'm having a problem with SA after upgrading to 2.55. I saw a posting to
the list a few days ago where someone else was having a similar problem,
but didn't see any responses to that message.
What I see in the procmail logs are things similar to this:
configuration file
Definitely. It's always good to see how other people do something.
Thank you
Marek
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Nichols [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 8:54 AM
To: Chadwick L. Sorrell
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chadwick L. Sorrell wrote:
Would there be any
If you are using outlook as your mail client you might want to look at
spambayes
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/spambayes
I have been using it along with SA for several weeks and am very happy
with it.
Tyler Hardison wrote:
I just wanted to throw an idea out there in case there
-Original Message-
From: Tim Litwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:41 AM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Maybe Spam?
If you are using outlook as your mail client you might want
to look at
spambayes
I like just having users set their filters based on X-SPAM_LEVEL. The
filter says if this header has this many stars, move the mail here. If it
has that many stars, move it there. This is an extremely simple way for
users to set their own level (or multiple levels).
Harold
I just wanted to
At Tue Jun 3 06:46:02 2003, Catherine Pinatiello wrote:
Since the rule for FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is 3.5 points, and our threshold
is set at 4.0 (we get an ungodly amount of spam) then we're having a lot
of trouble with mail wrongly being marked as spam, when the mail is
coming from Outlook
At 08:22 PM 6/2/2003 -0800, Jon Reynolds wrote:
Is there a way to add more checks on messages or does SA-2.55 come with
all of them bundled.
All of the standard rules are bundled in whatever the current released
version of SA is. Whenever a new ruleset is finished being scored and
tested, a new
Actually Solaris 9 comes with Iplanet LDAP 5.1 built in, so you may be
having library problems I don't use nss_ldap or pam_ldap on my Solaris 9
boxes. They all use the pam_unix which has ldap support built in to it..
Make sure your person has both posixaccount and shadowaccount in their
Well it looks like it was not ldap that that was my problem. I don't think it was
perl either. I changed some options around now, using the -x option (don't look at
users prefs) and it filters fine. I don't know why it was not working without the -x
but it is filtering fine at the moment.
Yes, this would be a major pain on a large rollout.
Tyler Hardison wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Litwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:41 AM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Maybe Spam?
If you are using outlook as your mail client you might
why not write your own rules as extension? I have some 500+ rules to stay
(ahead|close) to spammers...
ie.:
rawbody RAWBODY_PORN_OBFUS_01
/(\$ex|pr0n|p0rn|t(\||\!|1|í|ì|î)t|fvck|a\$\$|cl(\||\!|1|í|ì|î)t|c0ck|pen(\|
|\!|1|í|ì|î)(s|$)|b0y|d(\||\!|1|í|ì|î)ck|(\||\!|1|í|ì|î)nche?s?|erect(\||\!|
why not write your own rules as extension? I have some 500+ rules to stay
(ahead|close) to spammers...
ie.:
rawbody RAWBODY_PORN_OBFUS_01
/(\$ex|pr0n|p0rn|t(\||\!|1|í|ì|î)t|fvck|a\$\$|cl(\||\!|1|í|ì|î)t|c0ck|pen(\|
|\!|1|í|ì|î)(s|$)|b0y|d(\||\!|1|í|ì|î)ck|(\||\!|1|í|ì|î)nche?s?|erect(\||\!|
Dear Sir or Madam,
I have the pleasure to know your esteemed Corp.
We are a manufacturer of garments and bags in Quanzhou, China.
I think we can cooperate and supply you with garments and bags as you need.
The following is some introductions about our company.
Set up: 1988
Hi,
I am running SpamAssassin 2.54 and can't seem to get rbl checks working.
I have skip_rbl_checks 0 in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. I have
the default rules files with plenty of RBLs to check against. When I run
spamassassin -D rbl=-9 -t /var/tmp/test I get the following as part
of the
Keith Olmstead wrote:
Well it looks like it was not ldap that that was my problem. I don't think it was perl either. I changed some options around now, using the -x option (don't look at users prefs) and it filters fine. I don't know why it was not working without the -x but it is filtering
I relized that. Installing pam_ldap as we speak. I have a feeling that I will have
to get that working to get users_prefs working for individual users.
--Keith
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 23:03:54 +0200
From: Tony Earnshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Keith
At 01:04 PM 6/3/2003 -0800, you wrote:
So razor and dcc and pyzor are not installed by
default, do you have a preference on which works the best or do they all
perform different functions?
They perform similar but not quite the same function.. really for an
overview, look at the hit rates and S/O
How long does SA remember seen Message-Ids?
Is there a way I can make it forget or expire Message-Ids from the
bayes_seen db without making it forget the message, or when I no longer
have a copy of the message to send to sa-learn --forget?
---
The avalanche has already begun. It is too late
I find that regularly perusing the spam folder and feeding samples to the
Bayesian classifier helps rekindle that old feeling :)
--On Monday, June 02, 2003 5:58 PM +0100 Jim Ford
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Looks like I've got SA+Razor2 roughly setup OK - next to nothing gets
through
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:47:28PM -0700, Matthew Cline wrote:
I'm guessing that Outlook and similar must not show malformed comments, or
else the majority of spam recipients would see the comments stuck in the
middle of words, defeating the purpose of making them comments.
MS does strange
I have seen many entries like this since configuring spamass-milter on my
site (usernames and hosts addresses that count hidden) :-
Jun 3 16:12:16 hotline sendmail[2444]: h53NCEH02444:
from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=3600, class=-60, nrcpts=1,
msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA,
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 11:10, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 08:22 PM 6/2/2003 -0800, Jon Reynolds wrote:
Is there a way to add more checks on messages or does SA-2.55 come with
all of them bundled.
All of the standard rules are bundled in whatever the current released
version of SA is. Whenever a
Hi all
I'm currently adding a header field which contains the enevelope from
email address. I was wondering if there was a way to write a rule where
I could check this header against the from header field?
Spamassassin 2.55
Postfix 1.11
Procmail/formail in use.
I add the header:
Hey all,
Seems the older version of the web interface I was using calls to stuff
that doesn't exist in SA anymore, like report_header (at least I think
that's the one)
Where's the updated web interface again? Didn't run across it in
Google, and sourceforge's mailing list archives are pretty
I do not want spamassassin - I called my ISP and they do not
subscribe to you. I emailed them and they know nothing about you. I
found you on my computer, deleted you, and 3 days later you are back
again. I want you off my computer - if I want my email checked, I will
check it myself! Let
i have the following test in my procmailrc.. Doesnt seem that sa-learn
is working properly under 2.54.
here is my procmail excerpt
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
{
:0c: bayes-spam.lock
| /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam --local /tmp/spamout 21
:0:
./spamuser/Maildir/
}
#more /tmp/spamout
Failed to
What's the proper command to restart spamassassin? Sorry for the newbie
question but I've been all over the documentation, list archives, and FAQs
and couldn't find it. Apparently I didn't look good enough as I'm sure it
must be somewhere, but heyI really tried. :) Thanks,
---Marius
hmm.. looks like i need --single..
--single is not in the docs, but sneaks its way into the top of the -h
output..
adam
On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 09:54 PM, Adam Denenberg wrote:
i have the following test in my procmailrc.. Doesnt seem that
sa-learn is working properly under 2.54.
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:02:25PM -0400, Marius Kirschner wrote:
What's the proper command to restart spamassassin? Sorry for the newbie
question but I've been all over the documentation, list archives, and FAQs
and couldn't find it. Apparently I didn't look good enough as I'm sure it
must
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 18:17, Marge Golomb wrote:
I do not want spamassassin - I called my ISP and they do not subscribe to
you. I emailed them and they know nothing about you. I found you on my
computer, deleted you, and 3 days later you are back again. I want you off
my computer - if I
Hi,
Let's break this up into smaller pieces...
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:17:21 -0500 Marge Golomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not want spamassassin - I called my ISP and they do not subscribe
to you. I emailed them and they know nothing about you.
To be fair, we know nothing about you or your
Didn't this (and all the subsequent flames) just happen? Like several times
already in the recent past??
Anyone ever see Groundhog Day? I'm startin to get wigged out...
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Marge Golomb
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:17 PM
Subject:
Hi,
I have installed spamassassin on two boxes and set it to do the tagging systemwide. All incoming mail were replicated to both box A and B
On box A, it works beautifully, or detect 80% of the spam
On box B, it seems to work too, but missed about 70% of the spam and tag it with a lower hit
in an article written by Randy Cassingham, Randy describes 'why e-mail abuse
should be a crime' and suggests ways to stop spam. His fifth suggestion
states Ensure that your ISP is taking steps to combat the problem, such as
installing SpamAssassin...
this is in Playboy July 2003 pg 53 (bottom)
Bob offers an excellent, thourogh response:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)
[...]
3. An ISP you're sending mail to or receiving mail
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 08:40 pm, Ryan Bingham wrote:
Didn't this (and all the subsequent flames) just happen? Like several
times already in the recent past??
Anyone ever see Groundhog Day? I'm startin to get wigged out...
Yeah, but these guys aren't as funny as Bill Murray.
One other
Is it possible that the second system is behind some sort of firewall
router, that
prevents it from sending its net queries out?
You might try running a test with debug mode set:
spamassassin -tD sample_spam.txt
and see what it says.
-Original Message-
From: Steve N
Sent: Tuesday,
sure you don't.we read it for the ARTICLES...;o)
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Kister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 June 2003 06:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] OT: SpamAssassin in Playboy 07/2003
in an article written by Randy Cassingham, Randy describes 'why
OK, did what you suggested, and I guess the problem lies in either of the
following lines:
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Matt Beland wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 08:40 pm, Ryan Bingham wrote:
Didn't this (and all the subsequent flames) just happen? Like several
times already in the recent past??
Anyone ever see Groundhog Day? I'm startin to get wigged out...
Yeah, but these guys
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, did what you suggested, and I guess the problem lies in either of the
following lines:
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
debug: is
Thanks Jack,
I just found out by myself that there were some packages missing on my box,
so I went to RedHat an got the missing rpms. RBL is now working!!!
One more thing (this resource is really useful)...from what I see from
others posting here it seems to me that I do not have the Bayesian
ME_TOO!
... Whatever.
Look, guys. Simply put, next time this happens, just send a simple reply
offlist. In fact, I feel it would make a lasting impression on the account,
if not the person if EVERYONE can send a simple reply, offlist. That should
get the message through loud and clear.
But
how many times should i say unsubscribe me from this list
- Original Message -
From: Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matt Beland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Matt Beland wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 22:07:19 -0700 Matt Beland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 08:40 pm, Ryan Bingham wrote:
Didn't this (and all the subsequent flames) just happen? Like several
times already in the recent past??
Anyone ever see Groundhog Day? I'm startin to get wigged
Why don't you simply send an e-mail to the correct address??
- Original Message -
From: Frank Chibesakunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matt Beland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)
Hi,
Can anyone point me to the file that I can edit which will allow me to
change the This mail is probably spam text, I wish to add a few lines
asking our users to contact our Helpdesk if they have any Qns or wish to
request whitelisting.
Thanks,
Simon.
On my system it's /etc/mail/spamassassin/10_misc.cf, not sure if that will
be the same everywhere.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Simon Crowther [mailto:[EMAIL
On 6/4/03 1:31 AM, "Tyler Hardison" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(B[...]
(B Maybe_Factor 1 (default 0)
(B
(B Where messages within 5.0 - 6.0 (1 offset from threshold) are marked with
(B "maybe". This way, messages scoring higher then 6 (or more) are marked with
(B a definite. Then the user's
64 matches
Mail list logo
