At 04:56 AM 11/11/2003, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
I have attached a spam i keep getting,
no, you've quoted it in text-only form without all the headers... All I can
tell from what you posted is it's using bayes poison.. There's no way from
that little snippet to see what rules the email matched.
At 11:00 AM 11/11/2003, Bill wrote:
Bad, bad, bad idea!!!
There are many many people running home networks in dynamic space who send
their mail thru their isp server. These will all get caught and trashed by
your plan. You better have a VERY good explanation why you just alienated
hundreds of
At 12:58 PM 11/11/2003, Dan wrote:
1. I know spamassassin works on a point system, but does it learn as time
goes by?
IF you use the bayes subsystem, which is on by default but untrained as
well, SA will engage in some automatic learning for the bayes rules. The
remaining rules are static ones,
At 03:45 AM 11/11/2003, David B Funk wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
eManager Notification *
The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content.
Love the stupid -PC- double-talk here. Gee, what was the content
sensitive to?
At 12:31 PM 11/11/2003, Rajdeep Larha wrote:
I have successfully installed the SA. but I am not able to filer the
content. Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the rules directory
but not getting filter.
Um what do you mean by Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the
rules
At 01:19 PM 11/11/2003, Joao Pedro wrote:
I'm installing a Spam Gateway Email Server in a FreeBSD server with
Postfix+Amavisd+SpamAssassin
and a followed this howto http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html.
All it's appear ok, but when I send a email with the sample_spam.txt or
other spam example file
At 01:17 PM 11/11/2003, Peter P. Benac wrote:
Is there a legitimate reason not to blacklist email.com? I just seem to
get way too much SPAM from email.com.
It's a real webmail type service.. So the same arguments that apply for why
you should/should not block hotmail, yahoo, eudoramail, and
At 11:02 AM 11/10/03 +0100, matthias zeichmann wrote:
Meanwhile i suspect an error in my configuration. Is there a way to
check your local.cf for validity?
spamassassin --lint
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19
At 04:36 PM 11/10/2003, Bob Rosenberg wrote:
I have a number of gripes about this.
1) I only get 5 points not 5.1 when I add them together.
One word.. rounding.. The report only displays the rule score down to the
nearest tenth of a point, however the rules are scored down further in
At 04:14 PM 11/10/2003, you wrote:
What's the lowest spam threshold value you are managing to get away with
(without false positives) ?
There's always FP's at pretty much any threshold that's no absurdly high
(ie, 1.0).
However, I have yet to notice any significant amount of FP's at 5.0..
At 09:47 AM 11/10/2003, matthias zeichmann wrote:
is it possible that this messes up other behaviour of SA?
That type of error is unlikely to cause problems with other lines, but it
is possible.
Usually the ones that kill half your local.cf are missing terminators for
regexes.
At 03:00 PM 11/10/2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
This is the spammer trick of saying the email is from you, to you. So it got
Whitelisted.
No it did not Chris.. Read The Fine List of rules it matched.. no
WHITELIST_* or AWL rules match this.
X-Spam-Tests:
At 08:38 AM 11/7/03 -0500, you wrote:
I have noticed that RAzor2 is timing out and slowing down SA 2.6.
Has something changed in the past few months that may have caused this?
Maybe the razorzone has changed? I use razor2.cloudmark.com now.
I don't think the zone itself is likely to change
At 08:51 AM 11/7/03 -0500, you wrote:
I am new to Spam Assassin. I see that it checks e-mail against the MAPS
databases, but that it does not appear to check the RBL+ database. Is there
some way for me to add this check to the list?
Well, SA does NOT check maps by default.. it's just got support
At 10:29 AM 11/7/2003, Maarten J H van den Berg wrote:
Sorry if this has been discussed in the past...
It's been discussed many times.. It's very common for people to have a very
deep misunderstanding of how SA scoring works. Most people fall into the
trap of over-simplifying the problem, and
At 12:09 PM 11/7/2003, Roberto Salazar wrote:
I have Spamassasin with Postfix working . This server is a Gateway for
others internal mail servers (in these are the users accounts).
I need that spamassasin erase spam mails directly (DELETE FILTER ) in my
server gateway and don't send mail to users
At 01:13 PM 11/7/2003, Chip Paswater wrote:
Hey Guys,
I apologize if these questions are asked somewhere, but I did browse the
FAQ and documentation and didn't see an answer.
I have a good understanding of Razor v2, but I just started using SA.
1. When reporting spam via spamassassin -r, can I
At 02:16 PM 11/7/2003, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
am using an internal RBL list. When I test a header that is in the
list using the following command: /usr/bin/spamassassin -t
--prefs-file=/var/qmail/.spamassassin/user_prefs -D
/home/tmp/spam_test.txt,
it labels it as spam. However, when an
At 04:25 PM 11/7/2003, maarten van den Berg wrote:
Upon looking at those rules I see al LOT of
inconsistencies. For instance, I found these rules that have score of zero(!)
(and these are merely the top of a large iceberg)
score CASHCASHCASH 0
score ADDRESSES_ON_CD 0
score BLANK_LINES_90_100 0
At 11:23 AM 11/5/2003, Tom Meunier wrote:
Matt, thanks for this. It's a great resource. However, I'm wondering
why the following were scored as zero and thus don't have numbers to
support their efficacy or lack thereof:
0.000 0. 0.0.500 0.110.00 RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK
At 11:42 AM 11/6/03 +0100, Euro Cocolo wrote:
recently I've noticed this fault: when my MTA receives mail identified as
spam (score 7.0) from a specific external distribution list, SA tags the
message, and instead of discarding the message (as set by the CommuniGate
rule), it delivers it to
At 11:44 AM 11/6/2003, Jeff Lasman wrote:
My question is simply is this okay to filter on? Or does anyone have
any experience of any legitimate email coming with this?
Lots of legitimate HTML newsletters come with this. It's pretty much a
standard thing to do.
At 06:52 PM 11/5/2003, Robert Leonard III wrote:
Do I need to restart SpamD every time I make a modification or add a new .cf
file to my configuration?
Yes, SA only parses the .cf files when it first starts up. Only user_prefs
is parsed each time a message comes in.
If so, when I do a restart,
At 07:16 PM 11/5/2003, Lukreme wrote:
My spam assassin is still 2.60-rc6:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,CLICK_BELOW
autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc6
So
snip
Going to write /home/kreme/.cpan/Metadata
Mail::SpamAssassin is up to date.
cpan
color me confused
CPAN
At 08:57 PM 11/5/2003, Nigel Featherston wrote:
I would like to know if SpamAssassin uses the following blacklists:
rhsbl.ahbl.org
dnsbl.ahbl.org
And I would also like to know under what conditions they are enabled
(i.e. by default, etc.)
No they are not used by default, and there's no built-in
At 07:57 PM 11/4/03 +0100, Jim Knuth wrote:
which folder to the read the config is used?
local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin or
local.cf in /etc/spamassassin or
user_prefs in /.spamassassin/
It's actually parsed from two places:
*.cf in /etc/mail spamassassin
user_prefs in ~/.spamassassin
And
At 11:44 AM 11/4/2003, Matthew Thomas wrote:
It didn't get marked as spam since it appears to come from us, though the IP
address is located in Puerto Rico. I was just wondering how they get
biocontrolsys.com associated with their IP address. Is it a completely
manufactured (not real) header?
At 02:00 PM 11/4/2003, JC wrote:
Spamassassin seems to be running fine, except when I go into debug mode, I
get an error. Here is some relevant output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /]$ spamd -c -a -m5 -H -D
spamd needs to be started as root, unless you pass it -p to specify a port
number 1024..
by
At 03:10 PM 11/4/2003, Paul Hirschorn wrote:
I want to customize the following:
Spam detection software, running on the system SPAMGW.FILTER.COM, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
At 04:26 PM 11/4/2003, Jay Levitt wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jay Levitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jay Levitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 9:29 AM
Subject: Second request: AWL false hits
Hi.. does anyone have any ideas on this? I have read the FAQ, and this
does
At 06:36 PM 11/4/2003, Dennis Duval wrote:
I have tried to use the add_header feature in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf with no luck. It does not write the added
header at all. However the local.cf file is being processed, because I can
change required_hits and it has an effect.
snip
This is
At 02:57 AM 11/3/2003, Justin Mason wrote:
Pedro Sam writes:
I'm just wondering why RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK was a hit, when I sent a email
from
my localhost 192.168.2.125 with kmail using the SMTP server at
mail.student.cs.uwaterloo.ca to address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the proper way of sending
At 11:28 AM 11/3/2003, Anne Ramey wrote:
I'm trying to add local rules, but only one of the .cf files in
/etc/mail/spamassassin seems to be used. Can you only have one extra .cf
file? (I'm using amavis with SA, so I was told the extra rules can't go
in local.cf).
SA should use _every_ file
At 11:35 AM 11/3/2003, Brian Sneddon wrote:
I'm running SpamAssassin 2.60 on a public IP (not NATed) and none of the
-notfirsthop rules (including RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK) have worked correctly for
me, either. For reference I'm also running Sendmail and Spamass-milter
0.2.0. Here are the headers from
At 01:50 PM 11/3/2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
I'm not sure if it is just me, but there are some new rules I have in the
update that look like this:
(__meta1 + __meta2) 1
They don't work on older version of SA. they get an error when doing a
spamassassin -D --lint. The '+' is throwing it off.
I
At 06:10 PM 11/3/03 -0800, Mairhtin O'Feannag wrote:
The tests page of the spamassassin.org website seems not to be too
up-to-date. A search of the page reveals only three or four tests based
upon the word outlook and
they all refer to Outlook Express. YET ... when I get a message in as
spam,
At 04:14 PM 11/3/03 -0600, Chris Barnes wrote:
Background: I had SpamAssassin 2.60 running just fine (using sendmail).
I was calling spamd via the /etc/procmail.
After installing Mailscanner and ClamAV, I noticed that the original SA
conf file was being ignored in favor of the smaller version in
At 08:13 PM 10/30/03 -0800, Jeremy Hein wrote:
I added use_auto_whitelist 0 to
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
but it still subtracts AWL in my report.
Maybe I'm writing to the wrong config file? How do I find out where the
right one is and how do I find out if spamassassin is using that option.
At 11:18 AM 10/31/2003, Dan Tappin wrote:
Below is a snippet from a recent post to the list:
Oct 30 14:12:40 ns1 MailScanner[3201]:
snip
Is there a config option to have these triggered rules logged like that? My
maillog simply has mail identified or not identified as spam. It would be
great
look at spamass-milter or a similar milter-level plugin to sendmail. They
can generally be configured to issue a 5xx level error at the end of the
SMTP DATA phase if the SA score is over some threshold level.
At 02:30 PM 10/31/2003, Josiah DeWitt wrote:
I just installed SpamAssassin and got it
At 01:58 PM 10/30/03 +, you wrote:
What is the format of the files of ham/spam fed to sa-learn? Can I use
Outlook .pst files?
You can't directly use the outlook .pst format with sa-learn..
sa-learn supports 2 file formats:
The default is single-message per file in RFC 822 format, or a
At 07:17 AM 10/30/03 -0500, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
I've mined
Google and the archives. I've found some references to converting Outlook
files to mbox format. That would work I believe except that the messages I
want are really attached to those in my Outlook. Anyone know of a tool or
method of
At 10:33 AM 10/30/2003, Segree, Gareth wrote:
Addresses from my mail domain is being saved in the auto-whitelist file.
1) How do I prevent addresses from being auto-whitelisted?
you don't, unless you disable the AWL entirely.
2) How do I delete addresses that are already auto-whitelisted?
At 10:23 AM 10/30/2003, Andrea Riela wrote:
Hi folks,
How could I filter this type of spam:
Penis
P.enis
Pe.nis
Pen.is
Peni.s
This regex should work for a custom rule to match those patterns.
/P(\.?)e(\.?)n(\.?)i(\.?)s/
You'll probably want to make it a bit more useful like this:
At 07:56 PM 10/30/2003, Jeremy Hein wrote:
Is there anyway to have spamassasin check for this kind of HTML garbage.
If so, I could get rid of nearly all my spam.
it already does catch some of these things. check out the
OBFUSCATING_COMMENT rule.
However, those rules look for a HTML comment
At 08:00 PM 10/30/2003, Jeremy Hein wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know what this is and how to configure it? It seems to be
subtracting from the score different amounts each time. I can't figure
out why or what to do about it.
Read the FAQ.. the AWL is a score averager, and it's supposed to vary in
At 09:15 AM 10/29/03 -0500, you wrote:
Hi everyone,
snip
required_hits 8.0
rewrite_subject 1
fold_headers 1
report_header 1
use_terse_report 1
defang_mime 1
dns_available no
dcc_add_header 1
use_dcc 1
One thing I can spot right away is that you need to remove the defang_mime
statement from your
Dynablock should only be used to check the IP address delivering the
email.
Also of note to ISPs, SA users everywhere:
If the machine you run SA on has a NATed or otherwise non-routable IP
address (ie: 10.*.*.*, 192.168.*.*, etc) then you must manually set the
trusted_relays in your local.cf.
At 03:56 PM 10/29/03 +, you wrote:
Since I upgraded I get mail from cron with numerous errors of this
form in it.
Insecure dependency in link while running with -T switch at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line 452, STDIN line 136.
Razor requires a source-code patch to work
At 11:36 AM 10/29/2003, Tobin wrote:
I was wondering if anyone could help me fix a broken rule. Im getting a
error
Failed to compile body spamassassin tests, skipping:
(syntax error at /ect/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, rule Porn, line 1,
near /)
Well, what's the broken rule look like?
Can't
At 01:02 PM 10/29/2003, you wrote:
Sorry Im a newbie. I have attached my local.cf and my 20_compensate
rule. Thanks again. (I have no custom rules)
Well, you do have some attempts in there at making a custom rule.. and a
very, very, very broken one.
I'd delete the entire Penis rule you've got in
At 01:53 PM 10/29/2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
SUBJECT_XXX
and in it, it has naughty words. One of which it looks for is :
/pen.s/i
Rather than do the ^oO thing, why not modify your . to exclude spaces:
/pen\Ss/
This will look for a non whitespace in that spot.
I'd also suggest putting a \b at
At 03:02 PM 10/29/2003, Joe wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to group rules together for only certain instances?
For example, I want score the porn rules higher on a certain domain.. so I
guess I would need something like
header DOMAIN From =~ /filtereddomain.com/i
But is there a way I could then do
At 03:40 PM 10/29/2003, David Hubbard wrote:
How can one look at the envelope sender of a message
in a rule? Is there a variable available to SA for
that?
That's fundamentally impossible in SpamAssassin.. SA isn't provided the
envelope.
The only way SA can know about the envelope is if you have
At 05:23 PM 10/29/2003, Greg Earle wrote:
I've run truss on the running spamd and I'm not seeing anything in
the truss output that points to where it's looking for the ndbm file
that it doesn't like. The only lines that are relevant to Bayes-named
files are:
18263:
At 07:28 PM 10/29/2003, Riley J. McIntire wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin 578$ ps ax |grep [s]pamc
38938 ?? S 0:00.00 /usr/local/bin/spamc
So if I'm not badly mistaken I am using spamc. But not the right way? Is
there a problem with the procmailrc?
That procmailrc
At 08:48 PM 10/29/2003, Riley J. McIntire wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports 526$ ps auwx |grep [s]pamd
nospam 184 0.0 1.3 21236 20920 ?? Is 20Oct03 3:51.50
/usr/local/bin/spamd -a -c -d -u nospam -H (perl5.00503)
Is the -H parameter passed to spamd with no parameter? or is it just
At 12:06 PM 10/28/2003, Darryl Snover wrote:
I've attempted to issue the command:
spamassassin -t sample-spam.txt spam.out
without apparent success, as the cursor just sits there afterwards, and
nothing is returned.
First run this to make sure SA is OK with your configfiles:
spamassassin
At 01:13 PM 10/28/2003, Darryl Snover wrote:
spamassassin --lint
This command results in the following:
Cannot open /usr/share/spamassassin/user_prefs.template: No such file or
directory
Failed to create default user preference file
/private/var/root/.spamassassin/user_prefs
That's pretty
At 01:07 PM 10/28/2003, Howard Brazee wrote:
I pulled out ultra-edit and FTP'd in auto-whitelist.pag auto-whitelist.dir
These aren't text files. Where how can I find and edit my white lists
and black lists on my e-mail server?
First, those are the auto whitelist, aka AWL.. those files are
At 02:23 PM 10/28/2003, Howard Brazee wrote:
A lot of these documents and replies seem to be designed around me having
SpamAssassin on my computer. Instead it is on my e-mail server.
Is there a place to look at to find out how someone who has a server based
SpamAssassin can modify the
At 02:57 PM 10/28/2003, Howard Brazee wrote:
one word: SSH.
Ssh? I'm too loud? I bet this means something.I haven't worked with
non-mainframe servers ever. It took me a while to figure out how to use
Ultra-Edit to edit my user_prefs file.
SSH is Secure SHell, a remote login protocol..
At 03:41 PM 10/28/2003, Dominique Bagnato wrote:
Thank you to let me know how to install spamassassin on Solaris 9.
and where could I get the download ?
www.spamassassin.org
provided you've got perl 5.6.x or higher, you should be able to install as
per the documentation
perl Makefile.pl
At 06:34 PM 10/28/2003, Jack Gostl wrote:
Is it possible to use wild cards in a white list? For example:
whitelist_from abcd*.bigcompany.com
Yes, See the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf manpage for details. Basically it
should support any wildcards that a typical unix shell supports when doing
At 10:08 AM 10/27/2003, Dan Kohn wrote:
This should be a FAQ:
Q. How do I get SpamAssassin to mark as spam all Window patch emails
that include an executable?
A. Add the following line to your user-prefs (normally
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs):
score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 10
- dan
And it
At 04:56 PM 10/25/03 +0100, Paul Hutchings wrote:
I've ran spamassassin --add-addr-to-whitelist and it is reducing the
scores, but the GTUBE test has such a high score that the adjustment doesn't
seem to be enough!
I hope that makes sense, TIA for any advice!
1) this issue should be fixed in
At 12:12 AM 10/23/03 -0700, Rezk Mekhael wrote:
I have a DS20 Machine with 5.1 unix tru64 operating system, I am running
MailScanner, Sopho and SpamAssassin.
/opt/MailScanner/etc/MailScanner.conf.
MailScanner running perfict without SpamAssassin, one's I turn on the
spamAssassin, MailScanner
At 10:07 PM 10/23/2003, Hugh Caley wrote:
I'm trying to build spamassassin 2.60 as a non-root user on my ISP's mail
server. RedHat 7.3, perl version 5.004_04. I'm not sure where to go from
here. I'm getting the following errors:
What version of ExtUtils::MakeMaker do they have? SA requires
At 02:54 AM 10/23/2003, =?big5?B?WXVhbi1DaHVuZyBIc2lhb1wov72yV8TBXCk=?= wrote:
Now I research Spamassassin's Genetic Algorithms, but I don't
understand
Spamassassin work with GA and bayes classfilter.
Does anybody know?
The Genetic Algorithm is not a part of SpamAssassin itself.
At 12:43 PM 10/24/2003, ian douglas wrote:
Right now I have MailScanner configured to delete high scoring spam so it
doesn't end up in my user's mailbox, but what about the 'bounce' option?
IMO, post-delivery bounces of spam, such as MailScanner does, are of very
questionable value.
99.99% of
At 04:06 PM 10/24/2003, Josh Endries wrote:
I'm playing around with spamd for a few accounts on our mail server via
procmail and I would like to set up bayesian filtering. Everywhere I read
says that per-user is the way to go with bayesian filters versus one big
site-wide database, because
At 04:15 PM 10/24/2003, Dan Wilder wrote:
Ian, have you looked at the headers to determine where the
duplicates are coming from?
This appears to be a sourceforge problem.. I'm getting duplicates from
multiple posters, on multiple different lists.
Even Ian's message got double-posted.
Strangely,
At 10:58 AM 10/23/2003, Stuart Gall wrote:
I am not realy sure what else I can do to diagnose the problem.
did you try a spamassassin --lint?
Perhaps there's something in your local.cf that is causing 2.60 to choke on it.
---
This SF.net
At 01:34 PM 10/24/2003, Dan Tappin wrote:
rawbody USERNAME /username/i
describe USERNAME
score USERNAME -100.0
... where the person sending e-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Um... does username appear in the body part of the message? Note that
rawbody does not include the headers.
You probably want
At 08:30 AM 10/23/03 +0200, Philippe Van Hecke wrote:
I would like to know if there is a way with spamassassin to
disociate the analyze phase.
What's i want to ask here is if there exist a way to tell to spamassassin
1) analyse this mail . put rules match in the mail header.
2) later for the same
At 10:30 AM 10/23/2003, Listas - OPEN Internet wrote:
Hei Evan,
Here goes the example.
snip
Content analysis details: (7.3 points, 10.0 required)
You aren't by any chance running all your mail through spamassassin with
the -t parameter are you? If you use the -t parameter, you're
At 07:51 PM 10/22/03 -0500, Greg Thorne wrote:
I am trying to install SpamAssassin 2.6, and I keep getting the message:
$ ./spamassassin
HTML::Parser version 3.24 required--this is only version 3.05 at
/home/gthorne/perlmods/lib/site_perl/5.6.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm line 8.
snip
$ perl -e
At 08:55 AM 10/23/2003, Joseph P. Wetstein wrote:
When I do a: sa-learn --mbox --spam kill I get:
Learned from 0 message(s) (127 message(s) examined).
First, I'd check for file permission issues.. make sure you've got the
ability to create files in ~/.spamassassin. It's really easy to do
At 08:36 AM 10/22/2003, Scott Rothgaber wrote:
My Bayes database finally got its 200 spams and hams and kicked in. I've
noticed, however, that it *always* says that the probability is 99%. Is
this normal?
No.. It is however quite normal for nearly all spams to be at 99% and
nearly all nonspam
At 05:15 PM 10/21/2003, =?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Oleg=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?= wrote:
Can somebody advise me, please, the way in which I can update it?
Can I just do new install from CPAN? Or it will not be enough?
The system is working now and I do not want to screw it,
therefore I need help.
At 10:18 AM 10/22/2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
It is tough to remember everything SA looks for. Does 2.60 have something
like this? Comments?
rawbody MY_TROJANED_HOST
/http:\/\/\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\:\d{2,4}\//
describe MY_TROJANED_HOST Possible Trojaned box used for spam hosting
score
At 10:35 AM 10/22/2003, Anne Ramey wrote:
when I sa-learn on a folder of spam it takes almost no time and says
learned 1 no matter how many where in the file but when I do an sa-learn
of ham, it works fine. Ideas?
What command line did you use? and what format is the mail in?
If you're giving
At 09:37 PM 10/22/03 +0200, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
I see allot of such errors in my syslog. I think they apear only if i enable
RAZOR, with Razor disabled i never saw such an error, any idea ? Can i
change the timeout somewhere ?
What kind of setup are you using? It's hard to give a whole lot of
At 11:29 AM 10/21/2003, Philippe Van Hecke wrote:
#header RECEIVED_FROM_OTHER_THAN_MY_DOMAIN Received
!~/(server1||server2|server3|server4|server5)(\.fw)?\.foo\.bar/i
snip
the commented header RECEIVED_FROM_OTHER_THAN_MY_DOMAIN never match
and so the FORGED_MY_DOMAIN is never trigered but the
At 07:50 AM 10/21/2003, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
Do all custom rules have to be added to the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file OR
can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
SA will by default parse *.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Thus, you can put
them in a separate CF file
At 10:39 AM 10/21/2003, Cliff Browning wrote:
I went to the spamassassin.org site today and the list of tests is not
there. Could you please put it back.
Thanks
Seems to be there and just fine for me...
It's possible you caught the site in the middle of an update.. the tests
list is built
At 11:11 AM 10/20/2003, James Herschel wrote:
I've got an odd situation where I've received spam from a (forged) valid
address in my own domain. Problem is that the headers are clearly forged as
the IP for my mailserver is incorrect, but the whitelist rule for my domain
is being applied.
Yeah,
At 01:04 PM 10/19/2003, Masoud Pajoh wrote:
I was running SA 2.5 with kmail and all was well, then I upgraded to version
2.60. Now, SA stopped pocessing incoming mail all togther.
How can I correct this.
Well, what exactly do you mean by stopped processing incoming mail? Do
you mean that the
At 10:19 PM 10/20/03 +0200, Marco Calistri wrote:
Hello, first of all I want to make my compliments to the developers that are
spending their time to fight the SPAM and of course, among these thanks to SA
Team.
My first question (the first of a long series...) is:
Well, my first comment, before I
At 08:53 AM 10/17/2003, guenther wrote:
I just wondered about redirecting mail to learn as Spam, as mentioned in
FAQ 5.1.
This will add extra headers (especially Received headers).
Won't these headers poison the Bayesian database?
This varies a lot from mail client to mail client. With some mail
At 10:37 AM 10/17/2003, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
Does anyone else have trouble getting their messages on the list in a timely
fashion? It seems when I reply to the list it takes 15 to 45 minutes for my
message to appear. By the time my reply shows up, 3 other people have
replied and I look like a
At 04:36 AM 10/5/2003, Hendrik wrote:
First Question: Why does SA prints out autolean=no when the
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf says:
# Enable Bayes auto-learning
auto_learn 1
the autolearn=no means it didn't auto-learn THIS message because it
didn't score high or low enough to
At 11:22 AM 10/17/2003, Dave Bartmess wrote:
I put this on the command line, and immediately after restarting spamd,
it gave me the following messages in /var/log/mail/errors:
Oct 13 21:45:46 Dingo spamc[5596]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at
127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#3 of 3): Connection refused
At 03:10 PM 10/16/2003, Daniel M. Drucker wrote:
I wasn't even aware that this notfirsthop argument existed; as far as
I can tell in a few minutes of testing, the argument has no effect.
I've had to disable all dynamic-IP RBLs because of this problem...
Dan.. Are you using an internal mailserver
At 01:29 PM 10/17/03 -0400, Jon Fraley wrote:
From looking at some posts, it looks like Mailscanner just looks for a
score from SA. Does this mean that the message does not get re-written
as an attachment with the report if it is spam? Or does Mailscanner do
this? I can not find exactly how it
At 01:21 PM 10/17/03 +0200, Håkon Nilsen \(Exinet AS\) wrote:
Bayes tages it worth 5.4 points. My limit is 5. How does Byes tag it this
much? What should I do to solve the issue? Raise the limit to 7.5 or
something would probably help on this one, but not all. A whitelist service
is already
At 01:25 PM 10/16/03 +0200, Francis wrote:
Is it possible that Spamassassin generate somme out traffic on our Wan?
SpamAssassin itself does not generate network traffic, although some of the
optional modules that SA will use if available will generate network traffic.
Spamassassin does quite a
At 11:15 AM 10/16/2003, Michael Balamuth wrote:
Being very new to spamassassin, I hope these aren't too dumb questions.
Having configured /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf as inserted below,
I'd suggest running spamassassin --lint. There are errors in your
local.cf.. in particular, defang_mime is
At 05:20 AM 10/16/03 -0700, Doug Wolfgram wrote:
I just deleted 2.55 from my system and installed 2.60 via RPMs. Although
spamassassin is running (ps -ax | grep spamd) when i run the spam test
message through it says spam score:0 and 'template not found'
What template is it looking for??
It's
At 10:04 AM 10/15/03 -0400, Jon Fraley wrote:
I am running SA 2.60. I had skip_rbl_checks set to 1 and now changed it
to 0. I have started spamd with -D to get debugging, but do not see any
thing about checking rbl's. Is there away to debug the rbl checks? Is
there something I should look at?
401 - 500 of 1162 matches
Mail list logo
