Re: [SAtalk] Filtering html messages

2004-01-29 Thread Kenneth Andresen
Thank you for your answer! One thing - the blackhair.cf, should it be part of my current local.cf, or will it work by simply adding the file to /etc/mail/spamassassin/? Will I need to modify anything else to refer to this file? On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 13:46, Adam D. Lopresto wrote: Actually,

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering html messages

2004-01-27 Thread Adam D. Lopresto
It's backhair.cf, not blackhair.cf. If you want it for a system wide install, you only need to put it in /etc/mail/spamassassin and, if you're running spamd, restart spamd. Whenever it starts it finds all the .cf files in that directory and loads them (in alphabetical order). On Tue, 27 Jan

[SAtalk] Filtering html messages

2004-01-26 Thread Kenneth Andresen
Hello all, I am noticing that the majority of the current spam coming through are all html messages with invalid html tags, like spspammeram. Since it is rendered as html the invalid tag is removed, so we on the screen only see spam. Wouldn't it be possible to simply make a html rendering

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering html messages

2004-01-26 Thread Adam D. Lopresto
Actually, we can do better than that. Check out Jennifer's Backhair set. http://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm It'll find invalid HTML tags used to break up words, and give a message points simply for having them (so your message would have triggered BACKHAIR_22 even though the word it's

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering html messages

2004-01-26 Thread Jon
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 11:38, Kenneth Andresen wrote: Hello all, I am noticing that the majority of the current spam coming through are all html messages with invalid html tags, like spspammeram. Since it is rendered as html the invalid tag is removed, so we on the screen only see spam.

[SAtalk] Filtering per-recipient

2004-01-18 Thread Mark Squire
Forgot to add a subject when I first sent this . . . Sorry about that. _ Hi group, Got SA working, and I want to test it out on only a few users. I have SA set up to run when called from Amavisd, which is called by postfix, which is set up as a relay. Currently it is set

Fwd: [SAtalk] Filtering per-recipient

2004-01-18 Thread Casper Gasper
Hi group, Got SA working, and I want to test it out on only a few users. I have SA set up to run when called from Amavisd, which is called by postfix, which is set up as a relay. Currently it is set up to put a ***SPAM*** tag on every email that is suspicios to every email that passes through

[SAtalk] Filtering on second isp account being ignored.

2003-12-31 Thread John Phillips
Mandrake 9.2 dual boot Windoze / Linux, Dell Inspiron laptop 4150. New to Linux, but loving it so far! Ex TRSDOS boy! but I still can't type :-( Would like to dump Windoze. Running Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.8 and SpamAssassin with two isp accounts. Using SMTP. ADSL. Spam assassin filters on the

RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-12 Thread Erick Calder
, 2003 7:22 AMTo: Efren Pedroza; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000 SA does have the ability to filter (block/discard) if so configured.. basically by just settingSA to delete any incoming scanned msg with a score of 5+ (default score

Re: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-10 Thread JRiley
with configuration information. -JR http://www.spamfighter.org http://spamstats.systemnt.net - Original Message - From: Efren Pedroza To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 1:34 PM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting

Re: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-10 Thread Bob Apthorpe
Hi, [N.B. Reformatted into a sensible whole. Please trim your posts, line wrap and (I know this sounds petty) please don't top post if you expect follow-ups. Thanks.] On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:22:06 -0600 JRiley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Efren Pedroza On Behalf Of gentian I am very

RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-10 Thread Gary Smith
/2003 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000 Hi, [N.B. Reformatted into a sensible whole. Please trim your posts, line wrap and (I know this sounds

RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-09 Thread Efren Pedroza
someone help me on this ? Saludos === Efren Pedroza Huerta -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of gentianSent: Monday, December 08, 2003 7:50 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SAtalk] filtering

[SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-08 Thread gentian
Hi list, I am very new to spamassassin and i want to setup a gateway for external spam and then i want to relay mail from spamassassin to Exchange 2000. I read that spamassassin just tags the mail, doesn'filter it and i should filter it on Exhange 2000 and that was done by some other tools.

RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-08 Thread mailinglists
PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000 Hi list, I am very new to spamassassin and i want to setup a gateway for external spam and then i want to relay mail from spamassassin to Exchange 2000. I read

RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-08 Thread Bill
Of gentianSent: Monday, December 08, 2003 8:50 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000 Hi list, I am very new to spamassassin and i want to setup a gateway for external spam and then i want to relay mail from spamassassin

Re: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-08 Thread gentian
I will be using Fedora or Redhat Enterprise, one of two. - Original Message - From: Thomas Kinghorn To: 'gentian' Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:02 AM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000 What platform

Re: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-08 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* gentian [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I will be using Fedora or Redhat Enterprise, one of two. I am very new to spamassassin and i want to setup a gateway for external spam and then i want to relay mail from spamassassin to Exchange 2000. I read that spamassassin just tags the mail,

Re: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-08 Thread gentian
of it. - Original Message - From: Bill To: 'gentian' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:12 AM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000 It would be easy to set up a procmail rule to move all tagged spam

RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-08 Thread Yackley, Matt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralf Hildebrandt Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 8:52 AM To: gentian Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thomas Kinghorn Subject: Re: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-08 Thread Gary Funck
-Original Message- From: Ralf Hildebrandt Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 6:52 AM [...] Use Postfix+amavisd-new+SpamAssassin -- and user D_DISCARD to drop the spam on the gateway. What are the pros/cons of using sendmail+MIMEDefang+SA versus Postfix+amavisd-new+SpamAssassin?

[SAtalk] Filtering after Spamassassin

2003-12-01 Thread Vee Persaud
Hi, I'm using qmail, qmail-scanner and spamassassin and they are working great. Now I would like to introduce some more filtering, such as moving tagged items to a separate mailbox/mailboxes (depending on recipient), etc. Can this be done in SA ? Any advice ?? Thanks

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering after Spamassassin

2003-12-01 Thread Matt Kettler
At 09:08 AM 12/1/2003, Vee Persaud wrote: I'm using qmail, qmail-scanner and spamassassin and they are working great. Now I would like to introduce some more filtering, such as moving tagged items to a separate mailbox/mailboxes (depending on recipient), etc. Can this be done in SA ? Any advice

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering.

2003-11-15 Thread Nix
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Rajdeep Larha stipulated: Hi Jennifer, I read your mail. But this is something little above it. There are certain words in 20_porn.cf. When I use only those words even then the rating given is too low. I used 5 words from the list in same case.. even then the mail was

[SAtalk] Filtering.

2003-11-11 Thread Rajdeep Larha
I have successfully installed the SA. but I am not able to filer the content. Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the rules directory but not getting filter. What I have to do with this? For e.g I have to filter the vulgar stuff. But it does not filterit. My local.cf is as follows:- #

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering.

2003-11-11 Thread Matt Kettler
At 12:31 PM 11/11/2003, Rajdeep Larha wrote: I have successfully installed the SA. but I am not able to filer the content. Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the rules directory but not getting filter. Um what do you mean by Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the rules

RE: [SAtalk] Filtering.

2003-11-11 Thread Jennifer Wheeler
Hi Rajdeep, I have successfully installed the SA. but I am not able to filer the content. Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the rules directory but not getting filter. What I have to do with this? For e.g I have to filter the vulgar stuff. But it does not filterit. My local.cf is

RE: [SAtalk] Filtering.

2003-11-11 Thread Rajdeep Larha
: [SAtalk] Filtering. Okay, I think I am with you now. It looks like you are set up fine. When I first set up SA, I had to add *many* rules. Especially porn rules. I haven't done the upgrade yet, so I don't know what they added to that porn.cf. It was too liberal for me, so I added a LOT of porn rules

[SAtalk] Filtering on returned mails not written with my mail client

2003-11-08 Thread Wolfgang Rohdewald
Hi, I'm new on this list, hoping this is not a FAQ (at least I found no such rule and no bug report) Is there a rule saying oh - this mail claiming to be from me has been returned as undeliverable. But is has not been written with the mail client(s) I use - so it must be spam. (or - it does not

RE: [SAtalk] Filtering on returned mails not written with my mail client

2003-11-08 Thread Tom Meunier
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Rohdewald Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 8:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Filtering on returned mails not written with my mail client Hi, I'm new on this list, hoping this is not a FAQ (at least I

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering on returned mails not written with my mail client

2003-11-08 Thread Wolfgang Rohdewald
On 08.11.2003 15:33, Tom Meunier wrote: No. How would this be a bug? I never said so. I only said I would write a bug report. Of course in the category enhancement. This would be clearer if the bug list had a better name, maybe todo list. By definition it would have to be a custom rule,

RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Filtering mailsl without text

2003-10-28 Thread Chris Santerre
We really do think very much alike! rawbody RM_rb_TITLE /title/i describe RM_rb_TITLE Testing for HTML title in emails scoreRM_rb_TITLE 0.001 I have the EXACT same rule for testing! Been using it for a while. I will posts the stats next week with update. But the ratio is

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering mailsl without text

2003-10-27 Thread Keith C. Ivey
Robert Menschel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # RM rules to identify a completely empty HTML email header RM_hc_HTML Content-Type =~ /text\/html/ describe RM_hc_HTML Email is text/html format scoreRM_hc_HTML 0.001 That seems to be pretty similar to the existing MIME_HTML_ONLY

Re[2]: [SAtalk] Filtering mailsl without text

2003-10-27 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Keith, Monday, October 27, 2003, 5:03:57 AM, you wrote: KCI Robert Menschel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # RM rules to identify a completely empty HTML email header RM_hc_HTML Content-Type =~ /text\/html/ describe RM_hc_HTML Email

[SAtalk] Filtering mailsl without text

2003-10-26 Thread Andrea Riela
Hi folks, Now I'm receiving spam: - hi as subject - without text in the body (html or not). Have you got any idea to filter those? Thanks very much Andrea --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering mailsl without text

2003-10-26 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello Andrea, Sunday, October 26, 2003, 6:08:02 PM, you wrote: AR Hi folks, AR Now I'm receiving spam: AR - hi as subject AR - without text in the body (html or not). AR Have you got any idea to filter those? I think I've developed a set of filters for that. They have a content type of

[SAtalk] Filtering envelope to (was: Info about blacklist_to)

2003-10-06 Thread Andrea Riela
Hi folks, My problem is filter spam to nonexistent account. How could I do? Thanks Andrea --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___

RE: [SAtalk] Filtering envelope to (was: Info about blacklist_to)

2003-10-06 Thread Paul Hutchings
Riela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 October 2003 13:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Filtering envelope to (was: Info about blacklist_to) Hi folks, My problem is filter spam to nonexistent account. How could I do? Thanks Andrea

Re: [SAtalk] filtering bad words

2003-09-30 Thread A nonymous
Hi Jeff, Yes, but... how do you get a word like 'CensoredByServer' or other nasty word associated with the symbol 'BAD_WORD' in your example? Here's an example that seems to be working. in /etc/mail/spamassassin/ myphrases.cf header SUBJ_VICODIN Subject =~ /vicodin/i describe

Re: [SAtalk] filtering bad words

2003-09-29 Thread SikaSpam
I have checked the documents but it is not clear where we can add additional bad words for porn scoring. I've checked 20_porn.cf but I'm not sure what to change in that file. Is there a way to add more bad words in the local.cf file and what would the syntax of the configuration directive look

[SAtalk] filtering bad words

2003-09-29 Thread Jeff Koch
I have checked the documents but it is not clear where we can add additional bad words for porn scoring. I've checked 20_porn.cf but I'm not sure what to change in that file. Is there a way to add more bad words in the local.cf file and what would the syntax of the configuration directive look

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering spam sent to mail aliases

2003-06-17 Thread Owen B. Mehegan
| | | | |-+- -| | | |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |cc: | |Subject: [SAtalk] Filtering spam sent to mail aliases

[SAtalk] Filtering spam sent to mail aliases

2003-06-16 Thread Owen B. Mehegan
I'm running Sendmail on a Linux server, and I currently have Spamassassin set up for my users. Since some of them are untrusting of mail filtering apps, I use individual .forward files to enable SA for users who want it. The .forward calls Procmail, and the user's procmailrc file handles the

[SAtalk] filtering an mbox after installing SA (Forgive me if this is askedalot)

2003-03-12 Thread Brad Wyman
I'm trying to figure out a good way to send mail from my mbox threw SA on a machine that i just finished installing SA on. ie the mail was recived before SA was installed and i want to process it now if i can. anyone got a good one liner for me? -- Brad Wyman |\ _,,,---,,_

[SAtalk] Filtering spam by a Delivered-To header?

2002-04-24 Thread Brian Kendig
I have some old email addresses I no longer use which are getting flooded with spam these days. I want SpamAssassin to automatically tag these as spam. I receive email sent to any address at my domain; my ISP is nice enough to add a 'Delivered-To' header to my incoming email to tell me what

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering spam by a Delivered-To header?

2002-04-24 Thread Matt Sergeant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 24 Apr 2002 3:43 pm, Brian Kendig wrote: I have some old email addresses I no longer use which are getting flooded with spam these days. I want SpamAssassin to automatically tag these as spam. [snip] The spamassassin man page tells

RE: [SAtalk] Filtering spam by a Delivered-To header?

2002-04-24 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
Create custom rule like: header OLDADDRESS Delivered-To =~ /brians-old-address\@enchanter\.net/i describe OLDADDRESS This is an old address score OLDADDRESS 100.0 Now any message with Delivered-To: header will get a score of 100 and therefore get tagged as Spam. --- Ed. I have some old

[SAtalk] filtering through maildrop.

2002-04-18 Thread Brook Humphrey
I have been working in this since I posted last and I get the same behavior from both postfix and qmail. When filtering mail with spamassassin using maildrop for some reason spamd and spamassassin both are giving an exit code that causes maildrop to pass a fial code back to the smtp server.

Re: [SAtalk] filtering through maildrop.

2002-04-18 Thread Dave Weiner
I have been working in this since I posted last and I get the same behavior from both postfix and qmail. When filtering mail with spamassassin using maildrop for some reason spamd and spamassassin both are giving an exit code that causes maildrop to pass a fial code back to the smtp server.

Re: [SAtalk] filtering through maildrop.

2002-04-18 Thread Brook Humphrey
On Thursday 18 April 2002 08:20 am, you wrote: Hello Dave, Hello Brook Post your .mailfilter. I'm using maildrop under qmail 1.03 + vpopmail 5.2 without any problems whatsoever, using spamc/spamd Actually I've done some more testing and for some reason I get the same error's

Re: [SAtalk] filtering through maildrop.

2002-04-18 Thread Dave Weiner
[webmedic@server webmedic]$ cat .mailfilter VERBOSE=9 exception { xfilter spamc -f RETURNCODE=0 EXITCODE=0 } to ./Maildir My guess is a pathing problem. Put the full path to spamc in the xfilter line, like this: xfilter /usr/bin/spamc -f I only tried the exitcode and

Re: [SAtalk] filtering through maildrop.

2002-04-18 Thread Brook Humphrey
On Thursday 18 April 2002 10:13 am, you wrote: Sorry forgot to mention I already tried that. Same problem. Hmmmwhat's showing up in your qmail or postfix logs when the delivery is attempted? Dave Apr 17 22:44:19 server postfix/smtpd[16949]: connect from unknown[127.0.0.1] Apr 17

Re: [SAtalk] filtering on SA score, RFC thoughts.

2002-01-16 Thread Charlie Watts
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Dave Weiner wrote: A quick question for you Charlie. As I'm still learning maildrop's filtering language, if I wanted to grab the score and the required hits, would this work? if (/^X-Spam-Status: *Yes, *hits=![:digit:]+ required=![:digit:]+.*/) { # do something here