Hi Ketan,
Thanks for your comments at the mic and on the list.
Yes in RFC 8986 SRv6 End.X was extended to identify L2bundle member link, we
will not argue whether that is the best approach or not, but that is different
from the case here.
A L2 bundle member link is associated with an L3
Hi Sasha,
Thanks for your question at the mic. Please see some replies inline:
From: Alexander Vainshtein
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2024 5:27
To: draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programm...@ietf.org
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] My question
Hi Bruno,
Thanks a lot for the review and valuable comments. Sorry I missed this mail
during the travel to IETF.
The authors will reply to these comments and produce a new revision
accordingly.
Best regards,
Jie
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 10:59 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: spring@ietf.org; chen@zte.com.cn; linchangwang
Subject: Re: [spring] Re: I-D Action:
draft-dong-spring-sr-policy-with-nrp-00.txt
Jie:
Thanks for following up on the discussion from the idr interim meeting and
putting
y 4, 2024 11:39 PM
> To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; t...@ietf.org
> Cc: SPRING WG List
> Subject: [Teas] Re: [spring] Spring-Teas NRP inconsistency:
> draft-ietf-teas-nrp-scalability
>
> I may have misunderstood this email. You seem to have highlighted the
> contradiction between the
are welcome to join.
Best regards,
Jie
From: linchangwang [mailto:linchangwang.04...@h3c.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2024 7:38 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; chen@zte.com.cn
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-dong-spring-sr-policy-with-nrp-00.txt
Hi Jie,
I reviewed the draft
Hi Joel,
So sorry that I missed this mail in the whole June.
I assume you are talking about the following text in
draft-ietf-teas-nrp-scalability-04:
Assuming that an external mechanism can deal with path calculation
and selection, it is desirable that in the calculated path
and discuss this draft in the upcoming IETF 120 meeting.
Best regards,
Jie
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 9:35 AM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Liuyan Han
; Minxue Wang ; Ran Chen
; Zongpeng Du
Subject: New
, it seems my name was shown on another draft by mistake, which has been
fixed quickly.
Best regards,
Jie
From: chen@zte.com.cn [mailto:chen@zte.com.cn]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 3:10 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-dong-spring-sr-policy-with-nrp-00
Hi Robert,
Please see further inline with [Jie#2]:
From: Robert Raszuk
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 5:16 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: SPRING WG
Subject: Re: [spring] Fwd: I-D Action:
draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments-09.txt
Hi Jie,
> [Jie] The forwarding plane need to support s
Hi Robert,
Thanks for your review and comments, please see some replies inline:
From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:rob...@raszuk.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 4:06 PM
To: SPRING WG
Subject: [spring] Fwd: I-D Action:
draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments-09.txt
Dear Authors & Contributors of
To: Alvaro Retana
Cc: draft-cheng-spring-s
; chengweiqiang
; Dongjie (Jimmy) ;
spring-chairs ; draft-ietf-spring-re
; spring
Subject: Re:Re: [spring] Relationship
betweendraft-cheng-spring-srv6-policy-resource-gurantee
anddraft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments
Hi Alvaro,
Thanks for your
to improve the
readability and facilitate the understanding of its targeted scenarios.
As always review and comments are welcome.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 4:58 PM
> To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Liuyan Han
>
Vainshtein [mailto:alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 5:04 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segme...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; Acee
Lindem ; Gyan Mishra
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [spring] Intended status of
draft-ietf-spring-resource
:00 PM
To: Gyan Mishra
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segme...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org;
Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [spring] Intended status of
draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments
Gyan, and all,
I have re-read the
draft<https://datatracker.ietf.
will
continue there.
Hope this helps to align our understanding on this document.
Best regards,
Jie
From: Gyan Mishra [mailto:hayabusa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 2:02 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: Alexander Vainshtein ;
draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segme...@ietf.org
Hi Joel,
I have reviewed the latest version of this document and found it in a good
shape, it describes a fundamental mechanism of SRv6, which has become popular
in many SRv6 deployments, thus I support its publication.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On
Hi Sasha,
Thanks for the review and comment on this document.
Although this draft does not introduce new SR segment type/SRv6 behavior, there
is change in the semantics and forwarding behavior of the resource-aware
segments, as each resource-aware SIDs identifies a subset of the network
Hi Acee and Chongfeng,
First of all, as a coauthor I support to progress this document to publication.
Please see some replies inline:
发件人：Chongfeng Xie
收件人：Acee Lindem ;lsr ;teas
;spring
时 间：2024-01-20 10:44:46
主 题：Re: [Lsr] [spring] Shepherd's Review of "Applicability of IS-IS
Hi Joel,
The authors’ resolution of issue 1 looks good to me, and I’d consider issue 1
as closed.
This document is currently in a stable and good shape to move forward. Thanks
for all the good work of the editors, authors and WG chairs.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring On Behalf Of Joel
Hi Chairs,
I've read the latest version of this document and think it is a good starting
point to describe a specific usage of SR policy to mimic the characteristics of
circuit-based transport paths. Thus I support the adoption.
I used to have comments about how bandwidth guarantee is
, 2023 12:29 AM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz) ; Alexander Vainshtein
;
draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: A technical concern regarding
draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy-00
Hi Dongjie,
As long as traffic of a CS-SR policy
Schmutzer (cschmutz) [mailto:cschm...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 6:37 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Alexander Vainshtein
Cc: Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz) ;
draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: A technical concern regarding
draft-schmutzer-spring
Congratulations to Jim! Thank you for your excellent work in chairing SPRING
and SFC.
Welcome Alvaro and look forward to more collaborations!
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring On Behalf Of Andrew Alston - IETF
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 9:43 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Changes of
Hi Weiqiang,
Thanks for addressing my comments made on IETF 115 meeting, it is good to see
this version refers to draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments.
This document focuses on introducing resource guarantee to SR policies, which
is one of the use cases of resource-aware segments. It may
Hi Huaimo,
Thanks for drawing the attention on this document.
Here are some review comments for your consideration.
1. In section 3.1:
A Repair List RL is obtained based on the path. It is one of the followings:
o RL = if the path does not go through PE A; Or
o RL = if
Hi WG,
I've reviewed this document and think it is ready for WG adoption. The proposed
mechanism is mostly suitable for SRv6 networks, where usually the measurement
on only the segment endpoints is needed, thus the overhead on the transit nodes
can be reduced.
Best regards,
Jie
>
Hi Sasha,
Thanks for the useful discussion. Please see some replies inline:
From: Alexander Vainshtein
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 3:02 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: 韩柳燕 ;
draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programm...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org;
Michael Gorokhovsky ; Nitsan Dolev
; Rotem
path information in control plane.
With the above difference, do you think a new variant of End.X behavior is
needed? Thanks.
Best regards,
Jie
From: Alexander Vainshtein
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 6:50 AM
To: 韩柳燕 ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ;
draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programm
it is necessary to distinguish them
from the normal IP links.
Best regards,
Jie
From: Alexander Vainshtein
Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 1:20 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programm...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org;
Michael Gorokhovsky ; Nitsan Dolev
; Rotem Cohen
Hi Ketan,
In the use cases presented during the meeting, no IP address needs to be
provisioned on the endpoints of the underlay path, thus to my understanding
they are not IP enabled optical paths.
Best regards,
Jie
From: Ketan Talaulikar
Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 10:33 AM
To:
Hi Sasha,
This is a good question. I tried to answer your question on the mic. My reply
was that such information may be obtained as part of the underlay path
instantiation via either control plane or management plane.
The detail of layer-2 encapsulation is not covered in the current draft. We
believe it is ready for WG adoption, and would like to request WG
chairs to start the process.
Many thanks,
Jie (on behalf of coauthors)
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 6:26 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Ran Pang
Hi WG,
This is just a keepalive revision. More updates will be provided in next
version.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 3:39 PM
> To:
Hi WG,
This is just a keepalive revision. More updates will be provided in next
version.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 3:34 PM
> To:
Hi Sasha and Christian,
To my understanding the potential services of CS-SR require some level of
performance guarantee, which means the traffic needs to be distinguished from
other traffic in the network and be treated separately. As discussed in this
thread, one approach would be to steer
Hi WG,
I've read this document and support its adoption.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 6:19 PM
To: SPRING WG
Subject: [spring] WG adoption call -
Hi Adrian,
Thanks a lot for the review and comments. And please see come replies inline:
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2022 2:16 AM
> To: draft-ietf-spring-sr-for-enhanced-...@ietf.org
> Cc: spring@ietf.org
> Subject:
Hi Rajesh,
My understanding is if you have END.REPLACE and END.REPLACEB6 for the option C
case, then for option B you may also need two separate behaviors, one is
END.DB6 which is for replacing the VPN SID and encapsulate an SRH, the other
one is for replacing the VPN SID (by removing the
I've read the latest version of this document and found it provides practical
mechanisms for SRv6 compression. It is in the right direction and the maturity
has reached the bar for WG adoption.
Thus I support the adoption of this document.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring
Dear WG,
I support the adoption of both drafts. Many thanks to the Design Team members
for their hard work and contributions made.
Best Regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 9:13 PM
To:
Hi,
Please see comments inline with [Jie]:
From: Tarek Saad [mailto:tsaad@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 1:05 AM
To: John E Drake ; Lizhenbin ; TEAS
WG
Cc: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; spring@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org; 龚立艳
; draft-filsfils-sprin
; draft-ali-teas-sprin
; ext-vishnupa
Dear chairs,
I believe the WG should standardize a single data plane solution.
I fully agree with Dhruv that the cost of multiple data plane for SRv6
compression would be unaffordable and the interoperable deployment would suffer
from it.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
>
I support the publication of this document.
It provides useful functionality for several use cases and there are
implementations and deployments.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 9:03 PM
To: James Guichard
Binding SIDs (functions),
each may be applicable in a particular case. Feedbacks on these BSID types are
appreciated.
Best regards,
Jie
From: Gyan Mishra [mailto:hayabusa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2021 3:09 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: spring@ietf.org; xie...@chinatelecom.cn
Subject: Re
SDOs needs to be aligned, or the
relationship and mapping between different terms could be defined.
Best regards,
Jie
From: xie...@chinatelecom.cn<mailto:xie...@chinatelecom.cn>
[mailto:xie...@chinatelecom.cn]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 5:18 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) mailto:jie.d...@huaw
Hi WG,
Recently we published a new draft on Segment Routing for End-to-End IETF
Network Slicing:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-spring-sr-e2e-ietf-network-slicing
It introduces the new SRv6 behaviors and SR-MPLS BSIDs to enable the mapping
and concatenation of multi-domain
Hi Bruno,
I've read this document and support its publication.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 1:45 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-nsh...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Last Call
Dear WG,
We've submitted a new version of draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments.
Based on the comments and suggestions received, further clarifications about
the semantics of resource-aware SID are added. More specifically, the semantics
of resource-aware prefix-SID and its associated
Hi chairs,
Thanks a lot for your guidance. We have uploaded this document as
draft-ietf-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn, and will continue to work on both
draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments and this document.
And I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring
Hi Shunsuke,
Thanks a lot for your review and comments. Please see some replies inline:
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shunsuke Homma
Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 12:05 AM
To: James Guichard
Cc: spring@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
peng.sha...@zte.com.cn
Sent: Sunday, February 7, 2021 11:53 AM
To: james.n.guich...@futurewei.com
Cc: spring@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn
Hi
Hi Xuesong,
Thanks for your support and comment.
As this document mainly describes the SR data plane mechanisms and the
procedures of building SR based VTNs, the descriptions about the control plane
are brief, and the details are left to the control plane drafts. That said, we
could add some
Hi Robert,
Thanks for explaining your comments further.
We will revise the descriptions about RSVP-TE [RFC3209] to make this clear.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 8:46 AM
To: Adrian Farrel
Cc: James
Hi Robert,
From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:rob...@raszuk.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 6:52 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: James Guichard ; spring@ietf.org;
spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn
Jie,
Can you perhaps say exactly
Hi Robert,
From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:rob...@raszuk.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 1:01 AM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: James Guichard ; spring@ietf.org;
spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn
Jie,
> [Jie] Ag
Hi Robert,
Thanks for your email. Please see some replies inline with [Jie]:
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 8:03 PM
To: James Guichard
Cc: spring@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call
Yes, support. It provides a useful mechanism for path identification, and can
be used for many related functions.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 1:39 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
and comments are welcome.
Best regards,
Jie
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 2:23 PM
To: Takuya Miyasaka ; Fengwei Qin
; Francois Clad ; Zhenqiang Li
; Stewart Bryant ; Dongjie
(Jimmy) ; Yongqing Zhu
Subject
Hi all,
In my understanding, the objective and constraint with SR explicit path (aka.
TE) and SR loose path may be different.
As Zhenqiang mentioned, an SR-TE path with a list of adj/End.X SIDs reflects
the policy of the controller or the headend node, which may imply that a backup
path that
Hi Chairs,
Thanks a lot for your guidance in moving forward with this document. We have
submitted the first part as standard track, and will continue to work on the
rest as informational.
And I am unaware of any undisclosed relevant IPR.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring
Hi Tarek,
Thanks for your comment, please see some replies inline:
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tarek Saad
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 2:57 AM
To: James Guichard ; spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for
Hi Dhruv,
Thanks for your support and comments. Please see some replies inline:
> -Original Message-
> From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
> Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 1:28 AM
> To: James Guichard
> Cc: spring@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org
>
Hi Ketan,
Thanks for your comment and support. Please see some replies inline:
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ketan Talaulikar
(ketant)
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 2:27 AM
To: James Guichard
mailto:james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>>;
Hi Ran,
Thanks for your comments. While I don’t quite get your point of objection.
Perhaps you have some misunderstanding about the relationship of the drafts
mentioned.
RFC 8402 introduced the topology and service semantics of SR SID, this document
proposed to add resource semantics to
Hi Linda,
Thanks a lot for your support and comments. Please see some replies inline with
[Jie]:
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 4:54 AM
To: James Guichard ; spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this document.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 5:52 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this draft.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 11:38 PM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang
regards,
Jie
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 10:46 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Fengwei Qin
; Zhenqiang Li ; Francois
Clad ; Stewart Bryant ; Yongqing Zhu
; Takuya Miyasaka
Subject: New Version Notification
Yes, support.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 1:59 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG LC
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG:
for the design team. Does this solve your comment?
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:44 AM
> To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; 'SPRING WG'
> Subject: Re: [spring] FW: New Version Notification f
[mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 5:22 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Yongqing Zhu
; Takuya Miyasaka ; Fengwei Qin
; Stewart Bryant ;
Zhenqiang Li
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-08.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-dong-spring-sr
Thanks to Rob for your hard work, thanks to Bruno for your continued support,
and welcome Jim and Joel.
Look forward to more achievements in SPRING.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin
> Vigoureux
> Sent: Monday,
e progress of adoption.
The next step for the authors is to provide a new revision of the draft based
on these received comments. Thanks.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dongjie (Jimmy)
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 6:38 PM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: draft-dong
the document type later.
Best regards,
Jie
From: Takuya Miyasaka [mailto:ta-miyas...@kddi-research.jp]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 2:04 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Alexander Vainshtein
; Mach Chen
Cc: 'SPRING WG' ; Joel M. Halpern ;
draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-...@ietf.org; qinfengwei
Subject: Re
(NSB - CN/Shanghai) [mailto:weibin.w...@nokia-sbell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 2:47 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Alexander Vainshtein
; Mach Chen
Cc: 'SPRING WG' ; Joel M. Halpern ;
draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-...@ietf.org; qinfengwei
Subject: RE: [spring] 答复: Progressing draft-dong
e
meaning is "allocating dedicated network resources", i.e. resource isolation,
the description could be clarified further.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Halpern Direct [mailto:jmh.dir...@joelhalpern.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 10:08 PM
>
y, May 21, 2020 11:01 AM
> To: qinfengwei ; Dongjie (Jimmy)
> ; 'SPRING WG'
> Cc: draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [spring] 答复: Progressing
> draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn to enable SR with resource
> management
>
> This email (and the un
Hi all,
The latest version of draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn was uploaded in
March, which describes a generic enhancement to SR to support resource
representation and identification, by introducing the resource semantics to SR
SIDs. With such enhancement, SR could be used not only for
Hi Ketan,
After reading the discussion between you and Cheng, my understanding is that
you are converging on the technical parts, and some additional description
would help.
As for where such description belongs to, IMO it depends on whether it is about
generic path MTU computation and
Hi Ran,
Thanks for your feedback. Please see my replies inline with [Jie]:
From: chen@zte.com.cn [mailto:chen@zte.com.cn]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 12:08 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: spring@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org
Subject: Re:[spring] FW: New Version
adoption, and thus solicit
the WG to consider initiating the adoption poll on it. Thanks.
Best regards,
Jie
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 4:33 PM
To: Takuya Miyasaka ; Dongjie (Jimmy)
; Stewart Bryant
+1
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lizhenbin
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 7:55 PM
To: bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG List'
Cc: 6...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Subject: [spring] Request to close the LC and move
Hi,
I support the early allocation.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 12:54 AM
To: SPRING WG
Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early
Allocation Call
Hi
Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 5:13 PM
To: Takuya Miyasaka ; Zhenqiang Li
; Fengwei Qin ; Stewart
Bryant ; Yongqing Zhu ;
Dongjie (Jimmy)
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn
pring-cha...@ietf.org>; Dongjie (Jimmy)
mailto:jie.d...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: Request for WG adoption of draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-05
Hi all,
I have read the document and I think that matches the two criteria that are
usually considered for deciding whether the draft
; Stewart
Bryant ; Yongqing Zhu ;
Dongjie (Jimmy)
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-05.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-05.txt
has been successfully submitted by Jie Dong and posted to the IETF repository.
Name
Hi Rob and Bruno,
I’d like to request a 10 mins time slot in SPRING session to present the
following topic:
Name of draft: draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-04
Speaker: Jie Dong
Amount of time: 10 mins
A email highlighting the changes in the updated version has been sent to the
list.
-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2019 8:14 PM
To: Takuya Miyasaka ; Zhenqiang Li
; Fengwei Qin ; Yongqing
Zhu ; Stewart Bryant ; Dongjie
(Jimmy)
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-04.txt
A n
Hi,
Yes, support the adoption. The SR based service chaining mechanism and the SR
proxy behaviors defined in this document are useful for achieving service
programming in both SR-MPLS and SRv6 networks.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rob Shakir
Hi,
Yes, support the adoption. This document is useful in some scenarios to obtain
the benefit of both NSH and SR.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rob Shakir
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 2:14 PM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption
respectively. Then we will give more details about the preferred option in next
revision.
Comment is always welcome. Thanks.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 5:45 PM
>
Yes, support.
This document is fundamental to SRv6, and there are several drafts relying on
its progress.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 2:50 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc:
Support the adoption. This document defines useful functionality for the OAM
and protection of SR path.
Best regards,
Jie
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表
> bruno.decra...@orange.com
> 发送时间: 2019年2月20日 17:04
> 收件人: SPRING WG
> 抄送:
FYI we have submitted a draft in LSR WG on the IGP extensions for SR based
enhanced VPN.
This is an accompanying document of draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-00.
Comments are welcome.
Best regards,
Jie
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Hi Bruno,
The updated charter text looks good to me. Thanks.
For the work item “new types of segments mapping to forwarding behavior (e.g.
local ingress replication, local forwarding resources, a pre-existing
replication structure) if needed for new usages.”, the enhanced VPN drafts has
Hi Bruno,
I’d like to request for 15 minutes to present the update of
draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn. Speaker will be myself. Thanks.
Best regards,
Jie
发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 bruno.decra...@orange.com
发送时间: 2018年6月18日 18:30
收件人: spring@ietf.org
主题: [spring] IETF
...@telekom.de]
发送时间: 2018年6月13日 21:17
收件人: Dongjie (Jimmy)
抄送: spring@ietf.org
主题: AW: [spring] Updating the SPRING WG Charter
Dear Ji,
you’ve written „Although SR can rely on the network controller for global
traffic optimization and placement, there is no mechanism to provide resource
guarantee
,
and it would be very helpful to concentrate on constructive discussion of those
topics.
Best regards,
Jie
发件人: Zafar Ali (zali) [mailto:z...@cisco.com]
发送时间: 2018年6月14日 19:44
收件人: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Zafar Ali (zali)
; bruno.decra...@orange.com
抄送: SPRING WG List ; Rob Shakir
; Zafar Ali (zali
Hi Zafar,
As mentioned in my previous mail, the VPN+ drafts and this work item require
new functionality to be added to SR, which is to associate SR with particular
allocated resources and treatment. IMO this is not covered by existing SR
mechanisms. It is different from Diffserv QoS, and it
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
