RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread A.P.Silva
Todd, I don't think it works that way. With the assembly, there is a higher pressure loss, hence a reduced flow. The pressure is not important. The bucket test is done to measure the flow. GENERALLY, the actual flow without the test assembly should be higher than the the measured flow. I emphasize

Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread å . . . . . . .
Voice alarm with fault ridden smokes is still the same old joke: this time -- not by howling from a wolf in sheep's clothing, but by a human voice in a more expensive device that does little to correct the repetitive numbing effect. scot deal excelsior fire ___

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Tom Duross
I still have mine in my Basement Todd. 5' piece of 4" PVC drain pipe with a 4" female pvc end glued. 4" male pvc plug with a 1" hole drilled in the center goes into the female end. 1/2" x 4" nipple to a ball valve, another nipple and coupling with a fused head to match the house system heads. Th

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Phelps, Mark
reball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus,

Re: archive

2009-12-21 Thread Roland Huggins
I don't know the answer but have forwarded to those that do. Unfortunately it will be after the holiday vacation before we have an answer. Roland On Dec 16, 2009, at 4:11 AM, Dewayne Martinez wrote: > Is there any way to search the archives for material older than 5 > months? I liked the o

RE: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread David de Vries
Wow.  So even four year olds on the west coast know about our sad situation* here.  It will take a long time to live this down. *For Mr. Muncy's benefit, we are talking about our retrofit ordinance that exempts residential high-rise buildings built before 1975 as long as they have compartmentat

RE: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread Steve Leyton
It makes me so proud ... . Ask him what Jay Cutler says and he'll tell you, "Wah!" Steve Leyton Protection Design & Consulting San Diego, CA -Original Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Terri

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Steve Leyton
pp...@firesprinkler.org To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4707 (20091221) __ The message was checked by

RE: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread Terri Leyton
This is off topic, but I had to share. Sorry Mr. Muncy, in advance... - David - aka Mr. Chicago, If you ask the 4-year old Little Leyton: "Who is the biggest cry-baby in the NFL???" His response is: "Jay Cutler." Go Bolts. Terri Simmons Leyton PROTECTION DESIGN & CONSULTING Ph: 

Re: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread David de Vries
794 to 113. Dave David A. de Vries, P.E., CSP Firetech Engineering Incorporated --- On Mon, 12/21/09, Ron Greenman wrote: From: Ron Greenman Subject: Re: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please! To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Date: Monday, December 21, 2009, 5:09 PM John,

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Mike Cabral
I think the bucket test started because Uponor still requires it for their multi port (all 1/2" pex pipe network system. Mike Cabral Thom McMahon wrote: > I believe that I will submit a proposal to the next round of 13D to prohibit > bucket tests due to the lack of any standard or appreci

Re: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread David de Vries
I am taking all of these backhanded compliments about Chicago in stride here.  Having lived in the city for more than 30 years, before moving a few miles north, I came to appreciate the windy city's unofficial motto:  vote early and often.  That's the way we get things done.  Nice to know we can

Re: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread Ron Greenman
John, I voted for your father also. I'm sure he'd have liked that. I also voted for all the NAHB guys I know because they'll be needing some help later. On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:36 PM, John Denhardt wrote: > Same here.  10 times.  I voted for my father.  He passed away 4 years ago.   > Love you

RE: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread John Denhardt
Same here. 10 times. I voted for my father. He passed away 4 years ago. Love you dad. John John August Denhardt, P.E. Strickland Fire Protection Incorporated 5113 Berwyn Road College Park, Maryland 20740 Office Telephone Number: 301-474-1136 Mobile Telephone Number: 301-343-1457 FIRE SPRIN

RE: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread Steve Leyton
unsubscribe in the subject field) __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4707 (20091221) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signatu

Re: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread Ron Greenman
So when I went back to vote again another person had voted no. I voted yes two more times after the second. I feel like I'm in Chicago. On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Ron Greenman wrote: > Done! And I may vote again. > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Terri Leyton > wrote: >> A local TV stat

Re: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread Ron Greenman
Done! And I may vote again. On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Terri Leyton wrote: > A local TV station in Pennsylvania is doing an online poll on > residential fire sprinklers, today only. > > Please take a moment to "click and vote". > > Thanks!  A safe and Happy Holiday to ALL! > > > > http://ww

Re: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread Ron Greenman
After the NAHB's "statistics" how irrelevant cane they be. We're just balancing the system if you ask me. On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:12 PM, wrote: > So the numbers will be irrelevant. > > > Craig L. Prahl, CET > Fire Protection Specialist > Mechanical Department > CH2MHILL > Lockwood Greene > 150

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Thom McMahon
I believe that I will submit a proposal to the next round of 13D to prohibit bucket tests due to the lack of any standard or appreciable value and added expense to a system in which "Affordable" has always been an important part of the decision tree. Thom McMahon, SET Firetech, Inc. 2560 Copper Ri

RE: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread Craig.Prahl
So the numbers will be irrelevant. Craig L. Prahl, CET Fire Protection Specialist Mechanical Department CH2MHILL Lockwood Greene 1500 International Drive PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 Direct - 864.599.4102 Fax - 864.599.8439 craig.pr...@ch2m.com http://www.ch2m.com -Original

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Jim Johnston
Washington State Fire Marshals Office has an acceptance testing form, the bucket test is written on the form if the local AHJ requires it. In one area that we work there isn't a lot of information with regard to the underground distribution system, so the AHJ requires the test, if the end results

RE: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread George Church
Uh, did you know you can back up and vote again? A friend in Chicago noted that to me. -Original Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Eric Tysinger Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 4:57 PM To: sprinklerforum@f

Re: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Ron Greenman
David, Nowhere in NFPA. In Washington it's: WAC 212-80-088 Contractor's materials and test certificates. (1) The design certificate of competency holder shall complete the contractor's material and test certificate(s), affix his/her certificate of competency stamp, and forward the certificate(s)

RE: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread Eric Tysinger
655/105 Keep them going. Thanks, Eric Tysinger CET NICET 108988 Designer Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc. 4370 Motorsport Drive Concord, NC 28027 p: (704)782-3032 f: (704)795-6838 C: (239)633-9703 -Original Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerfo

RE: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread Terri Leyton
I sent the link to some large CA groups about an hour ago - the vote count was 274 then... HeHe indeed. Terri Simmons Leyton PROTECTION DESIGN & CONSULTING Ph:  858-751-2930 - ext. 101 Fax:    858-751-2933 Cell:  619-871-8450 If you do not have a dream in your pocket, run, don't walk, and fi

RE: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread John Drucker
Now 637 John -Original Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 4:45 PM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW pleas

RE: Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread Chris Cahill
Hehe, 633 for sprinklers 103 against at 4:44 PA local time. Methinks the sampling population has been skewed a bit. Chris Cahill, P.E. Fire Protection Engineer Sentry Fire Protection, Inc. 763-658-4483 763-658-4921 fax Email: chr...@sentryfiremn.com Mail: P.O. Box 69 Waverly, MN 55

Re: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Todd Williams
I agree with Ron that there seem to be as many variations of this test as there are people doing it and it can be of marginal value. I built a simulation of a bucket test on Autosprink. I removed the two remote sprinklers on a system and replaced them with the following assembly: 1/2" x 0-4 nip

RE: Residential Anti-Freeze Systems

2009-12-21 Thread Jim Johnston
Scott, We post a sign on the riser that spells out the requirements for annual testing, it sums up 4.2.4, we tell the owner we will be happy to provide this service, but presently none have taken us up on it. My personal thoughts is in the residential world antifreeze is not a good option due to

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread George Church
Whenever the AHJ says he wants on in 13d where the calcs don't have the same intestinal fortitude as our 13R and 13 calcs. Which begs the question- why do a bucket test if you did "real calcs"? glc -Original Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-b

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Autry, David
I've heard of it, seen the video, now it's being discussed here. Where is the requirement for a bucket test? David Autry Plans Examiner Nebraska State Fire Marshal's Office 246 S. 14th Street Lincoln, NE 68508 402-471-9659 402-471-3118 fax www.sfm.ne.gov ___

RE: Residential Anti-Freeze Systems

2009-12-21 Thread Scott A. Futrell
Out of curiosity: How will the annual testing of the antifreeze be accomplished? 4.2.4 (2007), Before freezing weather each year, the following procedure shall be performed: (1) Solution in the entire antifreeze system emptied into convenient containers. (2) Solution brought to the proper

Vote for Residential Sprinklers - NOW please!

2009-12-21 Thread Terri Leyton
A local TV station in Pennsylvania is doing an online poll on residential fire sprinklers, today only. Please take a moment to "click and vote". Thanks! A safe and Happy Holiday to ALL! http://www.wjactv.com/news/1960993/detail.html Terri Terri Simmons Leyton PROTECTION DESIGN &

John Stempo is out of the office.

2009-12-21 Thread JStempo
I will be out of the office starting 12/19/2009 and will not return until 01/04/2010. I will be periodically checking my emails throughout this time, but if you need immediate assistance, please contact Pam Hetzel (phet...@victaulic.com) at ext. 3451 or Eric McWhirter (emcwhir...@victaulic.com)

Ace hardware classification

2009-12-21 Thread å . . . . . . .
Back when 13 used to be 291C?, if i remember correctly, Home Depot called its bulk commodity a Class IV non-encapsulated. There were fires that tested this design, some involving oxidizers. I think the clamoring from NFPA and regulators over these near-misses may have motivated Lowes to ante up

RE: Ace hardware classification

2009-12-21 Thread George Church
Absolutely right. HodgePodge as in any general retail store. Thom, I know you don't want to do it, but the ONLY way to bid this is OH2 and qualify your bis as such, that you're assuming the top shelf is a CAP to signify to employees that storage can't exceed this 12' AFF mark. Cause you know most

Ace hardware classification

2009-12-21 Thread å . . . . . . .
There are all kinds of commodities: flammable liquids, aerosols, expanded Polystyrene plastic insulation, combustible liquids, haz-mats, and your plain vanilla Class I-IV (encapsulated and not), with a variety of: shelves (open or closed), transverse and longitudinal flue widths, and aisle widths,

RE: Ace hardware classification

2009-12-21 Thread David de Vries
I agree with Todd that you would be better off if someone else made the call.  Or are you bidding a design/build project?  Perhaps share the load by hiring an engr as a sub to you.   Other thoughts:   How about the owner's certificate -- now required by 13?  Can you get a commitment on product a

Re: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Ron Greenman
If you follow Owen's advice you will get an inaccurate reading. You are attempting to measure flow at the head with the system pressure at that head behind it. The length of pipe will add, if five feet long, will add 2.17 psi minus the loss through five feet of 1" pipe plus the restriction caused b

RE: Ace hardware classification

2009-12-21 Thread Law, Kevin W
Are they asking you as the sprinkler contractor to determine the commodity class? I am with Mr. Williams that you shouldn't have to make that selection. The commodity class should be called out in the specification with input to the engineer from the AHJ (wether it is the insurance carrier or the

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Todd Williams
100 lbs... not 100 gallons. If your system requires 35 gpm and you do a bucket test for 30 seconds, in theory, you will get at least 17.5 gallons of water. At 8.35 lbs/gallon, that is approximately 146 lbs of water on carpeted, painted and furnished space you will need to remove without spillin

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Matthew J. Willis
Hah!, Not really a punch line, we try to keep several 55 gallon drums around with hose connections made into them. Seems some contractors do not realize what a down piece does or the effect upon the remaining 200 feet of main and branch lines. The unlucky contractor finds out later when they pull

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread George Church
You know you CAN produce a suction line by sucking really hard- the local inspector should have plenty of zip And to get 100 gallons in there in a minute from a K4.4 head, boy you must have tanks atop some really big hills. Like a tank 1,000' uphill, since you'd need about 500 PSI to get 100 G

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread G. Tim Stone
Todd, Pump it off into the nearest toilet or window would be my suggestion. G. Tim Stone NICET Level III Engineering Technician Fire Protection Sprinkler Design and Consulting Services 117 Old Stage Rd. - Essex Jct., VT. 05452 TEL: (802) 434-2968 Fax: (802) 434-4343 ts

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Craig.Prahl
Wow, I was hoping for a better punch-line than that. ;) Craig L. Prahl, CET Fire Protection Specialist Mechanical Department CH2MHILL Lockwood Greene 1500 International Drive PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 Direct - 864.599.4102 Fax - 864.599.8439 craig.pr...@ch2m.com http://www.ch2m

RE: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Matthew J. Willis
Fit the can with a hose connection before hand. R/ Matt Matthew J. Willis, CET Automatic Fire Sprinklers Norred Fire Systems L.L.C. 318-387-1134 Voice 318-387-1163 Facsimile m...@norredfire.com -Original Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-bou

Re: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Todd Williams
Thanks. One question: How do you get a trash can with 100# of water off the third floor of a house without creating a disaster? At 02:11 PM 12/21/2009, you wrote: >Todd, >Take a 1" copper or CPVC pipe, 5' long. On one end place male >threads to be screwed into the over head. At the other end pl

RE: Ace hardware classification

2009-12-21 Thread Todd Williams
I wouldn't make a commodity class call without looking at the actual product. In a perfect world, they should have a PE or at least the insurance carrier making that determination. Does ACE have a standard specification? At 02:03 PM 12/21/2009, you wrote: >We've been looking at an ACE brand h

RE: Bonding of sprinkler systems

2009-12-21 Thread Thomas Reinhardt
Grounding: is the process of bonding one or more conductive objects to the earth so that they are all at zero electrical potential. Bonding: is a process by two or more conductive objects are connected by means of a conductor so that they are at the same electrical potential. The voltage differe

RE: Bonding of sprinkler systems

2009-12-21 Thread Matthew J. Willis
Joe, I would like to see them please. I always assumed bonding meant just that, to make one. This is essential so that all metal components in a structure have a Common path to ground (or Earth for our friends over yonder). I ran into this helping the brother-in-law do electrical service work on

Re: Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Owen Evans
Todd, Take a 1" copper or CPVC pipe, 5' long. On one end place male threads to be screwed into the over head. At the other end place a female connection for the sprinkler head (break the deflector off). In between place a 1/4 turn valve. Place a 30 gal trash can (pre-marked at gallon increments)

RE: Ace hardware classification

2009-12-21 Thread Thom McMahon
We've been looking at an ACE brand hardware/home center store, and trying to decide if it's class III or class IV commodities. They've already screwed up any possible OH II (Mercantile) because they have single row shelves and single row solid shelve racks with the top shelve or solid shelve rack a

RE: Bonding of sprinkler systems

2009-12-21 Thread Gus Olson
Please add me to the photo list. Thanks, Gus Olson gus.ol...@earthlink.net -Original Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Russell Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 1:06 PM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org

RE: Bonding of sprinkler systems

2009-12-21 Thread Russell
Put me down for photos Joe. >To anyone who wants I can forward 2 good pictures that we can debate >whether >it's bonding or grounding. >Joe Burtell Russell Rewis Brown Automatic Sprinklers, Inc. 107C Hemlock Street Valdosta, Georgia 31601 229-244-8130 russ...@brownautomatic.com __

Bucket test

2009-12-21 Thread Todd Williams
Does anyone have a good description of how to do a bucket test? I have a client who has been asked to do one on a 13D system but hasn't done one before. I have a general idea, but would appreciate input from someone with more experience. Todd G. Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting St

RE: Bonding of sprinkler systems

2009-12-21 Thread Steve Leyton
__ Sprinklerforum mailing list Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprink

RE: Bonding of sprinkler systems

2009-12-21 Thread Steve Leyton
ssistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4706 (20091221)

RE: Residential Anti-Freeze Sytems

2009-12-21 Thread Chris Cahill
That'll work. Chris -Original Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Jim Johnston Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 12:10 PM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Residential Anti-Freeze Sytems Are

RE: Bonding of sprinkler systems

2009-12-21 Thread Joe Burtell
To anyone who wants I can forward 2 good pictures that we can debate whether it's bonding or grounding. Joe Burtell -Original Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Sprinkler Academy - C Bilbo Sent: Monday,

RE: Bonding of sprinkler systems

2009-12-21 Thread Sprinkler Academy - C Bilbo
Yo forumites, Bonding is not easy too define in an exact way as totally different from grounding. The difference is in the purpose. -Don't ground something to the sprinkler system that may make the sprinkler system become charged. -Do bond the system to the building and the lightning pr

RE: Residential Anti-Freeze Sytems

2009-12-21 Thread Jim Johnston
Are you talking expansion tank? If so we have those installed. Jim Johnston, P.E. Fire Protection Engineer Inland Fire Protection, Inc 1100 Ahtanum Road Yakima, WA 98903 Phone 509-248-4471 Fax 509-248-1180 j...@inlandfireprotection.com -Original Message- From: Chris Cahill [mailto:chr..

RE: Residential Anti-Freeze Sytems

2009-12-21 Thread Chris Cahill
The only thing I don't see is a mention of temperature related over-pressurization control. Chris Cahill, P.E. Fire Protection Engineer Sentry Fire Protection, Inc. 763-658-4483 763-658-4921 fax Email: chr...@sentryfiremn.com Mail: P.O. Box 69 Waverly, MN 55390 Location: 4439 Hwy

Residential Anti-Freeze Sytems

2009-12-21 Thread Jim Johnston
Does anybody on the forum have experience with residential antifreeze? We have a community in Central Washington where sprinklers are required period no exception, the homes are high-end getaway homes. Some of the clients want antifreeze as a backup measure for freeze protection; we install Fi

Bonding of sprinkler systems

2009-12-21 Thread Steve Leyton
All: There is a current thread on another list that we subscribe to regarding electrical bonding of sprinkler systems.The cited reference is NEC 250.104 Bonding of Piping Systems and Exposed Structural Steel; since I have always subscribed to the "Let Sparky do the wiring" school of electrical

RE: Residential Burn Demo

2009-12-21 Thread George Church
I would hope they do, but I doubt it will bring the outrage it deserves. Residential sprinklers aren't taken for granted (obviously) so its not the same effect as if Detroit starting shipping cars without seat belts, and someone died from smashing the windshield with their face. It'll just be anoth

RE: Residential Burn Demo

2009-12-21 Thread Jim Johnston
Ron, Thanks for sharing this information; I only wish we could get everybody on-board with this. It's too bad that our State Building Codes people felt in their infinite wisdom that residential sprinklers were too costly, obviously in their eyes and the home builders associations eyes a life is a

RE: C factor in old copper pipe

2009-12-21 Thread Todd Williams
There is no practical way to run a flow test on the copper. This is one of several issues at this site including a significant drop in residual pressures in the building. My guess is that the final solution will be to replace the main. Given that we had 16-18" of snow this weekend, nobody is

RE: C factor in old copper pipe

2009-12-21 Thread George Church
Todd, is it possible to run a flow test at the end of the copper line to simply measure the real thing instead of degrading it? We'd had an AHJ want to degrade DI UG down to C=80 or 90, until we removed a section and showed it to him- clean as a whistle, allowed C=140 after all. glc -Origina

RE: C factor in old copper pipe

2009-12-21 Thread Todd Williams
I have no problem with C120 for the pipe from a technical standpoint, but it does make the calcs go over the curve. (2/3 of the system friction loss is in the underground). I have no idea how old the pipe is and there is no cathodic protection that I am aware of. As far as where they came up

schematic diagram?

2009-12-21 Thread Todd Williams
NFPA 13 (2002) section 14.1.3 (4) calls for a section view or "schematic diagram" on all drawings. What do they mean by a schematic drawing? Todd G. Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, Connecticut www.fpdc.com 860.535.2080 ___ S