set metadata.engine.echo=False ?
which revision are u using?
eventuly check for remaining print's somewhere:
grep -R ^ *print /sqlalchemy
or
grep -R ^[^#]*print /sqlalchemy
One of my scripts keeps printing out a bunch of LAZY CLAUSE
statements and I'd like to know how to turn that
how much OO u want?
There is SA, which has ORM layer over sql, so can become a somewhat
object persistency.
There are turboentity/activemapper, currently joining together, which
are simple declarative layer on top of SA.
Then here is this 'sawrapper' of mine, which is also declarative and
svilen wrote:
how much OO u want?
He's not using a DBMS. He has more OO-ness than SA could give him :-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to
I am wondering if there isn't a better way to handle connection issues
than how I am doing it (see the sample below)?
You should give a try with SA 0.3.3 (at least), since several connection
problems have been solved.
See thread MySQL has gone way. Although it talks about MySQL, the bugfix
question.
Lets say I have a series of table definitions, and a series of objects
linked to the tables with a bunch of mappers.
First question: Is there a way to get from the table definitions in
the metadata to the Mapper?
Second question: If I create a MapperExtension, can I then link it to
svilen wrote:
somehow u've managed to have 2 copies of same persistent-object -
which should not happen; how did u get it?
one has unicode-string '6', another one has int 6 instead - some
conversion failing?
ughno!! stop answering all these questions with the wrong
answersit means
before I read the next 10 replies in this thread, this seems like an issue
of too high of a transaction isolation level going on (something that
plagued my SQL server apps when i was writing them, though that was years
ago). cant the connection itself have a more lenient isolation level set
?
I have a directory on my laptop which looks like this:
./sa026
./sa027
./sa028
./sa030
./sa031
...
I set PYTHONPATH to ./lib. I change into each directory and run a
script that id like to compare between versions. No setup.py develop is
required...i dont want to install anything anywhere. I
percious wrote:
question.
Lets say I have a series of table definitions, and a series of objects
linked to the tables with a bunch of mappers.
First question: Is there a way to get from the table definitions in
the metadata to the Mapper?
not conveniently. you could loop through the
python setup.py develop [1] doesn't install anything. It makes a link
to a directory of source code, just like you are doing w/ the
pythonpath, and you only have to run it once. either method is
accomplishing the same thing. I just find workingenv very easy to use
and wanted to share since
question.
Lets say I have a series of table definitions, and a series of
objects linked to the tables with a bunch of mappers.
First question: Is there a way to get from the table definitions
in the metadata to the Mapper?
For simple table==class, the link is 1:1.
For
I should add that you *can* be more creative, and construct each mapper
with a MapperExtension at the beginning which later can be enabled with
a hello world callable. i.e.
class MyExt(MapperExtension):
def __init__(self):
self.func = None
def after_insert(self, ...):
Thanks for the tips, however I mean this DB we have is pure objects,
there are no tables. So there isn't much of a logical leap to strap
python on top of it, however you can't use and SQL. I guess I was
wondering how tied to SQL SA is? If it's fundamental to the core, then
I'm out of luck. But it
Thanks for the tips, however I mean this DB we have is pure
objects, there are no tables.
so u have to define the O-to-R mapping of your objects into tables,
then ...
So there isn't much of a logical leap
to strap python on top of it, however you can't use and SQL. I
guess I was wondering
The following code raises a FlushError because the child object named
Cheshire is an orphan and the delete-orphan cascade rule is in effect.
It seems to me that an orphan which has no database identity should be
detached from its session, just as it was attached when appended to a
parent's list
Forgot to say I'm using SA 0.3.4.
On Feb 9, 5:05 pm, SteveTether [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following code raises a FlushError because the child object named
Cheshire is an orphan and the delete-orphan cascade rule is in effect.
It seems to me that an orphan which has no database identity
16 matches
Mail list logo
