DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23433] - BodyTag.EVAL_BODY_TAG deprecated

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23433] New: - BodyTag.EVAL_BODY_TAG deprecated

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html CheckboxTag.java

dgraham 2003/09/25 23:28:05 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html CheckboxTag.java Log: Refactored the checked logic into a new isChecked() method. Revision ChangesPath 1.21 +32 -21 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/CheckboxTag.j

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html CheckboxTag.java

dgraham 2003/09/25 23:22:05 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html CheckboxTag.java Log: Removed the instanceof String check before calling result.toString(). If result is already a String, there is no harm in calling its toString() method. Revision ChangesPa

Re: TODO and deprecated calls

--- Chris Gastin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just retrieved the head from CVS. I see that there are alot deprecated > calls, and TODOs through out the code. If I startted to clean these up, > how would I get the changes updated into CVS. I am trying to get plugged > into the Struts community, a

TODO and deprecated calls

I just retrieved the head from CVS. I see that there are alot deprecated calls, and TODOs through out the code. If I startted to clean these up, how would I get the changes updated into CVS. I am trying to get plugged into the Struts community, and would love to contribute by doing some of this

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

--- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Graham wrote: > > >--- Sgarlata Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and couldn't > >>find > >>it. > >> > >>How about two simple changes: > >>1) Add a new renderExtraAttributes()

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

--- Chris Gastin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I can tell from the list I have opened topic that is pretty well > beaten. > Let me first apologize. I did not realize this was such a political > topic > in the Struts community. I wouldn't describe anything in Struts as political. We've all ope

Re: Struts 1.1 unittest suite problem

Sorry for the late response. I finally got some time to take a look at this and after fixing a few problems related to cactus configuration, I finally got the tests to run. Unfortunately, a few minutes and 665 tests later it bombed on the ErrorsTag tests. It seems we (committers) have been making

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

Chris Gastin wrote: Rob: I am not an contributer, but I am a young developer. I am willing to step up and support these abilities in the struts tags Great ! I have come to believe that young/single developers & older/grown kids/empty nesters developers are better situated to be Open Source dev

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

Rob: I am not an contributer, but I am a young developer. I am willing to step up and support these abilities in the struts tags Chris Gastin - Original Message - From: "Robert Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22706] - how to execute an initialization method before the first (web-)user interaction (e.g. to create singletons at the very beginning of struts operation)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

David Graham wrote: --- Sgarlata Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and couldn't find it. How about two simple changes: 1) Add a new renderExtraAttributes() method that gives people the chance to throw non-standard HTML into their tags that

Re: struts-chain, wildcards, web services

Don Brown wrote: Unless there are any objections, I'd like to join the struts-chain effort, and hope to put in some time this weekend. I've been experimenting with ways to develop struts forms/actions that can simultaneously be exposed as SOAP web services in stxx (http://stxx.sf.net), but feel t

RE: struts-chain, wildcards, web services

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote: > Shouldn't you be exposing your business objects as web services, not > Struts actions or forms? Struts deals with controlling the user > interface (currently Servlet specific) so any business tier / web > services tier code would be outside of the Struts

RE: struts-chain, wildcards, web services

> -Original Message- > From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: September 25, 2003 6:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: struts-chain, wildcards, web services > ... > > Regarding wildcards > (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21813), > I decided to > hold of

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

Sounds good. I'll put some thought into it. Niall - Original Message - From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:09 AM Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text > > --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22706] - how to execute an initialization method before the first (web-)user interaction (e.g. to create singletons at the very beginning of struts operation)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

The Struts Sourceforge site, http://struts.sf.net, is a good place for such Struts extensions. Don On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Chris Gastin wrote: > As I can tell from the list I have opened topic that is pretty well beaten. > Let me first apologize. I did not realize this was such a political topic >

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

As I can tell from the list I have opened topic that is pretty well beaten. Let me first apologize. I did not realize this was such a political topic in the Struts community. I am starting to think that there should be some sort of Struts Tag Lib Extensions, which would address some of these issu

struts-chain, wildcards, web services

Unless there are any objections, I'd like to join the struts-chain effort, and hope to put in some time this weekend. I've been experimenting with ways to develop struts forms/actions that can simultaneously be exposed as SOAP web services in stxx (http://stxx.sf.net), but feel the struts-chain is

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I submitted a PATCH in May 2001, but it wasn't applied. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01450.html > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1683 That bug is marked fixed but there are no patches attached to it. Thi

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

--- Sgarlata Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and couldn't > find > it. > > How about two simple changes: > 1) Add a new renderExtraAttributes() method that gives people the chance > to > throw non-standard HTML into their tags that extend

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and couldn't find it. How about two simple changes: 1) Add a new renderExtraAttributes() method that gives people the chance to throw non-standard HTML into their tags that extend from Struts tags. Here is a snippet from BaseFieldTag.java:

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and couldn't find it. How about two simple changes: 1) Add a new renderExtraAttributes() method that gives people the chance to throw non-standard HTML into their tags that extend from Struts tags. Here is a snippet from BaseFieldTag.java:

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

I submitted a PATCH in May 2001, but it wasn't applied. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01450.html http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1683 I haven't looked at them for a while but the issue was with the big chunks of code in the doStartTag()/doEndTag() - refactorin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9088] - FormTag.getActionMappingURL() assumes 1 servlet mapping

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9088] - FormTag.getActionMappingURL() assumes 1 servlet mapping

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

--- Edgar P Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it is more than a 'preference' based on the rapidity with which > INVALID or WONTFIX is stamped on tag suggestions and patches. I can't speak for anyone else but here is my view on the tags: There are 3 things that earn my -1 on tag enhance

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23409] - Additional parameters for actions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

I think it is more than a 'preference' based on the rapidity with which INVALID or WONTFIX is stamped on tag suggestions and patches. Perhaps it would be best if the tags were cut loose from struts and a different group of committers were responsible for them. I wouldn't, nor would I expect anyon

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

Edgar P Dollin wrote: If the tags were structured differently so they were easier to extend without breaking when new releases of struts come out these issues might not come up. Of course, I myself have resigned myself to this issue since the tags are such a political football on this list. Edgar

Forking Struts taglibs[ was Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text]

Edgar P Dollin wrote: If the tags were structured differently so they were easier to extend without breaking when new releases of struts come out these issues might not come up. Of course, I myself have resigned myself to this issue since the tags are such a political football on this list. Edgar

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23417] - Would like to add min value and max value to the validator framework

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

David Graham wrote: --- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years, and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts tags. I am not opposed to such a feature, and would support it, though other committers might not

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23417] - Would like to add min value and max value to the validator framework

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23417] - Would like to add min value and max value to the validator framework

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23417] - Would like to add min value and max value to the validator framework

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23417] - Would like to add min value and max value to the validator framework

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

--- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years, > and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts > tags. > > I am not opposed to such a feature, and would support it, > though other committers might not. > > The

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

--- Sgarlata Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone ever discussed adding a general-purpose "attributes" > attribute to > the tag library to support non-standard HTML like this? I'm -1 on any change to the tags that supports non-standard HTML. David > For > example, > > > > Obviousl

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

Sgarlata Matt wrote: Has anyone ever discussed adding a general-purpose "attributes" attribute to the tag library to support non-standard HTML like this? For example, Yes, it was vetoed by several committers. Search the archives. --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23417] New: - Would like to add min value and max value to the validator framework

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

If the tags were structured differently so they were easier to extend without breaking when new releases of struts come out these issues might not come up. Of course, I myself have resigned myself to this issue since the tags are such a political football on this list. Edgar > -Original Mess

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

Has anyone ever discussed adding a general-purpose "attributes" attribute to the tag library to support non-standard HTML like this? For example, Obviously it is better to not include onclick on the attributes attribute, but I just included it as an example. Just a thought... Matt - Orig

Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text

Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years, and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts tags. I am not opposed to such a feature, and would support it, though other committers might not. The key argument against it is that it would transform the html tag

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23407] - ActionMessages toString() method desirable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: How can I extend a Struts tag?

David, You could extend org.apache.struts.taglib.html.TextTag. Add datechooser atribute to your new class. Override the doStartTag() method. In the new doStartTag method first call super.doStartTag() so you maintan the current functionality then put any specific code for adding the datechooser . T

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23409] New: - Additional parameters for actions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23407] New: - ActionMessages toString() method desirable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

How can I extend a Struts tag?

Hi there, I would like to extend the struts tag, so I can add a date chooser popup next to it. I would do this by creating a custom tag, e.g. which adds some extra functionality (and a javascript) to the existing tag. Can somebody tell me which is the best way to do this? I allready searche