[...cut...]
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18066
>
> Arron (or Antoni). Does it seem like there would be an easy patch
> here? Would specifying the type be a reasonable workaround? -- at
> least until we can fix it properly in the next iteration.
>
> If we can swat these tw
-1
Two weeks seems a little tight.
I only say this because the change to the nested tags after RC1 wasn't the
smallest of changes, and I personally feel a little nervous that it would be
shoved out the door with only two weeks on a release. It was a big fix to get
Tomcat 4.1.x going with them, an
> OK, FileUpload 1.0 RC1 is out. I haven't done the announcement yet, or
> updated the web site, but it's there.
>
> The Tomcat build did indeed break, and interested parties can see the
> resulting fun on commons-dev or tomcat-dev. ;-) Thanks to David and Joe
> for their support.
>
> --
> Martin
Already voted. IDEA is being severely robbed, IMHO. And 3000 odd votes from
various users at keyboardmonkey.com would look suss. :P
Eclipse has more users, so I suppose it has to give in, but to JBuilder as
well!??... nah. doesn't bode well.
Arron.
> Ok, now that I've got your attention ;)
>
> What if we compromise on 3 weeks? I understand the tag testing issue but we
> shouldn't be holding back because of documentation issues.
It's all about getting the tags and other changes tested more completely.
(what's documentation? ;)
I can very munch understand something happening for Java
Isn't JSF just another spec like Servlets and JSP?...
Any vendor can make a JSP impl based on the spec, so they should also be able
to make a JSF impl. Struts-Faces allows Struts to play with any compliant JSF
implementation. If it doesn't we get to go Craig-bashing. :)
Struts plays with Servlet/
+1
This puppy's more than stable enough to cut another RC.
I understand why Martin wants the FileUpload to go through the wringer, and it
should, but it's already the most spiffy-est upload component there is. Beta2
of FileUpload has my vote for RC2.
Somehow in all this I get the nagging feeling
> Struts is a product of the Apache Software Foundation...
>
> [cut]
>
> ...we can learn from our mistakes and cut a release
> whenever we add a feature that people can put to good use (instead of
> after we have added a large set of new features).
>
> -Ted.
Couldn't agree more (hence my +1),
I've spent some time fixing (recoding?) a proprietary framework which worked
exactly like JSF's component driven nature (In fact, I wrote their grid
control. Craig- all you had to do was ask :P ). Let me say it has some very
clear appeal to the developer, even though that implementation was very
a
Once a patch is logged against the bug, it waits until a committer has time to
take it on and apply it. This patch will most likely be applied after 1.1,
and before 1.2.
OT: Solnet thrown you into another Struts project?...
At least you don't have to play with RHE's Struts fork we used at Zurich
> > And IDEA may be the best developer's UI ever invented.
>
> Ted, would you mind comparing IDEA to Eclipse a little
> bit, if you have time? Not a full blown feature-by-feature
> review, just highlights.
I've used the latest Eclipse, and it's ok, but it's not IDEA.
Eclipse has many of the feat
-0
Only because there is a bug raised against the nested tags where it's dropping
a reference for included/tiles files in some strange instance.
I would have liked to have confirmed, patched and squished/handled it, but my
last few weeks have been crazy with moving to the US. I wont be able to ge
> Edgar P Dollin wrote:
>
> >Everyone has preferences but in my opinion JSTL doesn't hold a candle to the
> >nested tags, especially customized nested tags.
> >
> >I do agree however that JSTL for nested tags is not that important. It does
> >help in environments where there is ZERO tolerance f
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Back in September, David Karr was threatening to do Tiles-EL and
> > Nested-EL. I
> > see that the Tiles-EL has been committed, sweet. Nested-EL seems to be
> > missing. David, have you started working on Nested-EL? If so, how far
> > off is
> > it from being
Peoples (Dave?),
Just curious as to how quickly the EL tag logic identifies that there is in
fact stuff to evaluate?
Any micro-benchmarks?
If there's no real overhead, especially for properties provided without
expression, to just use them in the tags as-is. Or at least the nested tags
where the
+1 for the TLP
+1 for Craig as V-Pres.
Arron.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
play time, then I'll knock on the PMC door as
required.
Cheers,
Arron.
> The response to this vote has been unanimous, with all proposed PMC
> members responding except for two: Arron Bates and Don Brown. I have
> attempted to ping those two directly, but have not yet heard back.
&
Guys,
Just got the summary email from the Apache board meeting, and the Struts
proposal went through with flying colours.
Congrats guys, really. So much never-ending quality work.
I guess that with everyone else out driking Irish alcohol I was the first to
see the email, and I got to be the whi
> --- Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Whether the "classic" and "el" taglibs are one chunk or two isn't
> > >> hugely important to me either -- I would prefer that this decision
> > be
> > >> made by developers who've done more work on that code to date.
> > >> However, I did fi
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
