Re: J2EE IDE

This is nonsense. I use NetBeans 3.5.1 with j2sdk1.4.2, and I rarely restart it (manually or through a crash) more than one a week. Right now it has been running for over three weeks fine. The speed issue is relative, what is slow? NetBeans 3.5.x version was primarily improvements to performance i

Re: J2EE IDE

Razi Ansari wrote: IntelliJ IDEA is the way to go +1. It costs money, but, then, so do I =:) See also http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?MyFavoriteIDEAndWhy -Ted. -- Ted Husted, Junit in Action - , Struts in Action -

Re: J2EE IDE

- Original Message - From: "Firat TIRYAKI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:03 AM Subject: Re: J2EE IDE > you should use eclipse, it doesn't use swing for GUI

Re: J2EE IDE

Maybe because "it is slow, and crash like once everyday". Andy Cheng wrote: Hi, I have never used anything else very seriously except Netbeans. I think it is slow, and crash like once everyday, but the feature it offer really is worth the trouble. It can generate the get and set method, it will

Re: J2EE IDE

Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:50 AM Subject: Re: J2EE IDE > I agree for next to nothing ($30.00 per year) you can > develop in J2EE with Xdoclet (rapid dev) > and use an app server like JBoss (free). > > > Barry > > &

Re: J2EE IDE

t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:11 AM Subject: Re: J2EE IDE I have been using both NetBeans and Eclipse extensively and my recommendation goes to Eclipse. With the proper plugins (available on their

Re: J2EE IDE

CTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:11 AM Subject: Re: J2EE IDE > I have been using both NetBeans and Eclipse > extensively and my recommendation goes to Eclipse. > With the proper plugins (available on their web-site), > you can do just about everything you want. > > Ecli

Re: J2EE IDE

NetBeans does it too, Vangos. - Original Message - From: "Barry Volpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:44 PM Subject: Re: J2EE IDE > For J2ee developing I am investingating

Re: J2EE IDE

esday, August 27, 2003 6:50 PM Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > I've used a text editor, visual slick edit, forte (inc sun one studio, > and netbeans) and now eclipse. I would highly recommend eclipse for > doing web apps (I cant speak too j2ee dev). I would suggest getting it > and the

RE: J2EE IDE

3 8:15 AM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > > > I use IntelliJ, really fast to get up and running, I believe > eclipse is really good, but heard many complain that its hard to > get up and running. But > then again, there's a lot of su

Re: J2EE IDE

> From: "Andy Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:35 PM > Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > > > > Hi, I have never used anything else very seriously > except

Re: J2EE IDE

IntelliJ IDEA is the way to go From: "Venkata Srinivasa Rao, Yerra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: J2EE IDE Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:5

Re: J2EE IDE

ent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:35 PM Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > Hi, I have never used anything else very seriously except Netbeans. I > think it is slow, and crash like once everyday, but the feature it offer > really is worth the trouble. It can generate the get and set method, it > w

RE: J2EE IDE

PROTECTED] Subject: RE: J2EE IDE I have a HP workstation 4 CPU.. 1.7 GHz.. 512MB Ram. thanks -raj VDS India +91 44 2254-0281 ext. 1059 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Paul Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Rajendra X. Yadav/EMPL

RE: J2EE IDE

ianinfo.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc:

RE: J2EE IDE

To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> an.co.za>cc:

RE: [OT] RE: J2EE IDE

hahahahaa -Original Message- From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:21 PM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: [OT] RE: J2EE IDE That's what I told my sister about boys Mark -Original Message- From: Brandon

RE: J2EE IDE

the only gel i tried is ...well, ok, come one...u know, the nice slidy stuff? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:51 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: J2EE IDE Anyone tried Gel from GeExperts. thanks -raj

RE: J2EE IDE

i agree, handsdown, handsup or in star wars, it rocks! -Original Message- From: David Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:01 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: J2EE IDE personally I think IntelliJ is wonderful - Original Message

RE: J2EE IDE

oo.com> cc: Subject: RE: J2EE IDE

RE: J2EE IDE

Hehe. I ran eclipse on a P-I 200Mhz with 64Mb without problems (though i was just stuffing around and not doing anything 'heavy') -Original Message- From: Mike Duffy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 28 August 2003 12:45 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: J2

RE: J2EE IDE

I agree with the points David makes below. Eclipse Rocks. And with the plugin framework, it is getting better all the time. I run Eclipse on Windows XP at work and on Linux 9.0 at home. No problems. Mike --- "Hibbs, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > a) Boot time : I haven't met a Java-base

RE: J2EE IDE

ways pissed me off about - I always felt like I was walking through water with it). Ah well > -Original Message- > From: Paul Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:15 PM > To: struts-user > Subject: Re: J2EE IDE > >

Re: J2EE IDE

s Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:04 PM Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > --- Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds like you need to upgrade your machine. I have a standard PC (2 > > years old) and eclipse works fine on this..

Re: J2EE IDE

personally I think IntelliJ is wonderful - Original Message - From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:04 PM Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > --- Paul Jackson <[EMAIL

RE: J2EE IDE

; > Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2003 7:30 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: J2EE IDE > > > OfCourse, I have tested it. Then only i can make these comments. > I was just expressing my views on Eclipse for other people who were > looki

RE: J2EE IDE

Sounds like you need to upgrade your machine. I have a standard PC (2 years old) and eclipse works fine on this... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2003 7:30 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: J2EE IDE OfCourse

[OT] RE: J2EE IDE

. To: struts-user Subject: Re: J2EE IDE On 27/08/2003 07:46 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can someone please suggest me a free J2EE IDE suitable for development of > webapps using STRUTS. I know of some IDE's like the FORTE, ECLIPSE, > NETBEANS. However I wanted to ckeckout if anyone has

Re: J2EE IDE

On 27/08/2003 07:46 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can someone please suggest me a free J2EE IDE suitable for development of webapps using STRUTS. I know of some IDE's like the FORTE, ECLIPSE, NETBEANS. However I wanted to ckeckout if anyone has already evaluated any of these since I am not sure

RE: [OT] RE: J2EE IDE

My criticism is that his patterns book is just rehashed stuff from other authors and adds nothing to the literature. Mark -Original Message- From: Shane Mingins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:17 PM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: [OT] RE:

[OT] RE: J2EE IDE

Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 28 August 2003 9:37 a.m. To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: J2EE IDE You are obviously a Fowler groupie. Try Metsker, "Design Patterns Jave Workbook" ( Addison-Wesley 2002) -Original Mess

RE: J2EE IDE

I'm glad you are enjoying the kool-aid. Drink up. :-p Brandon Goodin > -Original Message- > From: Yansheng Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:24 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > > > I

RE: J2EE IDE

You are obviously a Fowler groupie. Try Metsker, "Design Patterns Jave Workbook" ( Addison-Wesley 2002) -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:47 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: J2EE IDE --- Mark

Re: J2EE IDE -> patterns creator runt -> back to struts

th [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:16 PM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: J2EE IDE Martin Fowler ripped all the patterns in that book from previous authors. It isn't worth the money. -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailt

RE: J2EE IDE

I have to take the opposite point of view. They are all good. It's your own programming skill that matters the most. -Original Message- From: Brandon Goodin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 27, 2003 2:36 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: J2EE IDE THEY ALL

[OT] RE: J2EE IDE

That's what I told my sister about boys Mark -Original Message- From: Brandon Goodin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:36 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: J2EE IDE THEY ALL SUCK! Just pick the one that causes YOU the least pain. Br

RE: J2EE IDE

Fowler gives credit where credit is due. I have no beef with him or the book. -= J > -Original Message- > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:16 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > &

RE: J2EE IDE

-Original Message- > From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:14 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: J2EE IDE > > > Erich Gamma is one for eclipse leaders, does this means anything for > you. > > Ja

RE: J2EE IDE

I like flowers while i code. Brandon Goodin > -Original Message- > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:16 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > > > Martin Fowler ripped

RE: J2EE IDE

uts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > > > +1 for IDEA, its simply great tool, everything in it leads to > productivity, > > Panchasheel > > > -Original Message- > From: Vijay Pawar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003

RE: J2EE IDE

Martin Fowler ripped all the patterns in that book from previous authors. It isn't worth the money. -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:14 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: J2EE IDE Erich Gamma is on

RE: J2EE IDE

+1 for IDEA, its simply great tool, everything in it leads to productivity, Panchasheel -Original Message- From: Vijay Pawar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:24 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: J2EE IDE Dear All, I am

[OT] [Way OT] RE: J2EE IDE

Smelly heretic! Don't you dare oppress me! The Fowlerians shall smite the wicked Gammalons for all eternity! -= J > -Original Message- > From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:14 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > S

Re: J2EE IDE

A. If he uses it, so should you. -= J p.s. I use Eclipse & vim. -Original Message- From: Mainguy, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:47 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: J2EE IDE I would have said netbean

RE: [OT] RE: J2EE IDE

I use vi emulation inside both Idea IntelliJ and Eclipse and have been very pleased. The best of both worlds. -Original Message- From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:04 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: [OT] RE: J2EE ID

[OT] RE: J2EE IDE

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, William T Hansley wrote: > External Editor - integrates emacs (XEmacs) and vi (Vim) with NetBeans. > More editors can be integrated as well although the external editor team > is currently focusing on the above two editors. > > I've never tried the vi support, but I am a happy

[OT] RE: J2EE IDE

That's good to know - thanks for sharing. -Original Message- From: William T Hansley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: J2EE IDE NetBeans has experimental support available for external editors. From

RE: J2EE IDE

27;ve never tried the vi support, but I am a happy NetBeans user. -Bill Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject:RE: J2EE IDE If I could get an IDE to emulate vi in its edi

Re: J2EE IDE

: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: J2EE IDE All in all, vi or VIM remains the Real Programmer's editor! Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Korolyov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:01 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: J2EE

RE: J2EE IDE

Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:00 PM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: J2EE IDE All in all, vi or VIM remains the Real Programmer's editor! Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Korolyov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: J2EE IDE

only software tool I pay for. The refactoring and autocompletion tools have saved hours of my life. BAL From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: J2EE IDE Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:28:12 +0100 I'

[OT] RE: J2EE IDE

Well, this topic comes up here quite often, but is usually tagged OT way sooner. Mark "Not all .lengths were created equal" -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:55 PM To: Struts Users List Subject: RE: J2EE IDE

RE: J2EE IDE

All in all, vi or VIM remains the Real Programmer's editor! Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Korolyov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:01 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: J2EE IDE Just IMHO: 1. Eclipse and JDeveloper are FREE 2. ID

RE: J2EE IDE

--Original Message- From: David Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:44 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: J2EE IDE Raj, I had slow Eclipse load times (no crashes and no refresh issues) but my excuse was that I ran it on a dual CPU PII/266 MHz setu

RE: J2EE IDE

There's a wiki page for this topic that might be a better place to post IDE reviews that on the mailing list. http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?MyFavoriteIDEAndWhy (I sent this already but it didn't make it to the list. The original may show up in a few hours, so sorry if this is a dupl

RE: J2EE IDE

ruts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: J2EE IDE But eclipse has many problems at runtime. Boot up time is too high. Refresh time too high. Crashes very often. Am i right on these points ? thanks -raj "Firat TIRYAKI" <[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: J2EE IDE - IDEA - Freeware ?

have to leave IDEA to do any extra > work, everything could be configured in IDEA > > all of this and much more > leads to productivity > > Panchasheel > > -Original Message- > From: Mainguy, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10

RE: J2EE IDE

nds IDEA. If he uses it, so should you. > > -= J > > p.s. I use Eclipse & vim. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Mainguy, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:47 AM >> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; '[EM

RE: J2EE IDE - IDEA - Freeware ?

PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:47 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: J2EE IDE I would have said netbeans a year ago, but now I'm an eclipse 2 (2.1) fan. Haven't tried any recent (last 6 months) IDEs other than eclipse.

RE: J2EE IDE

13) 577-1496 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Hibbs, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:13 AM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > > > a) Boot time : I haven't met a Java-based IDE that didn't >

RE: J2EE IDE

iling List' Subject: RE: J2EE IDE I use IntelliJ, really fast to get up and running, I believe eclipse is really good, but heard many complain that its hard to get up and running. But then again, there's a lot of support for it nowadays. Just pick one or two and try them out, one of them m

RE: J2EE IDE

I've tried to avoid getting sucked in, but here I go... Isn't IntelliJ a commercial product? From what I can work out form their web site, it's a $500 licence for version 3.0 (cheaper if you qualify for an academic licence). Eclipse is free. One thing that Eclipse does lack (surprisingly) is supp

RE: J2EE IDE

ssage- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: J2EE IDE Can someone please suggest me a free J2EE IDE suitable for development of webapps using STRUTS. I know of some IDE's like the FORTE, ECLIPSE, NETBEANS.

RE: J2EE IDE

+1 again for IDEA   -- nagi   ---Original Message---   From: Struts Users Mailing List Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 08:34:54 PM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: J2EE

RE: J2EE IDE

a) Boot time : I haven't met a Java-based IDE that didn't have high boot time. That said, the core IDE boots pretty fast on my home machine (1GHz P4) -- much faster than NetBeans. Caveat--I quit using NetBeans because a) it was outclassed by Eclipse and b) I felt that the releases were becoming l

Re: J2EE IDE

James Childers wrote: p.s. I use Eclipse & vim. Me to, Eclipse + VIM. .V - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: J2EE IDE

leads to productivity Panchasheel -Original Message- From: Mainguy, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:47 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: J2EE IDE I would have said netbeans a year ago, but now I

RE: J2EE IDE

- > From: Mainguy, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:47 AM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > > > I would have said netbeans a year ago, but now I'm an eclipse > 2 (

RE: J2EE IDE

ubject: Re: J2EE IDE +1 on NetBeans although I've not used Eclipse. I tend to stop looking when I find something that works. However, I find that 90% of the time it's quicker for me to just use vi and Ant. I use NetBeans for debugging though. And if I'm forced to use Window

Re: J2EE IDE

From: "Vijay Pawar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:24 PM Subject: RE: J2EE IDE > Dear All, > > I am using WSAD 5.0 . Suppose i wish to use the latest nighty

RE: J2EE IDE

Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: J2EE IDE > > Can someone please suggest me a free J2EE IDE suitable for development > of > webapps using STRUTS. I know of some IDE

Re: J2EE IDE

+1 on NetBeans although I've not used Eclipse. I tend to stop looking when I find something that works. However, I find that 90% of the time it's quicker for me to just use vi and Ant. I use NetBeans for debugging though. And if I'm forced to use Windows for my development I'll immediately i

RE: J2EE IDE

e- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: J2EE IDE > > Can someone please suggest me a free J2EE IDE suitable for development > of > webapps using STRUTS. I know of some IDE's

RE: J2EE IDE

WSAD is the Good one. Thanks Nazeer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: J2EE IDE Can someone please suggest me a free J2EE IDE suitable for development of webapps using STRUTS. I

Re: J2EE IDE

you should use eclipse, it doesn't use swing for GUI's, and it's faster than > the others. > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Can someone please suggest me a free J2EE IDE suitable for development of >> webapps using STRUTS. I kn

RE: J2EE IDE

Message- From: Navjot Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:09 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: J2EE IDE Well, i like Eclipse a lot but it has it's constraints. If you wish to have O/R mapping support in your IDE, try JDeveloper etc. Although i

Re: J2EE IDE

uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> net> cc:

Re: J2EE IDE

m.tr>cc: Subject: Re: J2EE IDE 27/08/2003 01:33

RE: J2EE IDE

ginal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 August 2003 07:46 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: J2EE IDE > > > Can someone please suggest me a free J2EE IDE suitable for development of > webapps using STRUTS. I know of some IDE's like

Re: J2EE IDE

m.tr>cc: Subject: Re: J2EE IDE

Re: J2EE IDE

and it's faster than the others. F. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:46 AM Subject: J2EE IDE Can someone please suggest me a free J2EE IDE suitable for development of webapps using STRUTS. I know of some IDE&#

RE: J2EE IDE

ECTED] |Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:16 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: J2EE IDE | | |Can someone please suggest me a free J2EE IDE suitable for development of |webapps using STRUTS. I know of some IDE's like the FORTE, ECLIPSE, |NETBEANS. However I wanted to ckeckout if anyone has already

Re: J2EE IDE

you should use eclipse, it doesn't use swing for GUI's, and it's faster than the others. F. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:46 AM Subject: J2EE IDE > Can someone please suggest m

J2EE IDE

Can someone please suggest me a free J2EE IDE suitable for development of webapps using STRUTS. I know of some IDE's like the FORTE, ECLIPSE, NETBEANS. However I wanted to ckeckout if anyone has already evaluated any of these since I am not sure which one is easy to use and has reasonably