-0700, miguel wrote:
> Could Toad or Ian or someone out there supply us with some config file settings that
> will make Freenet run optimally(on most machines) without us having to do
> experiment after time-consuming experiment until we eventually(or not) discover
> which settings are
How is your node now?
What did you set the ipAddress to? It needs to be the external IP
address of your router... if it's on a dynamic IP, the best way to do
this is with dyndns...
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:24:28PM +, runya sairon wrote:
> i run my T1 ( win xp ) behind a DI-604 router/firewa
I can get it easily enough. Would you like me to email you
seednodes.ref? I could bzip2 it, if you have bzip2 to decompress it, to
save space (it'll still be ~ 2MB...).
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:59:10AM +0200, Mathieu Benoit wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm not able to connect to any freenet servers t
What build of Freenet? How much memory in the machine? Did you try to
reduce the memory limit? Are you running on Windows? If you are running
on *nix, please send your start-freenet.sh .. if you are running on
Windows, there's an equivalent issue with direct memory settings but I
don't know what it
Does this still happen? I think it was caused by tempfile leaks which
hopefully are fixed now...
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:54:28AM -0400, Daves Lists wrote:
> My node was up for 1 day 10 hours when I restarted it to increase the thread
> limit. After the restart I lost about 6000 keys. My datasto
I can add a special case to make this work. But I need the output of
the "uname" command on OS/X.
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:12:49AM +, Paul wrote:
> Hi. I have successfully run freenet on Mac OS X for some time.
> I have downloaded installed the latest
> stable, but when I attempt to star
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:41:57AM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just tried to insert a file into the network, running stable
> build 5084. After the successful insertion, I used the URI:
>
> freenet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> to request the file just inserted on the main web interfa
How long has the node been up?
Go to advanced mode on the web interface. What is the error message now?
It will be more detailed.
How many incoming connections do you have?
Show me the top few lines of the following page:
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html
As the warning on t
My reply is on tech. That is the more appropriate forum. Or perhaps even
chat.
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 07:00:01PM +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> First they came for the child porn sites ...
> http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1232422,00.html
> Discussion on http://yro.slashdot.org/
Hi!
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:33:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry for my late reply I was out of town most of last week.
> The newest build seems to have fix the problem with it almost always being
> overloaded, but it still is getting overloaded by this by a lot. It will get
> ove
Hehe. I assumed he was just using his work address...
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 05:55:03PM -0700, Galen wrote:
> Out of curiosity, is the U.S. Department of Justice interested in
> freenet? When I see from "@usdoj.gov" in an email address, it really
> makes me wonder. Might the DOJ be interested i
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 12:52:26PM -0400, samurai wrote:
> the downloading speed is extremely slow!..help me please.
Sure. What did you try, and what happened?
Please show me the top 10 lines of
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html
Are you behind a router, NAT or firewall?
Als
There are some minor technical issues happening:
Sourceforge appears to be down: CVS is not working, at least not from my
PC. "Cannot connect to host". Interestingly, the web site is still up.
The seednodes.ref (stable seednodes) file consists of one node:
physical.tcp=82.32.16.59:49561
...
End
Gue
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 06:06:46AM -0500, Robert Greenage wrote:
> is there a problem if my nodes data store reaches 100% ?
No.
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.
/etc/security/limits ?
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 12:15:28AM +, tripolar wrote:
> I have read Ed's tips below though I am still at a loss as how to add
> ulimit stuff to /etc/profile and /etc/initscript
> here is the path to java
> /usr/lib/j2re1.4-sun/bin/java
> and the path for freenet is
> /h
If you downloaded 5083 or 5084 recently, for a POSIX-like platform such
as Linux or MacOS/X, if you downloaded the tgz, rather than upgrading
an existing node, or if you built from CVS, you may have got an
incorrect update.sh. It accidentally slipped in in 5083 and has now been
corrected. It would
Freenet stable build 5084 is now available. Please upgrade ASAP, if you
are running a stable branch node (if you're not, you'll know). You can
do this by running the update.sh script on POSIX like systems such as
Linux or MacOS/X (stop the node first, then update it, then start it),
or on Windows,
All nodes, whether "transient" or not, now accept queries and process
them for other nodes. It is unclear whether transient actually means
anything, we will probably remove it soon.
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 07:33:16AM +, Cossack wrote:
> Would it be advantageous to make freenet default to a tra
Hi. Some users have been reporting NullPointerException's on startup of
their stable nodes. I have a possible fix, but I'd like to test this
before merging it to stable. If you have this problem please mail me and
I'll send you a jar to test. Include which branch you are running.
--
Matthew J Tose
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:46:10PM +, tripolar wrote:
> I am running Debian-sid
> I am currently trying to find my "ulimit -n" ??
> Any clues?
> Thanks
Just type it at a command line.
>
> Toad wrote:
>
> >Hmmm. What are you running this on? If unix,
Hmmm. What are you running this on? If unix, what's your ulimit -n ?
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:10:58PM +, tripolar wrote:
> java.io.IOException: Too many open files
>at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method)
>at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(Unkn
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 07:52:20PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> Woah. Oh well, what do you expect from the Church of Scientology?
I heard they own Earthlink, that all. If they don't, I apologize for
spreading malicious rumours.
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0400, Nichol
Woah. Oh well, what do you expect from the Church of Scientology?
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> Having found that I was using Mozilla 1.6 for most browsing, I allowed it to become
> the default browser with EarthLink TotalAccess. Before that I'd had
> Internet
Freenet stable build 5083 is now available. All stable branch users
should upgrade. This build will be made mandatory in the fairly near
future, so it is a good idea to upgrade soon. If you don't know which
branch you're on you're probably running stable. If on linux, MacOS/X,
or other POSIX like
Woah. We have MUCH less bandwidth in the UK. :|
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 10:13:04AM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2004 18:39:14 -0400, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >That's either not that speed, or not DSL!
> >
> >ADSL is 1Mbit up, 8Mbit down; SDSL is a
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:13:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds
> successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. The messageSendTimeRequest likes
> to hang around 4000ms. Now I've observed that the messageSen
Does it start anyway?
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:12:49AM +, Paul wrote:
> Hi. I have successfully run freenet on Mac OS X for some time.
> I have downloaded installed the latest
> stable, but when I attempt to start freenet, here is the result:
>
> iMac:~/freenet paul$ sh ./start-freenet.
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 12:45:05AM -0500, tripolar wrote:
> Hello
> I am running freenet on a linux system. All seemed well until I checked
> out firestarter ( GUI firewall program).
> When I noticed requests from my machine 192.168.*.*:12345 to 81.53.*.* .
> Under service it says "netbus" . Thin
A 1.4 JVM is an absolute requirement, because we use NIO. Sorry. Kaffe
or GCJ might run on NetBSD, however, right now the NIO doesn't work on
that either (bugs, being worked on, but can't give you a schedule).
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:23:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I recen
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 07:04:39PM -0400, Jay Oliveri wrote:
> On Thursday 27 May 2004 09:43 am, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:42:37PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I find Java's memory requirements to be totally unreasonable, its
> > > performance
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 01:37:24PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> Below
> >
> > Or use a service such as dyndns.org and put your hostname in your
> > freenet.ini. Freenet has routines to check for IP changes (I've
> > disabled them - static IP), so it should work pretty well once it's
> > establ
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:27:07PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > As I said above, it is technically possible to run it behind a firewall
>
> ok so I have put an automatic update of dns name in my internal Dns server which
> point to my external IP (externalIP.server.network) and put it i
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:09:17AM +0100, Dave wrote:
> > > Bandwidth isn't THAT expensive. People who want bandwidth will switch
> > > ISPs in a healthy market. I have been tempted by some DSL deals but
> > > unless Cable starts imposing and enforcing bandwidth limitations, I'm
> > > sticking to m
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 05:53:51AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have re download the seednode after thinking freenet was frozen for 5 minutes
> because no progress bar working (another bug).
What exactly happened? You tried to access a freenet site and it took
more than 5 minutes to fetch
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:49:30PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
> >But if I understand, Freenet can't work on a network without fixed IP
> >or dns server ?
> >Freenet can't work with an internal IP and port redirection from the
> >external IP so no way to go throw a firewall ?
> >Lot of constr
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:15:25AM +0200, Garb wrote:
> >Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> > I find Java's memory requirements to be totally
> > unreasonable, its performance lackluster, and I've
> > finally come to the conclusion that it was indeed a
> > poor choice of language in which to implement a proj
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 10:34:47PM +0100, Dave wrote:
> Just for an update on this, bouncing the thread appropriately for devl:
> What are the current outstanding issues with GCJ compatibility (or, for that
> matter, Kaffe/Blackdown/IBM java compatibility)
Primarily Classpath NIO bugs.
--
Matthew
Go to Advanced mode on the Web Interface. Then tell us exactly what the
error message says when you try to get the page(s).
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:26:07AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I try to get http://127.0.0.1:/[EMAIL PROTECTED] but always same error "Couldn't
> retrieve key" and
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 03:15:32PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Toad wrote:
>
> >>JIT Java (which we're all running) is also very speedy, there's only a
> >>few rare instances where it's worth the trouble to replace code with
> >>something na
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 08:22:51PM -0400, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
> On 26 May 2004 at 9:47, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
>
> >
> > On 26/05/2004, at 9:36 AM, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
> >
> > > ... rather than just having one, platform
> > > dependent #idfef-filled source file with the appropriate funct
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 01:37:04PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> > That is a shame. Clearly I don't agree with your reasoning, there is no
> > evidence that any other language would not have similar or worse issues
> > (consider the amount
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 05:39:34PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2004 10:51:20 -0400, Jay Oliveri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >1) Fred takes too much CPU and RAM because it's written in Java.
>
> I hate this depate.
>
> It's true that object orienting uses up (a few) more byte
Interesting. This is caused by some old code relating to the previous
datastore implementation that didn't get deleted. Hopefully if you stop
freenet, delete the "node" file, and start freenet, it will go away. If
not, I may have a fix.
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:59:12PM +, cryptic wrote:
> I
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 05:08:25PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> version 0.5.2.8 on win2k server and I install it by just clicking on freenet-
> webinstall.exe .
>
> I am on a Nat so I have modify freenet.ini file with ipAddress=192.168.0.1 and
> a redirector to this ip with the random freene
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:34:18AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
> Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 05:04:53AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
>
> > Not terribly well, because of high level bandwidth limiting. The node
> > needs to kno
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 05:04:53AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
> Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:05:42AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
>
> > Perhaps. That would also lead to high message send times though. Freenet
> > needs to know
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:42:28PM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
> Toad wrote:
> >On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:05:42AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
>
> >>So I've been working towards a Linux traffic shaper that gives sets no
> >>limits on traffic with domestic IP
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:32:50AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
> Phillip Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > One thing that I can think of is limiting the size of incoming files
> > not requested by the node directly - stop splitfiles and things going
> > through. I'm more interested i
>IPs get a high bandwidth (8,000 k/s) and other (international) IPs get
> >a low
> >bandwidth (0.75 k/s). I guess my node will always give a constant
> >recommendation for how much traffic it wants, and this will oscillate
> >wildly
> >according to how many d
> bytes/sec to keep things under control, but I'm waiting for my ISPs
> > traffic information to come back online...
>
> Toad: feel free to comment on point 3:
>
> Phillip, since we're in the same country with similar issues, I'd like to share
> my
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 05:27:41PM +, c enrique wrote:
> hello i just need some help with this issue. When I try to run freenet.sh
> this is the error message i'm getting :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] freenet]$ sh start-freenet.sh
> Detected freenet-ext.jar
> Detected freenet.jar
> Starting Freenet
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 06:58:19PM +0200, Someone wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
> >Why does my stable node have so few connections, but my unstable node
> >has many? When I start my stable node it begins with maybe 2 or 3
> >connections, but when I start my unstable node I get 20 or mor
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 01:39:37AM +0200, Martin Scheffler wrote:
> On Friday 21 May 2004 22:27, Toad wrote:
> > > STUN is used to determine whether you are behind NAT. If you are then you
> > > need a third party to start connections to others behind NAT. The third
>
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 09:36:57PM +0200, Ole Tange wrote:
> On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:02:39 +0100, dave-kId6I2PxnVtBDgjK7y7TUQ wrote:
>
> >>> and most of the rest are
> >>> behind NATs which the user doesn't properly work around. :)
> >>
> >> Is there any reason why we cannot use STUN to avoid the N
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 07:37:25PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> In any case, is it fair to say that we will probably need some sort of
> introduction over the network for anything like this to work? i.e. we
> will need a way to send a message to a node we are not directly
> connected to,
In any case, is it fair to say that we will probably need some sort of
introduction over the network for anything like this to work? i.e. we
will need a way to send a message to a node we are not directly
connected to, through the network?
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 07:36:16PM +0100, Toad wrote
Umm. I was told that most NATs would use the port number to forward
packets from any and all external hosts to the one internal PC that has
used a given port.. is that wrong?
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 06:48:42PM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fr
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 03:44:20PM +0200, Ole Tange wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2004 20:32:08 +0100, Toad wrote:
>
> > and most of the rest are
> > behind NATs which the user doesn't properly work around. :)
>
> Is there any reason why we cannot use STUN to avoid the N
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 04:22:22PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
> > > motivated. Is money worth losing our freedom for? I don't think so but a
> > > lot of shareholders probably disagree with me (because they're rich and
> > > can effect political maneuvering).
> >
> > Welcome to Babylon!
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:14:36AM -0500, tripolar wrote:
> I am running Debian-sid, 2.6.3 kernel, and java from sun ( j2re-1_4_2_04
> ). I installed freenet, edited the conf file- just added my ip address.
> When I started freenet $sh start-freenet.sh I get this error ( below)
> though this par
This shouldn't happen any more - at least, not from SORBS.
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:29:19AM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 18 09:25:34 2004
> Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 09:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:30:59PM -0700, Chris Linstruth wrote:
> Reversing this should do the trick. SORBS.NET is way too aggressive and
> often out-of-date with marginal support in gettting erroneous entries removed.
> Spamhaus hasn't given me any problems at all. Nor has the mail-abuse.org
>
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:51:34PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
> > The ISP can monitor your email even if they don't relay your mail..
> > > With the whole PayPal thing how
> > > long before ISPs start using *their* TOSes as weapons against freenet
> > > particpants.
> > Only if they get s
Arguably we should change the index format to not include actual
pathnames.
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 10:07:48AM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> Or adding code to handle the situation better even...
>
> /N
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:33:50AM -0400, Ed Soniat wrote:
> I have a freenet configuration which was working great and then it started crashing.
> Since it was working fine and I haven't changed anything I doubt it is the
> configuration file.
>
> Some times it runs for several minutes, some tim
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:13:48AM +0200, TLD wrote:
> Daves Lists wrote:
> > My node was up for 1 day 10 hours when I restarted it to increase the
> > thread limit. After the restart I lost about 6000 keys. My datastore is
> > set to 50 gigs and is no where near full. Below are the stats before an
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:54:28AM -0400, Daves Lists wrote:
> My node was up for 1 day 10 hours when I restarted it to increase the thread
> limit. After the restart I lost about 6000 keys. My datastore is set to 50
> gigs and is no where near full. Below are the stats before and after. Were
> tho
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 08:08:22PM -0700, pineapple wrote:
> The paypay-freenet incident has landed on slashdot.
> Wonder how the website will hold up? :)
The website isn't a problem, it's hosted on sourceforge.
The problem with slashdot is usually that the network gets 10,000 new
hosts, of which
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 04:13:38PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It seems so, as if the snapshots do not get updated anymore. At least the
> unstable-latest.jar (or similiar, the file which gets downloaded from the update
> script) is still version 60103, although 60105 was already announced.
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:21:31AM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
> On Tue, 18 May 2004, Toad wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
> > >=20
> > > And to further the mail objection against having to use my ISP&#
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:39:44AM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 May 2004, Jay Oliveri wrote:
>
> > Don't wait for someone to implement what you've suggested (allowing direct
> > SMTP connections from a dynamic IP); there's enough work to do without
> > building these kinds
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:16:58PM -0400, Jay Oliveri wrote:
> Don't wait for someone to implement what you've suggested (allowing direct
> SMTP connections from a dynamic IP); there's enough work to do without
> building these kinds of things that just lead to constant maintenance.
>
> There's
Ouch. I had no idea it was that aggressive.
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:43:24PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
>
> Um, perhaps your mailsever should check for subscriber addresses *before*
> it runs the overzealous spam filtering services?
>
> The message I tried to send (I am a subscribed
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 04:04:06PM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 18 May 2004 15:55, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote:
>
> > As I said, FAT32 filesystems under Linux are
> > *case-insensitive*...Whenever you type the name in UPPER or lower
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:27:41AM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 18 May 2004 09:40, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote:
>
> > Also, linux's FAT32 driver doesn't care for case... However, if the
> > Freenet client get a directory listing and
Try doIndex=false ? Does that make any difference?
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:30:20AM -0400, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a long time Linux user, but sometimes I need to run windoz to do
> somes tasks. I usually does them in batch and it keep my computer busy
> for a few days ever
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
>
> And to further the mail objection against having to use my ISP's mailer
> to talk to *this* list is that Shaw in theory can now look at my mail
> traffic and if they don't like the Freenet project, could suspend my
> inter
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Someone wrote:
> Edward J. Huff schrieb:
> >Nothing goes through my ISP's mail server,
> >but since traffic on port 25 is unencrypted, they can read my
> >mail anyway.
>
> As an alternative you could post to and read the lists via the gmane
> news group se
The account has apparently been frozen. Feel free to slashdot. (I was
rather tempted to CC this to announce, but I don't think it would have
been a good idea :) ). We should be able to get the money back
(fortunately there wasn't much in the account).. but it may take 6
months... Apparently the A
Freenet stable build 5082 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Please upgrade ASAP. Stable branch users should upgrade at
least weekly as Freenet is still at a relatively early phase of
development. You can use the update option on the start menu, or
freenet-webinstall.exe to update y
We need seednode sources for stable urgently.
All you need to do is give dodo.freenetproject.org access to mainport:
mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,212.13.198.248
in your freenet.conf
And send me the address of the node.
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemon
Sure. On Windows:
Mozilla, Opera (with some configuration, specifically you must set
it not to ignore MIME types), Firebird/Firefox, Lynx, Links.
On Linux/BSD/etc:
Mozilla, Firebird/Firefox, Konqueror (probably; not thoroughly tested),
Links, Lynx.
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:41:50AM -0700, mary y
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:37:44PM -0500, tripolar wrote:
> I restarted freenet- works now!
> Lesson I learned today-Dont delete temp files :-)
Or don't install software into the temp directory :)
>
> tripolar wrote:
>
> >I deleted windows temp files- call me paranoid & stupid ;-) because I
> >
Fixed in 5080. Upgrade!
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 08:34:05PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>
> On 11-May-2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Windows XP Pro
> >
> > After having Freenet disabled for a couple of weeks while I was doing some
> > heavy downloading I decided to fire it up again. I fig
Freenet stable build 5081 is now available. Please upgrade, unless you
are running an unstable build. Users of the stable network should
upgrade weekly on average. The snapshots are updating. You can get the
new build by using freenet-webinstall.exe on Windows, or update.sh on
Linux/*nix/MacOS X. D
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:07:47PM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> Most Win users are not at all accustomed to finding and editing .ini files
> because those went out of general use about three Win-generations ago
> when Microsoft decided that "those darn users just don't know how to
> use our softw
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:57:25PM -0400, Peter E. Urban Jr. wrote:
> Clear Dayjust found your software, but can not do anythingi.e. couldn't retrieve
> key any of them did not work
> help
> thanks
> Pete
Firstly, please don't use HTML mail, if you can avoid it, when talking
to us.
Secondly
Okay.
Show me the header (the lines at the top, before the table) from
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html
If it says 0 node references, stop freenet, remove it, reinstall it with
new seednodes, and if it still doesn't work, send me your freenet.log
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 07
Perfectly normal. It should perhaps happen less than it does, but
freenet is still under development.
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 04:11:12PM -0700, GumpyGal wrote:
> i really can't give much more detail, it happen
> sporadically when I'm browsing freenet. sometimes it
> will give me the Couldn't Retr
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 05:58:03PM +0100, Hibbs, Phil wrote:
>
> I was a little amused to discover that the Windows installer requires me to
> click "I Agree" to the GPL screen, despite the GPL stating specifically that
> "5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed
>
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 09:52:21PM +0100, Roger Hayter wrote:
> How would you distinguish messages you don't want very much (like
> possibly non-existent Frost messages) from ones you do want a lot? It
> is likely to generate quite a lot of extra traffic to automatically
> retry all RNFs till y
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 04:20:22PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote:
> "Niklas Bergh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Now I believe I can live with freenet being slow and that
> >> many documents are not immediately available. What is
> >> annoying me is that _I_ will have to do the retrying. Why
Yup. 60083 is a bit broken. It was an experiment. Upgrade to 60085+!
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:12:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have not seen any message relating to the 60083 build at the, so I thought that I
> should report this, although I cannot imagine that the devs did not notic
Currently freenet does not work with GCJ/GIJ/Kaffe/any other free JVM.
We are working on this. You will need to install the proprietary Sun VM.
I believe there is an installer package for it in debian, j2re maybe,
probably in the non-free section. You might want to look at blackdown.
Otherwise, use
Freenet stable build 5078 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. All stable branch users should upgrade ASAP.
Changelog:
* Make 5077 mandatory. This is a fairly significant change. 5077 made
huge changes, including some fundamental changes to how freenet
routes ("bidirectional rout
Usually this is caused by the hardware routers/etc not being able to
support enough connections. You could try decreasing maxNodeConnections
(the default is now 200, but if you have an old config file it might be
forced to 512; you could try 100).
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 08:30:34PM -0700, Galen wr
How long did it take for the log file to get that big? What were the
settings in the freenet.conf?
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 11:34:08PM +1000, Cameron GArnham wrote:
>
> Heare is a dump of the freenet dir:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/freenet$ ls -l
> total 5602160
> -rw-r--r--1 garnham garnham
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 11:41:16AM +1000, Yosuke Yoshikawa wrote:
> Hello. We're working on a uni project where we have to create an anonymous
> messaging system. As we're still in the early stages, we haven't gotten
> around to seeing the source code, but we can't get freenet to install on the
> u
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:12:39PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>
> On 27-Apr-2004 Toad wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:11:17PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> >> Just noticed after I had uploaded the log rotate script that the date
> >> command
> &
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:07:49PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
> >>No, they haven't. Please try running a web server behind a NAT that
> >>you
> >>can't forward ports on. Or ssh. Or any number of other client/server
> >>protocols.
> >
> >I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorren
501 - 600 of 862 matches
Mail list logo
