John Mitchell schreef:
No worries, thanks for your help,
I don't suppose there is any way to backup the RRD Graph data is there?
(More specifiically the Traffic portion). Trying to get a years worth of
data going ;)
Copy off the contents of /var/db/rrd
Regards,
Seth
Many many thanks
Am 11.12.2009 um 01:25 schrieb Scott Ullrich:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Chris Buechler
cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't believe there were any changes between RC3 and release
though?
It's been a while since the image size changed.
Yes, there where a couple NanoBSD fixes. One in
Hello,
I wanted to know if It was Ok to install SquidGuard package with an embedded
version of pfSense working on NanoBSD ?
I plan to deploy It on Alix board… As the system is mounted RO… I am not
certain this will be the best settings.
Will this still be ok - or do you have any other
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
In a nutshell, NanoBSD had many many changes up until a month or two
ago. You will need to reflash.
Is it safe to turn NanoBSD images (e.g. the 4 GByte one) from
embedded to full install in the old way (changing /etc/platfom
from
On 12/11/2009 5:21 AM, bsd wrote:
I wanted to know if It was Ok to install SquidGuard package with an embedded
version of pfSense working on NanoBSD ?
I plan to deploy It on Alix board… As the system is mounted RO… I am not
certain this will be the best settings.
Will this still be ok -
I just upgraded a 1.2.1-release directly to 1.2.3-release with no
hitches at all. wasn't a particularly busy box but still relatively
important, and no complaints so far!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
How did you update youir box?
With an update file or new full installation?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Paul Mansfield [mailto:it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com]
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 december 2009 15:59
Aan: support@pfsense.com
Onderwerp: Re: [pfSense Support] RC3 to RELEASE - Verify
I just
I just did the upgrade via the web GUI..
it went down w/o a hitch...
--
J.D. Bronson
Information Technology
Aurora Health Care - Milwaukee WI
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands,
On 11/12/09 15:00, R. M. Molenaar wrote:
How did you update youir box?
With an update file or new full installation?
with the update file using the web ui.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Paul Mansfield [mailto:it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com]
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 december 2009
I've been happily using 1.2.3-RC1 for many months now on a Soekris
net5501 and a 100GB 2.5 SATA drive. I like the idea of an embedded
system on a CF card, but that's not possible or advisable for me as
I'm running the squid and freeswitch packages.
I was wondering however, if it would be
On 12/11/2009 10:50 AM, David Burgess wrote:
I've been happily using 1.2.3-RC1 for many months now on a Soekris
net5501 and a 100GB 2.5 SATA drive. I like the idea of an embedded
system on a CF card, but that's not possible or advisable for me as
I'm running the squid and freeswitch packages.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
(cold-reset resiliency,
The moment you have a drive mounted rw, you lose this. :-)
Well you lose it on the rw partitions, but if the core system is
mounted to RAM from a read-only filesystem, then at least the core
system has
Hello David...
This is eaxctly what I want to work on :)
I came to this list and was given only two options...
1) use nanofrebsd...
2) use regular hardrive...
I din't like either one
My needs were exactly like yoursFreeSwitch and Squid...
I am pretty good with hardware, but
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:31:38AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
I just did the upgrade via the web GUI..
it went down w/o a hitch...
Same thing here. One thing that was a potential problem
in the past was https. Switching to http might fix your
problems. Or, do a console install.
--
Eugen*
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:31:38AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
I just did the upgrade via the web GUI..
it went down w/o a hitch...
Same thing here. One thing that was a potential problem
in the past was https.
Shouldn't be
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Manny A. Wise mannyw...@gmail.com wrote:
My needs were exactly like yoursFreeSwitch and Squid...
I am pretty good with hardware, but terrible with software... :(
My software background is a lot more linux than BSD, but a person can learn ;)
Some cursory
On 11/12/09 15:50, David Burgess wrote:
I've been happily using 1.2.3-RC1 for many months now on a Soekris
net5501 and a 100GB 2.5 SATA drive. I like the idea of an embedded
system on a CF card, but that's not possible or advisable for me as
I'm running the squid and freeswitch packages.
can
On 12/11/2009 12:22 PM, Paul Mansfield wrote:
can you do overlay file systems on freeBSD, so that the base OS and
config is read-only and you overlay a read-write file system at a very
late stage in booting IF that overlay is uncorrupted?
when you've made changes to config, if the worst
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
On 12/11/2009 12:22 PM, Paul Mansfield wrote:
can you do overlay file systems on freeBSD, so that the base OS and
config is read-only and you overlay a read-write file system at a very
late stage in booting IF that overlay is
On 12/11/2009 12:33 PM, David Burgess wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
On 12/11/2009 12:22 PM, Paul Mansfield wrote:
can you do overlay file systems on freeBSD, so that the base OS and
config is read-only and you overlay a read-write file system at a
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
Details here:
http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=531
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
Chris Buechler schreef:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:31:38AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
I just did the upgrade via the web GUI..
it went down w/o a hitch...
Same thing here. One thing that was a potential problem
in the past
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Oliver Hansen oliver.han...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if I'm missing it somewhere but is there a changelog between 1.2.3-RC3
and 1.2.3-RELEASE? The notes in the blog post seem to reference anything
that changed since 1.2.2.
Complete list of changes is here:
On Dec 11, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 12/11/2009 10:50 AM, David Burgess wrote:
I've been happily using 1.2.3-RC1 for many months now on a Soekris
net5501 and a 100GB 2.5 SATA drive. I like the idea of an embedded
system on a CF card, but that's not possible or advisable for me as
I might be missing the boat here, but what about using a 2.5 SSD
instead of flash + normal HD? That way you get the benefit of solid
state, plus you have the space performance for a regular file system
so you can run all the packages you want. Granted, SSDs aren't the
cheapest things around,
SSD work just fine.you don't need CF and SSDwith a single SSD 2.5
ide device it get the job done perfectly...BUT!! is always that butALL
the SSD have limited life cycle even the industrial ones, yes, it's 10
million of writes...but you know some day, sooner or later is going to
SSD woul definitely bring the power, speed sound benefits of flash. It only
lacks the perfect recovery of a read-only root fs. A big improvement over
spinning media nevertheless.
Regarding reserved unused space on an SSD, Anand recently recommended 20%
reserved, and more recently stated 'the
apt@gmail.com schreef:
SSD woul definitely bring the power, speed sound benefits of flash. It only
lacks the perfect recovery of a read-only root fs. A big improvement over spinning
media nevertheless.
The writes should be fine really, worst case is that it will fail to
write at some
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Tom Müller-Kortkamp
tmu...@kommunity.net wrote:
Am 11.12.2009 um 01:25 schrieb Scott Ullrich:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't believe there were any changes between RC3 and release though?
It's been a while
}
Could you please fix this?
--- openbgpd.inc.20091211.bak2009-12-10 11:26:10.0 -0500
+++ openbgpd.inc2009-12-11 17:15:09.76300 -0500
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
$used_this_item = false;
if($neighbor['groupname'] == ) {
$conffile .= neighbor {$neighbor['neighbor
Hi all
I have a problem with my pfsense and already changed my machine but the
problem still.
Well, i can make any changes in squid, but in the tab Cache management
just don't save. I put all info about cache i want and when i click save
the screen returns to default.
Does anyone seen this?
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Nathaniel Simch de Morais
nathanielmor...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, i can make any changes in squid, but in the tab Cache management
just don't save. I put all info about cache i want and when i click save
the screen returns to default.
Does anyone seen this?
I
I'm using firefox 3.5.5
2009/12/11 David Burgess apt@gmail.com
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Nathaniel Simch de Morais
nathanielmor...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, i can make any changes in squid, but in the tab Cache management
just don't save. I put all info about cache i want and
On 12/11/2009 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Simch de Morais wrote:
Hi all
I have a problem with my pfsense and already changed my machine but the
problem still.
Well, i can make any changes in squid, but in the tab Cache management
just don't save. I put all info about cache i want and when i click
not there is not bgpctl show ip command, we have to use bgpctl
show ip bgp
Fix for both issues:
--- openbgpd_status.php.20091211.bak2009-12-10 11:26:10.0 -0500
+++ openbgpd_status.php 2009-12-11 19:20:28.83700 -0500
@@ -140,10 +140,10 @@
defCmdT(OpenBGPD Summary,bgpctl show summary);
defCmdT
- Original Message -
From: Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Wake On LAN
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Tortise tort...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
Somehow I cannot get magic packets to awaken
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Tortise tort...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
Well I had already done all that and it still didn't work, that was
using 1.2.3 RC1 embedded. (3 NIC's, one WAN, two LAN) I now wish I had set
up a sniffer to see if magic packets were actually going out
I just
37 matches
Mail list logo
