Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:46:01 -0700, /David E. Ross/:
In that other thread, Stamenkov presents a script that causes a saved
password to be entered into the appropriate area on the password page
even for split logins. He suggested creating a bookmarklet to implement
that script, but I instead create
Sailfish wrote:
My bloviated meandering follows what Michael Gordon graced us with on
7/27/2011 10:02 PM:
Sailfish wrote:
My bloviated meandering follows what Bret Busby graced us with on
7/3/2011 9:22 PM:
My unbuntu 8.04 on my old(ish) laptop computer has just upgraded the
Seamonkey to versio
My bloviated meandering follows what Michael Gordon graced us with on
7/27/2011 10:02 PM:
Sailfish wrote:
My bloviated meandering follows what Bret Busby graced us with on
7/3/2011 9:22 PM:
My unbuntu 8.04 on my old(ish) laptop computer has just upgraded the
Seamonkey to version 2.
It has chan
Sailfish wrote:
My bloviated meandering follows what Bret Busby graced us with on
7/3/2011 9:22 PM:
My unbuntu 8.04 on my old(ish) laptop computer has just upgraded the
Seamonkey to version 2.
It has changed the appearance of Seamonkey, to some silly looking
theme, that is listed as the "defaul
On 7/3/11 9:22 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
> My unbuntu 8.04 on my old(ish) laptop computer has just upgraded the
> Seamonkey to version 2.
>
> It has changed the appearance of Seamonkey, to some silly looking theme,
> that is listed as the "default theme".
>
> It appears that software developers des
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/27/11 4:19 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote:
After installing 2.2 on one of my computers, it always starts in safe
mode. I checked all of the blocks except bookmarks but it still starts
in safe mode. What next? I don't want to lose my bookmarks.
Are you starting SeaMonkey fr
My bloviated meandering follows what Bret Busby graced us with on
7/3/2011 9:22 PM:
My unbuntu 8.04 on my old(ish) laptop computer has just upgraded the
Seamonkey to version 2.
It has changed the appearance of Seamonkey, to some silly looking theme,
that is listed as the "default theme".
It
WLS wrote:
JoergJaeger wrote:
JoergJaeger wrote:
Hi,
i try now for some time to change the font size for monospace. No matter
what i do, it stays. And it quite small.
I changed the dpi in the config, but that did not change it at all.
Is this eventually a bug?
I can zoom, but that will also zoo
On 7/27/11 1:55 PM, MCBastos wrote:
> Interviewed by CNN on 27/07/2011 16:19, Cathy Palmer-Lister told the world:
>> Hi, I moved to a new computer,and from XP to Win 7. I cannot get SM to
>> work with Norton antvirus though they got along just fine in old
>> computer. I've tried installing SM bef
On 7/27/11 4:19 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote:
> After installing 2.2 on one of my computers, it always starts in safe
> mode. I checked all of the blocks except bookmarks but it still starts
> in safe mode. What next? I don't want to lose my bookmarks.
Are you starting SeaMonkey from a desktop icon
On 7/27/11 3:43 PM, nr wrote:
> I cannot get the password manager to remember my ID or password for
> Vanguard's web site and I was wondering if any other SeaMonkey users
> (version 2.2) have been able to do this.
>
> I sent a note to Vanguard and they responded that they don't support
> SeaMonkey
On 7/27/2011 6:09 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Cathy Palmer-Lister wrote:
Hi, I moved to a new computer,and from XP to Win 7. I cannot get SM
to work with Norton antvirus though they got along just fine in old
computer. I've tried installing SM before the antivirus and vice
versa but same resul
After installing 2.2 on one of my computers, it always starts in safe
mode. I checked all of the blocks except bookmarks but it still starts
in safe mode. What next? I don't want to lose my bookmarks.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonke
I cannot get the password manager to remember my ID or password for Vanguard's
web site and I was wondering if any other SeaMonkey users (version 2.2) have
been able to do this.
I sent a note to Vanguard and they responded that they don't support SeaMonkey;
but they do support Firefox. Aren't
Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:32:23 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:
With a bit of delay, I've uploaded initial version on the AMO site:
https://addons.mozilla.org/bg/firefox/addon/remember-passwords/
Blah. The more friendly URL should be:
https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/remember-passwords/
--
Stanimir
On 07/27/2011 10:54 AM, PhillipJones wrote:
> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>> PhillipJones wrote:
>>> NoOp wrote:
On 07/26/2011 04:01 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>> On 07/26/2011 11:17 AM, S. Beaulieu wrote:
>>> Keith Whaley a écrit :
Every time I send a res
Cathy Palmer-Lister wrote:
Hi, I moved to a new computer,and from XP to Win 7. I cannot get SM
to work with Norton antvirus though they got along just fine in old
computer. I've tried installing SM before the antivirus and vice
versa but same result--some sites do not load at all, some give weir
On 7/27/11 2:54 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
> Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:41:54 -0700, /David E. Ross/:
>
>> According to the Add-ons Manager, I have two themes installed for
>> SeaMonkey 2.2: SeaMonkey Default Theme 2.2 and SeaMonkey Modern Theme
>> 2.2.
>>
>> Somehow, I have lost the Enable and Disab
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:41:54 -0700, /David E. Ross/:
According to the Add-ons Manager, I have two themes installed for
SeaMonkey 2.2: SeaMonkey Default Theme 2.2 and SeaMonkey Modern Theme
2.2.
Somehow, I have lost the Enable and Disable buttons for these.
Currently, SeaMonkey Modern Theme 2.2 is
According to the Add-ons Manager, I have two themes installed for
SeaMonkey 2.2: SeaMonkey Default Theme 2.2 and SeaMonkey Modern Theme
2.2.
Somehow, I have lost the Enable and Disable buttons for these.
Currently, SeaMonkey Modern Theme 2.2 is active; but I prefer SeaMonkey
Default Theme 2.2.
W
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:41:14 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:
Michel Gutierrez (mig) has given me a terrific hint over in
m.d.extensions and I've been able to make an extension with a
patched nsLoginManager which ignores autocomplete="off" entirely.
I'll see to make it further perform the form initiali
Interviewed by CNN on 27/07/2011 16:19, Cathy Palmer-Lister told the world:
> Hi, I moved to a new computer,and from XP to Win 7. I cannot get SM to
> work with Norton antvirus though they got along just fine in old
> computer. I've tried installing SM before the antivirus and vice versa
> but s
Interviewed by CNN on 27/07/2011 12:42, Bernard Mercier told the world:
> Even before updating, I didn't have a bookmarks.html file.
> As far as I remember some comment, it is not used anymore and all is in one
> place, places.sqlite.
> Thus such a file can maybe grow considerably.
Not quite corr
You can now list only one domain at a time, whereas you could list all of your
passwords together before, listing them by login name, password, or domain.
That is gone now. You can still search, but you can only search for a specific
domain. It is simply more awkward and less flexible. Both bad
W3BNR wrote:
Right click on what you don't want and select 'cut'.
Just make SURE you don't want it.
Not available (for me) for "Personal toolbar", which
is most certainly my top priority to remove from this
list.
** Phil (formerly G3TGQ).
___
supp
On 7/27/2011 3:29 PM Donna Waltman submitted the following:
Is there any way to move some of that junk at the top of the bookmarks
drop-down menu down to the bottom? When I click on Bookmarks, I just
want to see MY bookmarks, not a bunch of other options like bookmark
tabs, subscribe to this pag
Is there any way to move some of that junk at the top of the bookmarks
drop-down menu down to the bottom? When I click on Bookmarks, I just
want to see MY bookmarks, not a bunch of other options like bookmark
tabs, subscribe to this page & personal toolbar.
Hi, I moved to a new computer,and from XP to Win 7. I cannot get SM to
work with Norton antvirus though they got along just fine in old
computer. I've tried installing SM before the antivirus and vice versa
but same result--some sites do not load at all, some give weird error
messages. Sometim
seems like i should be able to "just edit" about config to allow google
to install the google opt-out plug-in... but for the life of me i can't
find the right line to edit in about:config
suggestions?
sean
--
Do not try to solve all life's problems at once
learn to dread each day as it come
On Jul 26, 6:08 am, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) schrieb:
>
> > Just right-clicked on a message title in a forum,
> > and the attached list of options appeared. 95%
> > seem completely irrelevant. Any idea why they have
> > appeared ?
>
> There is a know bug that sometim
Since I updated to 2.2 My filters are not always automatically sorting
incoming email. They sort some but not most of the messages. If I run
the filters manually they work as expected.
They are all set to "Checking Mail or Manually Run".
___
support-s
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Daniel wrote:
> So having discovered that you had a problem posting direct to the
newsgroup (why you and no-one else, ever??), you deliberately decided to
annoy us individually as well!!
No, I have no problem posting direct to the mailing list
(see two
PhillipJones wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 07/26/2011 04:01 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 07/26/2011 11:17 AM, S. Beaulieu wrote:
Keith Whaley a écrit :
Every time I send a response to a message on this group, I need
special
care that I don't
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 07/26/2011 04:01 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 07/26/2011 11:17 AM, S. Beaulieu wrote:
Keith Whaley a écrit :
Every time I send a response to a message on this group, I need
special
care that I don't end up sending my res
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) schrieb:
I /think/ that Justin Wood recognised this (as evidenced by his closing
"I doubt this is legit though, so please carry on.", but his earlier
"Umm seriously" does cast some doubt on this conjecture.
I think that Justin is used to re
WLS wrote:
Ken wrote:
DrSlider wrote:
Anyone else have any experience with this? Losing my browsing history
is no big deal. Having to reconstruct my passwords file is a very big
deal.
Love the Philip Taylor sig, but I have to disagree with dsavitsk on
the 4x3 screens. Widescreen is much better
NoOp wrote:
On 07/26/2011 02:01 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
Thunderbird has a [Reply to list] button; I'm not sure why it's not in
SeaMonkey.
Because no-one ported it.
This one?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=654009
[Reply to list: automatically determine From: a
DrSlider a exprimé avec précision :
> I thought I, too, had lost my bookmarks, since they did not appear when I hit
> "F9". However, they were just folded up. Click the "+" on the Bookmarks Menu
> and they are probably there. Custom icons will reload when you visit the
> sites.
> If you don't fin
Ken schrieb:
I gather that Password Manager just lists passwords and doesn't
actually fill them in automatically
You gather wrong.
Robert Kaiser
--
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never
meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible
a
Ken wrote:
DrSlider wrote:
Anyone else have any experience with this? Losing my browsing history
is no big deal. Having to reconstruct my passwords file is a very big
deal.
Love the Philip Taylor sig, but I have to disagree with dsavitsk on
the 4x3 screens. Widescreen is much better IMHO. There
DrSlider wrote:
Anyone else have any experience with this? Losing my browsing history is no big
deal. Having to reconstruct my passwords file is a very big deal.
Love the Philip Taylor sig, but I have to disagree with dsavitsk on the 4x3
screens. Widescreen is much better IMHO. There are a lot
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) a écrit :
Already incorporated into my "standard working practice" for
this list. It takes a chap a little while to get up to speed,
don't you know ? :-)
Well, better late than never!
S.
___
support-seamonkey mail
S. Beaulieu wrote:
if you simply deleted his address from the reply field (rather than editing it
to deobfuscate it), it would be less work for you and nicer to him (or anyone
else).
Already incorporated into my "standard working practice" for
this list. It takes a chap a little while to ge
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) a écrit :
Yes, I did receive a bounce; several, in fact. So, realising
that my messages were not getting through to the original sender,
because he/she had obfuscated his/her address, I did the gentlemanly
thing and manually removed the obfuscation, so that he/sh
WLS wrote:
> You do know that all posts to the mailing lists also show up in the
newsgroups?
Yes, I am slowly learning how this setup works :-)
>
> At least that is the way I understand it.
>
> I could be wrong and am often
>
> WLS (Webmaster Wannabe)
Aim higher : I was far far happier as a
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Daniel wrote:
> So having discovered that you had a problem posting direct to the
newsgroup (why you and no-one else, ever??), you deliberately decided to
annoy us individually as well!!
No, I have no problem posting direct to the mailing list
(see two
Daniel wrote:
> So having discovered that you had a problem posting direct to the newsgroup
(why you and no-one else, ever??), you deliberately decided to annoy us
individually as well!!
No, I have no problem posting direct to the mailing list
(see two immediately preceding messages for why
Daniel wrote:
> That's what I was expecting here with Philip's post, but in checking I saw
that he had posted to both the NG *AND* to me. Annoying!!
No, I had posted to the mailing list (see immediately preceding message)
and to the original sender after de-obfuscating his/her address. Any
a
Daniel wrote:
Philip, I have my toolbars set for text only, just like you, however I've done
(or had done) the auto-upgrade to SM 2.2, so I've got:-
Reply dropdown
Reply to Sender only
Reply to Newsgroup (in bold)
Reply to All dropdown
Reply to Sender and Newsgroup (in bold)
Reply to all Re
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) schrieb:
I /think/ that Justin Wood recognised this (as evidenced by his closing
"I doubt this is legit though, so please carry on.", but his earlier
"Umm seriously" does cast some doubt on this conjecture.
I think that Justin is used to reading very strange opi
DrSlider wrote:
I agree with you that 2.2 is a mess on several points. It seems like it is more
like IE than even Firefox.
Here is my question: Did you have any install problems going back to 2.1? I am
hesitant to just run the install file and hope it removes 2.2, as there have
been past glit
DrSlider schrieb:
Things I dislike about 2.2: Password manager is less functional,
"Less functional" in what way?
Robert Kaiser
--
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never
meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible
arguments that we
I thought I, too, had lost my bookmarks, since they did not appear when I hit
"F9". However, they were just folded up. Click the "+" on the Bookmarks Menu
and they are probably there. Custom icons will reload when you visit the sites.
If you don't find them folded up, they will be at C:\Documen
Anyone else have any experience with this? Losing my browsing history is no big
deal. Having to reconstruct my passwords file is a very big deal.
Love the Philip Taylor sig, but I have to disagree with dsavitsk on the 4x3
screens. Widescreen is much better IMHO. There are a lot of old guys here
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
S. Beaulieu wrote:
It would help if you could post a screenshot shewing this
mysterious arrow; I see none here (Seamonkey 2.2 under
Win/XP PRO;SP3).
Here's the screeenshot, where I included an arrow to point at the tiny
arrow.
http://www.sereenie.com
I agree with you that 2.2 is a mess on several points. It seems like it is more
like IE than even Firefox.
Here is my question: Did you have any install problems going back to 2.1? I am
hesitant to just run the install file and hope it removes 2.2, as there have
been past glitches in the histo
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
So what is your point, Keith ?
1) I am using e-mail inappropriately (in this context)
2) The list is inappropriately configured
3) Seamonkey is not correctly following RFC-822
4) Daniel is unreasonable in his expectations
Me?? Un
NoOp wrote:
On 07/26/2011 02:42 PM, S. Beaulieu wrote:
NoOp a écrit :
Philip and Keith are using the maill list rather than nntp.
Well, that would explain it!
Thanks for the info.
S.
I've found it helpful to set up a message filter so that I know when
someone is using the mail list rat
Keith Whaley wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
I used "reply/all"; if I don't, it goes only to you.
** Phil.
Daniel wrote:
Philip, why did you reply to the newsgroup *AND* to me via email?
There is no need and only wastes my available email allowance!!
True. So is Da
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Correct ! Having discovered (by virtue of numerous bounce messages)
that the majority of subscribers to this list have spurious elements
in their "From: " fields, I now routinely remove these spurii as
a matter of course.
Ph
60 matches
Mail list logo
