DoctorBill wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
They don't want to maintain the car,
Oh, but they -ARE- willing to invest large gobs of their time
into learning the fine points of anti-whatever apps
(which aren't necessary on a properly-crafted OS).
they just want to drive it.
On 12-01-08 12:53 AM, DoctorBill wrote:
JeffM wrote:
You folks get on here and talk technical jargon and act as if the
average person is some sort of useless (useful) idiot who should know
better.
I think that you have made my case for me !
Folks, please take this off-topic discussion
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Daniel wrote:
[...]BitDefender[...]anti-virus update[...]
I've been reading with great amusement
this thread about a toy OS and the hoops its users jump thru.
If your b-i-l used Mandriva, he'd not have had this problem!
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
They don't want to maintain the car,
Oh, but they -ARE- willing to invest large gobs of their time
into learning the fine points of anti-whatever apps
(which aren't necessary on a properly-crafted OS).
they just want to drive it.
...after they've ironed out all the
Does your inferiority complex pervade your whole life, Paul,
or is it restricted to your choice of operating system ?
Philip Taylor
JeffM wrote:
yet another childish and pointless diatribe about the
supposedevils of Microsoft and Windows
___
JeffM wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
They don't want to maintain the car,
Oh, but they -ARE- willing to invest large gobs of their time into
learning the fine points of anti-whatever apps (which aren't
necessary on a properly-crafted OS).
Really? Show me one, just one, non-geek/nerd who
JeffM wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
They don't want to maintain the car,
Oh, but they -ARE- willing to invest large gobs of their time
into learning the fine points of anti-whatever apps
(which aren't necessary on a properly-crafted OS).
they just want to drive it.
...after they've
Ricardo Palomares Martínez wrote:
I'm not trying to prove you wrong with this post, but for an average
user that is not really able to do himself the housekeeping in the
OS (besides applying updates), I'd say you will find / have found more
fundamental changes switching from Windows XP to
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
... And there are very few Windows users who would willing accept
that before they can use something, theg must first compile it.
On that issue, I've been using Linux for about seven years and have
never once compiled a single ... anything. I'm not sure why you think
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Ricardo Palomares Martínez wrote:
I'm not trying to prove you wrong with this post, but for an average
user that is not really able to do himself the housekeeping in the
OS (besides applying updates), I'd say you will find / have found more
fundamental changes switching
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
That was my initial reaction, too. But it turns out you can click
any folder name in the displayed hierarchy and go directly there,
so there's no need for an up button.
I agree : there is no /need/ for up button, in just
same way that there is no need for more than
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
[...]I've been using Linux for about seven years
and have never once compiled a single ... anything.
...though that does remain an option which is available with FOSS
--unlike the all-closed-source segment
which makes up the majority of the M$ ecosystem.
...despite
Hartmut Figge wrote:
JeffM wrote:
My question is: What tasks do these folks actually do
that **requires** the easily-infected / needs-anti-whatever-apps OS?
There *are* games which wine is unable to cope with. :)
...which echoes my use of the term toy OS. 8-)
Don't serious gamers run a
Daniel wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Daniel wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
In looking up methods to remove it, I went to
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
[snippage]
Thanks to Doctor Bill and Beauregard for confirming my
suspicions! I've just rung B-in-L to tell him to cancel card and
said I'd be over shortly to try and fix situation!
Card cancelled.
Started BitDefender via the Start button, ran complete virus
JeffM:
My question is: What tasks do these folks actually do
that **requires** the easily-infected / needs-anti-whatever-apps OS?
There *are* games which wine is unable to cope with. :)
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
JeffM wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Daniel wrote:
[...]BitDefender[...]anti-virus update[...]
I've been reading with great amusement
this thread about a toy OS and the hoops its users jump thru.
If your b-i-l used Mandriva, he'd not have had this problem! :-)
I was
JeffM wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Daniel wrote:
[...]BitDefender[...]anti-virus update[...]
I've been reading with great amusement
this thread about a toy OS and the hoops its users jump thru.
If your b-i-l used Mandriva, he'd not have had this problem! :-)
I was thinking
DoctorBill wrote:
XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
I looked up what a 'proxy server' isis it necessary to use one when
on the web in SM 2.6.1 ?
It seems to my limited knowledge that allowing a secondary server to
control what comes in to me is allowing the greater possibility
Daniel wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
In looking up methods to remove it, I went to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/forum/winxp
for
DoctorBill wrote:
Daniel wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
In looking up methods to remove it, I went to
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
In looking up methods to remove it, I went to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/forum/winxp
for help.
One of the sites I was told to
DoctorBill wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
In looking up methods to remove it, I went to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/forum/winxp
for help.
One of the
DoctorBill wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
In looking up methods to remove it, I went to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/forum/winxp
for help.
One of the
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
In looking up methods to remove it, I went to
DoctorBill wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
In looking up methods to remove it, I went to
DoctorBill wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
In looking up methods to remove it, I went to
Rickles wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
In looking up methods to remove it, I went to
DoctorBill wrote:
Rickles wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
In looking up methods to
DoctorBill wrote:
Rickles wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd
Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my system.
In looking up methods to remove
Rickles wrote:
I assumed you were connecting to the internet through a router
device, most likely provided by your Internet Service Provider (ISP).
That piece of hardware, that box, normally has at least a firewall
function in it to protect you from unwanted internet traffic. A proxy
is simply
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rickles wrote:
I assumed you were connecting to the internet through a router
device, most likely provided by your Internet Service Provider (ISP).
That piece of hardware, that box, normally has at least a firewall
function in it to protect you from unwanted internet
DoctorBill wrote:
Rickles wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Rickles wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.6.1 now.
I am in the process of trying to remove an infection of some Gawd
Awful
Trojan or Virus called XP Security 2012 that got into my
33 matches
Mail list logo
