Here's an alternative listing:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150416132638.htm
--
¡Ay, Pachamamita! ¡Eres la cosa más bonita!
___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium
Hmm, no. You might start with websites that cater to DIY beauty
hobbyists. You know, making your own soap and beauty creams and that sort
of thing. Just thinking out loud, here.
Sorry I can't be if more help.
--
¡Ay, Pachamamita! ¡Eres la cosa más bonita!
Midori,
Donating the library to Soil and Health was a great idea. They are a
wonderful resource.
There is a part of me that wants to take some or all of the processors, if
only for posterity's sake. But this is unrealistic. It's a near certainty
that I will not make use of them anytime soon. H
P.S. -- Sorry folks, I didn't see what auto correct was doing. That's
supposed to be *shingles*, not singles. . . .
--
¡Ay, Pachamamita! ¡Eres la cosa más bonita!
___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
Yes, I realize solar singles have been around for a while. Almost a decade
now. But until only pretty recently, they were quite expensive in
comparison to conventional PV panels.
Using coal as a cost benchmark is capricious and arbitrary. When paying
our coal-generated electricity bill, is the
All well and good. Of course, we need them now, and would have them by now
if this ridiculous benchmark of being "competitive with coal" weren't
causing artificial inertia.
--
¡Ay, Pachamamita! ¡Eres la cosa más bonita!
___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel maili
I've wondered about these issues you mention. What is the threshold
temperature, that you'd want to keep your PV below?
On Sunday, February 8, 2015, Zeke Yewdall wrote:
> It all depends on the temperatures of the thermal energy and whether you
> have a use for it. This is actually what I did m
help out.
Best,
--Chris
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014, Thomas Irwin wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Depending on the shipping cost, I would be willing to take the small and
> the ethanol still. If you are getting rid of the library, I would be happy
> to add it to mine as a future refe
What Darryl said.
>
--
¡Ay, Pachamamita! ¡Eres la cosa más bonita!
___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
Yay!
On Nov 20, 2014 5:50 PM, "Chip Mefford" wrote:
>
>
> Well,
>
> I gotta admit, I've gotten a huge response to my query, and honestly I
> wasn't expecting it.
> Aside from the responses you've all perhaps read, I've received many
> off-list as well.
>
> Okay, we'll leave it up.
> _
I think I echo pretty much everybody else's responses thus far. My time is
super limited right now, so I have little to contribute. I do see the
updates that get posted, though, and read them.
Please let us know what you decide.
___
Sustainablelorgbiof
accomplishment.
Keeping it available online, is a fitting tribute.
--Chris
On Wednesday, November 5, 2014, Keith Addison
wrote:
> Dear biofuel friends,
>
> Keith, who contributed so much to the handmade biofuel movement and
> related appropriate technology and organic movements, died of
We're going to be at 500ppm in the blink of an eye.
On Sep 10, 2014 7:29 AM, "Darryl McMahon" wrote:
> http://www.canadianunderwriter.ca/news/co2-concentration-in-
> atmosphere-now-42-higher-than-before-industrial-age-world-
> meteorological/1003244978/30sslyW42vwv682rM2vx/?ref=
> enews_CTECH&utm
So freaking lame. Corporate welfare knows no bounds.
On Jul 9, 2014 4:18 PM, "Darryl McMahon" wrote:
> http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/07/08/wv-chemical-company-fined-11000-for-
> poisoning-30-peoples-drinking-water/
>
> [Perhaps I have too high an opinion of myself, but I would like to thin
This sounds like a shill piece.
On Jun 24, 2014 3:31 PM, "Darryl McMahon" wrote:
> http://www.therecord.com/news-story/4595225-do-it-yourself-
> biodiesel-don-t-try-this-at-home/
>
> [FUD. Why is there an implicit assumption that motivated people of
> average intelligence can't learn how to do s
This seems to imply a large loss of combustion efficiency, with a lot of
(noncombusted) fuel going out the tailpipe. Is the engine running for
sinistral vs. biodiesel really so different?
On May 28, 2014 11:26 AM, "Darryl McMahon" wrote:
> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S09266
Hmm. Could this work? So far, all the algae energy hype has been just
that, hype. Algae can give you a great biofuel, but just doesn't scale
up. It's a "small is 'beautifuel'" thing.
On Feb 25, 2014 11:22 AM, "Darryl McMahon" wrote:
> http://www.maritime-executive.com/article/Continuous-
> P
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/11/04/david-suzuki-fukushima-warning_n_4213061.html
David Suzuki has issued a scary warning about Japan's Fukushima nuclear
plant, saying that if it falls in a future earthquake, it's "bye bye Japan"
and the entire west coast of North America should be evacuated.
Goods article, in terms of presenting the data and critiquing the climate
denial "movement". But almost depressingly disappointing in the way it
nosedived into a sales pitch at the very end, with fuzzy math and false
equivalencies.
There's no doubt a strong argument to be made for "air capture" (
Precisely, Dawie.
On Nov 7, 2013 1:53 PM, "Dawie Coetzee" wrote:
> I've been noticing Big Oil pushing plastics feedstocks instead of fuels
> ...-D
>
>
>
>
> >
> > From: Jake Kruger
> >To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
> >Sent: Thursday,
Ha ha. Yup
On Oct 13, 2013 4:33 PM, "Chip Mefford" wrote:
In a word?
Yu Becha!
___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
I'm somewhat less skeptical. There have indeed been quite a few
"breakthrough" battery concepts over the past decade or so, which have
never materialized commercially. But this one has something. Or things, I
should say.
First, the chemistry is pretty much pre-lithium-sounding; almost a hybrid
Yes, I saw this a few weeks back. Kept meaning to post it here.
Fortunately there are others on the list more on the ball than me.
Thanks, Keith.
There were a one or two things that bothered me about the talk, though.
Firstly, from my recollection he makes no mention of CAFOs. None.
He also
Wikipedia has sanitized that entry, but it's still in the Google search
engine cache. Too funny.
___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorg
BTW I shared that one on Facebook, about Israeli ethnic cleansing (I assume
that's the one you're referring to). Immediately got pounced on. Textbook
example of someone who refuses to confront their own irrationality. The
best I could get out of him was "there've been mistakes on both sides."
Th
ote:
> On 3/17/2013 9:30 AM, Chris Burck wrote:
>
>> I'd like to say thanks for your efforts with the daily postings. It is
>> really appreciated. Respect.
>>
>> Was there a volunteer to handle Truthout? I thought at one point I saw
>> someone say they&
I'd like to say thanks for your efforts with the daily postings. It is
really appreciated. Respect.
Was there a volunteer to handle Truthout? I thought at one point I saw
someone say they'd step up but haven't really been able to stay on top of
it.
One thing I noticed, though, is that on the i
So all of those missiles and bombs and bullets that rain down on Gaza and
the West Bank; the roadblocks, checkpoints and blockade; the total Israeli
control of infrastructure, etc., etc., etc. . .is all really just part of a
vast, pro-Palestinian humanitarian program on the part of the Israelis? I
If I may interject briefly, I saw a very timely political cartoon the other
day:
A bunch of founding father-looking dudes are gathered round a writing desk,
where another is seated with quill in hand. One of the fellows on his feet
asks, "Are you sure everyone will know we're being ironic?"
On Ja
And more. They just keep getting hammered:
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/12/03-5
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Keith Addison wrote:
> Climate Experts To World: Act Boldly Now, or Pay Severely Later
> There is still time to avert worst impacts of climate change, but that
> means s
Do you have a link for the PASA conference presentation/keynote?
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Chip Mefford wrote:
>
>
> Ooops,
> Wrong presentation,
> But it's still directly germane.
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Chip Mefford"
> > To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablel
Actually, Porritt seems to see the need for a greater emphasis on
local-scale power, though to what extent I can't tell (Perhaps this, in
addition to nuclear's absolutely atrocious record in terms of safety and
compliance and cost, is a factor in his opposition to nuclear.). Whereas
Monbiot makes
Oops, that's hilarious:
I can't read Chinese or Japanese, so all the neon buy-buy-buy signs were
> just a kind of rather pretty abstract art to me.
>
> --
¡Ay, Pachamamita! ¡Eres la cosa más bonita!
___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelor
Robert,
Nice essay. "Buy more stuff. Confuse everyone." That had me in stitches.
Just Wonderful.
Your post came on the heels of a interview program the other day. This guy
had written a book critiquing holiday consumerism. He was pretty good. So
somewhere he brings up iron lady thatcher, a
AP were way off the mark on this one.
Clearly that graph demonstrates that Iran is not merely researching 'da
bomb', but possess knowledge which only comes from having secretly built
and detonated many, many bombs. In fact it appears they are poised to
leapfrog the u.s. in nuclear weapons capabil
Yes, I wholeheartedly agree. Monbiot can't be criticized for pointing out
the complicated mess we're in. These are sticky issues indeed. Until we
recognize, collectively, that a fundamental restructuring lies at the heart
of it, we will forever find ourselves choosing whatever seems the least
un
Hi Keith,
True enough. Admittedly, my initial rection was unduly harsh.
> I don't think any of us thought dear old George is in anybody's pocket
>> though. So IMHO we can't (yet) convict Mr Dyer on any evidence that's
>> beyond reasonable doubt.
>
>
However, i remember the monbiot piece (the o
Hi, Keith.
Thanks much, all. I didn't post this piece because I thought it was a great
> article.
I, for one, certainly did not think that was why you posted it (and I doubt
anyone else did, either). Apologies if it seemed that way.
> As Daryl says, one can usually expect better of Dyer. .
Dyer was **so*obviously** hacking for the nuke industry on this one. the
piece is so riddled with industry distortions and
and falsehoods, either he (or the nuke PR guy who wrote it for him) must
have been making progressive commission on
a per-deviation-from-the-truth basis. Seriously, seriously
Hmm, so 'rogue cattle farmers' seeking a quick profit, and aided by death
squads to silence opposition,
basically carry out the Brazillian incarnation of Enclosure Movement 2.0.
In so doing, they contribute
mightily to pushing the ecosystem and climate to the breaking point. And
now, instead of
ucky i get to hear a part of his radio
slot once or twice a week. oh, well, it is what it is. . . .
On Nov 22, 2012 4:48 PM, "Keith Addison" wrote:
> Hi Chris
>
> ha, i was about to post this one.
>>
>
> Please don't let that discourage you!
>
> Follow
ha, i was about to post this one. an investigation into the '04 ohio
election results was opened, but stalled and was then dropped (i'm not
clear on why). it was then picked up by some attorneys (again, somewhat
murky: what was their competence? haven't had a chance yet to try and dig
for these
and 3 months. later he was assassinated (or executed). . . .coincidence?
On Oct 24, 2012 2:31 PM, "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/10/22-9
>
> Published on Monday, October 22, 2012 by The Guardian
>
> Is GDP's Reign as the Only Measure of Wealth Co
chip that would be amazing.
keith,
au contraire, it is you who should *take* a bow. you have done
a great service. truly. the first time i ran across jtf, i don't know how
long
the list had been around (and come to think of it, i still don't lol), but
it
seemed very well established and my fir
funded by altria, a family company. . . .
On May 16, 2012 5:30 PM, "Juan Boveda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list members.
> This technique shown in the video from the UC Berkeley is by no means
> something a backyarder can do in a short time.
> It shows in YouTube how they are using a lot
lol, maybe i should try that with my mortgage!
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Keith Addison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
> Anyway, the list host remains unpaid. But it emerges that since
> payment wasn't made on time, the list couldn't be closed down on time
> either. So I get another year by d
the grip is, indeed, not so deep. but it's a grip of iron, nonetheless.
basically, i find people buy into the belief system(s) of the power
structure. not because they've been brainwashed or 'implanted' as it
were. but because they know it's what's expected. they know it's
convenient. this is
what's got me scratching my head is this:
"oloid pond mixing nanotechnology"
wha. . .?!?
On Dec 7, 2011 9:26 AM, "Darryl McMahon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.environmental-expert.com/news/algarythm-australia-270152
>
> 5 December 2011 -- Algarythm Pty Ltd is the operating company of
woof.
On Sep 1, 2011 1:31 PM, "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really?
>
> http://search.japantimes.co.jp:80/mail/eo20110831rs.html
>
> Wednesday, Aug. 31, 2011
>
> Time for U.S. to say yes to Canadian oil sands
>
> By ROBERT J. SAMUELSON
>
> The Washington Post
>
> WASHINGTON - When it
in the "good old usa", the irs defines the highest income bracket as: $50
million and up. it's a tax bracket consisting of 74 individuals. these 74
individuals control fully one half the wealth of the u.s.
On Aug 18, 2011 6:48 AM, "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-- next pa
a public radio program out of philadelphia recently did this story:
http://www.npr.org/2011/07/21/138537515/how-alec-shapes-state-politics-behind-the-scenes
and this:
http://www.npr.org/2011/07/21/138575665/national-chairman-of-alec-responds-to-report
that ssecond item is i think a result of th
atoms for peace. . . .
On Jun 14, 2011 5:53 PM, "Midori Hiraga (JTF)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I think he is describing the situation here quite well.
> Midori
>
> from ENE News:
>
http://enenews.com/massive-entry-of-radiation-into-groundwater-will-spread-throughout-water-table-in
funny how the memory works. this reminded me of another detail that was in
that radio program i had mentioned in the other thread. apparently, it was
normal in japan for fresh goods to be labeled as to their placecountry of
origin. that practice seems to have come to an abrupt halt.
On Jun 1, 20
zeke,
those are radioactive *emissions*. there's an overlap in nomenclature. my
fault for not clarifying.
i was referring to radioactive particles in the sense of contaminated or
"dirty" particles, which will generally be fairly large and don't enter very
easily through the skin.
On May 31, 201
keith,
the radio program i mentioned is one i've listened to for many years. the
guy does his research and doesn't just bring on random people off the
street. the woman's name was hitomi kamanaka; a filmmaker and anti-nuclear
activist. the interview (3-way, there was also an american academic)
a local radio program had a japanese guest this past week, to discuss
fukushima. I was only able to catch a small bit of it. one thing that
stuck in my mind, was she said many people in tokyo are ignoring
recommendations to wear surgical masks.
the interviewer asked is this really effective our
i think dawie was referring more to the placement of the eyes. at least
that was how i understood his meaning. mammals = both eyes in front VS.
birds (or fish, reptiles, whatever) = one eye either side of head. so with
a dog we're more sort of automatically aware they're looking at us.
oh, and
beautifully said, dawie.
On May 19, 2011 12:13 AM, "Dawie Coetzee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20110521/85636839/attachment.html
___
Biofuel mailing lis
On May 18, 2011 8:46 PM, "bmolloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
> Re whales "choosing" to return to the sea.
wow, i'm surprised a little by the reaction that proposition is getting.
The statement seems
> to turn natural selection on its head.
i don't think so.
>My u
quite true keith. you've touched on some points i've been meaning to bring
to bring to bear on this discussion. hopefully i'll find some time to
contribute more.
robert, i was trying to draw you into the discussion as a thought exercise
(the thing about the whales). this very question was put t
some define intelligence as the ability to comprehend; or to compute. to
"grok".
others like to define it as the ability to think adaptively, i.e. to learn
from experience.
those are probably the two most common uses of the word. people don't
usually think of intelligence in terms of morality.
yes, well, I agree with your point about the question really being about
walking, and that bicycling will naturally flow from that.
wrt "car culture", this is a notion that i have always considered to be
corporate in origin. big auto, big oil, big development/real estate. big
brother.
the whole
yes, that's a good link, darryl. I read it when you posted. and as usual,
keith, you've followed up with a ton of good material more. thanks.
the reports coming out of fukushima, about the ridiculous iodine levels
being nothing to worry about, for example. or the links you posted, keith,
about
dawie,
as usual you have lifted the veil and voiced what lies at the core of the
discussion.
however, you aren't actually suggesting that "car culture" rhetoric is
original to the "carfree crowd?
On Apr 20, 2011 5:14 PM, "Dawie Coetzee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The thing to understand is that
asimov, he was a sinister one.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20110420/982ed1a6/attachment.html
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mail
rather amateurish, imho. esp. for an academic. maybe he's "writing down"
to a mass audience?
On Apr 16, 2011 8:36 AM, "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Human rapaciousness", Gaia the "avenger"? Mr Clare thinks it's
> humans that are doing this? "We"? "Us"? "Our"? Maybe Gaia won't make
y tired and since i can't keep my train of thought i'm starting to
sermonize which is one of the worst forms of human interaction. i think it
was chip who said that one of the best forms of communication is to *do*.
couldn't agree more.
anyway, hoping everyone is well,
-chris
this discussion is shaking loose some of the cobwebs that have built
up since my days driving big trucks, and there is another way to
approach this. darryl'sand jeromie's suggestions are very sound.
however, consider that if you just go ahead and begin doing business,
without paying any road tax (
can the guy explain a little about why he draws this conclusion about
taxes? not that i doubt the notion. in fact, he could well be right.
but it would help to know what information he's working with.
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.
there's something that seems to have gone completely under the radar
of the media (or they're willfully avoiding the question) in their
coverage of the gulf catastrofe. they report from time to time that
bp has brought, or is bringing, this or that asset to the gulf to add
a certain capability in
zeke, i'm glad you brought up solar thermal. i had intended to mention it
but left it out due to a need for brevity. my aoplogies for that, jim, but
i have a few minutes to tackle it now.
you can already imagine where i'm going based on zeke's comments, but solar
thermal would make a great addit
i know! i was tempted to sneak several "yet agains" in there. re the
whale story, i heard it on the radio, and just googled "whale" and
"feces" and "iron", which gave a lot of hits. the first link was an
article in mother jones from a couple days ago (which mentioned the
australians' findings we
talk about synchronicity. i heard two tidbits today. first (note
that i didn't have time to cross-check this one), the latest data
indicates that the oceans are even warmer, and warming at a faster
rate, than had been thought until now. which means that global
warming is farther along than previ
jim, pv has serious limitations, to be sure. but in reality, all
forms of energy do. biofuels are the least weather dependent and will
give more tangible results, but also require more infrastructure and
ongoing activity. the upside to wind, snall hydro, and solar is that
once in place, far less
jim, i posed some questions early on, which i'm glad to see you
answered (in part) when responding to jason. it would still help to
know what sort of funds you have to work with. whether it be your
economic development budget, or other funding streams which might be
under the control of other adm
hi, keith. sorry if my last post had a "negative nelly" tone. didn't
mean for it to sound that way, but didn't have the time to consider
composition. well, not now either. not even in bed yet and i have to
start all over again in 4 and a half hrs! anyway, i hope you're right
about ppl being re
couldn't agree w/you more, keith. you reffed a quote earlier fron the
rocky mtn inst, about efficiencies being the fossil fuel savings in
recent decades, and that mostly those efficiencies didn't require
behavioral changes. this is precisely the problem.
_
jim, it might be helpful if we understood better, under what sort of
policy constraints you are working. what are your funding streams
(i.e. ballpark dollar amounts) and what kind of mandates/conditions
come attached to them? i could go on. basically, what i'm trying to
get at, how much lattitud
your oil and israel post is an incredible piece of writing, keith.
you so obviously went into the right profession. tried checking out
the arundhati roy link, but seems lannan has revamped their website in
the intervening years, and the transcript is no longer offered in
html. will have to make a
wow, somehow i never expected to see the u.s.s liberty come up on this
list. the story is well documented (as secret non-incidents go) and
is slowly penetrating the american pryche. i first heard of it many
years ago when the local npr station interviewed a former cia guy who
had just published a
thanks for that, hoagy.
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Search the combined Biofuel and Bi
thanks for that, hoagy.
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Search the combined Biofuel and Bi
hi, keith. thanks for the links. no time to check them out in depth
right now. i heard a little a really horrifying little factoid
yesterday, which is that apparently the ocean floor in that region is.
. .highly porous, for lack for a better word. so concievably many of
the contaminants in the
the best biofuels idea i've heard is kelp farming. extremely
practical, easily managed both from a production and an environmental
standpoint. algea has astounding potential on paper, but you start
throwing genetic engineering, bioreactors, venting waste gases, etc.,
etc., you're just over-compli
cool stuff.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Darryl McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Binding biomass (lignin) with conventional diesel to reduce soot.
>
>
> http://w3.tue.nl/en/news/news_article/?tx_ttnews[tt_news]=9245&tx_ttnews[backPid]=361&cHash=519bda9553
>
> Darryl
>
> --
> Darryl McMaho
not exactly, ken. at least, as i understand it, GMOs do not contain
"manufactured" genes. they are merely transplanting already existing
genetic material into organisms which heretofore did not contain said genes
in their genome (and thus the attributes of the transplanted genes could not
be obta
lol, yeah, moles for sure are kind of tricky. precisely because of
the things you mention. (i dropped chem in college. there was no way
i was going to pass if i stuck it out.) thanks for sharing your
impression of the youtube guy. sorry if it was waste of your time.
__
i've been meaning to check some of this guy's stuff out myself
(really need to revisit a lot of high school math), but haven't gotten
around to it yet.
-chris
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Keith Addison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I have difficulty with moles. I do know
i don't know the particulars of the power industry in the u.k. (such
as whether the 'traditional' generators are subsidized), but while
monbiot makes some valid points his conclusion seems flawed. it's
less a question of whether to suasidize or not to subsidize, than one
of how to structure the su
darryl, you've summed up what i was starting to post earlier (had to
cut it short but instead of deleting must have hit send). the EERE
statement translates roughly as follows: 1) the era of corporate
welfare has entered a new phase (tens and hundreds of billions
annually for climate mitigation),
On 1/6/10, MH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like your idea Darryl and I'll see if I can join in and do that.
>
> My apartment managers just added more insulation to the ceiling
> and around the foundation. They also replaced all the bulbs with
> compact fluorescent lights that I didn't get around
h was thinking the same thing. <>
On 12/5/09, Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> wake me when they've done it with spam.
>
> :-) Sorry, we're fresh out of spam. No spam with spam either.
> Soyburger perhaps? It comes with tofu.
>
> Funny, though, that with all the objections greenies and
wake me when they've done it with spam.
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Search the combin
zeitgeist is on my "to see" list. in fact i've bumped it to top spot
thanks to jim's comments. i've seen a ton of documentaries in the
past year. while i have enjoyed most all of them and applaud their
efforts, few have left lasting impressions. those which i would most
highly recommend are "ma
looking at the photos, i was reminded of the documentary _Manufactured
Landscapes_. amazing stuff, just a *ton* of incredible images, and
the opening sequence is unforgettable. so is the rest of the film for
that matter. strongly recommended. you won't regret it.
__
excellent links. the splc list is interesting in the preponderence of
items from the clinton years: could that explain at least in part why
the republicans so zealously pursued his undoing? equally noteworthy
is the complete lack of awareness the american public has, either of
the crimes and con
you're right, keith. thanks for taking the time to point that out.
it's a sort of double-think process. there's no doubt in my mind that
many of those who have dialed down their sense of urgency vis a vis
global warming still believe it's a serious problem, but the mild
temps means part of their
these polling changes are probably less attributable to the issues of
the day (health care debate, financial crisis), than to the fact that
we have had a very below normal temperature pattern for some twelve
months now. while highly unusual and almost certainly due to the
strange effects of global
wow, with a 660cc engine, "50 percent more fuel efficient" must refer
to some already very high mpg vehicles. and of course, fuji isn't in
the u.s. car market. . . .
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailm
oh, duh. . . .thanks for the correction.
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Search the combin
1 - 100 of 562 matches
Mail list logo