[svg-developers] Re: Firefox running very slow when batch change svg elements' property

Rather than changing the style of each individual circle, one could change them using a style element, like so: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11-flat-20030114.dtd";> http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"; xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"; onload="init(evt)">

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 18

> > I've informed Mozila of this. You did? What's the bugzilla bug number? Best regards Robert - To unsubscribe send a message to: svg-developers-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox, Woff Fonts and Javascript

> The firefox error console lists the font as having a domain mismatch which is > causing a cross site error. It prints the URL of the font that's causing the > issue. What additional information would be helpful? Interesting! :-) My font problems are now solved, so the question has become ra

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox, Woff Fonts and Javascript

> The firefox error console lists the font as having a domain mismatch which is > causing a cross site error. It prints the URL of the font that's causing the > issue. What additional information would be helpful? Interesting! :-) My font problems are now solved, so the question has become ra

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox, Woff Fonts and Javascript

James, The firefox error console lists the font as having a domain mismatch which is causing a cross site error. It prints the URL of the font that's causing the issue. What additional information would be helpful? Robert. --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "james_ingram_svg" wrote: > >

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox, Woff Fonts and Javascript

Robert: Thanks for looking at this closely enough to find the answers. I hope they will be helpful to other programmers on this list. I've now removed the inconsistencies between my website and score generating software. 'www.' addresses are no longer used anywhere that has to do with fonts an

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox, Woff Fonts and Javascript

sounds like a cross domain problem that could be fixed using the javascript hack.. idk. On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:12 PM, james_ingram_svg wrote: > ** > > > > Thanks very much indeed for the help! :-) > > I deleted the 'www.' from the font paths and its now working in Firefox > too. After poking a

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox, Woff Fonts and Javascript

In your specific case relative links probably don't work because the page is http://james-ingram-act-two.de/compositions/study2/study2b/Study2b3.html but the stylesheet is http://www.james-ingram-act-two.de/fontsStyleSheet.css so relative links in the stylesheet end up with the absolute www.jam

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox, Woff Fonts and Javascript

Thanks very much indeed for the help! :-) I deleted the 'www.' from the font paths and its now working in Firefox too. After poking at this problem for several hours, I had actually given up hope -- and looking carefully enough at the addresses. I'd like to say that I didn't find the Firefox d

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox, Woff Fonts and Javascript

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "james_ingram_svg" wrote: http://james-ingram-act-two.de/compositions/study2/study2b/Study%202b3%20page%203.svg http://www.james-ingram-act-two.de/fonts/clicht_plain-webfont.ttf These don't have the same origin. www.james-ingram-act-two.de <> james-ingram-

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox, Woff Fonts and Javascript

wrote: > > After much trying, I have been unable to get my web fonts working in Firefox, > even though they work in all other modern browsers. This seems not to be a > cross domain problem (the fonts are stored in the same domain as is using > them). ... > url('http://www.james-ingram-act-t

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox, Woff Fonts and Javascript

After much trying, I have been unable to get my web fonts working in Firefox, even though they work in all other modern browsers. This seems not to be a cross domain problem (the fonts are stored in the same domain as is using them). I'm using the following @font-face file (edited from one genera

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox, Woff Fonts and Javascript

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "jamesd" wrote: > > I just posted a link on the Google+ site and found something interesting. > Using Firefox you can not use external WOFF fonts, but you can import an > external Javascript. So... Woff fonts are dangerous, but Javascript is not. Sure you

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 5

Hi, I'll be responding to your points below: --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Longson" wrote: > > > No support of filters that require the background graphic (yes I do have > > an enableBackground="new" attribute in my root element). Objects with > > filters that require this

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 5

> No support of filters that require the background graphic (yes I do have an > enableBackground="new" attribute in my root element). Objects with filters > that require this just don't appear (but can receive events). None of Firefox 5, 6 or 7 will have that unfortunately. > No way to zoo

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 5

Hi, Thanks for your speedy reply. I mentioned foreinObject because it's a feature I don't use so I wouldn't notice if it was added (and I obviously hadn't) or improved. The problems I've found with Firefox 5 (although the last version was pretty similar) are: No support of filters that requ

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 5

Compared to Firefox 4, firefox 5 has these SVG enhancements and a few of bugfixes. Adds support for animation of the class attribute. Adds support for animation between absolute and relative path segments of the same type Here's the complete list: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?lis

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 3.0.1

Richard, excellent news indeed! the great trick is to work to web standards, and check on recent builds, and depending on requirements older builds. this way it's easy to file bugs, one understands issues better, and knows which platforms and why. unfortunately bug fixes in my experience are

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 3.0.1

Hi, Yeah, I understand that it would be useful to have simple test cases. The problem is that these issues are occuring in large, complicated files and I have other things to do with my time. I'm reticent to spend many hours working on this only to have it resolved next month when Firefox ge

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 3.0.1

richard, if you hope to resolve these issues, you need to create a reduced testcase that demonstrates each issue. a reduced testcase should only include code that is essential. then file a bug and wait it may be worth checking the bug is not already filed. transient phenomenon can be partic

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 3.0.1

Hi, This last post was a bit hurried. For a start I forgot to include a link to my comic (which is in my sig which I also forgot). Here's some examples of the problems. Some seem to be related to filters, some to lack of SMIL or using SVG files in images, but with others the issue isn't at a

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox Problem

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Fuli Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.pinyinol ogy.com/planning /hanzi7.svg is delivered as text/plain, make sure you configure the HTTP server to deliver .svg files as image/svg+xml. -

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox Problem

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Fuli Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When opening following file offline with with Firefox, it looks good but the animation is not working. But when opening it online at my web site, the code is really messy. Firefox so far does not support any SMIL a

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems

@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:54 PM Subject: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems Try these: http://wiki.svg.org/SVG_FAQ http://wiki.svg.org/SVGZ http://wiki.svg.org/MIME_Type --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Aaron Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems

Try these: http://wiki.svg.org/SVG_FAQ http://wiki.svg.org/SVGZ http://wiki.svg.org/MIME_Type --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Aaron Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay I have a circle that works both in IE7 and Opera, but does not work in FireFox. > > There are two levels that it

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems

Whoopse forgot the example files :- http://www.aarongray.org/Examples/SVG/ScriptedCircle.html http://www.aarongray.org/Examples/SVG/ScriptedCircle.svg :) - Original Message - From: Aaron Gray To: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 7:43

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems

: Saturday, January 27, 2007 3:16 PM Subject: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Aaron Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I need different code for FF as compared to IE and Opera. No, if you script XML with namespaces (

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Aaron Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I need different code for FF as compared to IE and Opera. No, if you script XML with namespaces (like SVG) then use the namespace aware DOM Level 2 methods like getElementsByTagNameNS, createElementNS. Mozilla s

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems

Ah, ECMAScript is the answer. Thank you all for taking me back to DOM 2. Time to recode :) Aaron - Original Message - From: ddailey To: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 2:52 PM Subject: Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems Aaron: So

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems

Aaron: So I need different code for FF as compared to IE and Opera. Damb, thats a shame. No, fortunately var circle = document.createElementNS('http://www.w3.org/2000/svg', 'circle'); (or the equivalent D=document; svgns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'; D.creat

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems

So I need different code for FF as compared to IE and Opera. Damb, thats a shame. Aaron - Original Message - From: Martin Honnen To: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 2:00 PM Subject: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems --- In svg

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Aaron Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.aarongray.org/Examples/SVG/ScriptedCircle.svg > > FF does not display a circle, IE7 and Opera do. > > It must be something pritty basic but I cannot see it :( Use namespace aware methods, SVG ele

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox problems

Aaron, I just went through some of these same issues - check out these web sites --- they will answer many of your issues. Look at namespace aware DOM2 requirements. http://wiki.svg.org/Cross-Platform_Authoring http://jwatt.org/svg/authoring/ Regards, Jeff E. --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox: Mouseover slowed by point symbols

The location points don't work on Opera because of this "show- stopper" http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=146469 so the tab is greyed out. There are other things that don't quite work right with Opera but they haven't been fixed becuase currently we currently only support IE /ASV

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox: Mouseover slowed by point symbols

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "richard_smith_ons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Bruce, > > Does this massive URL work in Firefox 3? It should bypass > the "Browserhawk" sniffer... > > It logs in but fails to load - "Map failed Please try later" Opera 9.1 seems to work fine that

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox: Mouseover slowed by point symbols

well it almost worked for me, 4 boxes in 3.0a2pre os x cheers Jonathan Chetwynd On 16 Jan 2007, at 16:26, richard_smith_ons wrote: http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/svgmap.svgz? svgKey=H4sIAK1WWW- jNhB*z68w8pQAGx2OrwRaAYvY2QZIHCNyd4G*0dLY5pYmVZKy4- 76Dg85ku0u2qI

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox: Mouseover slowed by point symbols

Thanks Bruce, Does this massive URL work in Firefox 3? It should bypass the "Browserhawk" sniffer... http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/svgmap.svgz? svgKey=H4sIAK1WWW- jNhB*z68w8pQAGx2OrwRaAYvY2QZIHCNyd4G*0dLY5pYmVZKy4- 76Dg85ku0u2qIPhjjfHBzO6WQltoHgKuCgVFBQpWBDOdFU

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox: Mouseover slowed by point symbols

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "richard_smith_ons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The URL below will create an SVG thematic map of local authorities in > the South East region of England. > > http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView. > do? > a=7&b=276980&c=P

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox Animation

revelonshift: > Hi Andreas, how it is that you know, there will be SMIL support in > Batik 1.7? I was not able to find and verify this information, > although it souns as a great news! Animation support was checked in a couple of months. There is still a little work to do, but it is mostly comple

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox Animation

On 5 oct. 2006, at 11:24, revelonshift wrote: > Hi Andreas, how it is that you know, there will be SMIL support in > Batik 1.7? I was not able to find and verify this information, > although it souns as a great news! Current svn builds have SMIL animation implemented already, so I guess 1.7 wil

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox Animation

Hi Andreas, how it is that you know, there will be SMIL support in Batik 1.7? I was not able to find and verify this information, although it souns as a great news! Marek --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I had a feeling that Firefox didn't

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox Animation

> I had a feeling that Firefox didn't support animation - I just > couldn't find somewhere that said it outright. no, Firefox doesn't yet support animation. For simpler animations there is an alternative called SMILScript provided by Doug Schepers, Vectoreal: http://www.vectoreal.com/smilscript

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox Animation

I had a feeling that Firefox didn't support animation - I just couldn't find somewhere that said it outright. I assume that you've used Opera with animations? Their web site says they have built-in support for SVG 1.1 basics. Does that mean that they DON'T support animations? I was hoping to fin

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox Animation

Hi J. Voytovich, Fire-Fox does not support SMIL animations yet. Try Opera. Good luck, Samy --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "jvoytovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I can't seem to get Firefox to display the animation in various files. > I've downloaded the most recent versi

[svg-developers] Re: FireFox Problem with html (javascript) & svg

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Martin Honnen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "mondzin" wrote: > > > This code worked only IE with Adobe plugin, but doesn't worked with > > Firefox. Where problem? > > Have you checked the JavaScript error console in

[svg-developers] Re: FireFox Problem with html (javascript) & svg

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "mondzin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This code worked only IE with Adobe plugin, but doesn't worked with > Firefox. Where problem? Have you checked the JavaScript error console in Firefox whether it shows any error messages? - To unsubscribe send

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 2 beta

The "text appears as italic on mac" bug is already reported: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345494 Andreas --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Guy Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some good SVG improvements in FFb2, especially for Mac users of SVG! > They seem to have fi

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 2 beta

Hi, same at my mac. Fonts appear all italic in FF on Mac. About the missing texts: did you perhaps use font-size in a CSS class and did not use the px units? FF and Opera need the px unit at text elements in case you use CSS or the style attribute. You don't need it for the presentation attr

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox CPU usage

hi Cameron >Yeah, unfortunately it has stagnated somewhat. Hopefully I’ll >contribute a bunch of SVG animation related tests soon, though. yes that would be cool ! i just got a trac account, and subscribed to the mailing list. i will have a closer look at the project, now. i think this is a gr

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox CPU usage

Holger Will: > i think the Open SVG Test Suite ( http://www.svgtest.org/ ) could be > somthing similar, if it would be more active, and if there would be more > tests, > one could have nice statistics of all the implementations. Yeah, unfortunately it has stagnated somewhat. Hopefully I’ll cont

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox CPU usage

Hi Guy >>Has anyone written up a page comparing the strengths, weaknesses and >>performance pitfalls for each of the SVG implementations? That would >>be a handy reference. i think the Open SVG Test Suite ( http://www.svgtest.org/ ) could be somthing similar, if it would be more active, and i

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox CPU usage

Has anyone written up a page comparing the strengths, weaknesses and performance pitfalls for each of the SVG implementations? That would be a handy reference. Guy On 18/07/2006, at 11:13 PM, ddailey wrote: > > From: "Guy Morton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> ... >> I note that if I shrink the wi

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox CPU usage

From: "Guy Morton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ... > I note that if I shrink the window its in down so the app is about > half its normal size the CPU usage shrinks to about 50% too. Am I > just seeing limitations in FF's engine here? > I ran some benchmark sort of tests on some intentionally nasty cod

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox CPU usage

Well yes, it uses 100% CPU on XP2 but also under Mac OS X. The app is pretty busy and does a lot of stuff, and it loops through a bunch of code once per second. Curiously, if viewed on its own in Firefox it uses slightly less CPU than if it's embedded in a html wrapper. Our app animates vect

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox CPU usage

I bet you have sp2 on a winxp machine? I'm curious as to why these memory leaks started happening. --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > hi guys > > I have an app that is chewing up 100% of CPU in firefox, but which uses > only 50% > of CPU in opera and 40% in ASV.

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox on MacOSX, or is it Intel-related?

Hi, Not intel related I am running both! John --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chetwynd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Guy, > > my guess is that it's intel related. > > I marginally prefer firefox over opera, primarily because the bug > reporting is public. > svg support is si

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox on MacOSX, or is it Intel-related? / progress with latest Cairo?

On 7/4/06 8:27 AM, meikelneu wrote: > "jophof007" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes firefox on the Mac (Intel or PPC) is on SVG >> much worse than under PC. > > yes, this is unfortunately true and it's mainly due to poor Cairo (the > graphic engine for SVG behind Firefox) development on MacOS

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox on MacOSX, or is it Intel-related? / progress with latest Cairo?

"jophof007" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes firefox on the Mac (Intel or PPC) is on SVG > much worse than under PC. yes, this is unfortunately true and it's mainly due to poor Cairo (the graphic engine for SVG behind Firefox) development on MacOSX. Has anyone more insight in what the latest Ca

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox on MacOSX, or is it Intel-related?

Hi, Yes firefox on the Mac (Intel or PPC) is on SVG much worse than under PC. Font problems , the performance is much slower. Please file bugs in Bugzilla to help prioritise that (I did also but till now with no reponse). John Ophof http://open-modeling.sourceforge.net --- In svg-developers@yahoo

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox doesn't show SVG

Thank you very much for your prompt reply. It really helped me..:) jookeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:should be http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";> SVG is an XML application, so you must let the renderer know what application you are utilizing by the xmlns attribute.

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox doesn't show SVG

should be http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";> SVG is an XML application, so you must let the renderer know what application you are utilizing by the xmlns attribute. Similarly, in XHTML, you are supposed to have http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>, to let the browser know you are using elements from the XH

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chetwynd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > firefox 1.5 supports SVG natively there is no need to use a plugin > > regards > > Jonathan Chetwynd > Um, as others have pointed out, Mozilla's (and therefore Firefox's) implementation is far from complete

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox

If you really want to install the Adobe plugin for Firefox, it can be done for now. This can be handy for testing your SVG in Firefox and in ASV without having IE open. --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Jeroen Vanattenhoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The latest version of Firefox has nat

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 2

On 4/10/06 9:58 AM, Darryl Watson wrote: > Interesting. Support for is critical to my app, so for me > its IE + ASV until Firefox 3... will be in Firefox 2, and as mentioned is already in 2.0a1. - To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/gro

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 2

hi > BTW, does Firefox at least support transparency? yes (assuming you mean "opacity"). -- ___ andre m. winter, cartography for internet and multimedia applications schiessstand 4/1, a6091 goetzens, tyrol, austria tel.: ++43

RE: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 2

] -Original Message- From: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darryl Watson Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 7:59 AM To: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 2 Interesting. Support for is critical to my app, so for me its IE + ASV

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 2

Interesting. Support for is critical to my app, so for me its IE + ASV until Firefox 3... Jeff Schiller wrote: >--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "gnylarichard" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>I see the roadmap for Firefox 2 is looking to be released around end >>Q3, beginning Q4. Doe

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 2

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Richard Gnyla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh, not much then...linetypes would have been nice to have :-( > > Richard > Line types? Can you clarify what you are talking about exactly? - To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -o

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 2

When will FF2 approximately be released? Jeff Schiller schreef: > --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Schiller" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "gnylarichard" > > wrote: > > > > > > I see the roadmap for Firefox 2 is looking to be released arou

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 2

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Schiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "gnylarichard" > wrote: > > > > I see the roadmap for Firefox 2 is looking to be released around end > > Q3, beginning Q4. Does anybody know whether SVG will be improved in

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 2

Oh, not much then...linetypes would have been nice to have :-( Richard Jeff Schiller wrote: > --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "gnylarichard" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I see the roadmap for Firefox 2 is looking to be released around end >> Q3, beginning Q4. Does anybody know

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 2

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "gnylarichard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I see the roadmap for Firefox 2 is looking to be released around end > Q3, beginning Q4. Does anybody know whether SVG will be improved in > the release? > > Richard > They have added support for into Firefox 2

[svg-developers] Re: FireFox native SVG, Hats Off!!!

Hi, Indeed we had the same experience the SVG implementation and we hardly needs some codeforks. Differences were in the areas of getStyle, getBBox, eventhandling (not so accurate when clicking on small objects as line or small squares). For all things a solution was found to let it work in firefo

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox problem

thank you very much ! that works much better :) you can see the result there : http://www.gertrudesguessinggame.be/taquin/taquin.svg It's an artificial intelligence for solving puzzles. It works with all size of puzzles but with puzzles bigger than 3x3 it could take a lt of time. It's in

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox problem with SVGPathSegList::replaceItem()

I think I've run in to the same kind of stub with other methods in Mozilla's Javascript. It can't have been anything important I was working on because I believe my response was to give up. One mantra that's often heard in Javascript development is "test features, not agents." Testing for a user a

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox problem with SVGPathSegList::replaceItem()

Hi Jeff, On 1/8/06, Jeff Schiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Jeff > > > > On 1/7/06, Jeff Schiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Is the method not implemented in Firefox 1.5? > > > > > > Corr

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox problem with SVGPathSegList::replaceItem()

Jonathan, FYI I opened Bug 322724 related to this issue: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322724 Thanks, Jeff --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Schiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > H

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox problem with SVGPathSegList::replaceItem()

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jeff > > On 1/7/06, Jeff Schiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is the method not implemented in Firefox 1.5? > > > Correct, that's what NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED means. > Ugh. It's odd that appendEleme

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox issues with createElementNS, works in IE

Hi, On 1/7/06, jaychambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jonathan, > > This didnt work either, at least, not entirely. the JScript > console is cool. Learn something new every day!!! Does IE have > similar tool? didnt see one. Anyway, I've been looking around, and > this appears to be a p

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox issues with createElementNS, works in IE

On Saturday 07 January 2006 13:56, jaychambers wrote: >  The FF JScript JScript is a proprietary technology owned by MS. In FF and everywhere else, it is Javascript (based on ecmascript). JScript and Javascript have a lot in common, but they also sadly have many differences, and people invoke J

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox issues with createElementNS, works in IE

Hi Jonathan, This didnt work either, at least, not entirely. the JScript console is cool. Learn something new every day!!! Does IE have similar tool? didnt see one. Anyway, I've been looking around, and this appears to be a pretty common issue with FF. The FF JScript console says "svgDo

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

Ronan, it would be great to see examples of some of your accessibility solutions for SVG, perhaps you could post links with comments? As Chris points out, SVG would benefit from an accessibility techniques document. regarding meta-data labelling of SVG, http://www.peepo.co.uk uses reasonabl

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

Jonathan, On Monday 19 December 2005 18:07, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: > Ronan, > > as an accessibility consultant I use a variety of equipment and  > operating systems, linux since '97-'98**, OS X currently and windows  > whenever, certainly all three every workday. Yes, the inclusion of legacy

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

Ronan, as an accessibility consultant I use a variety of equipment and operating systems, linux since '97-'98**, OS X currently and windows whenever, certainly all three every workday. Accessibility has to be included at each level, from document through to application and operating system.

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

Jonathan, > 1.1 "Ensure that the user can operate, through keyboard input alone, > any user agent functionality available through the user interface." This capability already exists in all serious OS's, and adding this functionality on Yet Another Layer will only create confusion where none is

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

"Ensure that the user can operate, through keyboard input alone, any user agent functionality available through the user interface." Ronan, This distinctly is an SVG issue, which was drawn to your attention at our SVG meeting in London**. your quote* is an admission of error, not an exclusio

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

Robin, Thanks. I stand corrected. SVG-1.1 supports keyboard events http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-SVG11-20030114/interact.html#document-events-att-mod However... (referring to the above URL) "As in DOM2 Key events, the SVG specification does not provide a key event set. An event set designed f

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

On Dec 17, 2005, at 19:32, Ronan Oger wrote: > SVG only supports mouse events. > SVG supports all sorts of events that are not mouse events. -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

>From what I remember, keyboard inputs are not part of the currently released SVG recommendations. SVG only supports mouse events. What the browsers chose to do through their Javascript interaction is their issue, but this is not an SVG issue, imho. Ronan On Friday 16 December 2005 12:04, Jef

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

ASV supports keyboard input - I've never had a problem... --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chetwynd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ronan, > > until very recently I would have had to agree with you, but in fact > ASV has no support afaik for keyboard input, whereas Firefox1.5 does

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

Ronan, until very recently I would have had to agree with you, but in fact ASV has no support afaik for keyboard input, whereas Firefox1.5 does! so at least in respect of accessibility FF is clearly well ahead. regards Jonathan Chetwynd Accessible Solutions http://www.eas-i.co.uk On 4 Dec 2

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

On Thursday, December 1, 2005, 10:07:11 PM, Richard wrote: RP> Hi, RP> Firefox doesn't correctly display any of the SVG's on my site, including RP> ones I'm pretty sure have the Kosha namespace declarations etc. Also, as RP> far as I can tell, the server uses the correct mime type for SVGZ. Can

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

Richard, you probably want to read up on the status of SVG in FF1.5 here: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/svg/status.html and / or http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/SVG_in_Firefox_1.5 regards ~:" Jonathan Chetwynd Accessible Solutions http://www.eas-i.co.uk On 1 Dec 2005, at 21:07, Ric

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released (A word of appreciation.)

Thanks Marjorie. It's very kind of you to say so publicly. It would certainly be very cool if InstantAtlas could get their content working in FF. If they need any help I'd be glad to see what I can do. All the best, Jonathan On 12/8/05, Marjorie Roswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You write be

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 mouseover

If it is the size, then that would be a shame. The exact same file in IE with the ASV 3.x viewer is a lot faster. I'll submit it to Mozilla. --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Jean-David Benamou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sean Montague wrote: > > >I'm testing FF 1.5, and have an svg fil

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released (A word of appreciation.)

You write beautifully. I appreciate your work, and your clarity of writing. (I'm also a fan of default "on.") I'll be joyful when InstantAtlas supports Firefox, and I know they are working on it. You once kindly gave some helpful hints, which I forwarded on to them. Note: I once started this sit

[svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Chris Lilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > JW> The descriptions you gave sounded like they were most likely the result of > JW> bugs to me, not missing functuality. > > I agree there is no point sending in a bug like "there is no smil > animations support".

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

On Thursday, December 8, 2005, 11:13:45 AM, Jonathan wrote: JW> Hi Domenico, JW> I understand your main argument that you think it's too early to JW> release Mozilla's SVG implementation, and that you think the overall JW> effect will be to harm SVG on the Web. I just happen to take the JW> oppos

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

On 12/5/05, domenico_strazzullo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/4/05, Doug Schepers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > p.s. Don't confuse Jonathan's politeness for insincerity. He's a > stand-up > > fellow Thanks Doug. I appreciate you saying so. Which I'm not confusing. I think I know how to d

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

Hi Domenico, I understand your main argument that you think it's too early to release Mozilla's SVG implementation, and that you think the overall effect will be to harm SVG on the Web. I just happen to take the opposite view. Clearly there are people on this list that fall into both camps; some f

  1   2   >