Comment #10 on issue 2020 by jensen.oyvind: Symbols Matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2020
In this branch: http://github.com/jegerjensen/sympy/tree/gsoc_result the
Indexed class is more developed.
There is already a shape attribute for the IndexedBase class (which is
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
CC: mattpap
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Polynomial Simplify
New issue 2029 by asmeurer: Poly simplification functions need a deep option
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2029
I know there is the use() function in polys11, but I think there
Comment #4 on issue 1009 by asmeurer: solve(e, k) hangs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1009
I can't reproduce the is_zero bug anywhere. What Python, Architecture,
SYMPY_GROUND_TYPES, and branch were you using when you did that?
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #5 on issue 1009 by mattpap: solve(e, k) hangs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1009
Run without cache.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-iss...@googlegroups.com.
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: mattpap
Cc: -mattpap
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #1 on issue 2029 by mattpap: Poly simplification functions need a
deep option
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2029
cancel() will get 'deep' option in
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #24 on issue 1646 by mattpap: Solving inequalities
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1646
As long as we work with relational representation, then solving
inequalities with complex symbols in not a big deal. I added such
Comment #25 on issue 1646 by christian.muise: Solving inequalities
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1646
The work on assumptions is currently under way. The new assumption system
is drastically sped up as part of my summer of code, and will hopefully be
included in the trunk
Comment #26 on issue 1646 by mattpap: Solving inequalities
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1646
That's good. It's unfortunate but currently we underutilize assumptions in
SymPy (for known reasons). Anyway, in solve() I would like to have
additional syntax, e.g.:
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 956 by asmeurer: pollard_rho not working and not used
by factorint
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=956
This was already pushed in:
commit 28dc7ab9de19e1707bb9475275e3f70569bff20c
Author: Fredrik Johansson
Comment #2 on issue 2003 by asmeurer: Use factorint() with limit argument
in sympy/core/numbers.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2003
Actually, it already uses a function called
integer_nthroot() ._eval_power() to do this. We just need to make sure to
do this on any
Updates:
Cc: ondrej.certik asmeurer Vinzent.Steinberg
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #5 on issue 2027 by smichr: Invalid combination of bases
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2027
I can't push a branch right now until I get some internet issues resolved.
If someone
On Aug 17, 6:32 pm, Vinzent Steinberg
vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/8/17 Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com:
Well, here's the problem with the spaceless option:
var('ab cd ef')
(ab, cd, ef)
var('ab cd')
(ab, cd)
var('ab')
(a, b)
You could still do
var('ab ')
Hi Brian, Matt and Addison,
I think the discussion wandered a bit from the review.
1) Git history:
Do you want to keep your history? Does the history bring any value to
sympy? From what I understood, many times it doesn't import, or tests
don't pass. So it seems to me there isn't really any
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi Brian, Matt and Addison,
I think the discussion wandered a bit from the review.
1) Git history:
Do you want to keep your history? Does the history bring any value to
sympy? From what I understood, many times it
On Aug 18, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi Brian, Matt and Addison,
I think the discussion wandered a bit from the review.
1) Git history:
Do you want to keep your history? Does the history bring any
On Aug 18, 2010, at 8:31 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 18, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi Brian, Matt and Addison,
I think the
I just tested the latest master with Python 2.6.6 rc2 and I got the
exact same test failures.
If this isn't fixed by the final release of Python 2.6.6, I will open
up an issue for it.
By the way, the new release date for Python 2.6.6 final is August 24
[0].
Aaron Meurer
[0] -
I am inclined to agree with this. Depending on where we are by the time we are
ready to release 0.7.0, we could make it the last version that supports Python
2.4. Now, if supporting it becomes a real pain before the release, say because
of with statement context managers, then we should just
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:58:17AM -0600, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
I am inclined to agree with this. Depending on where we are by the time we
are ready to release 0.7.0, we could make it the last version that supports
Python 2.4. Now, if supporting it becomes a real pain before the
So a few words. First, if you just pass it a strictly rational function, it is
nothing new. It will return the exact same result as integrate() because it
uses the exact same function, which is the already existing ratint() (however,
there is a fix in my branch for rational functions with
20 matches
Mail list logo
