[Tagging] insurance health

In Argentina we want to correctly tagging offices of companies dedicated to what we call prepaid medicine, by paying a monthly fee you access a series of medical benefits. We are hesitating between these tags: office=health_insurance It has no wiki, it has 185 uses, the majority in Belgium since

[Tagging] Refining heritage tag

Hi there. In the last few days, the Portuguese community has been trying to create a national standardization with the heritage tag. We came up to a possible solution which can be seen at the wiki page based on the previous information on the

Re: [Tagging] Things within things | Re: Request for assistance in creating a tag.

sent from a phone > On 13. Apr 2020, at 11:29, Rory McCann wrote: > > OSM could do much better for indoor mapping, and for shopping centres or > train stations, that's easy. Add each `shop` or corridor. But what about a > (sorta of) clinic within a larger OSM object? it‘s a similar

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 12:56, Paul Allen wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 17:43, wrote: >> The second goal my proposal wants to message is to deprecate tagging >> "crossing=traffic_signals" together with "highway=traffic_signals" on the >> same node. Especially if you're saying this is a full

Re: [Tagging] contact:google_plus status discardable ?

I think that's a distinction without a difference right now. Given that I can check my Google+ right now (yes, mine still works) but it's *now* as dead as people used to claim it was before. On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 5:49 PM Phake Nick wrote: > Google Plus for Corporate is still functional. > >

Re: [Tagging] contact:google_plus status discardable ?

Google Plus for Corporate is still functional. 在 2020年4月14日週二 06:25，Marc M. 寫道： > Hello, > > the service was shutdown on 2 avril 2019 > can we set the status as discardable ? > > Regards, > Marc > > ___ > Tagging mailing list >

Re: [Tagging] Things within things | Re: Request for assistance in creating a tag.

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 23:31, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: It would be a good idea if the tag/s developed here could be used with > other things that have 'departments' such as universities. > > Hence my suggestion of 'department', as a key it is used some 799 times .. > > You'd have

Re: [Tagging] Things within things | Re: Request for assistance in creating a tag.

On 13/4/20 9:28 pm, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: Ok, I do agree that "healthcare=department" or perhaps "healthcare=hospital_department" would make sense for an inpatient department within a larger hospital, since that is certainly not an amenity=clinic (which are outpatient facilities). It would

[Tagging] contact:google_plus status discardable ?

Hello, the service was shutdown on 2 avril 2019 can we set the status as discardable ? Regards, Marc ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand

I see. Thanks for your answers. Okay, now it's clearer to me why highway=traffic_signals is used sometimes together with crossing=traffic_signals. I will change the proposal to only add the new traffic_signals=*-value and then get in touch again.   Thanks. -- Lukas     Gesendet: Montag, 13.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:42:42 +0200 lukas-...@web.de wrote: > The second goal my proposal wants to message is to deprecate tagging > "crossing=traffic_signals" together with "highway=traffic_signals" on > the same node. Especially if you're saying this is a full crossing > mapped. It breaks the

Re: [Tagging] Request for assistance in creating a tag.

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 17:48, wrote: > > I even do not know whether there is a consensus. > Not yet. Maybe never. > In Germany, we use "amenity=clinic" often for everything which has not > "hospital" (in german) in their name but looks like a hospital, often the > difference is just

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 17:43, wrote: > The second goal my proposal wants to message is to deprecate tagging > "crossing=traffic_signals" together with "highway=traffic_signals" on the > same node. Especially if you're saying this is a full crossing mapped. It > breaks the highway=crossing -

Re: [Tagging] Request for assistance in creating a tag.

So what's the consensus on clinics?  If there is a consenus (rather than the usual bunfight) I'll amend the wiki pages to make it explicit that clinic can be used for units/departments/centres in hospitals.   I even do not know whether there is a consensus. In Germany, we use "amenity=clinic"

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand

The second goal my proposal wants to message is to deprecate tagging "crossing=traffic_signals" together with "highway=traffic_signals" on the same node. Especially if you're saying this is a full crossing mapped. It breaks the highway=crossing - tagging scheme we use for all other types of

Re: [Tagging] Things within things | Re: Request for assistance in creating a tag.

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 15:09, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > I suspect carto people are going to say "no synonyms." > > While synonyms are a bad idea, we are talking about something that is > NOT a synonym: an inpatient department of a hospital, rather than a > clinic or doctor's office. > Since

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Unifying playground equipment tagging) - Cancelled

> How should the following scenario be tagged: > Playground https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320398422 just has one equipment > (sandpit) and this equipment (sandpit) fills up the whole area of the > playground. > The tagging used here is as follow: >(access=yes) reluctant for our purpose

Re: [Tagging] Things within things | Re: Request for assistance in creating a tag.

> I suspect carto people are going to say "no synonyms." While synonyms are a bad idea, we are talking about something that is NOT a synonym: an inpatient department of a hospital, rather than a clinic or doctor's office. > What is needed, though, is a tag for hospital wards. That might also

Re: [Tagging] Country-specific images for tags

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 14:43, Andrew Hain wrote: > One possibility would be to create data items for mappable attributes, for > instance post_box:type=pillar. > That would work. But then I'm left wondering what purpose it serves anyway. The images are already on the respective wiki pages.

Re: [Tagging] Things within things | Re: Request for assistance in creating a tag.

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 12:30, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > Ok, I do agree that "healthcare=department" or perhaps > "healthcare=hospital_department" would make sense for an inpatient > department within a larger hospital, since that is certainly not an > amenity=clinic (which are outpatient

Re: [Tagging] Country-specific images for tags

One possibility would be to create data items for mappable attributes, for instance post_box:type=pillar. -- Andrew From: Paul Allen Sent: 13 April 2020 14:35 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Country-specific images for

Re: [Tagging] Country-specific images for tags

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 14:03, Andrew Hain wrote: > I copied pictures from the Tag:amenity=post_box page in various languages, > any more would be added by hand. > The UK has several types of postbox, only one of which is shown on the wiki page for amenity=postbox. What do you do in the

Re: [Tagging] Request for assistance in creating a tag.

I think a department or a small office is a better primary tag for hiv treatment centers/ testing/ dispensary. Usually in our case in the Philippines, a small building has a clinic and in that clinic there is a small office space or room/s for hiv testing and for dispensing. On Mon, Apr 13, 2020

Re: [Tagging] Request for assistance in creating a tag.

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 11:29, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > Right, that doesn't work. If the HIV clinic or department has > different details, such as a different name, opening_hours, website, > etc, then it will need to be mapped as a separate feature, such as an > amenity=clinic node inside of

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Unifying playground equipment tagging) - Cancelled

Due to your feedback I will cancel the proposal. AGAIN: What you say is 100% correct. This proposal's purpose was just to simplify what seems unclear to many (not all) mappers. But keep you eyes on the following unsolved scenario: --- How should the following scenario be tagged: Playground

Re: [Tagging] Country-specific images for tags

I copied pictures from the Tag:amenity=post_box page in various languages, any more would be added by hand. -- Andrew From: Jake Edmonds via Tagging Sent: 13 April 2020 13:48 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Cc: Jake Edmonds Subject: Re:

Re: [Tagging] Country-specific images for tags

It’s not obvious how this works (at least to me). At first I assumed the gallery pulled images from Wikidata but the Wikidata page doesn’t have those images listed. > On 13 Apr 2020, at 14:16, Andrew Hain wrote: > > One feature of the OSM wiki data items that has seen little use so far is

[Tagging] Country-specific images for tags

One feature of the OSM wiki data items that has seen little use so far is the ability to set geographically specific properties. I have reorganised the images for amenity=post_box (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q6349) to use this scheme, but many countries are still missing and still

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand

Hi, oh sorry you are confused. Maybe it's too much text I think. But your conclusion is completely correct, yes.     Gesendet: Montag, 13. April 2020 um 13:47 Uhr Von: "Andrew Davidson" An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -

Re: [Tagging] Request for assistance in creating a tag.

>I think one issue is that healthcare tagging in OSM is a big of a mess. There's the `healthcare`, `medical_service`, `health_service`, `health_facility` etc. Some are probably from imports where someone makes up a new tagging scheme, causing further fragmentation and confusion. Seems the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand

I'm a bit confused by your proposal, but it would seem to me that what you want to do is add crossing_on_demand to the list of values for the key traffic_signals. Is this correct? On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:10 PM wrote: > Hi people, > I made a proposal to reform the tagging of those traffic

Re: [Tagging] Things within things | Re: Request for assistance in creating a tag.

Ok, I do agree that "healthcare=department" or perhaps "healthcare=hospital_department" would make sense for an inpatient department within a larger hospital, since that is certainly not an amenity=clinic (which are outpatient facilities). It would not be a good idea to use a totally new key like

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand

Hi people, I made a proposal to reform the tagging of those traffic signals, which do only control a crossing. The proposal has two main messages: First that crossing=traffic_signals is every time a strict under-tag of highway=crossing and should not be used on the same node with

Re: [Tagging] Request for assistance in creating a tag.

On 13/4/20 8:25 pm, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: ... Currently, what we are tagging is the hospital. So for example, Manila Hospital (tagged as a hospital) we add the tags like disease:hiv=yes. say that it is a treatment facility and it dispenses hiv medicine. But what i am having difficulty is that

Re: [Tagging] Things within things | Re: Request for assistance in creating a tag.

On 13/4/20 7:27 pm, Rory McCann wrote: I think this is a case of “Things within other things”. How do we map that? For the enclosing hospital, we know how to map that. But how do we map individual parts within it? Similar to universities?

Re: [Tagging] Request for assistance in creating a tag.

> ... Currently, what we are tagging is the > hospital. So for example, Manila Hospital (tagged as a hospital) we add the > tags like disease:hiv=yes. say that it is a treatment facility and it > dispenses hiv medicine. But what i am having difficulty is that hiv > facility is treated like a

Re: [Tagging] Request for assistance in creating a tag.

On 13.04.20 09:57, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: testing centers/clinics (testing only) Is this a doctor's office, or is there just a nurse, or just a laboratory technician who can draw blood for the test? If there is a doctor, it might be an amenity=doctors. If there is just a laboratory for

[Tagging] Things within things | Re: Request for assistance in creating a tag.

I think this is a case of “Things within other things”. How do we map that? For the enclosing hospital, we know how to map that. But how do we map individual parts within it? e.g. St. James' Hospital in Dublin (OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32015912 ), the hospital has it's own

Re: [Tagging] Request for assistance in creating a tag.

Thank you for the wonderful insights. Currently, what we are tagging is the hospital. So for example, Manila Hospital (tagged as a hospital) we add the tags like disease:hiv=yes. say that it is a treatment facility and it dispenses hiv medicine. But what i am having difficulty is that hiv facility

Re: [Tagging] Request for assistance in creating a tag.

> Treatment hubs (in patient + dispensaries+ testing): Are you sure you mean "inpatient?" An "inpatient" facility, in American English, is a hospital which has beds where patients are cared for overnight. This would be mapped as amenity=hospital for the main feature, most likely. > primary hiv

Re: [Tagging] Request for assistance in creating a tag.

At present there is the key healtcare. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare Some initial thoughts? healthcare:specialty=HIV_testing healthcare:specialty=HIV_treatment HIV dispensary ... would be a pharmacy? amenity =pharmacy and

[Tagging] Request for assistance in creating a tag.

Good day, fellow OSM tagging experts. I would like to ask assistance in creating a tag for HIV facilities. We have created a tagging system for hiv facilities here in the Philippines but it seems to be too extensive. We would like it to be more simple. I hope you can help me with it. I am reading